Pages:
Author

Topic: [ESHOP launched] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet - page 86. (Read 966173 times)

legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Just wanted to check in and introduce myself....

Very happy to announce CoinCadence is the TREZOR authorized Amazon reseller.

We are up and running on Amazon US. International Amazon's coming soon.

All colors can be found here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/node/index.html?merchant=A134DA22UU5SK7

We wanted to ensure a verifiable chain of custody and the highest security possible so TREZORs are shipped directly from SatoshiLabs to Amazon's secure fulfillment centers, and from there on to you.

To ensure your TREZOR is direct from the facotry via Amazon you can verify these 3 things on the Amazon listing:



  • By: SatoshiLabs
  • Sold by: CoinCadence
  • Fulfilled by: Amazon

Same price, free shipping (free 2 day for prime members), and any Amazon accepted payment method (no bitcoin yet Smiley).

If anyone has any questions about TREZOR on Amazon I'm always happy to help!

ian at coincadence dot com or here.

 
sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 250
hello, my trezor after plug in load load load and not show my bitcoin, why?
account 1 load load load

I've had many similar issues over the past weeks, and some evenings haven't been able to load my account at all.

Sent support a message about these ongoing issues, today they replied:

"The problems with the loading account was connected with some temporary problem on our backend.
We are currently working on new backend which should replace the actual one and should work with any similar issues."

So ... the good thing is they acknowledge it, but don't mention a time frame ...

donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
Any idea how the trezor could be used to sign longer messages? Like if you wanted to sign a contract that was a few pages long.

maybe sign a hash of the document?
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
I was hoping this new firmware would allow us to label accounts instead of the "account#1... Etc".

+1

I was surprised that it wasn't available when I got my Trezor.



that's a feature that can be added by wallet software. electrum does it, for example.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I got Satoshi's avatar!
Does anyone know why outgoing transactions take longer to confirm in mytrezor than incoming ones?

When sending coins to the trezor from my desktop client, they show up as confirmed on mytrezor after one confirmation, but when sending coins from the trezor to my desktop client they take longer. Mytrezor shows it as unconfirmed even though my desktop client reports 3of6 confirmations.

Edit: 6 confirmations in my desktop client (bitcoin core), but still shows as unconfirmed in mytrezor...

Close your browser window and reopen in a minute. This usually fizes it.
Perfect, that fixed it. Thanks Grau!
hero member
Activity: 836
Merit: 1030
bits of proof
Does anyone know why outgoing transactions take longer to confirm in mytrezor than incoming ones?

When sending coins to the trezor from my desktop client, they show up as confirmed on mytrezor after one confirmation, but when sending coins from the trezor to my desktop client they take longer. Mytrezor shows it as unconfirmed even though my desktop client reports 3of6 confirmations.

Edit: 6 confirmations in my desktop client (bitcoin core), but still shows as unconfirmed in mytrezor...

Close your browser window and reopen in a minute. This usually fizes it.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I got Satoshi's avatar!
Does anyone know why outgoing transactions take longer to confirm in mytrezor than incoming ones?

When sending coins to the trezor from my desktop client, they show up as confirmed on mytrezor after one confirmation, but when sending coins from the trezor to my desktop client they take longer. Mytrezor shows it as unconfirmed even though my desktop client reports 3of6 confirmations.

Edit: 6 confirmations in my desktop client (bitcoin core), but still shows as unconfirmed in mytrezor...
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
hello, my trezor after plug in load load load and not show my bitcoin, why?
account 1 load load load

Happened to me as well, but only once. I've unplugged the trezor and reconnected and it was gone.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
I also updated the firmware but the balance was still zero!

I put A LOT of bitcoins on my trezor.  However, I just plugged it into my USB and it connected fine on myTrezor.  However the balance is zero!  Please help!  I contacted support too and I am waiting for their answer.  I tried forgetting the device and reconnecting but I get the same zero balance.


this has something to do with the firmware update I guess.
I saw my balance being zero also, after firmware update problem was solved


PS: I really like the new firmware. The address checking is very nice!

Are you sure you entered the right passphrase?
hero member
Activity: 529
Merit: 500
In criptography we trust!
hello, my trezor after plug in load load load and not show my bitcoin, why?
account 1 load load load
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
Any idea how the trezor could be used to sign longer messages? Like if you wanted to sign a contract that was a few pages long.
...

Everything digital could be reduced to a single hash. Then sign the hash that corresponds to the document.

It expects a little to much in the way of technical skill on the part of the user. I thought about this today when i found myself needing to sign a message longer than the trezor would allow.
...

i thing that getting a hash of a file s as simple as 1 command? like sha256 contract.xml and it returns the string with hash value right there in the terminal. signing that as usual with your favorite bitcoin client. it is two steps but two small steps.


It still wouldn't have been appropriate for me to say. Here is a hash of the doccument: blablabla. Hash the document yourself to make sure you get the same hash. Now here is a signature of that hash: blablabla. Not as a businessman. You cant put barriers like that between people and your service. Even though in theory it is as simple as you said if they are using linux.

And actually it wouldnt have worked with bitrated.com (which is where i wanted to use an address stored on my trezor but couldn't). It's an automated process. I cant "explain" to it that its a signature of the hash of the document rather than the signature of the document that it asked for.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Any idea how the trezor could be used to sign longer messages? Like if you wanted to sign a contract that was a few pages long.
...

Everything digital could be reduced to a single hash. Then sign the hash that corresponds to the document.

It expects a little to much in the way of technical skill on the part of the user. I thought about this today when i found myself needing to sign a message longer than the trezor would allow.
...

i thing that getting a hash of a file s as simple as 1 command? like sha256 contract.xml and it returns the string with hash value right there in the terminal. signing that as usual with your favorite bitcoin client. it is two steps but two small steps.


I put A LOT of bitcoins on my trezor.  However, I just plugged it into my USB and it connected fine on myTrezor.  However the balance is zero!  Please help!  I contacted support too and I am waiting for their answer.  I tried forgetting the device and reconnecting but I get the same zero balance.

now that the issue is resolved you could send some btc to the addresses that previously showed 0 balance as a reminder (of the other passphrase)?
sr. member
Activity: 475
Merit: 250
I am one hundred percent positive nobody can steal any coins from my Trezor. For me "watch only" on a Trezor is a fools errand, in other words, not necessary. I can even give out my 24 word seed in proper order and know I have at least an hour to transfer my funds to a new wallet because of passphrase.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
Any idea how the trezor could be used to sign longer messages? Like if you wanted to sign a contract that was a few pages long.

I know for maximum security you need to be able to see what you are signing on the trezor but maybe there is some reasonable middle ground for when people dont need that much security? I mean even if someone is spoofing client side the worst they could do is trick you into signing something other than what you intended. As long as it wasn't a transaction than its an acceptable risk. By tricking you in this way they wouldnt actually be getting your private key. And unless they are in such control over your computer that they are man in the middle brute force projecting pixels onto your screen, or part of some vast conspiracy, when you went to verify your signature with a third party you would immediately know you had been compromised in said relatively contained fashion.

It could be bad though if they tricked you into signing a transaction. Does anyone suppose there is a way for the trezor to be sure that, when it is signing a message that is too long to be reviewed on the trezor screen that at the very least it is signing something other than a transaction? One idea is that the trezor forces a concatination onto the end of any long message it signed. For example: signed using trezor. Any message that was being signed that ended with "signed using trezor" shouldnt be validated by the bitcoin network as a transaction. I know that transaction scripting is fairly robust in some ways but not that robust, is it?

Ok anyway that was less of a simple question and more of a stream of consciousness but thoughts?

Everything digital could be reduced to a single hash. Then sign the hash that corresponds to the document.

It expects a little to much in the way of technical skill on the part of the user. I thought about this today when i found myself needing to sign a message longer than the trezor would allow. And i could have done it. But i just didn't think normal people would go through that extra step to verify so i found myself creating an old fashion air gapped cold storage machine. It was really sad to step backward like that after becoming accustomed to my awesome trezor.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 507
Any idea how the trezor could be used to sign longer messages? Like if you wanted to sign a contract that was a few pages long.

I know for maximum security you need to be able to see what you are signing on the trezor but maybe there is some reasonable middle ground for when people dont need that much security? I mean even if someone is spoofing client side the worst they could do is trick you into signing something other than what you intended. As long as it wasn't a transaction than its an acceptable risk. By tricking you in this way they wouldnt actually be getting your private key. And unless they are in such control over your computer that they are man in the middle brute force projecting pixels onto your screen, or part of some vast conspiracy, when you went to verify your signature with a third party you would immediately know you had been compromised in said relatively contained fashion.

It could be bad though if they tricked you into signing a transaction. Does anyone suppose there is a way for the trezor to be sure that, when it is signing a message that is too long to be reviewed on the trezor screen that at the very least it is signing something other than a transaction? One idea is that the trezor forces a concatination onto the end of any long message it signed. For example: signed using trezor. Any message that was being signed that ended with "signed using trezor" shouldnt be validated by the bitcoin network as a transaction. I know that transaction scripting is fairly robust in some ways but not that robust, is it?

Ok anyway that was less of a simple question and more of a stream of consciousness but thoughts?

Everything digital could be reduced to a single hash. Then sign the hash that corresponds to the document.
sr. member
Activity: 475
Merit: 250
How much for the green and blue Trezor pills from the email announcement?
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
Any idea how the trezor could be used to sign longer messages? Like if you wanted to sign a contract that was a few pages long.

I know for maximum security you need to be able to see what you are signing on the trezor but maybe there is some reasonable middle ground for when people dont need that much security? I mean even if someone is spoofing client side the worst they could do is trick you into signing something other than what you intended. As long as it wasn't a transaction than its an acceptable risk. By tricking you in this way they wouldnt actually be getting your private key. And unless they are in such control over your computer that they are man in the middle brute force projecting pixels onto your screen, or part of some vast conspiracy, when you went to verify your signature with a third party you would immediately know you had been compromised in said relatively contained fashion.

It could be bad though if they tricked you into signing a transaction. Does anyone suppose there is a way for the trezor to be sure that, when it is signing a message that is too long to be reviewed on the trezor screen that at the very least it is signing something other than a transaction? One idea is that the trezor forces a concatination onto the end of any long message it signed. For example: signed using trezor. Any message that was being signed that ended with "signed using trezor" shouldnt be validated by the bitcoin network as a transaction. I know that transaction scripting is fairly robust in some ways but not that robust, is it?

Ok anyway that was less of a simple question and more of a stream of consciousness but thoughts?
sr. member
Activity: 471
Merit: 250
I was hoping this new firmware would allow us to label accounts instead of the "account#1... Etc".

+1

I was surprised that it wasn't available when I got my Trezor.

hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 507
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
I also updated the firmware but the balance was still zero!

I've done multiple firmware updates without problem, but you are alays warned to make sure you have a backup of the mnemonic prior to upgrading. Are seeing the same wallet addresses on the new firmware ? If you have no passphrase you should see the same addresses, and if you have entered the same passphrase again you should see the same HD tree. Do you have any old transactions in from phone wallet to Trezor accounts you can check ?

I think that this one is already resolved. (wrong passphrase was used)

But in general, if you plug in your Trezor and you don't see your transaction history and you see balance zero, there is nothing to worry about. The website is down/slow/whatever, but your coins are almost certainly secure. The only situation to worry about is when you see a transaction history with some new transaction you did not approve. (I've never saw someone report this)
Pages:
Jump to: