Pages:
Author

Topic: [ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 97. (Read 303553 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 306
Quote from: FaucetKING link=topic=1935179.msg53111471#msg53111471
I'll be joining this campaign as a volunteer, i've searched all over Bitcoin Talk and this remains the greatest campaign ever.
I'll be wearing the Signature for Free till i get a place, maybe  Kiss .
Welcome to the club, but most likely it will not increase your chances to get accepted. Best wishes for you by the way.
I know, nobody knows what could happen when the days pass by. I tried to apply two times in the past i think, it didn't work. I'm doing this to fix some issues i did in the past, not mainly for the ca$h.

I'll be joining this campaign as a volunteer, i've searched all over Bitcoin Talk and this remains the greatest campaign ever.
I'll be wearing the Signature for Free till i get a place, maybe  Kiss .

I've heard of the adage "Dress for the job you want, not for the job you have", but this might be taking things a step too far.   Roll Eyes
Hohohh, you made me laugh for a sec. That's true, i'm taking things far beyond the logic but it's still good to do such acts or am i wrong?
Tom Bodett once said: “They say a person needs just three things to be truly happy in this world: someone to love, something to do, and something to hope for.” - I guess that you know what i'm hoping for right now, huh?  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
I'll be joining this campaign as a volunteer, i've searched all over Bitcoin Talk and this remains the greatest campaign ever.
I'll be wearing the Signature for Free till i get a place, maybe  Kiss .

I've heard of the adage "Dress for the job you want, not for the job you have", but this might be taking things a step too far.   Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Quote from: FaucetKING link=topic=1935179.msg53111471#msg53111471
I'll be joining this campaign as a volunteer, i've searched all over Bitcoin Talk and this remains the greatest campaign ever.
I'll be wearing the Signature for Free till i get a place, maybe  Kiss .
Welcome to the club, but most likely it will not increase your chances to get accepted. Best wishes for you by the way.
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 306
Username: FaucetKING
Post Count: 1093
BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1qxf8rsl5kwhysghaqgcgx5wm4q9y00nurw37pq5

I'll be joining this campaign as a volunteer, i've searched all over Bitcoin Talk and this remains the greatest campaign ever.
I'll be wearing the Signature for Free till i get a place, maybe  Kiss .
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I am not aware of any other forum in which the mass collection of posts are allowed.
(imo)
If the posts weren't collected, we wouldn't be able to read them.

Your issue seems to be that they are collected more than once, which is what happens when we post things on the internet.

Really should be a Meta thread though.  Can we take it there?  Def an interesting topic.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
I am not aware of any other forum in which the mass collection of posts are allowed.

Lol, please define forum.  A collections of posts, maybe?  All publicly accessible posts?   Roll Eyes

I think this just became number one on QuickSeller's List of Asinine Accusations.
Posts made in the forum are visible for all, excludes special boards for staffs and VIP members (as far as I know). Everyone have rights to use quote button to quote posts and they can save, scrap, archive any post they want.

If one care about their privacy, just don't use public forum or don't post personal information publicly.
As I read from the Welcome message by theymos, the forum is a place for discussion, not private or secret discussion.
This forum exists to provide a platform for the free (but ordered) exchange of ideas. If you have an idea to express, then it is probably possible to do it here as long as you follow the rules.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I am not aware of any other forum in which the mass collection of posts are allowed.

Lol, please define forum.  A collections of posts, maybe?  All publicly accessible posts?   Roll Eyes

I think this just became number one on QuickSeller's List of Asinine Accusations.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
I am not aware of any other forum in which the mass collection of posts are allowed.

What do you call what Google or any other search engine is doing?

Your claims are juste as pointless as usual.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I want to point out that the only way someone could have this information is if they are conducting de-facto surveillance on the entire forum on an ongoing basis. There is no other way to detect the start/end dates of signature campaign like this, nor the 'users', 'posts', and 'deleted' columns. This is further evidence that all posts made by anyone is being collected (surveilled). This is evidence that this person has a database of every post in the forum.

What a horrible person, collects public information and uses it for horrible purposes too. Put him on the distrust list ASAP.

Not sure why you buried this earth-shattering expose in this thread though. File a proper scam accusation. Preferably along with the real reason why you're concerned about this.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
I am not aware of any other forum in which the mass collection of posts are allowed.

So, go to another forum and hope that no one scrapes publicly available information. This is a 'problem' with the forum administration, so I suppose you could consider making a thread in Meta to petition theymos to ban those scraping posts. Pretty much every forum has Google/Bing crawlers that essentially perform mass collection of posts for indexing purposes. Reddit has user created mass collection of posts too.


Payment for this week have been sent. (de645b8c538998bcad79e3d4a5c9ed215bc3179ddd3a45303d779a45c4cca611)
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 6581
be constructive or S.T.F.U

Your point would have been valid if he was attempting the collection of personal information, however, none of the data in all the topics you linked here are personal or private, this is all public information which is/was available for anyone with a cheap VPS to store, the interpretation of this public data remains a free-choice, everyone can do whatever they want with it as long as it does not violate any rule/law.

To put this in another form, knowing when someone joined/left a signature campaign or deleted x number of posts within x period of time does nothing to their privacy.

If you think this is sort of privacy invasion,then linking alt accounts using their BTC or eth address is even worse, and I think most people do that ,and nobody complained.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I want to point out that the only way someone could have this information is if they are conducting de-facto surveillance on the entire forum on an ongoing basis. There is no other way to detect the start/end dates of signature campaign like this, nor the 'users', 'posts', and 'deleted' columns. This is further evidence that all posts made by anyone is being collected (surveilled). This is evidence that this person has a database of every post in the forum.

I have been unable to not rule out anything this person is doing except conducting surveillance on forum members.

I consider this to be especially ironic considering that ChipMixer is paying this person to advertise a service that claims to have "reinvented mixing for your *privacy*". I think this makes about as much sense as Casey Anthony advertising for a product that claims to keep your young children safe.


Just my two sats...

If you make a post on a forum for people to read, don't complain that people (or bots) are reading them. Simple as that. If you wish to make anonymous posts, your best bet is to either keep registering new accounts or use an alternative board like 4chan.
I am not aware of any other forum in which the mass collection of posts are allowed.

I guess the cigarette companies would know who would be good candidates that would need lung cancer insurance for them to sell on the inside of the box...
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
I want to point out that the only way someone could have this information is if they are conducting de-facto surveillance on the entire forum on an ongoing basis. There is no other way to detect the start/end dates of signature campaign like this, nor the 'users', 'posts', and 'deleted' columns. This is further evidence that all posts made by anyone is being collected (surveilled). This is evidence that this person has a database of every post in the forum.

I have been unable to not rule out anything this person is doing except conducting surveillance on forum members.

I consider this to be especially ironic considering that ChipMixer is paying this person to advertise a service that claims to have "reinvented mixing for your *privacy*". I think this makes about as much sense as Casey Anthony advertising for a product that claims to keep your young children safe.


Just my two sats...

If you make a post on a forum for people to read, don't complain that people (or bots) are reading them. Simple as that. If you wish to make anonymous posts, your best bet is to either keep registering new accounts or use an alternative board like 4chan.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
I want to point out that the only way someone could have this information is if they are conducting de-facto surveillance on the entire forum on an ongoing basis. There is no other way to detect the start/end dates of signature campaign like this, nor the 'users', 'posts', and 'deleted' columns. This is further evidence that all posts made by anyone is being collected (surveilled). This is evidence that this person has a database of every post in the forum.

I have been unable to not rule out anything this person is doing except conducting surveillance on forum members.

I consider this to be especially ironic considering that ChipMixer is paying this person to advertise a service that claims to have "reinvented mixing for your *privacy*". I think this makes about as much sense as Casey Anthony advertising for a product that claims to keep your young children safe.


Just my two sats...
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
I think it's a good move anyway, better reflection of the current trust system.

I don't know if the "trade with extreme caution" thing is still going though if that comes from a similar system than what you've suggested?
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
Seriously tho, as I read it, that seems like a relatively "sensible" update to the rules... removes the whole "feedback wars" scenario from play. That is to say, people aren't likely to get nuked from the campaign simply because they get on the wrong side of a DT1/2 member who gives them negative trust for something stupid and/or inconsequential...
That means someone like bill gator (Trust score loading...) wouldn't be removed under the current rules.

The way I read it, it says "may cause" and DarkStar_ can still remove or not remove anyone of any reason, as it should be.

It's pretty much just getting rid of the blanket "you receive DT2 negative trust, you get removed" policy as a negative is no longer as harsh as it once was. It's intentionally vauge enough to provide a bit of clarification but to also allow me to handle things on a case by case basis.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Seriously tho, as I read it, that seems like a relatively "sensible" update to the rules... removes the whole "feedback wars" scenario from play. That is to say, people aren't likely to get nuked from the campaign simply because they get on the wrong side of a DT1/2 member who gives them negative trust for something stupid and/or inconsequential...
That means someone like bill gator (Trust score loading...) wouldn't be removed under the current rules.

The way I read it, it says "may cause" and DarkStar_ can still remove or not remove anyone of any reason, as it should be.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I guess my point is that the whole "not necessarily against the forums rules, but frowned upon"-type tagging can, in my opinion, be a bit harsh at times...

Technically speaking, scamming people isn't against the (non-existent) "forum rules" either, but I doubt DarkStar_ would allow a proven scammer to remain on this campaign, even if he still had more positive than negative reviews.


especially when some members operate what is effectively a "zero tolerance with no chance of appeal" approach to trust. Undecided

I'm not one of those who red-tagged bill gator's account, but I do count myself as one of those who have a zero-tolerance policy for account sales.  It's a fraud from the word "go."  Having said that, I really felt bad for bill when he was removed from this campaign.  I think it was the right move for the health of the campaign, advertisers need to be trusted to be effective.
HCP
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4361
That means someone like bill gator wouldn't be removed under the current rules.
There will likely always be "edge" cases that "break" any given set of rules... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Bill's was a particularly polarising instance... as there are a number of DT members with very firm opinions on account sales. Also, the way that the entire situation was handled by both sides wasn't particularly great in my opinion.

I was talking more of the "likes lemons" scenario Wink  Having said that, I believe DarkStar_ has already exercised commonsense in a previous instance where a user was tagged for something that wasn't necessarily an attempted scam (I think it was HabBear from memory? Huh) they were given a chance to sort it out instead of just simply removing them from the campaign.

I guess my point is that the whole "not necessarily against the forums rules, but frowned upon"-type tagging can, in my opinion, be a bit harsh at times... especially when some members operate what is effectively a "zero tolerance with no chance of appeal" approach to trust. Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Seriously tho, as I read it, that seems like a relatively "sensible" update to the rules... removes the whole "feedback wars" scenario from play. That is to say, people aren't likely to get nuked from the campaign simply because they get on the wrong side of a DT1/2 member who gives them negative trust for something stupid and/or inconsequential...
That means someone like bill gator (Trust score loading...) wouldn't be removed under the current rules.
Pages:
Jump to: