Eth pools reject NO shares, unless stale. Dupes they consider too compute-heavy to return negative responses for.
Topic: ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1 - page 25. (Read 397387 times)
Eth pools reject NO shares, unless stale. Dupes they consider too compute-heavy to return negative responses for.
I am currently mining Eth on a Radeon RX 480 on Win 10 and wanted to ask if it's normal that my GPU load seems to jump from 100 to ~0 when a share gets submitted.
Is there any workaround? Do I need to change my settings? Or is this normal?`
Thanks for an Answer
Is there any workaround? Do I need to change my settings? Or is this normal?`
Thanks for an Answer
Stratum may fix this.
I'm willing to bet money 1/4th of the results are actually HW errors (miner not showing them, though.)
Hi Q_R_V, no that are not HW errors ...
Mining at open-ethereum-pool with following stats :
| ID | Hashrate (rough, short average) | Hashrate (accurate, long average) | Last Share |
| HD7850 | 14.44 MH
I'm willing to bet money 1/4th of the results are actually HW errors (miner not showing them, though.)
What is the benchmark speed with the 1GB epoch 0 DAG? If that is also 27% above my kernel, you would be hashing at a higher speed than the bandwidth of the card permits
 Code: m 09:29:39|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:39|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:40|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.06MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:40|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:41|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:41|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:42|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:42|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:43|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:44|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] m 09:29:44|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #6b5a9b6c : 15.22MH/s [A303+0:R0+0:F0] Hint: "Was modifications with the worksize and the addaped optimization routines for pitcarn from Wolfs optimized public Kernels for the Algoprocessing!" This is mining ETH @ nanopool I am not CUDA or OpenCL Programmer, so that the code isn't clean The Version is not stable enough to publish it. Genoils Version get me with same setup without OC 12 MH/s and with OC 10% 12,9 MH/s will only support Linux in case of publishing, Windows WDDM sucks, resets everytime the displaydriver after DAG Load is finished at Linux runs like a charm This was only a training to get a little bit looking inside OpenCL programming, only a training-project to verify that the learned things are working My first custom Kernel for AMD HD7850 Pitcarn : Code: m 23:30:25|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] YEAY Nice! How much increase from my kernel?
Once again low hashrate with Nvidia and windows 10 ? .
Is there repo for his clone? Any reason why you dont wanna build 118 for Win? It should be just recompile, no? Because I don't have it. I have 1.1.7 publicly available and 1.2.0 in the works. If LeChuckDE decides to release his changes, it would be ethminer-0.9.41-lechuckde-1.1.8  My first custom Kernel for AMD HD7850 Pitcarn : Code: m 23:30:25|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] YEAY Nice! How much increase from my kernel? R7 265 (PITCAIRN)-- I purchased 4 R7 265 cards, 2GB memory, shortly after they were released. At the time, they were billed as "750ti Beaters", and I put them in a rig for mining scrypt. They were a re-issue of the HD 7850, with tweaks. They only mined scrypt at 1/2 the rate of a 750ti. I boxed them up and put them away, rebuilding the rig with 750ti cards. Well, I am re-assembling a new rig with them. With your miner, the R7 265 cards mine ETH at 10-11MH/s each (2X 750ti rate). However, I had been expecting a hash rate around 14-15MH/s. I'd like to know if LeChuckDe is mining ETH, or EXP, or another Dagger-Hashimoto clone. I'd also like to try his version of cpp-ethereum. Is his kernel a public release? --scryptr
Is there repo for his clone?
Any reason why you dont wanna build 118 for Win? It should be just recompile, no? no 1.1.8 for windows?|! It's a fork by LeChuckDe. There will be no 1.1.8 from me. 1.2 maybe late August with fast loading binaries and +1% on GCN1.0 cards.
no 1.1.8 for windows?|!
My first custom Kernel for AMD HD7850 Pitcarn : Code: m 23:30:25|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] YEAY Nice! How much increase from my kernel? I wanna know if it gets shares, first  Easy check add -Z after cmd line for quick verification against low diff My first custom Kernel for AMD HD7850 Pitcarn : Code: m 23:30:25|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] YEAY Nice! How much increase from my kernel? my hd7950 1000/1250 gives 17.5 with claymore on current epoch, so 16.7 for old low end gpu is very impressive! But yeah - we need to see if it works with the pool )) My first custom Kernel for AMD HD7850 Pitcarn : Code: m 23:30:25|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] YEAY Nice! How much increase from my kernel?
My first custom Kernel for AMD HD7850 Pitcarn :
Code: m 23:30:25|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] m 23:30:26|ethminer-1.1.8 Mining on PoWhash #b558a53c : 16.74MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0] YEAY
I have some problems here..
Here is my config. ethminer.exe -G -S exp-eu.dwarfpool.com:8018 -SC 2 -SP 1 -O 0x4655a0336c9faff2f6e6e702c86f1c061e22df97.rigone --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 16384 --farm-recheck 200 2>> miner.log I keep getting this in my log file. i 11:02:32| Could not resolve hostexp-eu.dwarfpool.com:8018 EDIT: Figured it out... forgot to add -SC 2 The new Nvidia 368.69 drivers have been released, can someone test a 1070/1080 on Windows7/8/10 with these? win 7 need genoil work, because the drivers will not fix anything with pascal Holy shit, what I said over a week ago and you told me to suck it up and go to W10 because everything was working peachy keen. That aside, in replies that followed Genoil and Vaulter said that there would be a driver update that updates WDDM in W7/8. Although I'm almost 100% certain this isn't true and Microsoft has no interest in bringing newer versions of WDDM back to W7/8. That's one of the defining features of W10. Microsoft is in control of WDDM, not Nvidia or AMD. So a driver update wont fix this. Once again we're back to the problem with bugs. And 'your friend' which is a clever way of saying yourself, I'm sure will be happy when this bug finally gets fixed. You would've figured this out all over a week ago if you actually had a conversation with me, instead of telling me that I'm wrong and reassuring me of your non-existant fixes, which you still have no idea WTF you were talking about. I'll just leave this here - LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX, LINUX and LINUX. I have better uses for my time then debugging kernels and recompiling for the sheer masochistic fun. It's comments like this that let me know this fool actually probably tried Linux for all of ten seconds, and got the rest of his info from rumors and bullshit. Jump to:
|
