^^^ Considering every creature is different than every other creature, are you trying to say that we all have evolved from our parents? LOL! You are so silly. Just because somebody says there are blacks, and others say there are whites, and others say there are Asians, and Native Americans, etc., now you are trying to make an ethnic group for each and every lizard, because they are all different, every last one of them from every last other one of them.
You're kinda different than evolutionists. Just because you and
notbatman talk about different themes in life, themes that might even be opposites in some areas, you are more or less of the same kind. Did you evolve that way?
Come on. Show us some proof that people evolved from some single celled pond microbe, or something. I know. All your goofy talk exists because you can't even show this, to say nothing about proving it.
Evolution is a complete hoax.
Obviously some species of animals have some common features and are grouped that way. Do you understand that evolution is exactly what I linked above? Animals that ''evolve'' are animals that adapt to the environment through different processes AND pass their genetics to the next generations. If they simply adapted but didn't pass the genetics then it would be no evolution, however because they did pass their genetics, it's evolution. Is it really that hard to understand? This process can happen over and over again. For instance they have larger heads and developed cecal valves which all their children also have. How is this not evolution LOL?
If you have children - I mean like in your literal household - your children are human beings even though they are different than you or your spouse. To say they evolved would be stretching the term a little. Like animals, they have features common to others of their human grouping. Cows have similar features to cows. Lizards have common features to lizards. Etcetera.
If you want to call animals that change by adapting to their environment, or animals that simply adapt to their own individuality through in differences from their parents, or animals that are bred... to have evolved, that is really stretching the term "evolve" a bit.
If you want to say that some Chinese people are very small, and some of them are essentially giants, and that their hereditary changes are a form of evolution, you are really stretching the idea of evolution.
Why is it that you are stretching the idea of evolution? Because there would essentially be no use of the evolution idea with any of these forms if people were not looking for a literal change from one animal kind into a different animal kind. Does a fish ever change into a bird? Does a lizard ever change into a cow? Does one kind of fish ever change into a different kind of fish? Would or can one kind of animal ever change into another kind of an animal? We don't have any evidence of it. Lots of talk, but no examples that we know for a fact.
When we talk about evolution theory evolution (ETE), we are essentially talking a form of evolution similar to what Darwin expressed in his tree of life, or in some similar tree of life idea. Such evolution has never been proven to exist anywhere.
Attempting to apply the forms of so-called evolution that you suggest, to ETE as though they were a part of ETE, is something that we don't know ever happened anywhere. But saying that your forms of evolution are forms of ETE, while knowing that you don't know that they are, is exactly the thing that makes evolution a hoax.
Evolution is a hoax, you know it, and you are attempting to propagate this hoax. People are catching on regarding this hoax. It won't be long before evolution hoax dissolves into the silly nothingness charade that it is.
EDIT: Thanks for helping to prove that ETE is a hoax, by prompting me to show how it is a hoax, and how hoaxers like you and Dawkins are are trying to promote the evolution hoax.
