That means someone like bill gator wouldn't be removed under the current rules.
There will likely always be "edge" cases that "break" any given set of rules... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Bill's was a particularly polarising instance... as there are a number of DT members with very firm opinions on account sales. Also, the way that the entire situation was handled by both sides wasn't particularly great in my opinion.
I was talking more of the "likes lemons" scenario
Having said that, I believe DarkStar_ has already exercised commonsense in a previous instance where a user was tagged for something that wasn't necessarily an attempted scam (I think it was HabBear from memory?
) they were given a chance to sort it out instead of just simply removing them from the campaign.
I guess my point is that the whole "not necessarily against the forums rules, but frowned upon"-type tagging can, in my opinion, be a bit harsh at times... especially when some members operate what is effectively a "zero tolerance with no chance of appeal" approach to trust.