Topic: [END] [banned mixer] Premium Review and Suggestion Campaign (Read 3458 times)
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Thanks. Locking the thread now.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 2327
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
@Little Mouse, please confirm once you have done the payment. Thank you.
Sent the BTC to the address shared by Royse777.Tx id- 07820ebedb64831e07fdfb771b0c2a478dfd374d8bfaa2adef7dec1a9e24e712
My bad that I wasn’t able to complete the review. I had tested the mixer long ago and keep record and notes for the review but sadly things were not in my favor. Anyway, thanks Unijoin and Royse777.
Maintenance work completed
We have now completed all maintenance work. The website is now available and accessible again as usual. We thank you for your patience!
We have now completed all maintenance work. The website is now available and accessible again as usual. We thank you for your patience!
Maintenance work
We are currently performing some maintenance on our servers. Therefore, our website will be unavailable until we complete the maintenance. This should happen in the next few hours. We thank you all for your understanding!
We are currently performing some maintenance on our servers. Therefore, our website will be unavailable until we complete the maintenance. This should happen in the next few hours. We thank you all for your understanding!
Hi @DireWolfM14, thank you very much for sharing this detailed review!
I have forwarded this matter to the technical team, to see what we can do to optimize this. Thanks!
This is a pet peeve of mine, and I'm well aware that my neurosis is not common; but I hate pointless stuff on websites. Keep it simple and to the point. The more fluff I find a website, especially one that I have trust with my bitcoin, the more suspicious I get. For example; The scrolling line of links to the press releases on various financial sites struck me as especially odd. All those links point to a total of three different press releases that try to pass off as articles or reviews. The one press release that mentions the Ukrainian war makes claims that cannot possibly be verified without breaching your clients privacy, and to me it looks like an excuse to use a tragedy to create a catchy headline. It comes off as poor in taste.
We find it important to point with design and more to reflect the quality of mixed coins we provide. This includes many different things and we want to convince Bitcoin newbies of the fact that Bitcoin is not truly anonymous and that they should use a Bitcoin Mixer to enhance their anonymity with Bitcoin transactions. That's why we have also put a lot of information to the website, so that people can inform how important it is and what benefits it provides. It's always a matter of opinion and point of view. Some people like a good design with more information, some people don't.
Really, they look paid-for. 47 total reviews, 43 of which give 5 stars, and the remaining four gave 4 stars. All of this without a functional LoG? Strange.
We can say that these reviews are not bought.
Again, the fees are very reasonable. I was charged 2.03% for one transaction, and 2.01% for the other, both calculated before blockchain fees. A cheep price to pay for privacy.
One thing I noticed that my cause some confusion however, there's no mention of Tx fees on the mixing page:
On the FAQs it's described in more detail, specifically the bolded part:
Thank you for sharing this with us. We will add this to the mixing page to make it more clear.
From the mixing page:
From the FAQs:
That's correct, we will need to fix this FAQ and share the correct minimum mixing amount.
Thank you for sharing this review with us! A few things helped us to identify optimizable issues, and the technical team is informed about the LoG matter.
@UniJoin,
Thank you for the opportunity to review your mixer.
Here's a summery of my observations;
tl;dr:
The mixing functions work well, and fees are very reasonable, but I would not use this mixer without a GPG or Bitcoin signature.
With out the ability to independently verify the LoG, I would never use this mixer. I tried the site that was pointed to as the verification tool in previous posts. I don't know how many configurations I tried, all to no avail. Not that would even consider this if that site was my only option, I only went through the exercise for this review. Essentially, you have no LoG. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but that's a deal breaker for me.
Thank you for the opportunity to review your mixer.
Here's a summery of my observations;
- No Letter of Guarantee.
- Front page is busy and appears as if trying to look not scammy.
- Trustpilot reviews seem too good to be true.
- Fees are not accurately described on mixing page.
- Minimum mix amount on mixing page is in conflict with the FAQs.
tl;dr:
The mixing functions work well, and fees are very reasonable, but I would not use this mixer without a GPG or Bitcoin signature.
- No Letter of Guarantee.
With out the ability to independently verify the LoG, I would never use this mixer. I tried the site that was pointed to as the verification tool in previous posts. I don't know how many configurations I tried, all to no avail. Not that would even consider this if that site was my only option, I only went through the exercise for this review. Essentially, you have no LoG. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but that's a deal breaker for me.
I have forwarded this matter to the technical team, to see what we can do to optimize this. Thanks!
Quote
- Front page is busy and appears to be trying to look not scammy.
This is a pet peeve of mine, and I'm well aware that my neurosis is not common; but I hate pointless stuff on websites. Keep it simple and to the point. The more fluff I find a website, especially one that I have trust with my bitcoin, the more suspicious I get. For example; The scrolling line of links to the press releases on various financial sites struck me as especially odd. All those links point to a total of three different press releases that try to pass off as articles or reviews. The one press release that mentions the Ukrainian war makes claims that cannot possibly be verified without breaching your clients privacy, and to me it looks like an excuse to use a tragedy to create a catchy headline. It comes off as poor in taste.
We find it important to point with design and more to reflect the quality of mixed coins we provide. This includes many different things and we want to convince Bitcoin newbies of the fact that Bitcoin is not truly anonymous and that they should use a Bitcoin Mixer to enhance their anonymity with Bitcoin transactions. That's why we have also put a lot of information to the website, so that people can inform how important it is and what benefits it provides. It's always a matter of opinion and point of view. Some people like a good design with more information, some people don't.
Quote
- Trustpilot reviews seem too good to be true.
Really, they look paid-for. 47 total reviews, 43 of which give 5 stars, and the remaining four gave 4 stars. All of this without a functional LoG? Strange.
We can say that these reviews are not bought.
Quote
- Fees are not accurately described on mixing page.
Again, the fees are very reasonable. I was charged 2.03% for one transaction, and 2.01% for the other, both calculated before blockchain fees. A cheep price to pay for privacy.
One thing I noticed that my cause some confusion however, there's no mention of Tx fees on the mixing page:
On the FAQs it's described in more detail, specifically the bolded part:
Quote
The fee per mixing operation ranges between 1% - 3% and is generated with a decimal number of 4 digits. Also, the miner’s fee that is required by the crypto network is paid by the user and deducted from the total mixed amount.
Thank you for sharing this with us. We will add this to the mixing page to make it more clear.
Quote
- Minimum mix amount on mixing page is in conflict with the FAQs.
From the mixing page:
From the FAQs:
Quote
The minimum amount to mix Bitcoins is variable as it depends on the USD value. Currently, the minimum amount to mix is:
Bitcoin: 0.000 BTC
Bitcoin: 0.000 BTC
That's correct, we will need to fix this FAQ and share the correct minimum mixing amount.
Thank you for sharing this review with us! A few things helped us to identify optimizable issues, and the technical team is informed about the LoG matter.
Thanks all participants to join the review campaign and thanks to UniJoin too for this opportunity. The campaign ends here. Final spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iEixnn11EJ218O7n0ougEMzDXl_Oj6_AMr2q-zmB-TA/edit?usp=sharing
@Little Mouse, since you did not share your review yet. I would appreciate to returning the 0.00042364 BTC to the following wallet given by UniJoin team:
bc1qs9knfc8tvct59z80tv7yhszevf5lneuvpm9s28
Thanks you all again.
PS: I would appreciate if UniJoin confirm the above address as their.
@Little Mouse, since you did not share your review yet. I would appreciate to returning the 0.00042364 BTC to the following wallet given by UniJoin team:
bc1qs9knfc8tvct59z80tv7yhszevf5lneuvpm9s28
Thanks you all again.
PS: I would appreciate if UniJoin confirm the above address as their.
Hi @Royse777, the address is correct. @Little Mouse, please confirm once you have done the payment. Thank you.
@Royse777, thank you one more time for managing this campaign, you did a great job!
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Thanks all participants to join the review campaign and thanks to UniJoin too for this opportunity. The campaign ends here. Final spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iEixnn11EJ218O7n0ougEMzDXl_Oj6_AMr2q-zmB-TA/edit?usp=sharing
@Little Mouse, since you did not share your review yet. I would appreciate to returning the 0.00042364 BTC to the following wallet given by UniJoin team:
bc1qs9knfc8tvct59z80tv7yhszevf5lneuvpm9s28
Thanks you all again.
PS: I would appreciate if UniJoin confirm the above address as their.
@Little Mouse, since you did not share your review yet. I would appreciate to returning the 0.00042364 BTC to the following wallet given by UniJoin team:
bc1qs9knfc8tvct59z80tv7yhszevf5lneuvpm9s28
Thanks you all again.
PS: I would appreciate if UniJoin confirm the above address as their.
@UniJoin,
Thank you for the opportunity to review your mixer.
Here's a summery of my observations;
tl;dr:
The mixing functions work well, and fees are very reasonable, but I would not use this mixer without a GPG or Bitcoin signature.
With out the ability to independently verify the LoG, I would never use this mixer. I tried the site that was pointed to as the verification tool in previous posts. I don't know how many configurations I tried, all to no avail. Not that would even consider this if that site was my only option, I only went through the exercise for this review. Essentially, you have no LoG. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but that's a deal breaker for me.
This is a pet peeve of mine, and I'm well aware that my neurosis is not common; but I hate pointless stuff on websites. Keep it simple and to the point. The more fluff I find a website, especially one that I have trust with my bitcoin, the more suspicious I get. For example; The scrolling line of links to the press releases on various financial sites struck me as especially odd. All those links point to a total of three different press releases that try to pass off as articles or reviews. The one press release that mentions the Ukrainian war makes claims that cannot possibly be verified without breaching your clients privacy, and to me it looks like an excuse to use a tragedy to create a catchy headline. It comes off as poor in taste.
Really, they look paid-for. 47 total reviews, 43 of which give 5 stars, and the remaining four gave 4 stars. All of this without a functional LoG? Strange.
Again, the fees are very reasonable. I was charged 2.03% for one transaction, and 2.01% for the other, both calculated before blockchain fees. A cheep price to pay for privacy.
One thing I noticed that my cause some confusion however, there's no mention of Tx fees on the mixing page:
On the FAQs it's described in more detail, specifically the bolded part:
From the mixing page:
From the FAQs:
Thank you for the opportunity to review your mixer.
Here's a summery of my observations;
- No Letter of Guarantee.
- Front page is busy and appears as if trying to look not scammy.
- Trustpilot reviews seem too good to be true.
- Fees are not accurately described on mixing page.
- Minimum mix amount on mixing page is in conflict with the FAQs.
tl;dr:
The mixing functions work well, and fees are very reasonable, but I would not use this mixer without a GPG or Bitcoin signature.
- No Letter of Guarantee.
With out the ability to independently verify the LoG, I would never use this mixer. I tried the site that was pointed to as the verification tool in previous posts. I don't know how many configurations I tried, all to no avail. Not that would even consider this if that site was my only option, I only went through the exercise for this review. Essentially, you have no LoG. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but that's a deal breaker for me.
- Front page is busy and appears to be trying to look not scammy.
This is a pet peeve of mine, and I'm well aware that my neurosis is not common; but I hate pointless stuff on websites. Keep it simple and to the point. The more fluff I find a website, especially one that I have trust with my bitcoin, the more suspicious I get. For example; The scrolling line of links to the press releases on various financial sites struck me as especially odd. All those links point to a total of three different press releases that try to pass off as articles or reviews. The one press release that mentions the Ukrainian war makes claims that cannot possibly be verified without breaching your clients privacy, and to me it looks like an excuse to use a tragedy to create a catchy headline. It comes off as poor in taste.
- Trustpilot reviews seem too good to be true.
Really, they look paid-for. 47 total reviews, 43 of which give 5 stars, and the remaining four gave 4 stars. All of this without a functional LoG? Strange.
- Fees are not accurately described on mixing page.
Again, the fees are very reasonable. I was charged 2.03% for one transaction, and 2.01% for the other, both calculated before blockchain fees. A cheep price to pay for privacy.
One thing I noticed that my cause some confusion however, there's no mention of Tx fees on the mixing page:
On the FAQs it's described in more detail, specifically the bolded part:
Quote
The fee per mixing operation ranges between 1% - 3% and is generated with a decimal number of 4 digits. Also, the miner’s fee that is required by the crypto network is paid by the user and deducted from the total mixed amount.
- Minimum mix amount on mixing page is in conflict with the FAQs.
From the mixing page:
From the FAQs:
Quote
The minimum amount to mix Bitcoins is variable as it depends on the USD value. Currently, the minimum amount to mix is:
Bitcoin: 0.000 BTC
Bitcoin: 0.000 BTC
Hello Hispo, thank you for sharing your review with us! It is important to get some reviews from people who have no experience with Bitcoin mixers, as we also target newbies to stay anonymous with Bitcoin. We find it important to share the vulnerabilities they might have when not using Bitcoin mixers.
-snip-Hi Hispo, thank you or your reply! Actually, changing the name to the terms "receipt of mixing/operation" or similar is a great idea. Not everyone knows the term "letter of guarantee", especially new users that have never used a mixer. So we will definitely consider changing the name of this.
Our trustpilot is already setup and is visible in our website as well. Leaving your review would be much appreciated! You can share your impressions here: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/[banned mixer].
Thank you very much in advance!
Hello, I wanted to let you know I already left my impressions on your trustpillow webpage, as I said I would.
Also, I wanted to give a look to your webpages to see how it has changed since the first time I saw it, and unfortunately I could not access, I got this error message:
I am using Firefox, by the way.
Hello Hispo.
We have seen your review and replied you to that. As mentioned in our reply, the mixing processes still work in the background when there is such a backend error and people still get their mixed Bitcoins on their provided address. We needed to do some maintenance work on our servers and everything is running as usual again. Please check. Thank you!
Also, thanks for removing the 1-star review again from our Trust Pilot!
I believe your are mistaking me for someone else
I did not give your service a 1 star review on Trustpillow, but a 5 star review based on my first experience which was part of this campaign.
I just wanted to let you know this problem in case you were unaware of it, have a good day!
Hello Hispo, thank you for sharing your review with us! It is important to get some reviews from people who have no experience with Bitcoin mixers, as we also target newbies to stay anonymous with Bitcoin. We find it important to share the vulnerabilities they might have when not using Bitcoin mixers.
-snip-Hi Hispo, thank you or your reply! Actually, changing the name to the terms "receipt of mixing/operation" or similar is a great idea. Not everyone knows the term "letter of guarantee", especially new users that have never used a mixer. So we will definitely consider changing the name of this.
Our trustpilot is already setup and is visible in our website as well. Leaving your review would be much appreciated! You can share your impressions here: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/[banned mixer].
Thank you very much in advance!
Hello, I wanted to let you know I already left my impressions on your trustpillow webpage, as I said I would.
Also, I wanted to give a look to your webpages to see how it has changed since the first time I saw it, and unfortunately I could not access, I got this error message:
I am using Firefox, by the way.
Hello Hispo.
We have seen your review and replied you to that. As mentioned in our reply, the mixing processes still work in the background when there is such a backend error and people still get their mixed Bitcoins on their provided address. We needed to do some maintenance work on our servers and everything is running as usual again. Please check. Thank you!
Also, thanks for removing the 1-star review again from our Trust Pilot!
Hello Hispo, thank you for sharing your review with us! It is important to get some reviews from people who have no experience with Bitcoin mixers, as we also target newbies to stay anonymous with Bitcoin. We find it important to share the vulnerabilities they might have when not using Bitcoin mixers.
-snip-Hi Hispo, thank you or your reply! Actually, changing the name to the terms "receipt of mixing/operation" or similar is a great idea. Not everyone knows the term "letter of guarantee", especially new users that have never used a mixer. So we will definitely consider changing the name of this.
Our trustpilot is already setup and is visible in our website as well. Leaving your review would be much appreciated! You can share your impressions here: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/[banned mixer].
Thank you very much in advance!
Hello, I wanted to let you know I already left my impressions on your trustpillow webpage, as I said I would.
Also, I wanted to give a look to your webpages to see how it has changed since the first time I saw it, and unfortunately I could not access, I got this error message:
I am using Firefox, by the way.
Username: Anonbitcoiner
Merit eaned in 120 Days: 1
BTC Address (SegWit): bc1qxvumhm3xclmehynaeyq47u9tvccnrgslac97h8?time=165574694
My Rank is not enough but I wish I join this compaign because all review are positive and I want to be part of this .
Merit eaned in 120 Days: 1
BTC Address (SegWit): bc1qxvumhm3xclmehynaeyq47u9tvccnrgslac97h8?time=165574694
My Rank is not enough but I wish I join this compaign because all review are positive and I want to be part of this .
Ok so Here is My final Review About Unijoin
Review
It was my first time to use any Mix and FAQ help me very much. I have read all Faq question Answers and then used it.
* I find it very easy and very simple step to mix and newbie can also do it normally.
* Transaction Trace speed is very fast. It directly start processing fund after I send btc to UniJoin wallet.
* Support team is not bad if improve it will be much better.
* Fee is automatically deducted and I think it's good for project to work for long term
* Payout back speed is fast and they care all users like permanent customers.
Suggestions
* It will be better to add more coin like Bnb,Eth
* It will be better to Upload tutorial of Mixer in all Major language like Hindi/Urdu,Chinese and Arabic ( I can make Urdu Toturial if Team want)
Review
It was my first time to use any Mix and FAQ help me very much. I have read all Faq question Answers and then used it.
* I find it very easy and very simple step to mix and newbie can also do it normally.
* Transaction Trace speed is very fast. It directly start processing fund after I send btc to UniJoin wallet.
* Support team is not bad if improve it will be much better.
* Fee is automatically deducted and I think it's good for project to work for long term
* Payout back speed is fast and they care all users like permanent customers.
Suggestions
* It will be better to add more coin like Bnb,Eth
* It will be better to Upload tutorial of Mixer in all Major language like Hindi/Urdu,Chinese and Arabic ( I can make Urdu Toturial if Team want)
Hello MFahad, thank you very much for your review. We are glad hearing you that you was satisfied with our service!
More currencies will be added soon, starting with ETH. Updates will be published, when there is news to the development. Thank you!
If you are still accepting member to review UniJoin, I wouldn't mind testing the mixer and sharing my opinion.
BTC address (Segwit): bc1qr65gpuxglt6wvlvngkr4fvwr7wgryf4pk7923l
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 236
BTC address (Segwit): bc1qr65gpuxglt6wvlvngkr4fvwr7wgryf4pk7923l
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 236
Hello DireWolfM14, hoping you are doing good!
Of course, reviews are still welcome and very helpful. We have sent the payment to your wallet address. Thank you in advance!
Ok so Here is My final Review About Unijoin
Review
It was my first time to use any Mix and FAQ help me very much. I have read all Faq question Answers and then used it.
* I find it very easy and very simple step to mix and newbie can also do it normally.
* Transaction Trace speed is very fast. It directly start processing fund after I send btc to UniJoin wallet.
* Support team is not bad if improve it will be much better.
* Fee is automatically deducted and I think it's good for project to work for long term
* Payout back speed is fast and they care all users like permanent customers.
Suggestions
* It will be better to add more coin like Bnb,Eth
* It will be better to Upload tutorial of Mixer in all Major language like Hindi/Urdu,Chinese and Arabic ( I can make Urdu Toturial if Team want)
Review
It was my first time to use any Mix and FAQ help me very much. I have read all Faq question Answers and then used it.
* I find it very easy and very simple step to mix and newbie can also do it normally.
* Transaction Trace speed is very fast. It directly start processing fund after I send btc to UniJoin wallet.
* Support team is not bad if improve it will be much better.
* Fee is automatically deducted and I think it's good for project to work for long term
* Payout back speed is fast and they care all users like permanent customers.
Suggestions
* It will be better to add more coin like Bnb,Eth
* It will be better to Upload tutorial of Mixer in all Major language like Hindi/Urdu,Chinese and Arabic ( I can make Urdu Toturial if Team want)
If you are still accepting member to review UniJoin, I wouldn't mind testing the mixer and sharing my opinion.
BTC address (Segwit): bc1qr65gpuxglt6wvlvngkr4fvwr7wgryf4pk7923l
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 236
BTC address (Segwit): bc1qr65gpuxglt6wvlvngkr4fvwr7wgryf4pk7923l
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 236
Hello ChrisPop, your review is highly appreciated! Thank you!
That's correct, putting animations on our website is very subjective. Everyone has different opinions about this. Some might like animations, some might like it very simple. We from UniJoin love animations and a great design that has a modern theme, and we put a lot of effort in this.
Totally right. It's good for SEO but it's more important for us to reach people with these articles to teach them how to be private in the internet.
We are glad that you had a great experience when mixing with UniJoin and that everything went as expected. Regarding the loading time, this is definitely because of the Tor network. However, we didn't expect it to be 3-4 minutes. This is way too long, so we will double check this matter.
Regarding your suggestion, it's actually a great one. However, due to security and privacy reasons, we immediately delete all data of a mixing operation, so the order link is also not available anymore after a mixing operation is finished. However, we will keep this suggestion in mind!
We really thank you for your review and your suggestion and hope that you were overall satisfied with mixing with UniJoin. If you have anything else in mind you would like to share with us, please never hesitate to inform us. You can do so by sharing it here on Bitcointalk, either on this thread or on our ANN thread, or via the support page on our website.
Premium review and suggestion spreadsheet #18
UI - I like the theme of the website - looks clean and spacious. Perhaps it symbolizes the purity of the mixed coins
Personally I don't mind the animations someone on the thread was talking about, but I guess that's subjective.
UI - I like the theme of the website - looks clean and spacious. Perhaps it symbolizes the purity of the mixed coins
Personally I don't mind the animations someone on the thread was talking about, but I guess that's subjective.
That's correct, putting animations on our website is very subjective. Everyone has different opinions about this. Some might like animations, some might like it very simple. We from UniJoin love animations and a great design that has a modern theme, and we put a lot of effort in this.
Quote
Blog - it's good that you have informative blog posts that users can use to document themselves about the service. Probably it's good for the SEO as well, but being a rather new service might not be that visible at the moment on the search engines.
Totally right. It's good for SEO but it's more important for us to reach people with these articles to teach them how to be private in the internet.
Quote
Process
For increased privacy I have decided to test the service using the onion address (TOR browser).
I had to wait around 3-4 minutes until I could access the website, but that's probably just a disadvantage of using TOR (exchanging time for privacy). However after the connection has been established to the website I could navigate smoothly.
I like the transfer delay feature. I don't think the mixers I've used in the past enabled users to change that themselves. Cool addition!
I have received the coins after the preset time delay expired so there were no problems there. Really straight forward and intuitive experience overall.
Suggestion: I would really love to see a breakdown of the fees I had to pay on the last page for both network fee and service fee.
For increased privacy I have decided to test the service using the onion address (TOR browser).
I had to wait around 3-4 minutes until I could access the website, but that's probably just a disadvantage of using TOR (exchanging time for privacy
). However after the connection has been established to the website I could navigate smoothly.I like the transfer delay feature. I don't think the mixers I've used in the past enabled users to change that themselves. Cool addition!
I have received the coins after the preset time delay expired so there were no problems there. Really straight forward and intuitive experience overall.
Suggestion: I would really love to see a breakdown of the fees I had to pay on the last page for both network fee and service fee.
We are glad that you had a great experience when mixing with UniJoin and that everything went as expected. Regarding the loading time, this is definitely because of the Tor network. However, we didn't expect it to be 3-4 minutes. This is way too long, so we will double check this matter.
Regarding your suggestion, it's actually a great one. However, due to security and privacy reasons, we immediately delete all data of a mixing operation, so the order link is also not available anymore after a mixing operation is finished. However, we will keep this suggestion in mind!
We really thank you for your review and your suggestion and hope that you were overall satisfied with mixing with UniJoin. If you have anything else in mind you would like to share with us, please never hesitate to inform us. You can do so by sharing it here on Bitcointalk, either on this thread or on our ANN thread, or via the support page on our website.
Hello Hispo, thank you for sharing your review with us! It is important to get some reviews from people who have no experience with Bitcoin mixers, as we also target newbies to stay anonymous with Bitcoin. We find it important to share the vulnerabilities they might have when not using Bitcoin mixers.
I am glad you have found my review useful, Unijoin. Thanks for bringing this campaign to our community and also for respecting our values.
I was aware that some of the things I noticed were that way to preserve your privacy and the privacy of your costumers.
I would like to mention that I was aware that the letter of warranty was some kind of receipt to identify my mixing operation among others, however this is the first time I have seen that term used, is this something that other mixer do in general (to call it that way) ?
What about chaging it name to "receipt of mixing", "receipt of operation" or something similar?
By the way, once you have finished the setup of your trustpilot/review section, let us know. I would like to leave my impressions there as well with another mixing (in case I need it) otherwise, I shall use the first experience I had here.
Hi Hispo, thank you or your reply! Actually, changing the name to the terms "receipt of mixing/operation" or similar is a great idea. Not everyone knows the term "letter of guarantee", especially new users that have never used a mixer. So we will definitely consider changing the name of this.
Our trustpilot is already setup and is visible in our website as well. Leaving your review would be much appreciated! You can share your impressions here: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/[banned mixer].
Thank you very much in advance!
To finish my review, let me leave the receipt of my transaction made. Thank you.
why CoinJoin is mentioned here?
do you use some of their content, or this is awkwardly written?
I believe you have nothing against the competition, but perhaps they should not be mentioned on your site. Especially not CoinJoin I came across a lot of negative evaluations of their work.
With CoinJoin, not the project is meant by this. CoinJoin is also the technology that is used in mixing operations. There are many technologies and methods of mixing Bitcoins, and we believe that CoinJoin is one of the best methods. That is why it's mentioned here. You can look it up here.
Hello Text, your detailed review is highly appreciated. Especially, that you made a detailed review via your mobile phone, it helped us to notice a few things that you suggested. These definitely need to be optimized.
Thank you for the kind feedback! Simplicity is one of our goals, as we are also targeting new users, that don't know that Bitcoin is not truly anonymous. Our vision is to make everyone aware of that.
This is definitely a mistake from our side. We will fix this number.
Second, the operation details as the start of mixing, when I clicked the question mark (?) icon of Payout Address for mixed coins: as you can see on the image above, the text fields with the blue background as shown up after tapping the icon is not properly displayed so it can't be read the full message so it needs adjustment unlike the other two (Recurring Client and Transfer Delay) which are okay. I'm using the Chrome browser by the way.
Regarding this issue, we have received this feedback before and we will fix that too.
Third, for this one, I would like to suggest that you need to change the arrangement of the time of delay (the output with percentage ℅), I think you need to put it above the 'Transfer Delay:', below the '+Add New Address button.
One more thing, I want to see an added option of an input field for transfer delay and not only a slide bar so we can input an exact number of hour/s and minutes as we prefer.
That's a great suggestion. We will consider optimizing this.
Thank you one more time for your detailed review. We appreciate your honesty and hope we can make you change the score from 4.5 to 5 soon while we optimize our platform!
Premium review and suggestion spreadsheet# 19
I decided to visit the site and test this crypto mixer using my android mobile device and I can say that it loads flawlessly, quickly, and is easy to use. I never encounter any crashes or errors on web pages. The site is meaningful cause the contents are detailed. I think even a beginner can understand how it works and how to use it. He will not lose along the way as he progresses because the guides are simple and understandable.
I decided to visit the site and test this crypto mixer using my android mobile device and I can say that it loads flawlessly, quickly, and is easy to use. I never encounter any crashes or errors on web pages. The site is meaningful cause the contents are detailed. I think even a beginner can understand how it works and how to use it. He will not lose along the way as he progresses because the guides are simple and understandable.
Thank you for the kind feedback! Simplicity is one of our goals, as we are also targeting new users, that don't know that Bitcoin is not truly anonymous. Our vision is to make everyone aware of that.
Quote
I took some screenshots while reading especially the FAQS and by following the mixing operation order so I can suggest what I have noticed.
First, under FAQ (see the attached image above). I think anyone can seek an answer for this if what is the minimum amount to mix because there is no indication before he starts using the mixer like me, I wonder what is? Well, when I'm already in the process of sending the coins, the minimum is indicated there. But for me, the minimum amount should already be shown in the FAQ. I think you can do it even if it depends on the USD value or else put a fixed amount of the coin like 0.001 BTC.
First, under FAQ (see the attached image above). I think anyone can seek an answer for this if what is the minimum amount to mix because there is no indication before he starts using the mixer like me, I wonder what is? Well, when I'm already in the process of sending the coins, the minimum is indicated there. But for me, the minimum amount should already be shown in the FAQ. I think you can do it even if it depends on the USD value or else put a fixed amount of the coin like 0.001 BTC.
This is definitely a mistake from our side. We will fix this number.
Quote
Second, the operation details as the start of mixing, when I clicked the question mark (?) icon of Payout Address for mixed coins: as you can see on the image above, the text fields with the blue background as shown up after tapping the icon is not properly displayed so it can't be read the full message so it needs adjustment unlike the other two (Recurring Client and Transfer Delay) which are okay. I'm using the Chrome browser by the way.
Regarding this issue, we have received this feedback before and we will fix that too.
Quote
Third, for this one, I would like to suggest that you need to change the arrangement of the time of delay (the output with percentage ℅), I think you need to put it above the 'Transfer Delay:', below the '+Add New Address button.
One more thing, I want to see an added option of an input field for transfer delay and not only a slide bar so we can input an exact number of hour/s and minutes as we prefer.
That's a great suggestion. We will consider optimizing this.
Quote
Before I end this, I want to give a score of 4.5 out of 5 for this crypto mixer service. Overall, the features and site function well. I am very satisfied. I wanted to use this service again if needed.
To finish my review, let me leave the receipt of my transaction made. Thank you.
To finish my review, let me leave the receipt of my transaction made. Thank you.
Thank you one more time for your detailed review. We appreciate your honesty and hope we can make you change the score from 4.5 to 5 soon while we optimize our platform!
Jump to: