Pages:
Author

Topic: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds - page 26. (Read 135594 times)

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 505
Operating a Bitcoin Mixing service is considered illegal in many jurisdictions or extremly shady at best. For that and many other reasons we will continue to ban people who are abusing Fairlay. Banning abusive clients and criminals is however only possible with KYC procedures.  We will not pay out funds to customers who abused Fairlay and failed to establish their identity.  

Just play by the rules and our terms and conditions and you are fine like 99.9% of our customers.  

How is a withdrawal of deposited funds an "abuse"?
Just charge a good fee on the withdrawal, and that's it.
I don't understand why people would use a gambling site as a mixer when ChipMixer has such a straightforward service.

Well they use it as a mixer since some gambling site don't really charge a lot compared to mixing services. Also, they can deposit an infinite amount of times into the site and output it to one address with the sending address being different from the address they deposited with. This is quite similar to exchanges. Problem is, these casinos and exchanges keep logs of such things and in the event they are required by the government to present those data, then you are exposed. Unlike what mixers promises. Not to mention usually this act is prohibited by the ToS of most gambling sites.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
Operating a Bitcoin Mixing service is considered illegal in many jurisdictions or extremly shady at best. For that and many other reasons we will continue to ban people who are abusing Fairlay. Banning abusive clients and criminals is however only possible with KYC procedures.  We will not pay out funds to customers who abused Fairlay and failed to establish their identity.  

Just play by the rules and our terms and conditions and you are fine like 99.9% of our customers.  

How is a withdrawal of deposited funds an "abuse"?
Just charge a good fee on the withdrawal, and that's it.
I don't understand why people would use a gambling site as a mixer when ChipMixer has such a straightforward service.
sr. member
Activity: 473
Merit: 252
please do not contact us here via PM for support.
 Operating a Bitcoin Mixing service is considered illegal in many jurisdictions or extremly shady at best. For that and many other reasons we will continue to ban people who are abusing Fairlay. Banning abusive clients and criminals is however only possible with KYC procedures.  We will not pay out funds to customers who abused Fairlay and failed to establish their identity.  

Just play by the rules and our terms and conditions and you are fine like 99.9% of our customers.  
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
seriously I don't get it , why if someone deposit and gamble portion of the money in fairlay the don't suspect that the account is shady but if he deposited and not wagered they count it shady
people can deposit and not wager , maybe that account missed the odds he wanted when he got the money

it just doesn't make sense for a btc site to ask for verification IMO , but anyways it's not a big deal if fairlay is doing the verification quick and sending the money  right after


I haven't observed what Fairlay does but with other sites, if someone deposits like 1BTC which is substantial and loses half of it and tries to withdraw 0.5BTC. The withdraw will still most likely get flagged and need manual review.

The withdraw amount doesn't matter what matters is where the deposit originates from.

One example is the ETH hack from 2016 which sold some ETC on shape shift and now they might want to mix those BTC.

Since it's all on the blockchain, the casino might be liable for not having any compliance.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
seriously I don't get it , why if someone deposit and gamble portion of the money in fairlay the don't suspect that the account is shady but if he deposited and not wagered they count it shady
people can deposit and not wager , maybe that account missed the odds he wanted when he got the money

it just doesn't make sense for a btc site to ask for verification IMO , but anyways it's not a big deal if fairlay is doing the verification quick and sending the money  right after
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723

The user was asked to send in proof that his ID is authentic.  He couldn't fulfil our request stating that he has no camera ( or webcam or smartphone).    We won't pay out the money unless ordered by court, arbitrator or police.  This is the last  time we respond to this case. The user let the deadline we set pass and abused our support serveral times.
We follow AML laws and therefor cannot pay out funds to anonymous money launderers and criminals .  
 


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31000587


That is a shady thing to do to their customers. I thought only sportsbet.io does this to their customers from their last couple of posts on their thread.
As I just heard of fairlay and seeing they have these incidents happening on their site too
well then nitrogensports is looking more and more appealing for those who wish not to have their funds locked into an account that is rendered useless to them unless they submit their id so to have their winnings withheld until they do.
Sounds alot like holding your balance for ransom before being released if you ask me. Undecided

"shady" you mean the BETG was shady....if you are attempting to use Fairlay BTC site as a 'mixer" and not wager then go use another site and take your chances.."customers" use wagering sites to wager not attempt illicit criminal activities...you must be an ignorant shill

Lately these types of issues are all becoming very controversial matters.

Very similarly on Bitsler someone deposited a large amount, made one bet and requested a withdraw. The withdraw was held under suspicion.

Long story short. Bitsler sent it back to the deposit address source and user was happy. User didn't want to provide private ID either.
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0

The user was asked to send in proof that his ID is authentic.  He couldn't fulfil our request stating that he has no camera ( or webcam or smartphone).    We won't pay out the money unless ordered by court, arbitrator or police.  This is the last  time we respond to this case. The user let the deadline we set pass and abused our support serveral times.
We follow AML laws and therefor cannot pay out funds to anonymous money launderers and criminals .  
 


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31000587


That is a shady thing to do to their customers. I thought only sportsbet.io does this to their customers from their last couple of posts on their thread.
As I just heard of fairlay and seeing they have these incidents happening on their site too
well then nitrogensports is looking more and more appealing for those who wish not to have their funds locked into an account that is rendered useless to them unless they submit their id so to have their winnings withheld until they do.
Sounds alot like holding your balance for ransom before being released if you ask me. Undecided

"shady" you mean the BETG was shady....if you are attempting to use Fairlay BTC site as a 'mixer" and not wager then go use another site and take your chances.."customers" use wagering sites to wager not attempt illicit criminal activities...you must be an ignorant shill
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1012

The user was asked to send in proof that his ID is authentic.  He couldn't fulfil our request stating that he has no camera ( or webcam or smartphone).    We won't pay out the money unless ordered by court, arbitrator or police.  This is the last  time we respond to this case. The user let the deadline we set pass and abused our support serveral times.
We follow AML laws and therefor cannot pay out funds to anonymous money launderers and criminals .  
 


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31000587


That is a shady thing to do to their customers. I thought only sportsbet.io does this to their customers from their last couple of posts on their thread.
As I just heard of fairlay and seeing they have these incidents happening on their site too
well then nitrogensports is looking more and more appealing for those who wish not to have their funds locked into an account that is rendered useless to them unless they submit their id so to have their winnings withheld until they do.
Sounds alot like holding your balance for ransom before being released if you ask me. Undecided
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1082

The user was asked to send in proof that his ID is authentic.  He couldn't fulfil our request stating that he has no camera ( or webcam or smartphone).    We won't pay out the money unless ordered by court, arbitrator or police.  This is the last  time we respond to this case. The user let the deadline we set pass and abused our support serveral times.
We follow AML laws and therefor cannot pay out funds to anonymous money launderers and criminals .  
 

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31000587

newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
with that type of account history any other real sportsbook/exchange would have looked passed the bug for sure. That is all i am saying.
If you guys changed my withdrawal amount, i would be a lot more pissed than this guy. that is for damn sure.
Do not even deal with the nonsense no more, move to nitrogensports. they will appreciate your business and give you no hassles.
i withdrew 0.25 btc and got it in 3 minutes today. That is not a lot judging from your account history, but it's so much better than these other places.

nitrogensports .eu

newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
is there not anything you can with the exchange being so different today?

i really want to continue using your book fairlay Sad

but just throw me a bone, and my business will stay.

Like i said if you can offer that many tracks, I can guarantee you a lot more business from my end
sr. member
Activity: 473
Merit: 252
please do not contact us here via PM for support.
why does it say balance 0.04 and 0.08 if I owed you

We had to send money to your account  because your account was negative before.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
why does it say balance 0.04 and 0.08 if I owed you

sr. member
Activity: 473
Merit: 252
please do not contact us here via PM for support.
12/17/2016 18:19   mBTC   40.00   0.04   Other
12/17/2016 18:09   mBTC   39.30   0.08   Other



These are the two credits  that you owed us. 
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
i had high hopes with fairlay after using their service but i am just blown away by their response. Nothing they can do? when it was a misgrade on their end 2 years ago and they have allowed me to deposit several times after this and not brought it up? Not 1 email, not 1 thing in my statement history, nothing. But whatever.

here is my statement history FYI. How am i supposed to know my account was negative? Before I made my first deposit recently, my account statement said 0.04 balance and that was my balance when i Logged in.

nothing about a misgrade i can tell. Oh well. I am done with it. They will lose my business.


02/23/2018 17:14   mBTC   6.77   252.15   Settlement without commission (Strasbourg vs. Montpellier HSC)
02/23/2018 17:04   mBTC   58.79   245.37   Settlement without commission (Strasbourg vs. Montpellier HSC)
02/23/2018 16:54   mBTC   85.65   186.57   Settlement without commission (Strasbourg vs. Montpellier)
02/23/2018 16:38   mBTC   12.00   100.92   Settlement without commission (12.10 Fairview)
02/23/2018 14:22   mBTC   -456.00   88.92   Cashout
02/23/2018 14:16   mBTC   83.79   544.92   Settlement without commission (Al Wehdat vs. Al Ramtha)
02/23/2018 14:16   mBTC   43.79   461.13   Settlement without commission (Al Wehdat vs. Al Ramtha)
02/23/2018 12:41   mBTC   -10.00   417.34   Settlement without commission (17:10 Warwick)
02/23/2018 12:30   mBTC   42.69   427.34   Settlement without commission (CSKA Sofia vs. Cherno More)
02/23/2018 12:05   mBTC   2.00   384.64   Settlement without commission (16:40 Warwick)
02/23/2018 11:47   mBTC   -15.00   382.64   Settlement without commission (16:25 Lingfield)
02/23/2018 11:11   mBTC   -15.00   397.64   Settlement without commission (15:50 Lingfield)
02/23/2018 11:11   mBTC   -16.25   412.64   Settlement without commission (15:40 Exeter)
02/23/2018 10:54   mBTC   51.96   428.90   Settlement without commission (15:20 Lingfield)
02/23/2018 10:39   mBTC   -30.24   376.93   Settlement without commission (That Ras vs. Al Faisaly Amman)
02/23/2018 10:39   mBTC   23.14   407.18   Settlement without commission (That Ras vs. Al Faisaly Amman)
02/23/2018 10:29   mBTC   28.40   384.03   Settlement without commission (That Ras vs. Al Faisaly Amman)
02/23/2018 09:57   mBTC   37.92   355.62   Settlement without commission (14:35 Exeter)
02/23/2018 08:49   mBTC   90.52   317.70   Settlement without commission (Sagan Tosu vs. Vissel Kobe)
02/23/2018 07:51   mBTC   17.86   227.18   Settlement without commission (Sagan Tosu vs. Vissel Kobe)
02/23/2018 06:57   mBTC   9.85   209.31   Settlement without commission (11.35 Fairview)
02/23/2018 06:13   mBTC   199.45   199.45   DEPOSIT
02/19/2018 12:16   mBTC   -37.49   0.00   Settlement without commission (16:40 Carlisle)
02/19/2018 12:16   mBTC   -13.00   37.49   Settlement without commission (16:55 Lingfield)
02/19/2018 12:09   mBTC   -119.02   50.49   Settlement without commission (Shillong Lajong FC vs. Aizawl)
02/19/2018 11:58   mBTC   -106.04   169.52   Settlement without commission (16:25 Lingfield)
02/19/2018 11:23   mBTC   7.98   275.56   Settlement without commission (15:50 Lingfield)
02/19/2018 10:48   mBTC   28.35   267.57   Settlement without commission (15:15 Lingfield)
02/19/2018 10:12   mBTC   5.53   239.21   Settlement without commission (14:45 Lingfield)
02/19/2018 09:37   mBTC   33.71   233.67   Settlement without commission (14:15 Lingfield)
02/19/2018 01:42   mBTC   199.90   199.95   DEPOSIT
12/17/2016 18:19   mBTC   40.00   0.04   Other
12/17/2016 18:16   mBTC   -40.03   -39.95   Settlement without commission
12/17/2016 18:09   mBTC   39.30   0.08   Other
12/17/2016 18:04   mBTC   -39.21   -39.21   Unsettlement
12/17/2016 00:06   mBTC   -15.33   0.00   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 22:03   mBTC   6.18   15.33   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 21:34   mBTC   -149.99   9.15   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 20:39   mBTC   -150.00   159.15   Cashout
12/16/2016 19:52   mBTC   124.65   309.15   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 17:33   mBTC   88.27   184.49   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 13:50   mBTC   16.96   96.22   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 06:00   mBTC   39.21   79.25   Settlement without commission
12/16/2016 01:50   mBTC   40.04   40.04   Other
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
fairlay so you robbed this person $600 with exchange differences?

there is nothing you can do...i really dont believe that

but this just reiterates why i dont play with shitty books
they do shitty stuff like this to the customer.

i feel bad for you suneholder. Dont ever use them again and go with nitrogensports is the answer man

sr. member
Activity: 473
Merit: 252
please do not contact us here via PM for support.
to answer question, yes it was taken out of my withdrawal. I have no idea what the bug could have been from? Only guess would be a misgrade on their end.
i was unaware of 79 mbtc owed when i made 2 btc deposits of .20 each the past 48 hrs.  Neither time, did my account show a negative balance. For the past 2 years, I have logged on a few times and never seen a negative balance as well.

I'm hoping they can do something about it considering the circumstances, however.

It is from a misgrade and there is nothing we can do about it. Please check your statement for details.   Our system doesn't allow negative balances by design. 
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
if its from a misgrade then you have every reason to bitch after 2 years and nothing shown in the account reflecting that till now

Has fairplay emailed you regarding what they will do? And what was the bug?

this is some backyard bullshit from fairplay in my eyes.

the fact they even did this and did not just let it go, makes me question their sense of customer service
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
to answer question, yes it was taken out of my withdrawal. I have no idea what the bug could have been from? Only guess would be a misgrade on their end.
i was unaware of 79 mbtc owed when i made 2 btc deposits of .20 each the past 48 hrs.  Neither time, did my account show a negative balance. For the past 2 years, I have logged on a few times and never seen a negative balance as well.

I'm hoping they can do something about it considering the circumstances, however.

I think that the fact THEY had a bug from 2 years ago(!!) and they will now give you the penalty of paying it back is horrible. Not to mention that the value of the 79mbtc two years ago would be a fraction of what it's worth today.

Fairlay, give the dude his money back, what you've done now just shows an incredible lack of customer service.
Pages:
Jump to: