Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 18. (Read 108165 times)
^^^ How in the world many additional threads are you going to run inside this one, Evolution is a hoax, thread?
^^^ We went through this in that God proof thread over in Off-Topic.
Well, we might have but you never actually provided any solid evidence that ''outside the universe'' is real because there is none, in fact you never even defined what ''outside the universe'' would even be, it's a very abstract concept anyways because, why is it ''outside'', it's not like the universe is a thing, it's just what that we call it universe but it's literally everything that exists.
^^^ We went through this in that God proof thread over in Off-Topic.
^^^ What ever are you yammering about? Who can reject science theories? They are literally there.
In the case of Big Bang and Evolution, the theories are the things that are bringing us close to proving that BB and Evolution are non-existent:
1. BB, because the basis of the theory shows math and physics that we can't calculate because it is so different from ours. So the theory is literally destroying the BB it is trying to prove;
2. Evolution, because there is no way to do the necessary DNA tests on past living things to ever prove that there is a change from one kind of creature to another.
Both of these theories should have been tossed into the waste basket long ago. But some goofy "scientists" want to keep on playing with them... which is okay, of course, since the continued playing only strengthens the fact that neither BB or evolution exist.
Why would anyone want a science theory for outside-the-universe? Like the BB and evolution science theories, we don't have near enough understanding or ability to translate the theories into something useful. However, if you want to play with BB, realize that Hawking was the one who determined that "before" BB, there was something that was not of the universe, yet was there... outside-the-universe.
The fact that many people know that they don't know if evolution is fact or not, yet they proclaim that evolution is fact, shows that they are at least attempting to hoax people.
Evolution is a hoax, and the people who are proclaiming it to be factual (like you) are the hoaxers.
In the case of Big Bang and Evolution, the theories are the things that are bringing us close to proving that BB and Evolution are non-existent:
1. BB, because the basis of the theory shows math and physics that we can't calculate because it is so different from ours. So the theory is literally destroying the BB it is trying to prove;
2. Evolution, because there is no way to do the necessary DNA tests on past living things to ever prove that there is a change from one kind of creature to another.
Both of these theories should have been tossed into the waste basket long ago. But some goofy "scientists" want to keep on playing with them... which is okay, of course, since the continued playing only strengthens the fact that neither BB or evolution exist.
Why would anyone want a science theory for outside-the-universe? Like the BB and evolution science theories, we don't have near enough understanding or ability to translate the theories into something useful. However, if you want to play with BB, realize that Hawking was the one who determined that "before" BB, there was something that was not of the universe, yet was there... outside-the-universe.
The fact that many people know that they don't know if evolution is fact or not, yet they proclaim that evolution is fact, shows that they are at least attempting to hoax people.
Evolution is a hoax, and the people who are proclaiming it to be factual (like you) are the hoaxers.
Right, toss them in the waste basket but explain why you insist that ''outside the universe'' is a fact then. You clearly reject any scientific theory that goes against your beliefs, for instance you agree gravity or relativity exists. Show us the evidence for 'outside the universe' or admit you are a lying bastard.
^^^ What ever are you yammering about? Who can reject science theories? They are literally there.
In the case of Big Bang and Evolution, the theories are the things that are bringing us close to proving that BB and Evolution are non-existent:
1. BB, because the basis of the theory shows math and physics that we can't calculate because it is so different from ours. So the theory is literally destroying the BB it is trying to prove;
2. Evolution, because there is no way to do the necessary DNA tests on past living things to ever prove that there is a change from one kind of creature to another.
Both of these theories should have been tossed into the waste basket long ago. But some goofy "scientists" want to keep on playing with them... which is okay, of course, since the continued playing only strengthens the fact that neither BB or evolution exist.
Why would anyone want a science theory for outside-the-universe? Like the BB and evolution science theories, we don't have near enough understanding or ability to translate the theories into something useful. However, if you want to play with BB, realize that Hawking was the one who determined that "before" BB, there was something that was not of the universe, yet was there... outside-the-universe.
The fact that many people know that they don't know if evolution is fact or not, yet they proclaim that evolution is fact, shows that they are at least attempting to hoax people.
Evolution is a hoax, and the people who are proclaiming it to be factual (like you) are the hoaxers.
In the case of Big Bang and Evolution, the theories are the things that are bringing us close to proving that BB and Evolution are non-existent:
1. BB, because the basis of the theory shows math and physics that we can't calculate because it is so different from ours. So the theory is literally destroying the BB it is trying to prove;
2. Evolution, because there is no way to do the necessary DNA tests on past living things to ever prove that there is a change from one kind of creature to another.
Both of these theories should have been tossed into the waste basket long ago. But some goofy "scientists" want to keep on playing with them... which is okay, of course, since the continued playing only strengthens the fact that neither BB or evolution exist.
Why would anyone want a science theory for outside-the-universe? Like the BB and evolution science theories, we don't have near enough understanding or ability to translate the theories into something useful. However, if you want to play with BB, realize that Hawking was the one who determined that "before" BB, there was something that was not of the universe, yet was there... outside-the-universe.
The fact that many people know that they don't know if evolution is fact or not, yet they proclaim that evolution is fact, shows that they are at least attempting to hoax people.
Evolution is a hoax, and the people who are proclaiming it to be factual (like you) are the hoaxers.
^^^ So, what you are saying is that you don't really know how to read or understand what I am saying. But then, that is understandable. You don't seem to be able to figure out that evolutionists are saying that there isn't any proof for evolution, either.
The big bang and evolution both have their scientific theories and you reject both yet when it comes to "outside the universe" you believe it and use it in your arguments like its a fact even though there is no scientific evidence of it, you are a hoax.
^^^ So, what you are saying is that you don't really know how to read or understand what I am saying. But then, that is understandable. You don't seem to be able to figure out that evolutionists are saying that there isn't any proof for evolution, either.
^^^ But nobody has proof for evolution theory evolution. And that is what this thread is really about. So, either you are hoaxers, or you are kind of ignorant.
Well the thread is about that, however you rejected my arguments because of C&E and ''outside the universe'' both unproven so you are kind of the hoax here unless you can provide the scientific evidence referencing ''outside the universe''
Science doesn't always attempt to prove things like C&E, because some things are completely seen or understood. C&E is so completely seen and understood and used by science that there is no need to scientifically prove it.
Other things like "outside the universe" are so complex that scientists know that proving them is beyond general understanding. So, they don't waste time on them, except for a few. Gödel’s theorem, for example, proves God in a way that actually proves outside-the-universe at the same time.
The folks who are out there in the digs, looking for what they think is going to prove evolution, don't realize that they are only making more of a path for the big evolution science fiction story. Those folks like it the way it is. They won't take time to realize that what they are doing will never prove evolution.
Evolution is a hoax, and a hoax that is expanding as such by the so-called proof-finders, because the more they dig, the more they prove evolution doesn't exist.
So what you are saying is that 'outside the universe' has no scientific evidence therefore it's true because scientists don't bother with it but they somehow know it's real? Interesting argument, we could apply it to literally anything, even evolution, heh.
^^^ But nobody has proof for evolution theory evolution. And that is what this thread is really about. So, either you are hoaxers, or you are kind of ignorant.
Well the thread is about that, however you rejected my arguments because of C&E and ''outside the universe'' both unproven so you are kind of the hoax here unless you can provide the scientific evidence referencing ''outside the universe''
Science doesn't always attempt to prove things like C&E, because some things are completely seen or understood. C&E is so completely seen and understood and used by science that there is no need to scientifically prove it.
Other things like "outside the universe" are so complex that scientists know that proving them is beyond general understanding. So, they don't waste time on them, except for a few. Gödel’s theorem, for example, proves God in a way that actually proves outside-the-universe at the same time.
The folks who are out there in the digs, looking for what they think is going to prove evolution, don't realize that they are only making more of a path for the big evolution science fiction story. Those folks like it the way it is. They won't take time to realize that what they are doing will never prove evolution.
Evolution is a hoax, and a hoax that is expanding as such by the so-called proof-finders, because the more they dig, the more they prove evolution doesn't exist.
^^^ But nobody has proof for evolution theory evolution. And that is what this thread is really about. So, either you are hoaxers, or you are kind of ignorant.
Well the thread is about that, however you rejected my arguments because of C&E and ''outside the universe'' both unproven so you are kind of the hoax here unless you can provide the scientific evidence referencing ''outside the universe''
^^^ But nobody has proof for evolution theory evolution. And that is what this thread is really about. So, either you are hoaxers, or you are kind of ignorant.
^^^ Well, thanks for confirming that evolution is a hoax by continually avoiding the subject in its own thread.
Thanks for admitting you don't know whether ''outside the universe'' is real or not, continuously proving that you are a hoax and you just make up definitions. No scientific evidence for ''outside the universe'' your argument is dead.
ROFL hahahaha! That made my day.
^^^ Well, thanks for confirming that evolution is a hoax by continually avoiding the subject in its own thread.
Thanks for admitting you don't know whether ''outside the universe'' is real or not, continuously proving that you are a hoax and you just make up definitions. No scientific evidence for ''outside the universe'' your argument is dead.
^^^ Well, thanks for confirming that evolution is a hoax by continually avoiding the subject in its own thread.
^^^ Find it over in the "Scientific proof the God exists" thread.
However, evolution is a hoax.
However, evolution is a hoax.
I didn't, sorry, no evidence for ''outside the universe''
^^^ Find it over in the "Scientific proof the God exists" thread.
However, evolution is a hoax.
However, evolution is a hoax.
^^^ The only way that "outside the universe" doesn't exist is in the fact that "existence" as we know it doesn't apply to "outside the universe." Outside-the-universe is so different that "exist" doesn't apply or not apply to it. In fact, different doesn't really apply to it either.
What does this mean? It means that logically, logic or lack thereof, don't apply to "outside the universe," either.
Now, what does any of that have to do with the fact that, evolution of the type proposed by evolution theory, is pure hoax?
What does this mean? It means that logically, logic or lack thereof, don't apply to "outside the universe," either.
Now, what does any of that have to do with the fact that, evolution of the type proposed by evolution theory, is pure hoax?
''What does this mean? It means that logically, logic or lack thereof, don't apply to "outside the universe," either.'' The thing is, you have to prove that ''outside the universe'' exists in the first place before giving it properties. Where is the evidence for ''outside the universe'' ?
^^^ The only way that "outside the universe" doesn't exist is in the fact that "existence" as we know it doesn't apply to "outside the universe." Outside-the-universe is so different that "exist" doesn't apply or not apply to it. In fact, different doesn't really apply to it either.
What does this mean? It means that logically, logic or lack thereof, don't apply to "outside the universe," either.
Now, what does any of that have to do with the fact that, evolution of the type proposed by evolution theory, is pure hoax?
What does this mean? It means that logically, logic or lack thereof, don't apply to "outside the universe," either.
Now, what does any of that have to do with the fact that, evolution of the type proposed by evolution theory, is pure hoax?
^^^ We have no other evidence than C&E. Nothing comes about without a cause. Therefore, since the universe exists, in universe language there was a cause - the Great First Cause - even though we don't know what that cause is like, or even if it was a cause regarding itself, that is, with relation to itself.
Right but I'm talking about ''outside the universe''. You just admitted that we don't know if that exists but you keep using it in all your arguments freely like it's already a proven thing, isn't that illogical?
^^^ We have no other evidence than C&E. Nothing comes about without a cause. Therefore, since the universe exists, in universe language there was a cause - the Great First Cause - even though we don't know what that cause is like, or even if it was a cause regarding itself, that is, with relation to itself.
Jump to: