Topic: Evolution is a hoax - page 151. (Read 108046 times)

Lol! That's a very lame argument about monkeys and there's been several points that makes sense that explains why there still are monkeys. Is there even a more logical explanation aside from evolution? Logical meaning taking magically springing from dirt out of it.

Why is there still white milk now that chocolate milk has been invented???

We didn't exactly evolve from the monkeys you see now. They are different species from what we evolved from! STOP SPREADING FAKE NEWS!

I got a funny analogy
We are just ape that successful segWit
So gene is just code
We decide to hard-fork (keep old code but add some changes)
And luckily (just lucky), we won (just in our mind)

I agree: anyone has the right to believe what makes him confortable

What's the matter? You want to stop me from posting. Why? Are you really afraid that your whole life would crumble if you dared to look at truth?

You say lots of stuff. This is a forum. That's the way you participate. It doesn't make what you say correct, or even close.

Anybody can look up entropy all over the Net and in the text books to see that I am right about it.

Anybody can look up irreducible complexity to see that the contradictions to it are a mass of convoluted, meaningless blabber.

Anybody can look up the word "theory" to see that it is something that isn't known to be factual. Can you find even one piece of fact or scientific fact that shows that scientific theory is fact and not unknowns?

As I said, scientific-theory-as-fact has not, itself, even been put into theory form, to try to prove if any object of any scientific theory can be known to be factual. After all, common knowledge is that science fact is called science law, not science theory.

Nobody knows that scientific theory is fact. If we don't know, believing scientific theories to be factual is a religious response. When you state that evolution theory is factual, or that big bang theory is factual, or that black hole theory is factual, or that relativity theory is factual, you are taking those things into the realm of religion. Why? Because faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not known.

Stop talking religion, and start talking science.

Haven't you realized, yet, that "something" and the "theory of something" are two different things? Black holes are factual. They are anomalies that we have given the name "black hole." But we don't really have much of a clue about "black hole theory" being the true explanation of what black holes really are.

Same with creation. Creation fits, because evolution doesn't. Evolution theory might fit, but it has been rebutted in as many ways as it stands, by the simple fact that 100% of the science that evolution theory says proves evolution to be real, can fit things other than evolution, and can fit these other things better.

Evolution is a dream. It is science fiction. When it is promoted as being factual in the face of all the things that are against it, it is a hoax. It might not have been a hoax in the days of Darwin. But with all the science that contradicts it nowadays, evolution has become a big fat hoax.

That all folks

What? Do you even try to make sense when you post here? As I said, you were wrong numerous times, with entropy, not knowing what a scientific theory meant, you were wrong about irreducible complex systems and many many more, stop embarrassing yourself.

Since evolution is a theory and not a fact, it doesn't matter how many science you put into that theory, at the end of the day it still remains a theory, that there should have been your sign. Practicly all science is based upon theory, only some of it has been proven and turned into fact, but people being gullible that they are almost instantly believe in every theory coming out of the mouths of scientists since they have a way of using words painting things into what it is in fact not.

You know very well that the idea that a scientific theory is fact hasn't even reached the status of theory, yet. It probably isn't even a hypothesis.

Companies that try to change the genetics of plants and animals, have a very difficult time doing it. And the changes that they make generally add detriment in some ways, even though they might be beneficial in others. Mostly the changes do not last.

And somebody thinks that nature can do what we can't? Kinda laughable.

The fact that species evolve one from another doesn't mean that the previous creatures must go extinct.

The word in the title is "hoax." Evolution might be simply wrong, and not a hoax, except for one thing. It is so blatantly wrong that those who promote it are actually hoaxters. Thus, evolution is indeed a hoax.

Can we prove that evolution is false without using the Bible? Certainly we can! Evolution is a scientific theory that stands or falls on the physical evidence. In fact, one can be an atheist, a person who doesn’t believe in God, and still not believe in evolution!
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, as taught at school, is a biological explanation of how creatures have supposedly “evolved” or developed progressively through natural selection and variation (now known as mutation) over eons of time from the tiny cell to the largest creatures on earth today. What is taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution—small changes within a species—but macro evolution, the change from one type of creature to another quite distinct life form.What many evolutionists are trying to convince you of is that there is no need for a Creator since, as they say, evolution can substitute as the mechanism for creating and transforming life. They teach that life arose from non-life and evolved from simpler creatures to more complex life forms. In other words, the tiny cell eventually became an amoeba, then a lizard, then a monkey, and finally— you !In order to remember key points that disprove Darwinian evolution—the “molecules to man” theory—we’ll use the acronym FALSE. (A few of these points also disprove the compromise of theistic evolution—the notion that God employed macroevolution over eons in forming the creatures we see on earth today.)

I do not believe in the theory of evolution.

People generally have a difficult time comprehending things outside our lifespan.

They think if they can't create and kill it within their lifespan, it doesn't exist.   

How does a person imagine a four BILLION year period?

I think the evidence, logic behind it is pretty clear. Unfortunately some people just can't comprehend a simple concept, it seems. Maybe it's turning their brains off because of the way they were born.

There is a lot of misinformation in this field. Btw, if someone want to believe in some old guy in the sky, let him in his illusion.