Pages:
Author

Topic: ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1 - page 27. (Read 397363 times)

legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
July 09, 2016, 08:54:23 AM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

No temp monitoring, no temp control, no xintensity/rawintensity/intensity, no API, no per-card hashrate readout, no cutoff on high temps...

No, I'm fucking with you, I don't expect you to do all that, I just wanted to show this (NSFW):

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-2.png

and

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-3.png

I pulled the other cards from Mithra to test my new 380 by itself!

Nice. Are you planning to open source it (with stock kernel)? Then I can finally move on to something else Smiley

I... actually hadn't planned on it, but I might. If I do, I'll need to modify your kernel to work with it.

IF I CAN BELIEVE MY EYES--

You have developed an SGminer-compatible Ethereum kernel.  Is this correct?  That is fantastic if so!       --scryptr

I pretty much had to rewrite LARGE parts of SGMiner to get it to work. Then, I used my own kernels with it. So it's not that I developed an SGMiner-compatible kernel, it's that I developed an Eth-compatible SGMiner.

ARE THE OTHER KERNELS STILL COMPATIBLE? --

That is a great accomplishment.  Does ithe rewrite break the other kernels?       --scryptr

I did my VERY best to leave those intact. You would not believe how many if(algorithm.type == ALGO_ETHASH) statements I had to write to do that.

Weird... Bugs... Maybe you should've switched to a different miner.

I know you're trying to be your normal, sarcastic-yet-stupid self, but actually, you happen to be correct.

Genoil's ethminer was far too limited for me, so you know what I did? I put in work to make something for myself that would suit my needs. Also fixing the bugs now.

EDIT: Proof of some bugs fixed already (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07082016-3.png

And thank you for proving what I was talking about. Don't fix bugs, just switch to a different miner. That fixes all the bugs... right...

No 100% .

But windows 10 is the present and future .

Ethbabies fricking everywhere. You don't just switch OS's because one is having a rough day. If one was a lost cause, then sure, like mining on XP. But mining still works on 7/8/10. I personally used 8.1 because it gave the best hashrate. Some people still use W7 as it gives them better hashrate depending on the hardware they're using (some AMD for instance). W10 I used for a bit, but stopped because of worse hashrate as I mentioned before. It really has nothing to do with the 'lifetime of the OS' or 'what is the future', it has everything to do with profits, both in short term and long term.

If W10 turns out to be great for mining, I'll switch to it. But right now, that's simply not the case. Just because there is one bug does not mean the OS is 'dead' or that you should switch off of it. Mining has been happening for years. Bugs get fixed, chill the fuck out.

Some of you seem like you're all of the age of 15-16 and spent your lunch money on a 960 to mine with.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
July 05, 2016, 03:04:07 PM
On 280x I get over 25% more hashrate for Exp than for ETH,
on 370 likewise,
but on 380 and 380x (4gb) hashrate for Exp is equal with Eth hashrate..
whether the cause is cards architecture or something else?


I think it's due to how it accesses memory.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
July 09, 2016, 08:25:59 AM
No 100% .

But windows 10 is the present and future .
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
July 09, 2016, 06:06:50 AM
it work good on windows 10, you can get 41MH there with a single 1070 and 27MH for etheruem, all with a very little consumption, around 140w

sooner or later will be forced to move to win 10 anyway, it's better to not be stuck with win 7 forever
win 7 is good until 2020 and I won't agree to giving up ownership and privacy for the free "upgrade"

i remember there are way to remove that trash from win 10, not sure if it was possible to remove it at 100%
hero member
Activity: 835
Merit: 1000
There is NO Freedom without Privacy
July 09, 2016, 05:41:03 AM
it work good on windows 10, you can get 41MH there with a single 1070 and 27MH for etheruem, all with a very little consumption, around 140w

sooner or later will be forced to move to win 10 anyway, it's better to not be stuck with win 7 forever
win 7 is good until 2020 and I won't agree to giving up ownership and privacy for the free "upgrade"
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
July 08, 2016, 11:08:36 PM
Nice work as always Wolf. Now how about getting windows to mine ETH with a 1080?
Well guess someone would have to donate you one, lol.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
July 08, 2016, 08:37:20 PM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

No temp monitoring, no temp control, no xintensity/rawintensity/intensity, no API, no per-card hashrate readout, no cutoff on high temps...

No, I'm fucking with you, I don't expect you to do all that, I just wanted to show this (NSFW):

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-2.png

and

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-3.png

I pulled the other cards from Mithra to test my new 380 by itself!

Nice. Are you planning to open source it (with stock kernel)? Then I can finally move on to something else Smiley

I... actually hadn't planned on it, but I might. If I do, I'll need to modify your kernel to work with it.

IF I CAN BELIEVE MY EYES--

You have developed an SGminer-compatible Ethereum kernel.  Is this correct?  That is fantastic if so!       --scryptr

I pretty much had to rewrite LARGE parts of SGMiner to get it to work. Then, I used my own kernels with it. So it's not that I developed an SGMiner-compatible kernel, it's that I developed an Eth-compatible SGMiner.

ARE THE OTHER KERNELS STILL COMPATIBLE? --

That is a great accomplishment.  Does ithe rewrite break the other kernels?       --scryptr

I did my VERY best to leave those intact. You would not believe how many if(algorithm.type == ALGO_ETHASH) statements I had to write to do that.

Weird... Bugs... Maybe you should've switched to a different miner.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
July 08, 2016, 08:29:15 PM
elpida+380x pulls over 21.5mh/s
23mh/s with bios mod

What bios mod, do u have a link?
legendary
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
July 08, 2016, 08:06:43 PM
elpida+380x pulls over 21.5mh/s
23mh/s with bios mod
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
July 08, 2016, 06:28:34 PM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

No temp monitoring, no temp control, no xintensity/rawintensity/intensity, no API, no per-card hashrate readout, no cutoff on high temps...

No, I'm fucking with you, I don't expect you to do all that, I just wanted to show this (NSFW):

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-2.png

and

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-3.png

I pulled the other cards from Mithra to test my new 380 by itself!

Nice. Are you planning to open source it (with stock kernel)? Then I can finally move on to something else Smiley

I... actually hadn't planned on it, but I might. If I do, I'll need to modify your kernel to work with it.

IF I CAN BELIEVE MY EYES--

You have developed an SGminer-compatible Ethereum kernel.  Is this correct?  That is fantastic if so!       --scryptr

I pretty much had to rewrite LARGE parts of SGMiner to get it to work. Then, I used my own kernels with it. So it's not that I developed an SGMiner-compatible kernel, it's that I developed an Eth-compatible SGMiner.

ARE THE OTHER KERNELS STILL COMPATIBLE? --

That is a great accomplishment.  Does ithe rewrite break the other kernels?       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
July 08, 2016, 05:48:44 PM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

No temp monitoring, no temp control, no xintensity/rawintensity/intensity, no API, no per-card hashrate readout, no cutoff on high temps...

No, I'm fucking with you, I don't expect you to do all that, I just wanted to show this (NSFW):

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-2.png

and

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-3.png

I pulled the other cards from Mithra to test my new 380 by itself!

Nice. Are you planning to open source it (with stock kernel)? Then I can finally move on to something else Smiley

I... actually hadn't planned on it, but I might. If I do, I'll need to modify your kernel to work with it.

IF I CAN BELIEVE MY EYES--

You have developed an SGminer-compatible Ethereum kernel.  Is this correct?  That is fantastic if so!       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
July 08, 2016, 12:26:22 PM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

Anyway this is the code at 1.1.6. I know I should start using tags etc...

https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/443f549e657de149f9184d440577ff31e9b39e99

Using tags would be nice.

And, what is wrong? I found this.

http://donkeypool.com/

We recommend Genoil's ethminer. It's easy, very efficent, supports AMD/Nvidia and doesn't require a extra software for stratum.
There are prebuilt binaries for Windows and instructions for building/running on Ubuntu on the BitCoinTalk forum.
Some people reported having issues with the 1.1.7 release of Genoil, if you do too please use v1.1.6.
So I'd like to compare those two builds in performance.
And Thank you for link.
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
July 08, 2016, 12:14:26 PM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

No temp monitoring, no temp control, no xintensity/rawintensity/intensity, no API, no per-card hashrate readout, no cutoff on high temps...

No, I'm fucking with you, I don't expect you to do all that, I just wanted to show this (NSFW):

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-2.png

and

https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-eth-sgminer-WIP-07072016-3.png

I pulled the other cards from Mithra to test my new 380 by itself!

Nice. Are you planning to open source it (with stock kernel)? Then I can finally move on to something else Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 438
Merit: 250
July 08, 2016, 11:59:04 AM
Whats wrong with 1.1.7?

Anyway this is the code at 1.1.6. I know I should start using tags etc...

https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/443f549e657de149f9184d440577ff31e9b39e99
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
July 08, 2016, 11:20:35 AM

I don't know, maybe I'm blind, or what, but I don't see any history.
I see only commits, branches, releases, contributors, code, issues, pull request, wiki, pulse, graphs, but no history.
Can you tell me where is that history located exactly please?

History is commits. Just keep going back until you see 1.1.6.

Thank you for answer but it's not anywhere in there.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/commits/110

1.1.5 is named, but you're right, 1.1.6 isn't.

And it's windows compiled binary, I'm looking for source code.
It doesn't matter which version if 1.1.5 or 1.1.6.
If anyone know, where to find please let me know.
cheers.
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
July 08, 2016, 10:21:30 AM

I don't know, maybe I'm blind, or what, but I don't see any history.
I see only commits, branches, releases, contributors, code, issues, pull request, wiki, pulse, graphs, but no history.
Can you tell me where is that history located exactly please?

History is commits. Just keep going back until you see 1.1.6.

Thank you for answer but it's not anywhere in there.
https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/commits/110
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
July 04, 2016, 10:37:50 PM
Forgot to implement  a +2% speed increase (7950) that @Wolf0 hinted me at a while back. Will likely make it to 1.1.8
only for 7950 increase ?
I liked your miner most, but
another miner is still about 1mhs/card better than yours Sad


That miner also uses more power.
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
July 08, 2016, 09:30:34 AM

I don't know, maybe I'm blind, or what, but I don't see any history.
I see only commits, branches, releases, contributors, code, issues, pull request, wiki, pulse, graphs, but no history.
Can you tell me where is that history located exactly please?
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
July 07, 2016, 11:55:42 PM
Where can I find genoil ethminer 1.1.6 source code?
I cant find it anywhere on github.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ethminer-0941-genoil-11-1368785

Why did you post link to OP?
Pages:
Jump to: