Topic: ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1 - page 43. (Read 397363 times)
My miner isnt creating the DAG files, i´ve checked APPDATA and theres nothing there, how can i fix this? The normal ethminer creates the DAG files.
Hi I picked up my first 980ti to add into the farm. It sounded like a good idea at the time but does not seem to be performing as well as expected. (Compared to my others - 950/960/970) I'm only getting around 18MH/s and it sounds like I should be getting more. It's running on Mint 17.3 with ethminer 1.1.4, does anyone have any suggestions for the optimal command line options? If I can't get better then that I might as well return and get a 970. Thanks for any help.
You should be able to get 20+ by forcing the card into P0 state: http://cryptomining-blog.com/7341-how-to-squeeze-some-extra-performance-mining-ethereum-on-nvidia/
But it won't be much faster than a 970, so that's a better use of your money.
ok 10% OC explains 10% better hashrate 
tnx. for info
tnx. for info
The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150
Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.
First of all thanks to Genoil for all your hard work.
I've been getting a nice increase in performance by using this miner with my Geforce 670 GTX (Gigabyte 2GB OC model), here are some results:
Windows 8 64bit, 368.39 driver:
ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + getwork: 14.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s
Linux Mint 17.3 64bit, 367.xx driver:
ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / getwork: 9.9MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s
https://i.imgur.com/QOjbPuQ.jpg
Ordered 2 1070's that i'm still waiting for to add to the mix
What setting do you use...
I'm on W7, genoil 1.1.4, 368.39 drivers... and can't get much over 13MHs
My bat file looks like this:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ethminer.exe -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -O "wallet address" -U --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --cuda-schedule auto --farm-recheck 400
For me the default settings seem to work the best, tried messing with some settings but im running with no bat, command-line only, ethminer -U -O -S but the card is overclocked further than the factory OC settings.
In MSI Afterburner i can get a stable system/driver and a stable hashrate with the following settings and values that Afterburner is showing:
Core voltage: -50mV
Power Limit: 100%
Core Clock: 1280Mhz (+131Mhz) GPU-Z showing Default Clock, Boost: 1059, now 1190.
Mem Clock: 3105Mhz (+102Mhz) GPU-Z showing Default Clock: 1502, now 1553.
With fan at 80-85% temp is at 76-80C, 84% TDP (nvidia-smi doesn't support all the functions with the card so can't tell the wattage used.).
Hi I picked up my first 980ti to add into the farm. It sounded like a good idea at the time but does not seem to be performing as well as expected. (Compared to my others - 950/960/970) I'm only getting around 18MH/s and it sounds like I should be getting more. It's running on Mint 17.3 with ethminer 1.1.4, does anyone have any suggestions for the optimal command line options? If I can't get better then that I might as well return and get a 970. Thanks for any help.
The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150
Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.
First of all thanks to Genoil for all your hard work.
I've been getting a nice increase in performance by using this miner with my Geforce 670 GTX (Gigabyte 2GB OC model), here are some results:
Windows 8 64bit, 368.39 driver:
ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + getwork: 14.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s
Linux Mint 17.3 64bit, 367.xx driver:
ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / getwork: 9.9MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s
https://i.imgur.com/QOjbPuQ.jpg
Ordered 2 1070's that i'm still waiting for to add to the mix
What setting do you use...
I'm on W7, genoil 1.1.4, 368.39 drivers... and can't get much over 13MHs
My bat file looks like this:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ethminer.exe -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -O "wallet address" -U --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --cuda-schedule auto --farm-recheck 400
for 970 nvidia
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
For Nvidia use -U, not -G. When using win7, you can also use latest drivers.
347.52 (or 350.12, better) is only for gtx960,970,980 (950 too with some additonal tweaks) on Win10. This also requires a CUDA 6.5 build, which you'll need to do on your own.
Feature request: When the GPU mines a share not meeting the target, could that increment the Failed counter?
?
A share meets the target by definition.
If the CPU verification (using lightweight method since 1.1) fails, F is already incremented. I hardly see that happen though.
The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150
Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.
First of all thanks to Genoil for all your hard work.
I've been getting a nice increase in performance by using this miner with my Geforce 670 GTX (Gigabyte 2GB OC model), here are some results:
Windows 8 64bit, 368.39 driver:
ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + getwork: 14.4MH/s
genoil 1.1.0 / 1.1.3 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s
Linux Mint 17.3 64bit, 367.xx driver:
ethminer / getwork: 12.4MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / getwork: 9.9MH/s
genoil 1.0.8 / 1.1.4 / cuda + stratum: 14.6MH/s
https://i.imgur.com/QOjbPuQ.jpg
Ordered 2 1070's that i'm still waiting for to add to the mix
Quote
1.1.3
i m a bit confuse what s the last version? is it not the 0.9.41?
0.9.41 was the version of ethminer when I forked it. 1.1.3 is the release number of the fork.
Is the stratum code working in the OpenCL build of 1.1.4?
It builds fine, and runs great using network - but, I'm getting a missing symbol when using a -S (stratum) config with Ubuntu 15.10.
Does it need a link to boost? or is that built-in?
Anyone else running stratum with 1.1.4?
If so, would you please share your config line.
thanks!
Does donkeypool support stratum now?
for 970 nvidia
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
For Nvidia use -U, not -G. When using win7, you can also use latest drivers.
347.52 (or 350.12, better) is only for gtx960,970,980 (950 too with some additonal tweaks) on Win10. This also requires a CUDA 6.5 build, which you'll need to do on your own.
The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150
Is that 960-only? Interesting, nice rate for a 128-bit bus. Haven't got one, so can't even start guessing.
for 970 nvidia
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
are those the best driver? i changed to the last one, it may explain why i experienced a little loss in the hash, but not sure
On 970 rigs yes. On 960 rigs no.
for 970 nvidia
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
still better to use win7 , 347.52 driver with ethminer 1,1,4 -G option ?
The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150
Im use 2x R9 390
my OC :
power limit +10%
core clock 1100mhs
memory 1700mhs
fan speed auto (usage device)
Gpu temperatur stable at 74
i get black scren(blank) after 2hours then i reduce the OC of memory to 1600mhz but i get blank screen again after 1hours.
anyone can help me ?
im use genoil too.
just information, this is my first problem, before it im runing in 24hours without any problem like this
my OC :
power limit +10%
core clock 1100mhs
memory 1700mhs
fan speed auto (usage device)
Gpu temperatur stable at 74
i get black scren(blank) after 2hours then i reduce the OC of memory to 1600mhz but i get blank screen again after 1hours.
anyone can help me ?
im use genoil too.
just information, this is my first problem, before it im runing in 24hours without any problem like this
For the R9 390, When you run the core at 1100 MHz, the memory freqeuncy can be 1500 or 1250. 1600 MHz is too high.
buying new fan to cooling my vga and now the temperature stable at 71 and i can mning prefectly without any problem
970 already has those 10% because of natively supported warp shuffle and better compiler.
Not entirely sure about that. I took some ghetto math shortcuts.
I know and I should try hacking those into PTX if possible at all. But with the current CUDA kernel I can simply run the first keccak stage twice and not lose any performance, so I don't think it will do a great deal.
Anyone using maxas here? https://github.com/NervanaSystems/maxas
No, no, I meant in the rest of the code.
I haven't seen that so yes you could be right
970 already has those 10% because of natively supported warp shuffle and better compiler.
Not entirely sure about that. I took some ghetto math shortcuts.
I know and I should try hacking those into PTX if possible at all. But with the current CUDA kernel I can simply run the first keccak stage twice and not lose any performance, so I don't think it will do a great deal.
Anyone using maxas here? https://github.com/NervanaSystems/maxas
970 already has those 10% because of natively supported warp shuffle and better compiler.
I don't know where Claymore gets his additional 5-ish percent performance increase from, but I really can't keep up with the features he keeps adding to his miner. But mine is free
I don't think Claymore's miner is faster, I think he gets the increase because his stratum protocol works allowing a direct connection to Dwarf. Supposedly this makes a big difference going direct rather then over eth-proxy... If you got stratum working with dwarf I think you would be just as fast. Great miner. Thank you for your work. Good way to verify would be testing solo mode with each as solo mode must use HTTP.
Actually, while I can get
10% on amd only right? because if it is on the 970 too, that's what i call impressive
Jump to: