Author

Topic: El Salvador has become the first country to make #Bitcoin legal tender! 🇸🇻 - page 114. (Read 43211 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1337
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
I would not feel suprised if the FMI and the World bank started to issue some official declarations against the "unwise" investment made by the Salvador in Bitcoin, I would not feel surprised either if some protests started there under the narrative that the president is gambling the money of the people away, etc.

We all know Bitcoin has powerful enemies and during this bear market they weill show up again, wielding as well the Terra-Luna and Celsius cases as extra ammo to seed the FUD around the community and the people of Salvador.
It would only be matter of time, what would be said as an unwise decision made by countries that legalize bitcoin as a legal tender would be later changed to a brave decision that later favoured. Bitcoin price decreases and unfavoured period like this present bear market has been in history, not only in 2022 but back then in 2014 and 2018. These should not be a surprise but a possible indication that next long period bull market is coming and should probably be in less than 2 or 3 years from now. It can be far, but the months of bulls that will lead to all-time-high will become tomorrow soon. You are saying the truth, the world has been full of lies since the beginning of human advancement.

We should also not forget that El Salvador is a poor country, their president bought a risky investment near the all time high and he used taxpayers money to buy this risky investment. What would this make him appear in front of his constituents presently that bitcoin has dumped?
Can you see what I quote in bold now when I first brought the topic, you can read it below:

I think El Salvador government prepared before they accepted bitcoin as a legal tender, see what Alejandro Zelaya, the minister of finance of El Salvador said about buying bitcoin.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/el-salvador-has-not-had-any-losses-due-to-bitcoin-price-dive-finance-minister-says

Quote
“There is a clear criticism of Bitcoin as such, not of El Salvador's strategy. El Salvador is what interests them the least, they [the media outlet] are not interested in what happens to our economy, they are not interested in what happens with our people, what happens with inflation.”

Quote
“I have said it repeatedly: A supposed loss of 40 million dollars has not occurred because we have not sold the coins.”

I hope you can get the meaning of that bolded quote, that is just how the world is, there are bitcoin critics and people prefer to take up the unimportant part that is not having significant effect on economy compared to the main ones they should talk about. Bitcoin adoption is not the problem of El Salvador, even El Salvador is not as rich as many other countries when it comes to citizens holding and buying bitcoin. People just failed to understand that countries that do not make bitcoin a legal tender but their citizens buy are also having such effect just like El Salvador, but people are not talking about that but focus on what is not.

I support the inspiration of uniting South America under bitcoin, however, it appears reality has come again to kill the dream. But what has just occured is they have become bagholders. If someone told you a country and a multibillion electric car company would become bagholders of bitcoin, no one would believe you hehehehe.
There is not dream that reality kill, bitcoin adoption continues as a result of what has happened in the past. I hope you are not the type that will change your mind during bull and again change your mind during bear and change your mind again during bull. Bitcoin is a safe haven but in long term, not short term.
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1509
At Which volume, i don't think that's so important in this situation, since Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and being used and adopted as an alternative currency in El Salvador, the volume at which the country reserve stands is what is important and since 1 Bitcoin= 1 Bitcoin and the 2,301 holding is still intact El Salvador government through the president understand the game quite well and are prepared what this even before the Bitcoin adoption and that can be deduced from the minister of finance interview yesterday.

In my opinion, this statement is the mass and media consumption of something similar to populism. No party that uses cryptocurrencies periodically can not be affected by a sharp decline in price, whether in the current wave or others in previous crises and even the next.
For savers, we cannot talk about a definite loss as long as the savings have not been touched and as long as there is a firm conviction that the price will return to the rise. But once they think about their use, they are necessarily losers. Do not forget, my friend, that we are here to talk about a country-wide investment with an important economic size .

We should also not forget that El Salvador is a poor country, their president bought a risky investment near the all time high and he used taxpayers money to buy this risky investment. What would this make him appear in front of his constituents presently that bitcoin has dumped?

I support the inspiration of uniting South America under bitcoin, however, it appears reality has come again to kill the dream. But what has just occured is they have become bagholders. If someone told you a country and a multibillion electric car company would become bagholders of bitcoin, no one would believe you hehehehe.
sr. member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 360
I am sure that it is worth looking for a very thin level between whether to use bitcoin, and if so, in what volumes. I think it's pretty important.
At Which volume, i don't think that's so important in this situation, since Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and being used and adopted as an alternative currency in El Salvador, the volume at which the country reserve stands is what is important and since 1 Bitcoin= 1 Bitcoin and the 2,301 holding is still intact El Salvador government through the president understand the game quite well and are prepared what this even before the

For sure they had already studied about the probabilities thats why they are already expecting something like this for the market to be on this condition.Its true that 1 btc is always equal to one and no matter what
happen as long they dont sell everything or anything then its not considered to be losses.It might be on negative or deep reds but its not really into that situation where its totally considered to be one.
They could always opt to hold and wait and even the President might be considering on buying even more with these cheaper price since he do indeed know on how crypto game
works and only to those dumb or lacking some ideas will really be just whining and keeps complaining.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook
At Which volume, i don't think that's so important in this situation, since Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and being used and adopted as an alternative currency in El Salvador, the volume at which the country reserve stands is what is important and since 1 Bitcoin= 1 Bitcoin and the 2,301 holding is still intact El Salvador government through the president understand the game quite well and are prepared what this even before the Bitcoin adoption and that can be deduced from the minister of finance interview yesterday.

In my opinion, this statement is the mass and media consumption of something similar to populism. No party that uses cryptocurrencies periodically can not be affected by a sharp decline in price, whether in the current wave or others in previous crises and even the next.
For savers, we cannot talk about a definite loss as long as the savings have not been touched and as long as there is a firm conviction that the price will return to the rise. But once they think about their use, they are necessarily losers. Do not forget, my friend, that we are here to talk about a country-wide investment with an important economic size .
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am sure that it is worth looking for a very thin level between whether to use bitcoin, and if so, in what volumes. I think it's pretty important.
At Which volume, i don't think that's so important in this situation, since Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and being used and adopted as an alternative currency in El Salvador, the volume at which the country reserve stands is what is important and since 1 Bitcoin= 1 Bitcoin and the 2,301 holding is still intact El Salvador government...

Sure, but we should not ignore the obvious consequences of the bear market we seem to be going into.

The fact that El Salvador (and other institutional investors) is in the zone of unrealized losses will be use as ammo by the detractors of Bitcoin and decentralization as a whole. I would not feel suprised if the FMI and the World bank started to issue some official declarations against the "unwise" investment made by the Salvador in Bitcoin, I would not feel surprised either if some protests started there under the narrative that the president is gambling the money of the people away, etc.

We all know Bitcoin has powerful enemies and during this bear market they weill show up again, wielding as well the Terra-Luna and Celsius cases as extra ammo to seed the FUD around the community and the people of Salvador.
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 765
Top Crypto Casino
I am sure that it is worth looking for a very thin level between whether to use bitcoin, and if so, in what volumes. I think it's pretty important.
At Which volume, i don't think that's so important in this situation, since Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and being used and adopted as an alternative currency in El Salvador, the volume at which the country reserve stands is what is important and since 1 Bitcoin= 1 Bitcoin and the 2,301 holding is still intact El Salvador government through the president understand the game quite well and are prepared what this even before the Bitcoin adoption and that can be deduced from the minister of finance interview yesterday.


Screen short source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/el-salvador-has-not-had-any-losses-due-to-bitcoin-price-dive-finance-minister-says
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 421
武士道
<...>
Quote
“I have said it repeatedly: A supposed loss of 40 million dollars has not occurred because we have not sold the coins.”
<...>
Sometimes though, you can’t have it both ways …:

Whilst the above is true on its own, not that many months ago, the non-realized surplus due to BTC prise rise back then was the argument for financing the construction of the Pet Hospital:

<…> I've always wondered how that hospital is going to be built from the profits of investing in BTC while no bitcoin will be actually sold. <…>
By playing along dangerously with the numbers, in a manner similar to fable the milkmaid and her pail:

When he announced the Pet Hospital back in October, he twitted an explanation on where the funds were coming from. The tweet (see https://twitter.com/nayibbukele/status/1447017312893161478 and scroll down) is in Spanish, so I‘ll summarize the core parts in English (freely translated, with my minor added comments):

Quote
FIDEBITCOIN (the Bitcoin Trust) has, by law, an allocated amount in USD.
Nevertheless, its balance sheet bears both USD and BTC [the latter derived from the purchases].
<…>
The Trust is now worth more than the allocated figure, due to the rise in price of BTC, rendering FIDEBITCOIN with a "surplus" of 4M $ [theoretical on the books, and forever changing with BTC price fluctuation].

Therefore, the government made company, Chivo, can dispose of 4M $ [October 2021 numbers], without affecting the Trust’s allocation.
This is carried out by keeping the same amount of BTC, and reducing the amount of USD. We can therefore invest 4M $ in some project.

So we decided to invest part of that money in a Pet Hospital.
<…>

There we go, the perfect potential example of the former part of to fable the milkmaid and her pail. While BTC goes up, they extract USD from the trust, keeping the book value of the Trust near the legal allocated value. The problem is, that BTC could go down, and activate the second part of the fable …

It’s a dangerous game playing each direction with a different set of rules (though we may know which one is right and which one isn't)…


I agree, they’re using an accounting trick that can be risky depending on how much is actually being put into the trust.

To be fair tho, i think they took the danger into account. The trust is relatively small with just 150 million $, this can’t bring them into any serious risk.

Also with the hospital thing, they marketed a short sited gain as a win, which is questionable(but this is politics). But i still think a country with such a weak economy should invest into infrastructure and jobs and this 4 million $ were more than well spent.

// Edit: Also i cant think of a model that better fits their interests than this.

1. As Bitcoin goes down, they can accumulate more sats for cheap, keeping the trusts value stable.

2. As Bitcoin goes up, they can pull usd out and take home profits.

Leaving them with more and more Bitcoin over time, till they run out of usd. Then they can scale the trusts value higher.

They would never need to dump btc on the market(which is good for price), but they can still pull out profits and stack sats. This fits perfectly into the bet we all do with Bitcoin, we want more sats not fiat. Is there a smarter way than this?
jr. member
Activity: 98
Merit: 2
I am sure that it is worth looking for a very thin level between whether to use bitcoin, and if so, in what volumes. I think it's pretty important.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 10802
There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain
<...>
Quote
“I have said it repeatedly: A supposed loss of 40 million dollars has not occurred because we have not sold the coins.”
<...>
Sometimes though, you can’t have it both ways …:

Whilst the above is true on its own, not that many months ago, the non-realized surplus due to BTC prise rise back then was the argument for financing the construction of the Pet Hospital:

<…> I've always wondered how that hospital is going to be built from the profits of investing in BTC while no bitcoin will be actually sold. <…>
By playing along dangerously with the numbers, in a manner similar to fable the milkmaid and her pail:

When he announced the Pet Hospital back in October, he twitted an explanation on where the funds were coming from. The tweet (see https://twitter.com/nayibbukele/status/1447017312893161478 and scroll down) is in Spanish, so I‘ll summarize the core parts in English (freely translated, with my minor added comments):

Quote
FIDEBITCOIN (the Bitcoin Trust) has, by law, an allocated amount in USD.
Nevertheless, its balance sheet bears both USD and BTC [the latter derived from the purchases].
<…>
The Trust is now worth more than the allocated figure, due to the rise in price of BTC, rendering FIDEBITCOIN with a "surplus" of 4M $ [theoretical on the books, and forever changing with BTC price fluctuation].

Therefore, the government made company, Chivo, can dispose of 4M $ [October 2021 numbers], without affecting the Trust’s allocation.
This is carried out by keeping the same amount of BTC, and reducing the amount of USD. We can therefore invest 4M $ in some project.

So we decided to invest part of that money in a Pet Hospital.
<…>

There we go, the perfect potential example of the former part of to fable the milkmaid and her pail. While BTC goes up, they extract USD from the trust, keeping the book value of the Trust near the legal allocated value. The problem is, that BTC could go down, and activate the second part of the fable …

It’s a dangerous game playing each direction with a different set of rules (though we may know which one is right and which one isn't)…
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1337
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
I think El Salvador government prepared before they accepted bitcoin as a legal tender, see what Alejandro Zelaya, the minister of finance of El Salvador said about buying bitcoin.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/el-salvador-has-not-had-any-losses-due-to-bitcoin-price-dive-finance-minister-says

Quote
“There is a clear criticism of Bitcoin as such, not of El Salvador's strategy. El Salvador is what interests them the least, they [the media outlet] are not interested in what happens to our economy, they are not interested in what happens with our people, what happens with inflation.”

Quote
“I have said it repeatedly: A supposed loss of 40 million dollars has not occurred because we have not sold the coins.”

We all know that the second  quote is true, 1 BTC is equals to 1 BTC, if El Salvador has not sold bitcoin, this is not loss. Some holders will see the price falling, only what they think about is to wait for another years for all-time-high.

How do you see people that are criticizing El Salvador government as bitcoin price has decreased? As for me, I see them as someone that will only panic and sell, thinking they have lost money, but latter regret this in long term when the price of bitcoin reach all-time-high.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 3049
...
You still do not get the fact
...

I know all that. We are talking about reasons why Salvadorians can protest against bitcoin adoption and not transparent system is one of most substantial reasons for that. If we'll get answers to the questions about the keys it will not solve all the problems but will make the situation more transparent. And yes, I totally agree that it is much more reasonable for Salvadorians to use non custodial wallets instead of Chivo.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 421
武士道
Well that worked out great for them. Because now people are going to demand their actual currency and make inflation even higher.

They’re still using the US dollars and Bitcoin as legal tender, no „actual currency“ was ever taken away, what is there to demand? Chivo(their wallet) actually let’s people decide if they wanna receive Bitcoin or usd, you can convert anytime you want, no one is forced to keep payments in Bitcoin.

Before i cringe too hard, please inform yourself what actually causes inflation, if more people did maybe we wouldn’t be in this mess.

It’s funny that people that don’t even understand what causes inflation, come here with a time horizon of a few months(that’s not how to build things), and then try to judge one of the poorest countries in the world for trying to better things. Where were y’all before they adopted Bitcoin? Y’all didn’t give two shits.

They certainly don’t need approval from a mob of emotional people that don’t even understand basic economics. And an exchange rate into usd doesn’t change what Bitcoin is, it still works the same as before, still has sound monetary properties. Let people time to build things without falling into hysteria, thanks.
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 528
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Well, that worked out great for them. Because now people are going to demand their actual currency and make inflation even higher.
I think you are beginning to add feelings into this whole thing, don't used present Bitcoin price conditions to judge long term goals. El Salvador is a country and its total Bitcoin holding has never be touched or sold before and this is because the country have a long term goals for Bitcoin not some short fallacy of getting rich quck mindset.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1337
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
it is an experiment, final success is not warranted.
A country make a coin a legal tender, you are calling it an experiment, that is completely wrong. Some other countries can see it as an experiment for them to know if it will work good in El Salvador or not, but not an experiment in El Salvador.

newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Well that worked out great for them. Because now people are going to demand their actual currency and make inflation even higher.
hero member
Activity: 1928
Merit: 538
Now this become a bad omen to the country because the supposedly to help their economy ? look at their country now.
Explain this into details, how has bitcoin affected El Salvador?

Who controls the keys? I think about it over and over: who controls El Salvador's bitcoin savings keys? Who controls keys of Chivo wallets? How would these funds be protected after transfer of power? What is good in bitcoin is that I don't need to think about trust towards anyone. How it is done in El Salvador makes me think about trust towards Bukele and his team. It is not the same to me.
You still do not get the fact

Some countries government are hostile to bitcoin and never like its adoption and make a ban, just like China, but reverse is the case with El Salvador, bitcoin was adopted, even as a legal tender.

If something is accepted as a legal tender, the government will want to have control, El Salvador as a country bought the bitcoin that are used with Chivo wallet which is centralized, making fee to be cheap and transactions to be instant. That is how he centralization is helping.

But it is not compulsory Salvadorans should use Chivo wallet, if they like, they can use Electrum or other noncustododial wallet if they want.

About the transfer of power, remember bitcoin transaction is more transparent than fiat, the government can not mishandle bitcoin if compared with fiat.

I think you need to wake up, if you are a Salvadoran, use noncustododial wallet instead of Chivo wallet if you want.

it is an experiment, final success is not warranted.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1337
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
Now this become a bad omen to the country because the supposedly to help their economy ? look at their country now.
Explain this into details, how has bitcoin affected El Salvador?

Who controls the keys? I think about it over and over: who controls El Salvador's bitcoin savings keys? Who controls keys of Chivo wallets? How would these funds be protected after transfer of power? What is good in bitcoin is that I don't need to think about trust towards anyone. How it is done in El Salvador makes me think about trust towards Bukele and his team. It is not the same to me.
You still do not get the fact

Some countries government are hostile to bitcoin and never like its adoption and make a ban, just like China, but reverse is the case with El Salvador, bitcoin was adopted, even as a legal tender.

If something is accepted as a legal tender, the government will want to have control, El Salvador as a country bought the bitcoin that are used with Chivo wallet which is centralized, making fee to be cheap and transactions to be instant. That is how he centralization is helping.

But it is not compulsory Salvadorans should use Chivo wallet, if they like, they can use Electrum or other noncustododial wallet if they want.

About the transfer of power, remember bitcoin transaction is more transparent than fiat, the government can not mishandle bitcoin if compared with fiat.

I think you need to wake up, if you are a Salvadoran, use noncustododial wallet instead of Chivo wallet if you want.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 3049
...
base on my conviction I don't see any reason why chivo wallet being centralized should be a challenging factor in a country that adopts bitcoin as a legal tender, it will rather do more good to help those you mentioned that complained their inability to know how to engage the use of bitcoin, if you have the experience about bitcoin as an El-Savadoran and uses chivo wallet then i don't see anything bad if you want to secure more privacy by using an open source wallet along the line, we can't expect the entire citizens to go all decentralized, that will give a serious complications at first, scam rate and many other loss of digital asset will be lost, remember you're dealing with the whole populace of El-Savador.

Who controls the keys? I think about it over and over: who controls El Salvador's bitcoin savings keys? Who controls keys of Chivo wallets? How would these funds be protected after transfer of power? What is good in bitcoin is that I don't need to think about trust towards anyone. How it is done in El Salvador makes me think about trust towards Bukele and his team. It is not the same to me.
full member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 182
Elsalvador country is a country that dares to legalize bitcoin as a medium of exchange, I applaud the elsalvador government they can revive the economy in their country by legalizing bitcoin but yesterday I read the news there were a few people who held demonstrations they refused to use bitcoin as a medium of exchange maybe some people are not happy with government decisions in their country.
seriously? you have just read  the news yesterday? when the demonstration had been going on since day 1 of adoption?

the EL Salvadorian is not that happy for them being forced of this adoption when  the government can make a trial first or at least to have a plebiscite  so they can learn the peoples heart about Bitcoin.

Now this become a bad omen to the country because the supposedly to help their economy ? look at their country now.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1106
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Last year during the June month El Salvador President Nayib Bukele announced that he will send the bill to make bitcoin legal tender within the country. One year passed and during the same time period the announcement have been implemented during the month of September. Following the same El Salvador government started to accumulate more volume of bitcoin. As a result now El Salvador have got 2301BTC in its reserve. The $100million spending have come down to $70 million due to the drop in the market. Meanwhile it have faced several criticism, warnings and lack of support. Amidst that El Salvador stays strong in its decision. During the first year of adoption it is termed as a failure through different surveys. After several negative comments against El Salvador's adoption of bitcoin President Nayib Bukele is strong to make his country better through bitcoin.

When a person is new to the bitcoin market, everyone used to give suggestion that you should have patience to enjoy the growth of bitcoin. Here also same is the situation, but very few agree on it whereas majority make fun how the president is gonna come out of the ongoing crash that'll have impact on country's economy.
Jump to: