Bottom line is the system that enables the most meritorious competition will win. It doesn't need and won't be a perfect system.
If you want to prosper the most, make sure you align yourself with that future.
Our inborn humanitarianism will come forth naturally from that prosperity.
yeh i believe i may have misundertood marxism by listening to the poly psy friends over the years that would never get to the point.. talking about labour parties.. rebellion.. union.. cause for the working man..
But the fuckers wouldnt be working.. and would never get to the point.. so just wikied marxism. kinda needed to know the definition. perhaps i am a marxist simply by working hard and believing in the general rule that good men will conquer the bullshit, by eating the bullshit.. and continually building a better society..
"Marxism is a worldview and a method of societal analysis that focuses on class relations and societal conflict, that uses a materialist interpretation of historical development, and a dialectical view of social transformation. Marxist methodology uses economic and sociopolitical inquiry and applies that to the critique and analysis of the development of capitalism and the role of class struggle in systemic economic change.
In the mid-to-late 19th century, the intellectual tenets of Marxism were inspired by two German philosophers: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxist analyses and methodologies have influenced multiple political ideologies and social movements. Marxism encompasses an economic theory, a sociological theory, a philosophical method, and a revolutionary view of social change.[1]
There is no single definitive Marxist theory; Marxist analysis has been applied to diverse subjects and has been misconceived and modified during the course of its development, resulting in numerous and sometimes contradictory theories that fall under the rubric of Marxism or Marxian analysis.[2]
Marxism builds on a materialist understanding of societal development, taking as its starting point the necessary economic activities required to satisfy the material needs of human society. The form of economic organization or mode of production is understood to give rise to, or at least directly influences, most other social phenomena – including social relations, political and legal systems, morality and ideology. Thus, the economic system and social relations are called a base and superstructure. As the forces of production (most notably technology) improve, existing forms of social organization become inefficient and stifle further progress. These inefficiencies manifest themselves as social contradictions in the form of class struggle.[3]
According to Marxist analysis, class conflict within capitalism arises due to intensifying contradictions between highly productive mechanized and socialized production performed by the proletariat, and private ownership and appropriation of the surplus product in the form of surplus value (profit) by a small minority of private owners called the bourgeoisie. As the contradiction becomes apparent to the proletariat, social unrest between the two antagonistic classes intensifies, culminating in a social revolution. The eventual long-term outcome of this revolution would be the establishment of socialism – a socioeconomic system based on cooperative ownership of the means of production, distribution based on one's contribution, and production organized directly for use. Karl Marx hypothesized that, as the productive forces and technology continued to advance, socialism would eventually give way to a communist stage of social development. Communism would be a classless, stateless, humane society erected on common ownership and the principle of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".
Marxism has developed into different branches and schools of thought. Different schools place a greater emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism while de-emphasizing or rejecting other aspects of Marxism, sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxian concepts. Some variants of Marxism primarily focus on one aspect of Marxism as the determining force in social development – such as the mode of production, class, power-relationships or property ownership – while arguing other aspects are less important or current research makes them irrelevant. Despite sharing similar premises, different schools of Marxism might reach contradictory conclusions from each other.[4] For instance, different Marxian economists have contradictory explanations of economic crisis and different predictions for the outcome of such crises. Furthermore, different variants of Marxism apply Marxist analysis to study different aspects of society (e.g. mass culture, economic crises, or feminism).[5]
These theoretical differences have led various socialist and communist parties and political movements to embrace different political strategies for attaining socialism and advocate different programs and policies from each other. One example of this is the division between revolutionary socialists and reformists that emerged in the German Social Democratic Party (SPD) during the early 20th century. Similarly, although the Bolsheviks of Russia declared Leninism and later Marxism–Leninism to be the only legitimate development of Marxism, the Mensheviks and many other social democrats worldwide considered them totalitarian deviations."
One thing i do know is that this vague concept has not only empowered men of nations destroyed by economic chess.. to create the rebellions to turn their governements over to foreign powers and interests but also fueled the movements supporting things like the original post i made regarding minority races birthrates diminishing based on incarceration.. and the seemingly genetic program of the world order to lower crime by killing off what may have been or may not have been pure blood of ancient Gods or heros... Many a pantheon would not have existed to some extent if abortions were wide spread amongst certain populace.. again ima white german dude taught my whole life in school to be ashamed of my skin color.. my heritage.. my origin.. my pagan roots... in a inherently christian.. although now being diluted and destroyed.. Godless and fully indoctrinated society of drones.. who are taught to work.. breed in small numbers.. while accepting all of the mass immigration.. ridicule if christian.. (literally been laughed at for believing in Christ) violence... societal degragation... the entire time.. working.. employing.. building economy with no predjiduce or racist bone in my body.. whole thing is fucked..
But why i like cryptos.. even though full of lies... cheating.. tricks... financial and advertising wielding... there is still those who believe the technology and the freedom of the crypto user is the goal.. these are the hardcore programmers who are literally still in it.. because code is blind.. there is no marxism.. anarchism.. capitolism... racism... sexism... C dont give a fuck who you are.. Its all been built (post bitcoin sha-256 - totall nuther conversation) to ultimately free us as I believe is also your goal..
Good conversations bro. Me and you may be similar.. I will never profess entirely to know something without being given the chance to a better man to disprove my theories.. Which is exaclty what the core of the alt revolution is doing. Without question.. trolls.. lol newbies who can even open an exe without a self extraction.. haha this whole game wouldnt exist..
but overall. fuck you. (in general to every prick who has poisoned this beatiful thing called cryptocurrency - not you dude) every single one of you that has preyed off the good hearts and weakness of men trying to free themselves from the money power and corporate curriculum we are all taught from preschool throughout university... the crypto game is as beautiful as it is ugly.. and im in the opinion. Only us good fuckers will be left standing after the dust of bullshit has faded into the desert. (-;
). I really mean it this time.
