"And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card." -- Von Braun, Wikileaks
TL;DR - BADecker is a cuck and cucks to the elites with their satanic transhuman faggot agenda.
Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 14. (Read 108030 times)
^^^ You deny evolution and admit to a creator but cuck hard on everything needed (outer space & the Copernican model) for the planned fake alien invasion as described by Von Braun. Space aliens are fake (tanshumans created by Jewish doctors) you massive cuckold, there's a fucking steel dome (firmament) above us! No aliens (that evolved on another planet) in, no humans out.
"And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card." -- Von Braun, Wikileaks
TL;DR - BADecker is a cuck and cucks to the elites with their satanic transhuman faggot agenda.
"And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card." -- Von Braun, Wikileaks
TL;DR - BADecker is a cuck and cucks to the elites with their satanic transhuman faggot agenda.
^^^ density as gravity is a hoax; aether
the big bang is a hoax; creation
stationary earth is a hoax; the Copernican model
projections are a hoax; planets reflect light in the sky
earth covered by a steel dome is a hoax; outer space
flat earth is a hoax; globe earth and billions of globe-shaped objects throughout outer space
flat earth is a hoax; giants and dinosaurs are real
ancient earth is a hoax; the earth is less than 10,000 years old
atheism and zeus are hoaxes; God
Evolution is a hoax; man was engineered by God.
the big bang is a hoax; creation
stationary earth is a hoax; the Copernican model
projections are a hoax; planets reflect light in the sky
earth covered by a steel dome is a hoax; outer space
flat earth is a hoax; globe earth and billions of globe-shaped objects throughout outer space
flat earth is a hoax; giants and dinosaurs are real
ancient earth is a hoax; the earth is less than 10,000 years old
atheism and zeus are hoaxes; God
Evolution is a hoax; man was engineered by God.
gravity is a hoax; aether
the big bang is a hoax; nothing exploded
the copernican model is a hoax; the earth is stationary
planets are a hoax; lights in the sky
outer space is a hoax; the earth is covered by a steel dome
the globe is a hoax; the earth is flat
evolution is a hoax; man was engineered
dinosaurs are a hoax; giants are real
ancient earth is a hoax; the earth is less than 10,000 years old
atheism is a hoax; zeus
the big bang is a hoax; nothing exploded
the copernican model is a hoax; the earth is stationary
planets are a hoax; lights in the sky
outer space is a hoax; the earth is covered by a steel dome
the globe is a hoax; the earth is flat
evolution is a hoax; man was engineered
dinosaurs are a hoax; giants are real
ancient earth is a hoax; the earth is less than 10,000 years old
atheism is a hoax; zeus
Consider two major reasons why evolution is a hoax.
1. All so-called evolution evidence can fit things other than evolution. So, why does it have to be evolution?
2. Evolution is a family tree of life story. An alternative that has never been properly investigated is Multiple Abiogenesis Theory. MAT says that there is no tree. It says that all the various kinds of plants and animals sprang from their own source without evolution. After all, this is essentially what the fossil record shows us.
The idea that the fossil record shows evolution is simply an interpretation that scientists make, while they totally voluntarily the MAT idea that is shown in the same fossil record they get evolution from. Evolution is simply interpretation that ignores a whole bunch of evidence.
Why do scientists do this? Because they want answers, and they want them NOW. All they are getting by not accepting what is there is science fiction... and they know it.
Why is evolution so popular? Because the universities are making money from propagating a sci-fi story.
Evolution is a hoax.
1. All so-called evolution evidence can fit things other than evolution. So, why does it have to be evolution?
2. Evolution is a family tree of life story. An alternative that has never been properly investigated is Multiple Abiogenesis Theory. MAT says that there is no tree. It says that all the various kinds of plants and animals sprang from their own source without evolution. After all, this is essentially what the fossil record shows us.
The idea that the fossil record shows evolution is simply an interpretation that scientists make, while they totally voluntarily the MAT idea that is shown in the same fossil record they get evolution from. Evolution is simply interpretation that ignores a whole bunch of evidence.
Why do scientists do this? Because they want answers, and they want them NOW. All they are getting by not accepting what is there is science fiction... and they know it.
Why is evolution so popular? Because the universities are making money from propagating a sci-fi story.
Evolution is a hoax.
There is evolution within species (intra species)
There is no proof of evolution from a species to another (inter species).
There is no proof of evolution from a species to another (inter species).
^^^ Precisely! An unclear theory produces evidence that whatever the theory is attempting to explain, doesn't exist.
Evolution is a hoax.
Evolution is a hoax.
Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?
Cause the aliens didn't send them the monolith they gave our ancestors at the end of 2001 A Space Odyssey. Therefore monkeys couldn't comprehend how to use a dead animal's bone as a weapon and got defeated in the famous battle for the water source of 1000000000BC. The rest of their once mighty tribe were forced to scatter around the African wilderness in search of their true identity. A search which continues to this day.
I do not believe in the theory of evolution , Because the theory is not clear
^^^ That doesn't prove evolution. Evolution is a hoax.
^^^ Emotional appearing. Dogs will never evolve to the point where they have emotions.
They can program AI to look and act like they have emotions, but how do you know they do?
They can program AI to look and act like they have emotions, but how do you know they do?
I agree with everything but I am one of liberty and trust me I am the best real life player in the game, I don`t care for liberal`s or conservatives.
lib·er·ty
/ˈlibərdē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: liberty
1.
the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.
^^^ That doesn't prove evolution.
^^^ Emotional appearing. Dogs will never evolve to the point where they have emotions.
They can program AI to look and act like they have emotions, but how do you know they do?
They can program AI to look and act like they have emotions, but how do you know they do?
^^^ Emotional appearing. Dogs will never evolve to the point where they have emotions.
They can program AI to look and act like they have emotions, but how do you know they do?
They can program AI to look and act like they have emotions, but how do you know they do?
If you hug your dog for too long, would you classify his reaction as "emotional"?
^^^ You don't know that animals have emotions. They might simply have been designed by God to look and act like they have emotions, to make man more comfortable in this life. But the animal emotion hoax is for another topic.
Many people say that evolution is a fact. Yet, they don't have any proof. Why not? Because all the evidence fits other things, besides fitting what evolution might be if it exists. So, they don't know if it is evolution they are observing or something else.
Here is where the evolution hoax lies. The evolution thinkers (not the common people who don't think about it very much) absolutely know that they don't know about evolution. But they keep on saying evolution is fact. Sounds like a hoax to me. Or if they simply wish and hope that evolution is real, sounds like a scientific religion/philosophy to me.
Many people say that evolution is a fact. Yet, they don't have any proof. Why not? Because all the evidence fits other things, besides fitting what evolution might be if it exists. So, they don't know if it is evolution they are observing or something else.
Here is where the evolution hoax lies. The evolution thinkers (not the common people who don't think about it very much) absolutely know that they don't know about evolution. But they keep on saying evolution is fact. Sounds like a hoax to me. Or if they simply wish and hope that evolution is real, sounds like a scientific religion/philosophy to me.
^^^ Right! Modern examinations of human DNA and DNA interactions are so extremely different than that of any animal, that there is no way that humans could have evolved from any animal that we have discovered. We haven't even found an animal that might be similar enough to the one we supposedly evolved from, to show that we could have had a prehistoric animal parent.
because they have the different sets of the evolutionary tree and they just have the similar DNA markers and some DNA similarities thats it nothing like that they can evolve into humans or something like that. if that is right then i do not think that human will ever have that senior mentality and the superior brain for thinking and as the science said it already that human evolve from monkeys or something then the humans should have more physical and even the more similarities to them in every aspect of science.
^^^ Did you actually take your smartphone camera along last time? Your DNA test kit?
Evolution is a hoax, but you are proving that you aren't that good.
Evolution is a hoax, but you are proving that you aren't that good.
The articles contain the evidence and proof you are asking for. Animals have been shown to evolve, the case of the toad is simply one of many. Just like the lizards they evolved by adapting to the new environment developing new features that are passed on through generations (evolution). This clearly shows that animals not only adapt but they can pass their new genes to their offspring and so on. Is it really difficult to understand this?
You have a normal animal, somehow its environment changes or its forced to go somewhere else and starts developing, say, longer legs, those genes are passed on and only longer legged animals exist, the others eventually die, now you have that animal but with longer legs. After thousands of years, they might be forced again to change for whatever reason, now they also develop a bigger head, so now you have longer legged, bigger heads animals, if you follow this progression, eventually after many years you will find a totally new animal, is it really hard to see this?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You said it: "... they might be forced ... ." Why did you say "might be?" Because you and everybody know that nobody knows.
Evolution is a hoax.
EDIT: Next time you go back there, take your smartphone along, and snap a few pictures for us.
It was an example, dumbass, I already showed you instances where THEY WERE FORCED to move, look at the examples above and stop being a religious faggot. Do you really not understand the example or are you just fully delusional unable to accept anything that doesn't involve the magic daddy in the sky?
The articles contain the evidence and proof you are asking for. Animals have been shown to evolve, the case of the toad is simply one of many. Just like the lizards they evolved by adapting to the new environment developing new features that are passed on through generations (evolution). This clearly shows that animals not only adapt but they can pass their new genes to their offspring and so on. Is it really difficult to understand this?
You have a normal animal, somehow its environment changes or its forced to go somewhere else and starts developing, say, longer legs, those genes are passed on and only longer legged animals exist, the others eventually die, now you have that animal but with longer legs. After thousands of years, they might be forced again to change for whatever reason, now they also develop a bigger head, so now you have longer legged, bigger heads animals, if you follow this progression, eventually after many years you will find a totally new animal, is it really hard to see this?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You said it: "... they might be forced ... ." Why did you say "might be?" Because you and everybody know that nobody knows.
Evolution is a hoax.
EDIT: Next time you go back there, take your smartphone along, and snap a few pictures for us.
^^^ The point isn't about linking articles. Neither is it about nature doing things without the involvement of mankind. The point is about proving evolution. Nothing you have shown has any proof that mankind, in his history and prehistory, was some other animal at some time. All science writings that suggest it don't show that their science wasn't something else.
Even if we could find something that was undeniably ETE, today... something that did not fit adaptation, simple change, or like-begets-like, at all... such isn't proof that life as we know it formed on earth by ETE. Why not? Because abiogenesis might have happened individually for billions of species in the distant past. We don't have any evidence that says it could not have.
There is no proof for evolution.
Evolution is a hoax.
EDIT: The simple fact that, since Darwin, and for thousands of years before, people have not been able to find evolution for a fact, shows that we are very inadequate for and incapable of finding stuff that is right in front of us, or that evolution doesn't exist.
Even if we could find something that was undeniably ETE, today... something that did not fit adaptation, simple change, or like-begets-like, at all... such isn't proof that life as we know it formed on earth by ETE. Why not? Because abiogenesis might have happened individually for billions of species in the distant past. We don't have any evidence that says it could not have.
There is no proof for evolution.
Evolution is a hoax.
EDIT: The simple fact that, since Darwin, and for thousands of years before, people have not been able to find evolution for a fact, shows that we are very inadequate for and incapable of finding stuff that is right in front of us, or that evolution doesn't exist.
The articles contain the evidence and proof you are asking for. Animals have been shown to evolve, the case of the toad is simply one of many. Just like the lizards they evolved by adapting to the new environment developing new features that are passed on through generations (evolution). This clearly shows that animals not only adapt but they can pass their new genes to their offspring and so on. Is it really difficult to understand this?
You have a normal animal, somehow its environment changes or its forced to go somewhere else and starts developing, say, longer legs, those genes are passed on and only longer legged animals exist, the others eventually die, now you have that animal but with longer legs. After thousands of years, they might be forced again to change for whatever reason, now they also develop a bigger head, so now you have longer legged, bigger heads animals, if you follow this progression, eventually after many years you will find a totally new animal, is it really hard to see this?
Jump to: