Pages:
Author

Topic: excavator by NiceHash - multi-algorithm NVIDIA GPU miner [1.5.6a] - page 44. (Read 179268 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
I got an ASUS 1070 Turbo 8gb that is giving me trouble and I would like to know if maybe somebody else encountered this problem.

I have the card installed in windows 10 with the most recent drivers, and it is recognized by the system and by Afterburner, and also by excavator and nicehash miner.

The problem is - at stoc settings I am only getting 330 sols/sec. But no matter what OC settings I throw at it , it still remains at 330-340 (or even less if TPD is 70-75).

Any ideeas?

Check your clocks (core and memory), and run with two or more workers.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
I got an ASUS 1070 Turbo 8gb that is giving me trouble and I would like to know if maybe somebody else encountered this problem.

I have the card installed in windows 10 with the most recent drivers, and it is recognized by the system and by Afterburner, and also by excavator and nicehash miner.

The problem is - at stoc settings I am only getting 330 sols/sec. But no matter what OC settings I throw at it , it still remains at 330-340 (or even less if TPD is 70-75).

Any ideeas?
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 250
How can I use it with suprnova?
hero member
Activity: 835
Merit: 1000
There is NO Freedom without Privacy
for 1070 equihash is this still the best miner? Haven't had time to spend on the forums lately but been running excavator for the last couple months, just checking if anything faster came out.
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
While it seems that Optiminer is still the best for RX480 cards with 305 in average in equihash.
Will wait for linux version to give it a try.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
I checked excavator 1.2.4a (latest version 04.07.2017) speeds.

at the moment it only support 4 algos:
equihash
pascal
sia
decred

sia(nanopool) and decred(suprnova) wont work for me because of some problems with pool get job routines (failed to parse JSON from pool).

pascal gave ~710mh for RX 470 it is good, because whattomine show 560mh for RX 470.   RX 470+RX480+RX480 gave me 2gh at pascal.

equihash (ZCash) speed is only ~210,  claymore miner give me ~290mh. I setup 4 workers for each device (as manual said), tryed to switch on binary options and global data share (GDS wont work for rx 480, only rx 470) but it not helped much.

So for now excavator for AMD cards is bad at equihash, and good for pascal.

excavator have no dev fee but if compare to claymores 2% fee, claymore miner speed is much faster 290 sol - 2% = 284 sol and for now claymore is better.

Due to good structure, excavator allow to do any compilations of algos, so maybe some interest dual or triple mining schemes may result in good profits. Need to do research it that way.

For now it is not worth to switch from claymore miner.
Will wait ethash support.

Thanks for the detailed feedback. The low hashrate for Equihash is most likely a driver issue.
(I am pretty sure I mentioned somewhere that you need Crimson 16.9.2 for optimal performance.)
The current developmental version runs at around 290 S/s on stock RX480 with the latest driver.
We will see if we can release it sooner than later along with Ethash support.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
I checked excavator 1.2.4a (latest version 04.07.2017) speeds.

at the moment it only support 4 algos:
equihash
pascal
sia
decred

sia(nanopool) and decred(suprnova) wont work for me because of some problems with pool get job routines (failed to parse JSON from pool).

pascal gave ~710mh for RX 470 it is good, because whattomine show 560mh for RX 470.   RX 470+RX480+RX480 gave me 2gh at pascal.

equihash (ZCash) speed is only ~210,  claymore miner give me ~290mh. I setup 4 workers for each device (as manual said), tryed to switch on binary options and global data share (GDS wont work for rx 480, only rx 470) but it not helped much.

So for now excavator for AMD cards is bad at equihash, and good for pascal.

excavator have no dev fee but if compare to claymores 2% fee, claymore miner speed is much faster 290 sol - 2% = 284 sol and for now claymore is better.

Due to good structure, excavator allow to do any compilations of algos, so maybe some interest dual or triple mining schemes may result in good profits. Need to do research it that way.

For now it is not worth to switch from claymore miner.
Will wait ethash support.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
Any eta on ethash?

Hard to say as I am quite ambitious with Ethash. We got a permission from Genoil to use his kernel, and it's already running faster by 15% after a few optimizations on RX 470. We will see.

You mean faster than genoil , not claymore right? Smiley

Well, I would say you do the math.  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250
Any eta on ethash?

Hard to say as I am quite ambitious with Ethash. We got a permission from Genoil to use his kernel, and it's already running faster by 15% after a few optimizations on RX 470. We will see.

You mean faster than genoil , not claymore right? Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
Any eta on ethash?

Hard to say as I am quite ambitious with Ethash. We got a permission from Genoil to use his kernel, and it's already running faster by 15% after a few optimizations on RX 470. We will see.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
hi everyone.

Got en error with excavator. i got a few cards, but Only this card 1070 Gygabyte gives this error. it is new. I wonder it is warranty, but not sure how to prove it.
if you know what to do please let me know please. the error shows up everytime i run the excavator and it does not let me do benchmark in nicehash.

the error as follows: Cude ........ 2276 , 2191




Please see my reply to your PM. Did you try to overclock?
I ruled out that possibility because GPU-Z showed stock clocks.
full member
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
I had a similar error with 1070 on another miner. Happens the card did not support memory overclocking.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
hi everyone.

Got en error with excavator. i got a few cards, but Only this card 1070 Gygabyte gives this error. it is new. I wonder it is warranty, but not sure how to prove it.
if you know what to do please let me know please. the error shows up everytime i run the excavator and it does not let me do benchmark in nicehash.

the error as follows: Cude ........ 2276 , 2191

https://www.upload.ee/image/7074177/11.jpg
https://www.upload.ee/image/7074206/2017-06-02_013858.jpg
full member
Activity: 254
Merit: 100
Any eta on ethash?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
is it possible to set fan speed through "device.set"? If yes, is it in percentage? How would it look in json such a line?
It would be great to not have to use the afterburner for fanspeeds.
Or is there another alternative for fan speeds?

Yes, currently manual for this is being created, but drafted version is here: https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/blob/master/excavator-man-API.txt

It works fine for NVIDIA, regarding AMD, please ask zawawa.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
Are there any news about *nix version?

I am currently working on it along with Ethash. No worries!
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
is it possible to set fan speed through "device.set"? If yes, is it in percentage? How would it look in json such a line?
It would be great to not have to use the afterburner for fanspeeds.
Or is there another alternative for fan speeds?
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
Are there any news about *nix version?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Morning.

Just started mining yesterday. Super excited Smiley

Started with EQM which is cool but I think I'd like to just get paid in ZEC.

Pointed at zecmine.pro and seems to be working but I wonder if anyone can clarify and comfort me that I'm getting full efficiency out of this.

I'm running two 1080ti cards BTX.

On the log it only shows one device:
[08:09:12][0x000004e4][info] net | Share #82 accepted
[08:09:16][0x000008d8][info] net | Share #83 accepted
[08:09:18][0x000004e4][info] core | Device #0-0 speed: 292.836667 H/s
[08:09:18][0x000004e4][info] core | Device #0-1 speed: 291.620000 H/s
[08:09:18][0x000004e4][info] core | Algorithm 'equihash' total speed: 1.225017 kH/s
[08:09:20][0x000008d8][info] net | Share #84 accepted
[08:09:21][0x000004e4][info] net | Share #85 accepted
[08:09:21][0x000008d8][info] net | Share #86 accepted
[08:09:27][0x000004e4][info] algo-equihash | New job '446626875279046', diff=481.882

Although the "total speed" is essentially the total of all four workers (two per GPU).

Also on the mining site it only shows one worker but hashrate of 1.25 KS/s.

So I guess just trying to wrap my brain around a worker count.

From the above does it look like I'm using my two GPUs at full potential? If so, great. If not I'd love some tips on how to tweak them.

Thanks.


EDIT: realized that pool had not found a block in 14 days so I switched to nanopool. Still only seeing device "0" but getting around 1.2 KH/s.
mez
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases

All I want to know is if I can reach 435 Sols/s using GTX 1070 stock values - without having to tweak core/mem clocks and temps.

i can't reach it, my gpu at default when i start the miner do only 300 sol, something is wrong here, how cna i increase the hashrate?

yeah I need a line for equihash on supernova aswell. using it trough awesome miner, don't know what to write in to the command line :/ <>

Is awesome miner using latest excavator version?

1.1.4a its using this version dunno is it latest. What about the line guys []

Ah okay. v1.1.4a doesn't have special EULA, but 1.2+ does and it cannot be bundled with any other miner/package without our permission.
It's correct that it's Excavator 1.1.4 that can be automatically downloaded from Awesome Miner today. Thanks for pointing out the EULA changes because I might have missed them otherwise.

Awesome Miner doesn't bundle any mining software, but can do automatic download on demand. So I assume this is the point we need to discuss for the future versions?

where i can download the new version? i can't find it anywhere, and does it come with the same json compilation or like the old 1.13 with more tradiniotal command line?
Pages:
Jump to: