Pages:
Author

Topic: Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam! - page 5. (Read 6718 times)

legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
I think Atriz has been bought and his 'review' is bogus. I also think that Television loving dude is shady as fuck too. What if the big 'investments' so to speak are his seed money reciprocating between alts? Try to reel in some easy suckers with the initial BTC0.01 then greed kicks in and they throw more cash at him for '1337 profit' and here he goes with 'teh l00t!!!1111!!!' 'These mofos are getting rekt yo' RIP

Get your head out of your ass and take a look at the big picture  Grin
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 16
It is obvious that this alia person or group attempted a failed ponzi like scam. Which begs the question, what was user aTriz's role in this scam?

Points to consider:

1 Aside from the alia group, aTriz is the only other person to see, use and test this magical script. Only aTriz!

2 aTriz left a vouch for the non existent script, claiming to have made a very good ROI. He actively encouraged other members to invest in it, but luckily no one did. In aTriz's own words:

Was given a vouch copy of the method by op and played around with in with funds from the faucet.

With the 10 minutes I used this script with, I profited and worked perfectly. Would recommend.

I made an extremely good ROI, and I’m sure that others who buy the method will experience similar results. Thanks, Alia!


Update: This seems to be a shady user: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/evidence-of-alias-u-1764044-long-con-scam-3032057 Do not trade with him/her!

This is aTriz describing how he made 1.3x profit with a script that does not exist.

I was asked to give a rating on her method that she was selling, and since it was a vouch copy I didn't want to deposit real money, since it would feel like cheating. I also think the reason why I was asked to test was because I would probably be trusted enough to not leak it.

So I farmed the faucet and then used the coins there to gamble. I made like 1.3x of the farmed amount. That seems like a very good ROI if I was to actually deposit.

My knowledge with gambling / scripts is very limited, as you can see from my previous history and I was just speaking from personal experience. I profited so I said that.

3 By renting the alia account's signature space, did aTriz (a highly respected user) give it some legitimacy?

4 Why was aTriz still willing to pay this alia person/group after they were exposed? Claiming his hands were tied and he couldn't break their contract publicly.

5 I find it strange that the alia group refunded $2000 to aTriz. This, after threatening to "expose" him, like they had some dirt on him. But instead of an expose, they refunded him and left him negative feedback in a very public divorce.

I speculate that there is more to the alia - aTriz relationship than meets the eye, and the only reason the alia group still posts here is to keep the heat off the aTriz account.

The alia account is dead and buried, nobody will trust it with a single satoshi. There is no "lady in distress" here, if there is one, she is complicit. This is not a genuine attempt to clear their name, frankly they don't care, its all obfuscation to hide aTriz's role in this scam. aTriz is safe, as long as all the attention is focused on the dead alia account.

The public divorce, negative feedback rating, refund of signature payments is all a charade in an attempt to distance the alia account from the alTriz account. Yes, this is all speculation, but you know it makes sense. If there is no script, then aTriz lied, why is the alia account bearing all the brunt, afterall aTriz profited and made an extremely good ROI using it?

@ aTriz I have nothing against you, but you have a lot to answer for here and should. I'd rather post here than in the kangaroo court like thread started by quickseller.

@ nullius, on skype video recordings can be manipulated with software to make like its live. This trick is used by romance scam artist, dig a little, you will find the answer to your question.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036
Skype is notorious for being a huge vulnerability. He wants to 'hack' you.
Alia is a male teenager who wanted to run a ponzi. The investors were refunded with his ponzi seed money. There is no script, just a lot of dumb-asses in this thread.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
@nullius, is this it?

The post you quoted referred to others on the previous page.  I will here give only brief excerpts from the discussion; as one of the other persons named in that list, you may be interested in reading the whole thing.  I think this may (?) have been the first mention of your nym in this thread:

Fake investors: nullius is fake? SyGambler is fake? TelevisionLover is gake? I added my brother there to gain credibility, which may have been wrong of me, but to be fair, I do gamble for him a lot, and the amount has been larger than 2 BTC.

The investors in question are not persons who gambled with you while the thread was open, but rather, the investors for whom you shut the thread down.  After which you told me that if I wanted back in on the game, minimum investment was 1.2 BTC.  Oops, I forgot to mention that before.

Could you have brought a substantial return on 1.2 BTC for me, as you did with my 0.01 BTC?  Too bad, I’ll never know...

If I understand nullius's point correctly,he wants to know who are the investors you found on the forum who invested 1.2 BTC in that service ? Since you said you have found investors and are not accepting participants anymore,you should have some sort of proof right ?

Actually, no:  My point is to inquire as to whether doubling 0.01 BTC for me was an investment on conning a rich mark.

In her very first PM to me, Alia said that I must be rich.  I never contradicted this; I let her make her own assumptions.  Only after she required 1.2 BTC from me upfront for a deal I had seen to be profitable, I regrettably had to inform her that I do not have that kind of money to invest.  I really don’t.

My PM inbox got a bit quieter after that...



nullius was one of your most well known and well-respected customers. So he gets a 200% return. (Suspicious anyone?).
Its a classic bait before the scam.

I noticed that.  This (from another thread) may perhaps be somehow pertinent?

You told me that you initially lost all my money.  You said you covered it with your own funds, then recovered, won, and split the profit with me.  Beforehand, when you told me that you would not set a stop-loss as I requested, you said (of your own initiative) that you would instead insure my funds; but you did not say that insurance included continued gambling with a split of profits.

FWIW / at face value:

Quote from: Alia
The story is, I lost your initial deposit, so I loaded 0.1 BTC of my own to make it back. Now I'm 0.2 BTC in the green, withdrew a bit of profit, and playing with house money, so thank you xD

Code:
gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 23 06:35:49 2018 UTC
gpg:                using RSA key 857D1532A793AAAA0247DE92CED5586964477E72
gpg: Good signature from "Alia <...>"
Primary key fingerprint: 857D 1532 A793 AAAA 0247  DE92 CED5 5869 6447 7E72



Whilst I pick over unaddressed issues, I ought pay more attention to what NLNico gives a whopping +10:

With a bit of searching, it seems like "favours" is actually (serial) scammer "Light" on the site mpgh.net.

[...]

Now back to bitcointalk:

As per Lauda's request, I am posting a repayment address here.

1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18986684

1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S had 1 TX, sent to Poloniex deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc". Other addresses from user "favours" make deposits to the same Poloniex deposit address.

Light's address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" and Alia's address "1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk" (as seen here), both made payments in to the same cryptopay.me account.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/02d8d4de4563bb08?from_address=15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/b38cffcf6a125c71?from_address=1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk

So, so, so...  Alia shares with her little brother (0) her home network connection (thus IP address, per theymos’ evidence), (1) her computer, (2) her passwords to various online accounts, and (3) the sacred private keys to her 1Sexy Bitcoin address.  Is that right, Alia?

(Any chance you share PGP private keys, too?)

Yet, I still have reasonable doubts!  Which is why, Alia, perhaps you should be more accomodating toward anything I might wish to do to investigate those doubts.  I am willing to keep an open mind toward the possibility that something highly improbable may have happened here, and give you a chance to explain that to me.  Really, I want to know the truth here.  But I won’t dance to your tune, and I won’t expend extraordinary time and effort for you.  And I really don’t see why you expect me to.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1159
Answer a simple question. If I am a scammer, why have I scammed nobody? And if I am a scammer, why did I refund $2k of what was rightfully mine?

Your repetitive excuses on that gambling script lies are:

1. Maybe I got lucky
2. I never gamble my own money.
3. I'd never put big amounts on it (Yet you started asking for a 1.2 BTC minimum, which is like 10K USD, lot of money)

nullius was one of your most well known and well-respected customers. So he gets a 200% return. (Suspicious anyone?).
Its a classic bait before the scam. My guess is that you were waiting for one of the old fellas who would commit multiple BTC. One of those who haven't bought bitcoin but got them as early adopters.

Its hard to believe you after all the blunders and half-truths (Like "he must be some other Jack")
Its hard to believe after you are linked with a series of scams from your IP and linked users, all of which is being done supposedly by your 15 y.o. brother. Must be an evil genius this brother of yours.

Your offer for skype isn't working because nobody wants to be in a potentially illegal situation with you. Its nearly impossible for you to now get out of this. Better for you to stop this and put your energies elsewhere. Maybe try to be more truthful and sincere in your future exchanges. You may earn less but you'll earn much more respect.
jr. member
Activity: 59
Merit: 3
I am disappointed that things on the “0.01 BTC to 1.2 BTC” front suddenly went all quiet after I posted my txids above.



Thank you for your excellent work, NLNico.  It will take me awhile t digest all the links you dumped...  Will probably comment sometime (much) later.  Curious that alia has not commented.



* nullius gulps coffee.

New hypothesis:  There really is a girl actively involved, not only as a hireling or sidekick but perhaps even as the one writing the posts here.  revcback/favours/whatever is the boyfriend or “FWB” who provides penis for on-camera sex acts which require one.  There is no brother-sister relationship.

Observe:

Alia was not the one who suggested a “little brother”.  That was me!  I was the one who discovered that ibminer’s “15-year-old” was a self-alleged 15-year-old boy; and when ibminer questioned this scenario, I tossed this off-the-cuff:

A better question may be "Why is there a 15 year old boy asking for a fake ID matching the name of an e-whore who appeared on this forum a week after that 15 year old boy asked for it"

I dislike speculating about such things, especially in public.  But if I try to think of a plausible “why”, the first thing which comes to mind is, “Little brother got jealous of big sis doing that Bitcoin thing, wanted his own exchange account, needed to be 18+, had easy access to her identity docs for alteration.”

This occurred during the time when Alia was allegedly (and probably) asleep.  When she returned, she immediately picked up and ran with three distinct things I had written in the interim—including the “little brother” scenario.

Now, think:  The female in a boy-girl “friends with benefits” scammer pair gets caught.  Another party casually suggests a “little brother” hypothesis.  What is the girl going to say?



The foregoing is only a hypothesis—much like my “little brother” hypothesis in the first instance.  It is not proved.  It does fit available evidence, however.  There is simply not (yet) enough evidence to draw firm conclusions.



I also noticed something odd.  In some of Alia’s threads, she is hungry and desperate for a meal.  In others, she is handling quite large amounts of money.

(There is more I could say to analyze this; but I wish to not detract from one particular point.)

Alia, if you’re trapped in some desperate situation, this is a better opportunity to come clean and get out than you’ve ever had.

There are people here who are highly efficient at running these things down.  Hereto undiscovered swaths of your boyfriend’s scamming are being examined, archived, and fit together as puzzle pieces by people who do this as a hobby—perhaps also some who do this for a living.  The jig’s up.

The loser promised you a wealthy lifestyle.  You don’t need to tell me that.  He impressed you with some intelligence.  Gives TEDx talks, does he?  And then you wind up in situations like this:

I'm really hungry and I want some KFC, but all my funds are in BTC right now.

There are people who could help, and who could connect you with the right ways to GET OUT NOW.

I myself would like to help you, Alia.

Results are not guaranteed.  I don’t know what kind of soup you got yourself into, but it looks to me like you’re in over your head.  A chance is a chance.  You’re a gambler, right?  You take risks.  Bet on yourself this time, for real—and for some real merit.

Please take the chance when you have everybody’s attention, and tell us (publicly or—to trusted parties, privately) just what is going on here.  Seek advice.  Bust your way out of this mess.  You could turn out to be the hero of the day, and put all this behind you.

I appreciate the PM you sent me earlier.  I feel similarly.  I write the foregoing for your sake.  Insofar as my own personal interests are concerned, I could leave this thread and not come back.  Nobody’s accusing me of anything anymore.  But I am still here, waiting for you to prove who you really are...

nullius

@nullius, is this it?
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
I do have substantive questions and comments on this thread.  Whereas I’ve needed to turn my attention and my time to other matters; people are laughing at me, and justifiably so:

I mean, nullius has been pretty preoccupied spending the last week in a high school-like gossip and drama circle, whereas if this challenge would have started last week, his posts most certainly may have been outshined by any other participants' posts haha

A few notes for now:

@amishmanish, good summation of some important points.  I think that Alia did herself no favours (so to speak) with her responses to accusations against her.  Guilt tends to show itself in belligerence and manipulativeness.

@all, I really don’t think it’s productive to engage in endless back-and-forth.  Some pages ago, scam_detector left the thread open, after I suggested a need for a place for Alia-related evidence.  Certainly, I also think that some substantive discussions are warranted.  Please, let’s keep to that.

On that note, one of the significant questions I have for Alia:  Why are you insistent on Skype, specifically Skype, and Skype only?

Surely, you realize that anybody wanting to contact you for the purpose of sorting out questions of your identity would be benefitting you, if you be telling the truth.  Surely, too, you understand that the benefit would not be mutual—quite to the contrary, insofar as such a person would be spending time and risking reputation for no motive other than an interest in abstract justice.

You would expend minimal effort by installing some alternative; by contrast, anybody outside the MicroMacSoft walled garden and behind Tor would need to expend great effort to get Skype working, if it could be done at all.

To be blunt, why do you feel entitled to demand that someone else should jump through hoops to help you?

I ask because I do have reasonable doubts as to whether or not I’ve only been speaking all along to a 15-year-old boy.  Reasonable doubts.  But I don’t jump through hoops for anybody, and I certainly wouldn’t for you.



EDIT BEFORE POSTING:  While I was writing the above (and juggling a few other things), this came in:

The only weird part about her conversation was that she was trying to consistently ask me do bets over 1BTC. .25BTC i could lose, 1BTC was still an acceptable cost, but I just considered it overconfidence, so i was working up to larger amounts. My last .25BTC, she stated that she was going to raise the minimum deposit to 1.2BTC, and that is when I tapped out, as people lose alot of money due to overconfidence. I still have our skype convo.

As I stated upthread, Alia also tried to push me from 0.01 BTC to 1.2 BTC.  Same minimum:  1.2 BTC.  If/when I have time, I will try to find the post where I said that about ten pages ago.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
Quote from: alia
Thanks for vouching for me.

That's no vouch for you or the non existent "script".
The dust you paid him would have been wiped out and much more as soon as he was tempted to bet real money.
And written off with "Oh well, I told you it wasn't 100%...."

Quote
The script was making profit... until I posted that I will stop using the script, and just began yolo betting for fun. Any bets I make from then on say nothing about my script.

You are now implying that the closed thread proved that the "script" worked?
Please.

-------------

Just read your nth farewell.

Quote from: alia
pages and pages and pages

An excellent, if slightly expensive, trolling exercise.

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I made a bit but gave most of it to the investors... obviously. The end goal is to make investors happy. And no, a friend of mine from Discord depo'd 1k bits.

And you promptly lost that too. Good thing you have that magic script and can get back up in no time.

Fascinating tale.

I don't use scripts on personal funds. Period. Fifth time.


Also, this will be the last post I'll make from this account for the forseeable future. Let it be known that I paid out investors $5k+ and refunded $2k to a scammer, money that was rightfully mine. Let it be known that all the haters simply make "long con" allegations that are completely unfounded. I am glad that I was able to give money to the community. I wanted to help more, but the haters shut me down too fast. Good luck and good bye.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I made a bit but gave most of it to the investors... obviously. The end goal is to make investors happy. And no, a friend of mine from Discord depo'd 1k bits.

And you promptly lost that too. Good thing you have that magic script and can get back up in no time.

Fascinating tale.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Script is profitable but there is always a risk. I don't take 10% risks.

Yes, I was only using faucet funds, but someone in the BaB chat tipped me 100 bits. (Check the chat history)

But it's ok to take that risk with "investor" funds? Were they aware of that? Who are those large investors you mentioned and why did they bail? How come you didn't make any profits from those investors and have to resort to begging now?

And did someone tip you 1000 bits too?

[img=http://600]https://i.snag.gy/S6wmJy.jpg[/img]

I made a bit but gave most of it to the investors... obviously. The end goal is to make investors happy. And no, a friend of mine from Discord depo'd 1k bits.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Script is profitable but there is always a risk. I don't take 10% risks.

Yes, I was only using faucet funds, but someone in the BaB chat tipped me 100 bits. (Check the chat history)

But it's ok to take that risk with "investor" funds? Were they aware of that? Who are those large investors you mentioned and why did they bail? How come you didn't make any profits from those investors and have to resort to begging now? Begging AND yolo-betting at the same time? Damn, you give degens a bad name.

And did someone tip you 1000 bits too?

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

No, that's the thing. The only thing that was "proven" was that no script can be profitable in the long run.

So you don't consider that the thread you just closed proves that the script doesn't work in any time period? It was just having an off day?
Define the period over which you think it does work.
Define "long run".

Quote
For me, the script works. Maybe I was just lucky.

So, you were "lucky" when no-one was looking, unlucky when they did?




The script was making profit... until I posted that I will stop using the script, and just began yolo betting for fun. Any bets I make from then on say nothing about my script.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Notable on the record:  Alia apparently locked the gambling script thread—just as I was trying to post a rather snide reply which insinuated that she was seeking attention with it.  I suppose not.

I posted something to that effect but perhaps not as nice... alia deleted the post before locking the thread.

Which is good, no need for a misleading thread. This scam thread is much more relevant.

I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Long con. Well, not very long but you didn't know that at the time.

I deleted a post where you called me "120% scammer", and said nothing else. Please read the rules of the thread.

Your deleting of suchmoon's post seems to go to topical substance, and is not any kind of off-topic assertion.

I recall that suchmoon was responding to my post, which estimated your assertion to be that you are beyond math, and accordingly, I attempted to mathematically calculate your aspirations to be in the 110% territory - yet suchmoon was perhaps exaggerating when he asserted that you were aspiring to a 120% level of achievement...

Actually the more I type, the more I come to your thinking, alia.  Go figure.  Upon reflection, I think that suchmoon is completely wrong, and there is no fucking way that you are going to achieve beyond 115% achievement in your numbers... so I think that I am beginning to agree with you that suchmoon should not be able to proclaim 5% beyond what is even possible.  THAT IS RIDICULOUS.  I am glad that you deleted that outrageous suchmoon post based his EXAGGERATION.  SHAME on you suchmoon!!!!  I think that we should edit your avatar, too, suchmoon, just to show you how to keep things real.   Tongue Tongue Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
I paid out a lot. Almost $5k. Say what you will about that

Yeah, without checking with each of your "winners", for the sake of argument I accepted that you did pay out.
Seeing as the "script" has been proven not to exist/work, the question was 'Why?'
Pro Tip: don't bother to answer that.

No, that's the thing. The only thing that was "proven" was that no script can be profitable in the long run.

So you don't consider that the thread you just closed proves that the script doesn't work in any time period? It was just having an off day?
Define the period over which you think it does work.
Define "long run".

Quote
For me, the script works. Maybe I was just lucky.

So, you were "lucky" when no-one was looking, unlucky when they did?


jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
For the third time... I'm not using the script. Are you braindead? And, nice cherrypicking. Try sending the link so people can watch in realtime Wink

Ad hominems get us nowheere

There is nothing to cherry pick. You're failing bigly and you don't have a winning script, that much is obvious.

Link: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain


For the fourth time, I'm not using the script. I never use it on my own funds, plain and simple. You really are dense...

So... you lied when you said you were broke? And you lied about gambling only from faucet? And you lied about the script being profitable, otherwise what's the point of pissing away your own funds and not using it? Let me know if I missed any lies, it's getting really confusing.

Script is profitable but there is always a risk. I don't take 10% risks.

Yes, I was only using faucet funds, but someone in the BaB chat tipped me 100 bits. (Check the chat history)
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Hi all,

tmfp just told me about this conversation.. I didnt know that there is something shady going on? Honestly, I am just confused.
They asked me to describe the circumstances of my winnings, so here is my account.

I saw alia's post advertising this script, and I treated it with skepticism. I saw a few others post that they received some bonuses out of alia's scrip, so I thought of giving it a go. I messaged them through skype, they gave me a deposit address, and they gave me the money back with a bonus after they stated the script was done. Started with a 100 dollars, they gave me a bonus. I then went with slightly higher amounts and it did not seem to be a big deal, as they gave me active returns.

I did not, however, see the user gambling. Nor camming. I gave them a deposit to an address, and a short time later (from 15min to an hour and a half) they gave me a larger amount back.  I didnt see a script working, just saw a result. I dont know how gambling scripts work, so I thought I got lucky.

I mean, i gave her .25 and she returned .275, although it isnt alot of money, she still gave it.
The only weird part about her conversation was that she was trying to consistently ask me do bets over 1BTC. .25BTC i could lose, 1BTC was still an acceptable cost, but I just considered it overconfidence, so i was working up to larger amounts. My last .25BTC, she stated that she was going to raise the minimum deposit to 1.2BTC, and that is when I tapped out, as people lose alot of money due to overconfidence. I still have our skype convo.

Anything else I can contribute? Feel free to ask, I dont understand what alia scammed or what this is resulting in, but I can state that I recieved the money she stated, just dont know if it was through a script.

The minimum bet was raised to save my time, since some big investors had stepped in at that point that were betting much more by a rather significant margin. Thanks for vouching for me. Glad I could've helped. Also, as you have probably seen, my investors have stepped out, so if you want to tip me back some of the (large) profits I gave you then it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
For the third time... I'm not using the script. Are you braindead? And, nice cherrypicking. Try sending the link so people can watch in realtime Wink

Ad hominems get us nowheere

There is nothing to cherry pick. You're failing bigly and you don't have a winning script, that much is obvious.

Link: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain


For the fourth time, I'm not using the script. I never use it on my own funds, plain and simple. You really are dense...

So... you lied when you said you were broke? And you lied about gambling only from faucet? And you lied about the script being profitable, otherwise what's the point of pissing away your own funds and not using it? Let me know if I missed any lies, it's getting really confusing.



Hi all,

tmfp just told me about this conversation.. I didnt know that there is something shady going on? Honestly, I am just confused.
They asked me to describe the circumstances of my winnings, so here is my account.

I saw alia's post advertising this script, and I treated it with skepticism. I saw a few others post that they received some bonuses out of alia's scrip, so I thought of giving it a go. I messaged them through skype, they gave me a deposit address, and they gave me the money back with a bonus after they stated the script was done. Started with a 100 dollars, they gave me a bonus. I then went with slightly higher amounts and it did not seem to be a big deal, as they gave me active returns.

I did not, however, see the user gambling. Nor camming. I gave them a deposit to an address, and a short time later (from 15min to an hour and a half) they gave me a larger amount back.  I didnt see a script working, just saw a result. I dont know how gambling scripts work, so I thought I got lucky.

I mean, i gave her .25 and she returned .275, although it isnt alot of money, she still gave it.
The only weird part about her conversation was that she was trying to consistently ask me do bets over 1BTC. .25BTC i could lose, 1BTC was still an acceptable cost, but I just considered it overconfidence, so i was working up to larger amounts. My last .25BTC, she stated that she was going to raise the minimum deposit to 1.2BTC, and that is when I tapped out, as people lose alot of money due to overconfidence. I still have our skype convo.

Anything else I can contribute? Feel free to ask, I dont understand what alia scammed or what this is resulting in, but I can state that I recieved the money she stated, just dont know if it was through a script.

Such scripts can't exist so alia was probably working towards a ponzi-type scheme or just a plain cut-and-run scam. You were right to not fall for the larger deposit - likely you wouldn't have received it back.

If you can share TX IDs that could help.
jr. member
Activity: 59
Merit: 3
Hi all,

tmfp just told me about this conversation.. I didnt know that there is something shady going on? Honestly, I am just confused.
They asked me to describe the circumstances of my winnings, so here is my account.

I saw alia's post advertising this script, and I treated it with skepticism. I saw a few others post that they received some bonuses out of alia's scrip, so I thought of giving it a go. I messaged them through skype, they gave me a deposit address, and they gave me the money back with a bonus after they stated the script was done. Started with a 100 dollars, they gave me a bonus. I then went with slightly higher amounts and it did not seem to be a big deal, as they gave me active returns.

I did not, however, see the user gambling. Nor camming. I gave them a deposit to an address, and a short time later (from 15min to an hour and a half) they gave me a larger amount back.  I didnt see a script working, just saw a result. I dont know how gambling scripts work, so I thought I got lucky.

I mean, i gave her .25 and she returned .275, although it isnt alot of money, she still gave it.
The only weird part about her conversation was that she was trying to consistently ask me do bets over 1BTC. .25BTC i could lose, 1BTC was still an acceptable cost, but I just considered it overconfidence, so i was working up to larger amounts. My last .25BTC, she stated that she was going to raise the minimum deposit to 1.2BTC, and that is when I tapped out, as people lose alot of money due to overconfidence. I still have our skype convo.

Anything else I can contribute? Feel free to ask, I dont understand what alia scammed or what this is resulting in, but I can state that I recieved the money she stated, just dont know if it was through a script.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
For the third time... I'm not using the script. Are you braindead? And, nice cherrypicking. Try sending the link so people can watch in realtime Wink

Ad hominems get us nowheere

There is nothing to cherry pick. You're failing bigly and you don't have a winning script, that much is obvious.

Link: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain


For the fourth time, I'm not using the script. I never use it on my own funds, plain and simple. You really are dense...
Pages:
Jump to: