Topic: [ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 99. (Read 303553 times)
Have slot for new member?
I believe a discussion regarding the well-being of the Chipmixer campaign is as relevant and on-topic as any post can get on this thread 
.
Some people report posts like crazy as a form of retaliatory attack, I think the mods should not be over-zealously deleting every reported post as valuable content is getting lost...
Now only a small part of my original post remains (even though 5 people responded to it, and it facilitated a quite engaging debate), and a new reader cannot even follow the gist of the discussion anymore, wouldn't you agree (this post will also get reported by default
so please watch out mods...) ?
.Some people report posts like crazy as a form of retaliatory attack, I think the mods should not be over-zealously deleting every reported post as valuable content is getting lost...
Now only a small part of my original post remains (even though 5 people responded to it, and it facilitated a quite engaging debate), and a new reader cannot even follow the gist of the discussion anymore, wouldn't you agree (this post will also get reported by default
so please watch out mods...) ? 
(and signature design plagiarism)
It is not. I would shut down a huge chunk of this campaign as well and actually agree with the bloke on this situation for the most part.@DarkStar_ Is Vadi2323's plagiarm on the signature design allowed?
Unless you think that Vadi2323 is actually promoting terrorism, this is either parody (may be fair use) or satire (probably not fair use). Given that Vadi2323 seems to be ridiculing the Chipmixer campaign itself - it could be considered parody. On the other hand, he could be targeting privacy/anonymization in general, in which case it's more of a satire. IANAL.
@DarkStar_ Is Vadi2323's plagiarm on the signature design allowed?
Unless you think that Vadi2323 is actually promoting terrorism, this is either parody (may be fair use) or satire (probably not fair use). Given that Vadi2323 seems to be ridiculing the Chipmixer campaign itself - it could be considered parody. On the other hand, he could be targeting privacy/anonymization in general, in which case it's more of a satire. IANAL.
@DarkStar_ Is Vadi2323's plagiarm on the signature design allowed?
The merit earned stats tab in the spreadsheet is a bit out of date, some users are no longer participating in the signature campaign, and new participants haven't been added: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1700332667
Yeah, I'm pretty lazy with updating it. Will get it updated right now. (edit: done)
Payments for this week have been sent. 1fb4059f5e4faed5b6c1700c4db78a6fecab42707210d2652a15fe6eace836f1
When will this campaign end?
The merit earned stats tab in the spreadsheet is a bit out of date, some users are no longer participating in the signature campaign, and new participants haven't been added: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1700332667
Yeah, I'm pretty lazy with updating it. Will get it updated right now. (edit: done)
Payments for this week have been sent. 1fb4059f5e4faed5b6c1700c4db78a6fecab42707210d2652a15fe6eace836f1
The merit earned stats tab in the spreadsheet is a bit out of date, some users are no longer participating in the signature campaign, and new participants haven't been added: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1700332667
What do you think of some changes to the part of Chipmixer signature in conjunction with bitcointalk 10th anniversary?
Open more additional spot LOL
hello, maybe do you have a signature for me? Thank you
I understood you just asked for one and got that delivered already.
Anyway I took some time to create another one which you possible like better?!
Looking forward receiving your answer in Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q3)
Cheers
hello, maybe do you have a signature for me? Thank you
You are not reading the OP, there is no signature for Full member, this campaign only accepts sr members up and currently the slots are full. Rank up first, then try to join if you rank to sr member.
Payments sent for this week. 08621c16f66a8dc13c1302bab0527f8fa5f89f2e707550b228a9bcfb6163e4f5
this is something that should be done.
You do realize this is what DarkStar has been doing like the 3 last times already ?
Mistyped when I wrote should be done.
Meant more along the lines of that this is the correct way to go about things as he was seeking feedback. You do understand what my point is though, even if I mistyped.
this is something that should be done.
You do realize this is what DarkStar has been doing like the 3 last times already ?
If you didn't decide on a system yet, I'd say offering multiple slots at once is probably best for quite a few reasons:
• less analysis on your end, you don't have to keep going through 60 new applicants' 20+ posts a week to see which is best...
• There's less of a chance of 2/3 great users applying and you having to reject 2 of them because one was almost unnoticeably better in quality/discussion with their posts.
It's still very similar no matter what anyways, you can always do like you did this time and say 1-4 posts are open and avaliable and then choose how many you distribute once all of the applications come in.
• less analysis on your end, you don't have to keep going through 60 new applicants' 20+ posts a week to see which is best...
• There's less of a chance of 2/3 great users applying and you having to reject 2 of them because one was almost unnoticeably better in quality/discussion with their posts.
It's still very similar no matter what anyways, you can always do like you did this time and say 1-4 posts are open and avaliable and then choose how many you distribute once all of the applications come in.
Might be a bit late, and you may have already come to a decision. But I do think that this is something that should be done. Much better then opening slots all the time and having to look through 60+ every 2 weeks instead of 60+ every couple months.
Because we all know that you're going to be getting the same amount of people attempting to join this campaign if theirs 1 slot or if these 6 open.
Nice job jack on explaining it, really swayed me as well.
This weeks' payments have been sent. 80eba2b8af988d20f739dfeba1b4cbaa7166f7a027862786f9f35a7c583d8a84
This week's payments have been sent. 0ea450e1d5ac7f4125903a4938b78d473c76f1d43ddbf4fc825f77ec2b2416b5
Halab, joniboini, nc50lc and suchmoon right now:
Everyone else who applied:
Everyone else who applied:
I think the value of being able to choose the best N of M is much better than the value of seeing progressive post quality increases, especially considering that most high-quality posters will inevitably end up applying here when the slots open.
The top quality posters inevitably join such highly competive contest in the top (highest) campaign. In my opinion, there are at least three causal components that motivate users to do their good quality posts and improve posting quality over time:(1) Their internal purpose to improve themselves by learning more about bitcoin, blockchain, and cryptocurrencies.
(2) The merit system, that requires them to do quality posts to rank up.
(3) The top campaigns that require them to compete each other (among top quality posters) to be accepted by managers.
Personally, I will keep applying here whenever new open slots announced by manager.
Jump to: