---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject:
Why the West can't reform;
also another tribute to Martin ArmstrongFrom: "Shelby Moore III" (a.k.a. repugnant, wearefucked, iamback, AnonyMint, etc)
Date: Wed, April 8, 2015 12:43 am
To: "Armstrong Economics" <
[email protected]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please click here to read this forum post in context, because there are 3 images and a lot of bold and underline emphasis:
I hope this is my final communication on this. I wanted to clarify and condense to achieve razor sharp reader comprehension.
Anonymity is a desperate and somewhat repulsive solution. Unfortunately I have no better or even viable alternatives to offer.
Clarification of my vehement reaction is necessary.
I find it
heinously repugnant that you (or any Marxist) think you have a right to
impose upon me a State that has an exclusive monopoly on the use of force.
You do not respect the individual's right to live in freedom. You want to top-down control society.
All your talk of "balance" makes me want to vomit, when you seem to ignore the balance that has existed for 6000 years and which you now say is "repulsive".
By doing that and ignoring the 6000 years of history of the State murdering its own citizens when the top-down economics turns intractable (as it always does eventually due to the
Iron Law of Political Economics combined with human nature!),
you are attempting to murder me or my genetic offspring (my entire evolutionary reason to live). And
thus you can expect for me to be as angry as if you held a gun to my or any of my kids' head.
You find it "repulsive" any attempt employing digital anonymity technology to avoid a monopoly which the State never historically had until the digital age. Anonymous cash and the ability to trade in black markets had always existed and
only now does the digital age potentially give the State the ability to eliminate all black markets and brand every human like cattle with a number. I believe individuals even had the right to bear arms in those cases where they weren't enslaved by a King or feudal warlord.
You desire to track me like a cow just because you have some delusion that you could eliminate all use of force by humans (e.g. gun control to eliminate an individual's right to self-protection) and somehow turn human nature into some perfect nirvana.
In your delusion, you create a perfect Orwellian hell.
And thus fuck, you piss me off and there is no way I will rest until I protect myself and my evolutionary offspring from your insanity!
If you didn't mean to use the word repulsive, then why did you? You see underlying you have this subconscious Marxist insanity. Remember I warned you about that tendency with your Judging Myers-Briggs personality type. As
I wrote to you then, your variant doesn't become the megalomaniacs Stalin, Mao, or Goebbel, but hordes of you closet Marxists causally brings those totalitarians to power.
Marxists couch their insane idealism within the sugar-coated wrapping of "protecting the weak" (or in I335's case "love" and "sharing reputation"), just as the Nazi propaganda did before they eventually turned against the "weak race" and culled it. You could review the transformation of the Nazi propaganda. And I am sure they believed their idealism too. That is the really sick reality of this phenomenon.
Your genuine desire to help and protect those who are weak is honorable and admirable. You've even attempted to help me in my weakened health (Multiple Sclerosis!), but unfortunately the top-down (increasingly totalitarian) medical system to which you ascribe is the one that prevented me from having
the information that could have cured me 9 years ago. (note I don't blame you for the medical system) The problem is not your heart, but rather your mental irrationalization which is I posit is evident on a Myers-Briggs personality test as Judging.
CoinCube, I beg of you somehow try to find a cure to this insane tendency to ascribe to top-down solutions to those aspects of human nature and economics (e.g. human trafficking) which pains you. I like you very much as a person and I know your heart is good and not evil. Why does your brain get you caught up in this insanity? You appear to be somewhat effeminate in your one pic I saw, are you easily frightened or do you feel envious or afraid of boisterous, forceful alphamales? Were you bullied in your youth (note I was)? I335, I hold out no hope for him, he appears to be so deep in the insanity, he writes insane incoherent, ideological diatribes. And then you CoinCube latch on to his writings as if you've seen God. That was the reason I was getting incensed with you upthread when you started to support I335's proposals (because I thought all along you were on the side of reason but in hindsight perhaps I should not have so easily discounted the warning sign of your Myers-Briggs personality type). Then I thought maybe I should just STFU and let Marxists gang up to do what they will do.
Human trafficking for example has always existed and will always exist. It is an economic phenomenon. All you can do is protect youself and yours, and help educate others how to protect themselves. If you instead go for the totalitarian non-solution, you will end up in a worse, horrific Orwellian hell (Mao's 57 million exterminated is a prime example).
First the Marxist police State does this (
note how they don't want you to see so they quickly cover it):
http://cdn.brownstoner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/snowden-martyrs-040615.jpgThen later totalitarians achieve this miraculous accomplishment:
http://i1.wp.com/armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/statue_planet-of-the-apes.jpeg
Btw, interestingly Armstrong clarified that after 2033 (2032.85 to be precise), the 51.6 year Public wave is contained within a shift to a 309 year Private wave. The Private economy will rise over the next 325 years.
http://i1.wp.com/armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Economic-Confidence-Model-309-Fractal-6th-Wave.jpg?resize=584%2C395What set the irascible Finn's blood boiling was kernel developer Steven Rostedt's discovery that when a Linux system is started with the "debug" option enabled, systemd can flood the system's logging services with so much information that it will fail to boot.
"Key, [sic] I'm f*cking tired of the fact that you don't fix problems in the code *you* write, so that the kernel then has to work around the problems you cause," Torvalds fumed, adding that he wouldn't merge any more of Sievers' code into the kernel until he cleans up his act.
Other kernel developers wasted no time proposing solutions to the issue, the leading candidate being to add rate limiting to the kernel logging services so that they truncate excessive output. But Torvalds is notoriously reluctant to make changes to the Linux kernel to address bugs found in other software, and in this case the issue seemed personal.
"It's really sad that things like this get elevated to this kind of situation, and I personally find it annoying that it's always the same f*cking prima donna involved," Torvalds wrote.
He later added on a Google+ thread, "So this really really doesn't make me want to ever work with Kay Sievers, because this all just reinforces the fact that he just doesn't care if his changes cause other projects pain."
Gotta say that CoinCube and many other posters on here have been awesome too.
). I really mean it this time.