Pages:
Author

Topic: Enjoy? - page 3. (Read 16588 times)

hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
February 14, 2014, 12:53:07 AM
According to the last 10 news posts at blockchain.info, there is a lot more to it than a penny in someones mailbox.. it seems to be a little more complicated than that

You are saying that you believe that send you a satoshi is the same thing as the ongoing DDOS attack?  There is a real attack going on which has absolutely nothing with this thread.

You are right to some extent but still .. if you receive 1000 pennies, instead of 1, your mailbox is getting problems; if you run a business then such an extremely clogged mailbox could cause serious damage even if you manage to clean them out after awhile.

If such spamming is used in a serious and malicious way, it would not really be good for BTC would it? What consumer would want to use a wallet with hundreds of such transactions in it?

Spam mail does not cause damage to my email software but clogs it up nevertheless.

I am afraid that this is the beginning of something awful. We witness the birth of crypto spamming.  Embarrassed

That started a long time ago , one of the reasons the minimal transaction fee was imposed.

But will blockchain.info show the public note while it's still unconfirmed?  If it does, then this is a very successful spamming technique for advertising penis growth pills. 

If someone is using a vanity address they should always have to pay the transaction fee.   That would stop the spam!
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
February 14, 2014, 12:49:11 AM
According to the last 10 news posts at blockchain.info, there is a lot more to it than a penny in someones mailbox.. it seems to be a little more complicated than that

You are saying that you believe that send you a satoshi is the same thing as the ongoing DDOS attack?  There is a real attack going on which has absolutely nothing with this thread.

You are right to some extent but still .. if you receive 1000 pennies, instead of 1, your mailbox is getting problems; if you run a business then such an extremely clogged mailbox could cause serious damage even if you manage to clean them out after awhile.

If such spamming is used in a serious and malicious way, it would not really be good for BTC would it? What consumer would want to use a wallet with hundreds of such transactions in it?

Spam mail does not cause damage to my email software but clogs it up nevertheless.

I am afraid that this is the beginning of something awful. We witness the birth of crypto spamming.  Embarrassed

That started a long time ago , one of the reasons the minimal transaction fee was imposed.

But will blockchain.info show the public note while it's still unconfirmed?  If it does, then this is a very successful spamming technique for advertising penis growth pills. 
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
February 14, 2014, 12:46:34 AM
What the hell did you use to write that text? It looks so sexy.

-boringstuff-

So it's my handwriting.


Well then, I like your handwriting.


I agree, that is one hell of a hand job.. i mean...
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
February 13, 2014, 08:50:37 PM
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 109
February 13, 2014, 08:19:28 PM
What the hell did you use to write that text? It looks so sexy.

-boringstuff-

So it's my handwriting.


Well then, I like your handwriting.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
February 13, 2014, 08:14:20 PM
What the hell did you use to write that text? It looks so sexy.

It's a Galaxy Note phone, with the built-in pen. One thing it really rocks at is annotating when weird stuff happens, like now. You take out the pen, write what you like on the screen image you're commenting on, and hit "send" in whatever way you like - here, save to imgur. Much quicker than anything else I've used for quick WTF notes that need to be passed along.

So it's my handwriting.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 109
February 13, 2014, 08:08:02 PM
I got this too some hour back... to my phone of all places where it's hard not to react to the coin-arrival sound.

Gotta give them credit for the creativity of spamming with vanity addresses, though. Took me a while to find this thread.



What the hell did you use to write that text? It looks so sexy.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
February 13, 2014, 08:03:16 PM
I got this too some hour back... to my phone of all places where it's hard not to react to the coin-arrival sound.

Gotta give them credit for the creativity of spamming with vanity addresses, though. Took me a while to find this thread.

http://i.imgur.com/GrfQIOQ.jpg
member
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
February 13, 2014, 07:54:47 PM
Got more of the spam stuff. It seems like whoever is behind this is getting farther back into the blockchain, as its stumbled upon addresses I last used a few months ago.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
February 13, 2014, 03:53:48 PM
It seems whoever is sending these is still at it.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
February 13, 2014, 02:45:09 PM
You are right to some extent but still .. if you receive 1000 pennies, instead of 1, your mailbox is getting problems;

Now there is a problem I'd like to have.

Ok everyone, I'm making a request that you please spam me with pennies.  Put a penny into an envelope and mail it to me.  As many as possible, but only 1 penny per envelope.  Thank you very much.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
February 13, 2014, 02:18:05 PM
According to the last 10 news posts at blockchain.info, there is a lot more to it than a penny in someones mailbox.. it seems to be a little more complicated than that

You are saying that you believe that send you a satoshi is the same thing as the ongoing DDOS attack?  There is a real attack going on which has absolutely nothing with this thread.

You are right to some extent but still .. if you receive 1000 pennies, instead of 1, your mailbox is getting problems; if you run a business then such an extremely clogged mailbox could cause serious damage even if you manage to clean them out after awhile.

If such spamming is used in a serious and malicious way, it would not really be good for BTC would it? What consumer would want to use a wallet with hundreds of such transactions in it?

Spam mail does not cause damage to my email software but clogs it up nevertheless.

I am afraid that this is the beginning of something awful. We witness the birth of crypto spamming.  Embarrassed

That started a long time ago , one of the reasons the minimal transaction fee was imposed.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1014
February 13, 2014, 02:10:14 PM
According to the last 10 news posts at blockchain.info, there is a lot more to it than a penny in someones mailbox.. it seems to be a little more complicated than that

You are saying that you believe that send you a satoshi is the same thing as the ongoing DDOS attack?  There is a real attack going on which has absolutely nothing with this thread.

You are right to some extent but still .. if you receive 1000 pennies, instead of 1, your mailbox is getting problems; if you run a business then such an extremely clogged mailbox could cause serious damage even if you manage to clean them out after awhile.

If such spamming is used in a serious and malicious way, it would not really be good for BTC would it? What consumer would want to use a wallet with hundreds of such transactions in it?

Spam mail does not cause damage to my email software but clogs it up nevertheless.

I am afraid that this is the beginning of something awful. We witness the birth of crypto spamming.  Embarrassed
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 515
February 13, 2014, 07:51:46 AM
How would you propose changing it?  I guess optionally you could hide transactions below a certain threshold (possibly the same limit as they will be uneconomical to spend anyways), but you can "undo" Bitcoin transactions even ones you don't "want".
That is weird. Form the 0.8.2 changelog:
Quote
  • Payments (transaction outputs) of 0.543 times the minimum relay fee (0.00005430 BTC) are now considered 'non-standard', because storing them costs the network more than they are worth and spending them will usually cost their owner more in transaction fees than they are worth.
  • Non-standard transactions are not relayed across the network, are not included in blocks by most miners, and will not show up in your wallet until they are included in a block.
Do all the people who received this spam use versions prior to 0.8.2? Or does this only affect blockchain.info users because of their custom implementation?
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
February 13, 2014, 07:43:40 AM
My Enjoy Sochi transactions finally disappeared.
I didn't know that Bitcoin-QT removes TXs that didn't get confirmed after a while.

They were on my blockchain.info wallet.
copper member
Activity: 3948
Merit: 2201
Verified awesomeness ✔
February 13, 2014, 07:36:20 AM
My Enjoy Sochi transactions finally disappeared.
I didn't know that Bitcoin-QT removes TXs that didn't get confirmed after a while.
Bitcoin-QT doesn't do that. The Bitcoin Network does that. TX's that don't get confirmed will be removed eventually and the money will be returned to the sender.
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 515
February 13, 2014, 07:32:53 AM
My Enjoy Sochi transactions finally disappeared.
I didn't know that Bitcoin-QT removes TXs that didn't get confirmed after a while.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
February 13, 2014, 07:26:22 AM
My Enjoy Sochi transactions finally disappeared.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
February 13, 2014, 06:33:56 AM
It isn't the equivalent because mailing pennies isn't going to break anyone's mailbox, but this did break some wallets.

If it broke anyone's wallet then that wallet it so horribly defective that they are in the running for beating MtGox when it comes to worst wallet implementation ever.  You should run for the exit now, because if a wallet can't properly handle an unconfirmed transaction who knows what else they got wrong.  I mean someone sent you money.  A wallet that can't handle that is a joke.  If your bitcoin wallet breaks when someone sends you bitcoins that is generally speaking a bad sign.



Do you see a real reason behind this "attack" , if as I assume stealing coins with this method is almost impossible ? Other than wasting people time with those unconfirmed transactions?
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 510
February 13, 2014, 01:37:53 AM
It isn't the equivalent because mailing pennies isn't going to break anyone's mailbox, but this did break some wallets.

If it broke anyone's wallet then that wallet it so horribly defective that they are in the running for beating MtGox when it comes to worst wallet implementation ever.  You should run for the exit now, because if a wallet can't properly handle an unconfirmed transaction who knows what else they got wrong.  I mean someone sent you money.  A wallet that can't handle that is a joke.  If your bitcoin wallet breaks when someone sends you bitcoins that is generally speaking a bad sign.



I'm not disagreeing, but as bitcoin grows more mainstream there are going to be more of these types of problems.  
Pages:
Jump to: