Topic: 🔥 FAKE: Defamation At Its Worst During Chipmixer Applications 🔥 - page 2. (Read 3857 times)

What exactly is the name of the medical problem that Vispilio suffers from?

you know a member uninitiated to the total corruption of DT1 might have been enthusiastic to debate you, but it seems the only ones reading and inhabiting the reputation boards are gang members desperate to hold on to their signature salaries these days, so I'll move on to more interesting pursuits.

I would like to just make it 100% clear that this thread is by no means an attack or even criticism towards Chipmixer, who have undeniably put some BTT members on a very generous welfare check for many years.

I'm interested in helping them make more meritocratic choices, both to help flourish their business more profitably, and as an act of kindness to many intellectual members on this forum who have long been disenfranchised and discouraged by your disgusting gang activity...

Further trolling and diversionary libel on this thread will be promptly deleted, the only ones I'm interested to converse with here are admin, Chipmixer staff, or moral intellectuals of this forum who have woken up to the nepotist manipulation of DT1.


***************************************************************************


@theymos: Your political experiment works, it's a curious attempt at decentralization, but the stakes are too low the current format is way too high maintenance and the rewards have become almost non-existent, no one in his right mind would be interested in debating these resident trolls every day to maintain a very fragile reputation on an internet forum, thus the larger crypto community suffers from their incestuous propaganda, and many brilliant people leave BTT...

Most people respect your and staff's decisions in general, if you nudge the community in the right direction by including truly meritocratic members in your lists / roster and greatly curbing the privileges of the nepotism gang, these colluding freeloaders would either have to play fair or take their con game elsewhere, both outcomes would greatly help the forum and crypto space.

All these shitheads who treat signature campaigns as jobs AND demand entitlements are quite funny when you think about it.

I wonder if they do the same thing when they don't get a job IRL. Attack the employer and its employees. "You're employing terrorists. You must hire me because I'm Turkish." I can't imagine any success with such strategy but here we are.

Yes, I know I should have posted this in the non-self-mod thread but whatever. Gotta give the dragon dunce something to do.

You can selectively edit my posts and leave out the parts that contradict your vendetta all you like, it doesn't make you any more truthful.



You see this? I posted this months ago, well before your cherry picked quotes above. Both things are true, you just want to pretend only the parts you selectively included apply. Let me point this out again...



Here you are admitting you are making your conclusion based on assumptions. You some how think you have the magical ability to know my inner thoughts and goals, and if I disagree with those conclusions I am a liar who is up to something nefarious. There is no "body of evidence". There is you vomiting up the same lies over and over again in the desperate hope that if you repeat it enough times people will believe you.

I mediated a dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community

they added me

as a result I ended up back on the default trust list.

[I have been here for a whole three years and I know absolutely everything about the inner working and dynamics of this forum!]

That's the thing though -- the real timeline of events is not based on "assumptions". Its based on documented words and data that is accessible by all, and runs contrary to your assertions.

Some of the users I added for the simple reason that I agreed with their trust list.

But since I admittedly can't prove that I know what you were actually thinking or what your actual motivations were, I ask that people look at the body of evidence presented and come to their own conclusions.

Archived for future reference: [1a], [1b]


Has anyone else noticed the link Tecshare posted as "proof" of my fantasy response was actually a link to a quote by Tecshare.??

---

---

I'm laughing at you Tecshare. (or whatever your main alt is)

Tecshare is peloso's upgraded form with more advanced language skills. Both use the same algorithm pretty much.

Find a group of people who think they were being abused (even though they are the abusers), casually defend them and gain their trust. They are happy for finding an ally outside from their gang, tech is happy for hacking his way into dt by using their fake power.

People may choose to lie just because truth doesn't suit them anymore. When enough number of people do that, they can rewrite the rules of the system.

This is also exactly what bsv and bch is about.

They'll defend the lie to the end.

ps. just the fact that genuinely insightful users like bonesjonesreturns have to hide behind alternate aliases to speak the truth on this forum,

while terrorists like ~lauda manage to sustain artificially net positive DT trust sheets, is all the evidence you need that this forum is broken,

Meanwhile more and more people seem to believe that Blockstream just wants to keep it that way in an attempt to silence all crypto competition with its paid trolls that have taken over Bitcointalk

OK, so me pointing out exactly how you are lying is "irrelevant." Totally trustworthy behavior.  

Just give up the lie and admit it for what it is. Peloso has no qualms doing that, neither should you.

Who said I talked to you via PM? I convinced several members of the Turkish community to drop an invalid flag on you, and this was your response. Just because you were the only unreasonable one in the equation doesn't mean mediation didn't occur independently of you.

You asserting your assumptions to be factual when it is not, does not make my denial of it a lie.

Here's the order of events you presented:

1.

2.

3.

Here's what actually happened:

1. You added Turkish members to your trust list and they reciprocated (with the exception of Blacknavy who added you first).

2. You ended up back on DT1.

3. You mediated the dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community.

So, you lied. Stop lying and I'll stop correcting you.

OK, so me pointing out exactly how you are lying is "irrelevant." Totally trustworthy behavior.  

Just give up the lie and admit it for what it is. Peloso has no qualms doing that, neither should you.

I didn't because it is irrelevant in spite of your protestations otherwise.

What's funny is that nowhere in your long-winded, insult-ridden response did you demonstrate how my timeline was incorrect.

Some of the users I added for the simple reason that I agreed with their trust list.

[Long winded ball washing and baseless conclusions.]

Archived for future reference: [1a], [1b]


No, that's an outright lie - you've never spoken to me via PM AFAIK.

Thanks to the person who pointed this lie by TECSHARE out to me, it would have gone unnoticed by me otherwise.

Here are my 39 flags https://bpip.org/flaglog.aspx?accuser=Timelord2067 As you can see there is only one Flag that I have withdrawn my original support for - all others remain active with the ones being referenced concerning DT Trust Abuse in conjunction with other extenuating circumstances.  At least some are alts that were connected by Yoshi etc in the Known Alts thread.  Feel free to view those threads for details.

Make no mistake, TECSHARE is lying to you.

Sorry for wrong link, I was pointing to his reply about the flag on you being invalid.

How does Tecshare crying about *neutral* trust feedback on his Trust Feedback Wall equate to "mediating"?

This is not what these flags are for. You are free to leave ratings on his profile if you insist, but this is also frowned upon unless the intent is to prevent fraud. This has nothing to do with fraud and is just retribution for a disagreement, righteous or otherwise. You can not use flags like this because it devalues the entire rating system. This is an invalid flag that reflects more poorly on its creator than its target.

TECSHARE is probably talking about the genuine and natural comment he made about the dispute here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52379325

Please dude.

Should be negative, not neutral.  :/

Archived for future reference: [1a], [1b]


No, that's an outright lie - you've never spoken to me via PM AFAIK.

Thanks to the person who pointed this lie by TECSHARE out to me, it would have gone unnoticed by me otherwise.

Here are my 39 flags https://bpip.org/flaglog.aspx?accuser=Timelord2067 As you can see there is only one Flag that I have withdrawn my original support for - all others remain active with the ones being referenced concerning DT Trust Abuse in conjunction with other extenuating circumstances.  At least some are alts that were connected by Yoshi etc in the Known Alts thread.  Feel free to view those threads for details.

Make no mistake, TECSHARE is lying to you.

I mediated a dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community, they added me, as a result I ended up back on the default trust list.

This is why decentralization is tricky stuff.

People may choose to lie just because truth doesn't suit them anymore. When enough number of people do that, they can rewrite the rules of the system.

Tecshare is peloso's upgraded....bla...bla..bla