Topic: [END] [banned mixer] Premium Review and Suggestion Campaign - page 6. (Read 3447 times)

Royse777 I am staying in campaign but I think you only complicated everything with updated rules and you won't have much better results.
My opinion is that creating new separate topic only for reviews would be better solution, that could be linked with their main ANN topic.

I feel like this doesn't fix anything in the end and doesn't actually address the issue of incentivized posting. Imagine if some kind of altcoin ANN (pre-bumping changes) had people leave honest legitimate reviews once every 24 hours; I think the community would be up in arms about it being essentially a disguised bumping/"fake" activity service. I feel like if 1xBit did this today people would also complain, since the general trend for these types of campaigns has been feedback left on the Services thread and not the actual ANN thread.

Please opt me out of the campaign. I don't think your intentions are bad here, but I don't really like it. I would hope that something like this (specifically, paying for posts in specific non-Services/Games and Rounds threads) is against the forum rules because we might start seeing a lot of spam otherwise.

It's ironic: after the bumping changes, bumping more than once within 24h on that board doesn't matter much. But a daily post from a different user (with lots of earned Merit) will almost certainly keep the topic on top of Service Announcements.

I'm still in

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qsed4h8rnllus8dvsmyxpzl7ep9aq76nrtt0hgy
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 99

Thanks

Please disconsider
Thanks again

I updated my post with the bech32 address because of your notification in a spreadsheet, I'm not sure you've noticed.
I will write it here as well: bc1qkegtplcagvqkwmf2gewacvz8cvraseexdnc5fa
regards

Reserved

Archived old topic: https://archive.ph/ieXmj

After observing the response on Subject review and feedback thread and talking to some users in private I have a long discussion with [banned mixer] team. They respect the forum value and would like to comply with the rules to make a strong community for their business on bitcointalk. To reflect that UniJoin decided to make some chances on the campaign.

To avoid bump in 24 hours, on the ANN one participant is allowed to post one review/suggestion a day. Others are free to make regular posts but anything coming with Premium review and suggestion spreadsheet#x will be once after 24 hours. I understand this is becoming hard to maintain but with your co-operation I think we can do it. Once you are done with your review then just check when the last feedback (..spreadsheet#x) posted. If this is still not 24 hours then please save it in a text file. I think 1 hour +/- should not be a big issue. We want to ensure that these reviews are not bumping the ANN more than once in 24 hours.

At some point there will be a LOG (Letter of Guarantee) file. This is not a must job to do but if you think it's not more hassle to you then please send it via their contact form:
https://[banned mixer]/en/contact
Select anything on the subject, upload the letter of guarantee and on the message follow this:
Premium Review Campaign / < Bitcointalk username >

The above changes are now updated on the OP. Please re-read.

Following users are accepted.

However, since we have some changes on the rules, I would like you to review it and then let me know if you still want to do it. If you want to withdraw your entry then please just strikethrough your application post. I will remove you from the spreadsheet. If you are fine with the changed rules then you do not require to do anything. I will wait 24 hours before sending your rewards to start the testing officially.

PS: We still have 10 available slots (so far, hoping no one is withdrawing :-D ). Please apply.

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qmledau87pf6uy0dfk00s9zeherlz4lj7rkkxls
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 1074

For what it's worth: I've tested several mixers in the past, but I've never used coinjoin.

BTC address- bc1q94uf9sz859mdwvg2tzgn20gs65t3aknvhearej

Merit earned in last 120 days- 158

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qwmuh9d5x3vkx8ev6qy2ytf0pgfvcccjhgyun6u
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 875

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qsgnfrndxj20lvz5m2f6n2xggk85pjtzahjtnda
Merit earned in the last 120 days:  26

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qpqlaumlvwatjpp6l79uq77tjfwp6p007jpm8r2
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 144

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qgfluvq03jcqzvaz6dc00qqgvyvmfuxra6etsd2
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 524

I don't know if it matters, but I have almost 16 years of experience in testing software products. Besides, I was chosen in the past for offering reviews and feedback by other companies using the forum.

I am not a hero member but if I fulfill your criteria, then I will really want to give this a try and share my experience.

BTC address (Segwit):  bc1qy8lzja2f2duvapzp6dqc7vyatd87j9trx0pk4j
Merit earned in the last 120 days:  109+

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qcay6pst9y53gaxk5yuwkkad6c9vccs0z3ckvz5
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 100

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qd82v6vjx7aw9vff42tamwfm5dfesxfyg6ccnth
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 92

I had the rule in mind but what I understood from it that it's for
- Alternate cryptocurrencies sections
- Not allowed to give people any incentive to post insubstantial posts in your threads
- You can't offer to pay people who post their addresses, usernames, etc.

As you can see my interpretations are in bold. Since this is a bitcoin paying service and not looking for insubstantial posts but very constructive even criticism about the service so that they can improve the site experience, I did not find it's conflicting with this rule. I hope my interpretation is correct :-D

The reason to select users before sending out their rewards and participating in this campaign is because I will pick those users who have good forum track records and who I believe that they do not sell their reputation for any amount of money. Like I said earlier, you are free to criticize anything that you will feel is not good. Please apply if you are interested.

When I am picking someone, I would like to believe that they will do the job by being loyal. If I have the slightest confusion then I won't pick them in the first place.

PS: Before sending out the payment and ask the accepted users to start their testing I will create a topic about it on meta just to be 100% sure that we are good.

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qqhme8fe2p8qh7semk49t20f3lfgujzskaxe8dp
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 23

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qfj7yh6gu8fwxveqwt5wgrzk5zzw72cgpujr6n0
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 70

BTC address (Segwit): bc1qcry6ehyf2r9zrcjr62dl9nrakehx7uyy6w6u35
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 127