Topic: Enjoy? - page 9. (Read 16588 times)
This is a new paradigm people, don't you see? In the matter of weeks, our addresses will all be scraped from the blockchain and we're going to be hit by 1 satoshi spam messages constantly. The silver lining is, if we get enough of these messages, we can make a decent sum of money at the expense of the distrubitors.
This address too: 1SochiWwFFySPjQoi2biVftXn8NRPCSQC
The Sochi Olympics organizers are trying to ride on the wave of Bitcoin popularity
A strange thing happen to me today too. Maybe this is common, but it's the first time for me.
I withdrew .033 BTC from Coinex to my BTC address on Blockchain. It appeared right away, then disappeared,
then a short while after receiving the email below it reappeared again.
Transaction Confirmation Failed
A transaction made through Blockchain.info has been removed from our database because it was taking a long time to be included in a block.
Any funds have been returned to your wallet and you can now spend the coins again. Please consider including a larger fee in future transactions.
I withdrew .033 BTC from Coinex to my BTC address on Blockchain. It appeared right away, then disappeared,
then a short while after receiving the email below it reappeared again.
Transaction Confirmation Failed
A transaction made through Blockchain.info has been removed from our database because it was taking a long time to be included in a block.
Any funds have been returned to your wallet and you can now spend the coins again. Please consider including a larger fee in future transactions.
I think that's pretty normal.. just make sure you include at least a .0001 fee
A strange thing happen to me today too. Maybe this is common, but it's the first time for me.
I withdrew .033 BTC from Coinex to my BTC address on Blockchain. It appeared right away, then disappeared,
then a short while after receiving the email below it reappeared again.
Transaction Confirmation Failed
A transaction made through Blockchain.info has been removed from our database because it was taking a long time to be included in a block.
Any funds have been returned to your wallet and you can now spend the coins again. Please consider including a larger fee in future transactions.
I withdrew .033 BTC from Coinex to my BTC address on Blockchain. It appeared right away, then disappeared,
then a short while after receiving the email below it reappeared again.
Transaction Confirmation Failed
A transaction made through Blockchain.info has been removed from our database because it was taking a long time to be included in a block.
Any funds have been returned to your wallet and you can now spend the coins again. Please consider including a larger fee in future transactions.
Spaceship != script, but if you want to play it that way, sure, go ahead.
Spaceship > script; this is the correct formula. 
I could make a spaceship if I wanted to, but I don't, so I won't. Sorry.
Spaceship != script, but if you want to play it that way, sure, go ahead.Um I already have a copy of every single address which has ever been used and it is continually kept up to date. So do you, so do over a hundred thousand other people on the planet.
Nice one. Very nice one. I could make a spaceship if I wanted to, but I don't, so I won't. Sorry.
DeathAndTaxes beat both of us (And congratulations to him, I'm still sitting here like "How the fuck didn't I think of that?"), just rip 'em from the blockchain. Blockchain.info, blockexplorer, bitcoind, and all the rest already do it.
I could make a spaceship if I wanted to, but I don't, so I won't. Sorry.
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
Then write it, mister 'I can do everything'.Quote
Bitcoind will get angry at you if you parse invalid addresses, so angry, it'll just simply refuse to process any of them.
True. You could resolve that by simply dumping the addresses (one by one) into the Blockexplorer / blockchain.info's address checker or write up your own script for it (which would bring us back to your point). Oh well. I would use regex to get the addresses from a page and check it afterwords which some other script. But you are right and I should change my statement. I could do something like that in a few hours, depending on how much I browse on YT during the creation progress 
That's effort though, it's not even a big project.
Um I already have a copy of every single address which has ever been used and it is continually kept up to date. So do you, so do over a hundred thousand other people on the planet.
Wow. God dammit, well played good sir.
That's effort though, it's not even a big project.
Um I already have a copy of every single address which has ever been used and it is continually kept up to date. So do you, so do over a hundred thousand other people on the planet.
I wonder where are they getting the addresses?
Probably some distributed database containing a list of used Bitcoin addresses. Anyone have an idea of a project that does that?
Maybe the dredged em from this forum.
Not sure if serious?
What....what is that?? Up in the sky...? OMG... ITS FALLING!!! OMG THE SKY IS FALLING, SELL!!!!!!!!!! RUUUUUUUUN!!!!!!!!!!! SELL!!!!!!!!!!
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
A few minutes? Base 58 would take me a few minutes to implement in of it's own.
Regex doesn't check the parity of an address to verify it's valid, does it now?
Bitcoind will get angry at you if you parse invalid addresses, so angry, it'll just simply refuse to process any of them.
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
Then write it, mister 'I can do everything'.That's effort though, it's not even a big project.
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
Then write it, mister 'I can do everything'. Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
A few minutes? Base 58 would take me a few minutes to implement in of it's own.
Regex doesn't check the parity of an address to verify it's valid, does it now?
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
A few minutes? Base 58 would take me a few minutes to implement in of it's own.
Regex doesn't check the parity of an address to verify it's valid, does it now?
I wonder where are they getting the addresses?
Probably some distributed database containing a list of used Bitcoin addresses. Anyone have an idea of a project that does that?
Maybe the dredged em from this forum.
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
A few minutes? Base 58 would take me a few minutes to implement in of it's own.
I wonder where are they getting the addresses?
Probably some distributed database containing a list of used Bitcoin addresses. Anyone have an idea of a project that does that?
Jump to: