Author

Topic: FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread - page 273. (Read 66111 times)

legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1883
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It is true and from there many speculations were made, because it began to be said that some sheikhs offered a very large amount of money to the Ecuadorian players, so much money that each player could fix their lives and that of their families, they just had to leave win, however, those same rumors claimed that the players did not accept.

The forceful result of the first World Cup game in Qatar left all that behind, but you are absolutely right, the hosts are those teams that have a lot of quality and it is very difficult to beat them, the truth is that sometimes these types of comments are made because they They are generated on sports channels and there they create debate and arouse some curiosity.

I am a person who always watches every special program of the World Cup and everything that is generated in the host country, and not only the World Cup, every sporting event that refers to fútbol..
I bet that was sort of true, like there was an "offer" on the table I am sure, but in the end it would be basically a risk not worth taking. What if they promised to pay you that much, you lost, and they didn't pay? What if they exposed you? Who are you going to complain to? Like are you going to go out and say "they promised us 100 million dollars and we lost but they didn't pay!!" to a judge or something? Of course not.

This is why I believe they didn't take it. In the end, I think USA for example could end up winning, they went out of the group stage, which shows that they are capable of winning, just need a weaker opponent and not some team like brazil or France.

Yes, what you say is true, in these fútbol events it should also be noted that money is handled at a very high level, many frauds have still been uncovered and the fact that corruption has always existed is something evident, without going far away, in the League they accuse that Barcelona paid the referees in a limited period of time, I think it was when Mou was in charge of Real Madrid that many said that Barcelona bought referees and it is possible that it was like that, in the World Cups without Hosts or not, they can drop any plan with technology and VAR, and although everything is quite new, it is a way to attack corruption in fútbol.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 630
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
I am not sure if the experiment would be beneficial - when one country host an event they are solely responsible to take the advantage of it
How would this be helping 3 nations. It is beyond my understanding.

I am against the idea of granting hosting rights to 3-4 countries. Look at the 2022 world cup. All the matches were hosted by Qatar and the fans were also happy about the travel arrangements. During the 2026 world cup, the fans need to travel many thousands of miles to watch the matches. The venues are spread all across the North American continent, from Canada in the north to Mexico in the South. The hosts will obviously benefit, from increased tourist revenues and exposure. But for the fans, it is an exhausting task to reach the destinations on time.

I understand your reasoning and plight towards the combine hosting of the next world cup in Usa, Canada and Mexico by 2026 regarding the logistics and all the challenges you perceive around such kind of hosting but for me I believe all those logistical assumed challenges won't matter because there is a long time of planning from now towards it. The countries that are having this combine hosting are also in same locality and zone, so travelling in between them won't give such problem and majority of the games are going to be played in Usa and it is not like the teams are going to be traveling at intervals of a match, it is well organized. The benefit of this is to give a new taste to the world cup and allow more countries the feel at a go. Remember many countries are now interested in bidding to host the world cup and when the bidders are from close locality, they can possibly grouped together for that particular tournament hosting. But this will not be the first time for a FIFA world cup combine hosting. It has been tasted and was successful with Japan Korea in 2002, Brazil won the tournament for the fifth time that year
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 792
Watch Bitcoin Documentary - https://t.ly/v0Nim
~snip~
I am not sure if the experiment would be beneficial - when one country host an event they are solely responsible to take the advantage of it
How would this be helping 3 nations. It is beyond my understanding.

Well, the world cup is now a massive event, actually it's probably the largest sporting event in the world.

I think it's fine to have more than one country hosting it. We've had it before in Korea-Japan 2002 and it worked fine.

As the number of teams increase I think it makes sense to host it in multiple countries.

Also in these weird times we're living in, this also adds the ability to move matches around if things go wrong in one country, instead of cancelling the whole thing.
It can pretty much be hosted in one big country, especially in the USA that has all the territory and resources, idk why it's hosted by three countries. I understand that there will participate lot more teams in next event but definitely that's not the case.
Also, Canada and USA are so hard to enter for majority of people, I don't really understand for whom is this even hosted for. Will they soften visa requirements for that event? Maybe. If not, then it seems this event is exclusively for local citizens which will cause protest. But if they soften visa requirements, a lot of people will take this chance to immigrate in the USA.
I don't know what's happening there.
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 722
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

I am against the idea of granting hosting rights to 3-4 countries. Look at the 2022 world cup. All the matches were hosted by Qatar and the fans were also happy about the travel arrangements. During the 2026 world cup, the fans need to travel many thousands of miles to watch the matches. The venues are spread all across the North American continent, from Canada in the north to Mexico in the South. The hosts will obviously benefit, from increased tourist revenues and exposure. But for the fans, it is an exhausting task to reach the destinations on time.

I agree with you, when there is more than one host for the world cup the national teams have to travel between these countries, and they will have problems also whenever the teams come to a country and play a match there, they will have to have reserve hotel and get a ticket to travel another place with will take some energy and it will make the team tried while having one country hosting the games won't have these problems.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am not sure if the experiment would be beneficial - when one country host an event they are solely responsible to take the advantage of it
How would this be helping 3 nations. It is beyond my understanding.

I am against the idea of granting hosting rights to 3-4 countries. Look at the 2022 world cup. All the matches were hosted by Qatar and the fans were also happy about the travel arrangements. During the 2026 world cup, the fans need to travel many thousands of miles to watch the matches. The venues are spread all across the North American continent, from Canada in the north to Mexico in the South. The hosts will obviously benefit, from increased tourist revenues and exposure. But for the fans, it is an exhausting task to reach the destinations on time.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 960
~snip~
Three different countries hosting the The world cup won't be bad idea as the way lots of us think. The world cup tournament is growing and the 26 world cup will be accommodating many teams, this is one of the reasons it will be hosted by three countries to make it easy and Interesting.

I think the 2030 edition of the world cup should be hosted in South America, where everything started 100 years from that day.

There are doing a joint proposal, I think it's four countries that would want to host it together. It would be amazing I think.

I guess they're waiting to see how the 2026 edition plays out to see if it works fine.
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1009
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Judging from the geographical and weather conditions, it seems that the South American zone is very supportive for national teams from Europe, many national teams seems not comfortable when Qatar as the host of FIFA World Cup 2022 because have hot weather and changed several league schedule for World Cup matches held on at the end year.

Still not official confirmed yet with FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States will held on middle years after several European League competition ended or FIFA keep try begin like the same previous FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar, but most effective with FIFA World Cup start after all league ended around June until July not on December like in Qatar.

To be honest, I didn't hear any complaints from the participants who competed in the 2022 world cup in Qatar regarding the weather conditions. because, the organizers have designed it in such a way for the convenience of the players. plus, visitors. they've worked around this with state-of-the-art "giant air conditioning" cooling technology to keep the stadium cool. so, weather problems were not an obstacle at the 2022 world cup in Qatar. but regarding the World Cup schedule being changed, that's true. it aims, in order to overcome the extreme climate. As a result, the league schedule was disrupted. but yes, at least the 2022 world cup was successful and lively despite the many controversies surrounding it.

For the 2026 world cup, it's natural that there is no official confirmation yet. because, this event still has a gap of 3 years in the future. at least, before everything is confirmed, the host will make sure in advance to prepare for this once every 4 yearly event. So, yeah, just wait.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 110
India team is not superior not only with World Cup level but also can't qualify to AFC Cup 2024 in Qatar, but not only with India but also China have spent much money last than three years ago and many star player joined with Chinese Super League teams but can't bring positive impact for China can speak more how to qualify in FIFA World Cup.

For Asian team qualify to FIFA World Cup seems dominate by the same teams national on every time World Cup, between Saudi Arabia, Australia, South Korea, Japan and Iran are the most appearance national teams participants in FIFA World Cup.
I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.
current fifa ranking of india is 106 and it will be a great experience if teams from asian countries like india and others can fight in world cup 2026

I'm also really looking forward to my country (Indonesia) being able to compete with other countries in the 2026 world cup, it will be an extraordinary experience to hear our national anthem roar in the world cup stadium
That is correct India is on 106 at the moment - but you never know the indian gov is smart - they have kept their term with Russia and they have been friend with USA
likewise they Indian can get the their space in the world cup - lol - you never know!
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 109
1xBit.. recovered their reputation
India team is not superior not only with World Cup level but also can't qualify to AFC Cup 2024 in Qatar, but not only with India but also China have spent much money last than three years ago and many star player joined with Chinese Super League teams but can't bring positive impact for China can speak more how to qualify in FIFA World Cup.

For Asian team qualify to FIFA World Cup seems dominate by the same teams national on every time World Cup, between Saudi Arabia, Australia, South Korea, Japan and Iran are the most appearance national teams participants in FIFA World Cup.
I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.
current fifa ranking of india is 106 and it will be a great experience if teams from asian countries like india and others can fight in world cup 2026

I'm also really looking forward to my country (Indonesia) being able to compete with other countries in the 2026 world cup, it will be an extraordinary experience to hear our national anthem roar in the world cup stadium
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 722
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I agree on the quality. The Indian team is ranked 104th and they don't even reach the last round of AFC qualifiers most of the times. China is marginally better, and are ranked 80th in FIFA ranking. Two and half decades back, China was included in the top-40, but in due course the quality of their football declined. The problem here is that if you exclude these two countries, there goes 40% of the world's population. I am not in favor of giving direct qualification to these two countries, but there should be some compromise solution which increases the probability of them featuring in the world cup.
India team is not superior not only with World Cup level but also can't qualify to AFC Cup 2024 in Qatar, but not only with India but also China have spent much money last than three years ago and many star player joined with Chinese Super League teams but can't bring positive impact for China can speak more how to qualify in FIFA World Cup.

For Asian team qualify to FIFA World Cup seems dominate by the same teams national on every time World Cup, between Saudi Arabia, Australia, South Korea, Japan and Iran are the most appearance national teams participants in FIFA World Cup.

I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.


I didn't know if India could even be a part of any world cup in the history of this national team but if want to be a part of the world CPU they have to rework and develop their team because currently, they have to race with other Asian teams like Japan, South Korea, and Iran for to a be a part of the world cup and maybe will need to do more investment in football and have a stronger team for the next world cup.
member
Activity: 672
Merit: 16
~snip~
I am not sure if the experiment would be beneficial - when one country host an event they are solely responsible to take the advantage of it
How would this be helping 3 nations. It is beyond my understanding.

Well, the world cup is now a massive event, actually it's probably the largest sporting event in the world.

I think it's fine to have more than one country hosting it. We've had it before in Korea-Japan 2002 and it worked fine.

As the number of teams increase I think it makes sense to host it in multiple countries.

Also in these weird times we're living in, this also adds the ability to move matches around if things go wrong in one country, instead of cancelling the whole thing.
Three different countries hosting the The world cup won't be bad idea as the way lots of us think. The world cup tournament is growing and the 26 world cup will be accommodating many teams, this is one of the reasons it will be hosted by three countries to make it easy and Interesting.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1100
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~snip~

No, a friendly match at the World Cup? Cheesy How are you even going to pull that off? People would freak out if during such a tournament the FIFA would also have friendly games in between. That makes no sense.

The World Cup qualifiers are already quite fair and the national teams have a lot of games to prove they are good enough to participate. Just look at Italy and how they screwed up during the last qualifications. They even had the chance to make their way to the World Cup in the play off games against North Macedonia and they failed again. I think enough is enough and it doesn't matter whether the team had a long tradition or not. Italy didn't perform well enough and so they didn't earn their starting spot at the World Cup.

The competition for becoming a host is always fierce and the only thing i don't like is if money decides in the end whether a country can host the tournament or not. It should always be the best application, not the country with the most money.
Whoa! Dude, I concur. World Cup fun match? Like sailing into shark-infested waters. FIFA's thoughts? Do they want us to go crazy or make the game more exciting? I'm starting to think FIFA's leaders are aliens. To spice up football, imagine small green creatures rushing around. If so, a friendly game is just the beginning.

You're right. World Cup qualifiers are tough. Teams are trying to qualify for the tournament. Right, Italy? Their "long tradition" doesn't entitle them. They can't. No more.

I concur regarding the host nation. The best people should be chosen, not the wealthiest. However, bribery and corruption may spice up the game! Imagine if the host country had to beat the other countries in hopscotch to keep their spot. A memorable World Cup
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 960
~snip~
I am not sure if the experiment would be beneficial - when one country host an event they are solely responsible to take the advantage of it
How would this be helping 3 nations. It is beyond my understanding.

Well, the world cup is now a massive event, actually it's probably the largest sporting event in the world.

I think it's fine to have more than one country hosting it. We've had it before in Korea-Japan 2002 and it worked fine.

As the number of teams increase I think it makes sense to host it in multiple countries.

Also in these weird times we're living in, this also adds the ability to move matches around if things go wrong in one country, instead of cancelling the whole thing.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 110
Taking a quick look at this report from top Asian teams and how they performed during the recent world cups I can say most of the Asian teams even Japan as the first team on the list and first team of Asia mostly failed to pass the staging phase of the world cup and this shows us the gap between Asian teams and Europian teams except for South Korea where they could even be in the semi-final match for once. That's the reason to say increasing the number of teams in the world cup can't be good because there will be more weak teams there.
I just think the reason why FIFA is also adding World Cup participants besides making football more evenly distributed globally is also the economic factor with more and more countries participating will increase the number of countries that want to buy broadcast rights from existing matches, we know that FIFA is becoming one of the sports organizations that is always aiming for big profits especially the world cup is a valuable tournament, so seeing that there will be more and more weak teams participating in the world cup later is not the concern of FIFA because that is the concern of the participating countries.

To me, it seems like FIFA added more national teams mostly because there are many national teams in the world that could never be a part of the world cup in history and that's why they added more teams to let them give a chance to a part of the world cup. but this will surely decrease the quality of the world cup and it can be a reason for many strong teams to have easy games against the teams they couldn't be a part of the world cup normally.
I have a different thought to this matter though, I personally feel that FIFA decided to add more national team to the 2026 world cup solely because the tournament will be hosted in three different countries, and having just a few national teams divided amongst this three countries that would be hosting the world cup simply means that each of these countries might not have enough games to host, this i believe is the reason why FIFA felt the need to add more national team to game, so that each of this countries(Canada, Mexico and USA) will all have a good number of team playing on each.

But then, I still agree with your point though, adding more teams have given opportunities to some teams that have never gotten the chance to play in the world cup before.
I am not sure if the experiment would be beneficial - when one country host an event they are solely responsible to take the advantage of it
How would this be helping 3 nations. It is beyond my understanding.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
~snip~
I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.

I'm not sure they have the skills to qualify, but who knows, in the next world cup the standards will be lowered to allow more teams qualifying.

Maybe it will be possible to see them, I'm not that convinced though. There are still other teams that might grab the extra spots before them.

We'll have to wait and see how they perform in the field.

The current coach of India is Stimac, a Croatian football expert and former coach of the Croatian national football team.
He has already raised the level of play of the Indian national team, and he has also introduced a serious selection of players and improved the training of the team, and also improved the overall organization of work.
The first concrete results are already visible because the Indian football team started to win in the World Cup qualifiers, but they were still too weak to win the first two places in their group, but in the end they were third in their qualifying group.
For greater progress and eventual participation of India in a world cup, however, much more work and time will be needed.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 34
~snip~
I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.

I'm not sure they have the skills to qualify, but who knows, in the next world cup the standards will be lowered to allow more teams qualifying.

Maybe it will be possible to see them, I'm not that convinced though. There are still other teams that might grab the extra spots before them.

We'll have to wait and see how they perform in the field.
India has not participated in the world cup competition for longtime I don't expect much from them in the 2026 world cup, but it will be interesting to watch them how they can be able to cope with strong teams that have Already have good record in performance.
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 553
Play Bitcoin PVP Prediction Game
It is not about being stronger, it is about the idea that the privilege to host a World Cup should engage the hosting nation as much as possible as it is what I said it is: a privilege. This way some fairness can be preserved for as long as the right to host the World Cup isn't won due to corruption.


I support the idea that World Cup events should be debated by a committee made up of members from several countries and not by a single institution with centralized decision-making power.

I recognize that FIFA's role is important and essential for world football, but events of great impact such as the Football World Cup should have their issues debated and resolved in common agreement with several representative countries, it would be more democratic, fair and probably it would greatly reduce the corruption that we all know exists within FIFA.

That doesn't solve the problem. Even if you have sort of an assembly of a lot of people who could then vote for a nation to become the host of the next World Cup, how would you prevent those voters from being bribed in advance? Corruption is so hard to fight because voters would be willing to vote against their own countries and people as soon as the price is high enough to suppress the last bit of morals inside of them.

Having more people to vote on the outcome would at least raise the price for corruption. Perhaps there should be some probabilistic procedure where 200 people get to read the applications, all of them have to cast a vote but only 20 of them will count based on a predetermined selection procedure. Like a lottery here on Bitcointalk that is based on the hash of a future block.

The basic idea would be to raise the price for corruption in any way possible, but I don't know what the right way could be to go about it.
I think every country that didn't qualify for the World Cup should be given one friendly match in the World Cup. Then the teams will develop the spirit of World Cup and work hard to qualify for the World Cup. This issue needs to be considered by the FIFA authorities.

No, a friendly match at the World Cup? Cheesy How are you even going to pull that off? People would freak out if during such a tournament the FIFA would also have friendly games in between. That makes no sense.

The World Cup qualifiers are already quite fair and the national teams have a lot of games to prove they are good enough to participate. Just look at Italy and how they screwed up during the last qualifications. They even had the chance to make their way to the World Cup in the play off games against North Macedonia and they failed again. I think enough is enough and it doesn't matter whether the team had a long tradition or not. Italy didn't perform well enough and so they didn't earn their starting spot at the World Cup.

The competition for becoming a host is always fierce and the only thing i don't like is if money decides in the end whether a country can host the tournament or not. It should always be the best application, not the country with the most money.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 960
~snip~
I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.

I'm not sure they have the skills to qualify, but who knows, in the next world cup the standards will be lowered to allow more teams qualifying.

Maybe it will be possible to see them, I'm not that convinced though. There are still other teams that might grab the extra spots before them.

We'll have to wait and see how they perform in the field.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.

The only way India can qualify for the FIFA World Cup is if the sub-regional qualifiers come to effect. If FIFA decides to have one slot from the South Asia region, then there is a chance that they may qualify. Out of the 7 member associations, India is currently ranked 106, while all the other teams are ranked below them. In fact none of the other teams are even in the top-150. Maldives is at 156, while the two populous nations (Bangladesh and Pakistan) are ranked 192 and 195 respectively. Previously, Afghanistan used to be a part of South Asia, but now they have moved to Central Asia.

In case of China, it is even more difficult. There are quality teams such as Japan and South Korea from the same region, and it will be extremely difficult for them to qualify from the same grouping. China is a part of the East Asian Football Federation, and as per ranking they are much below Japan (20) and South Korea (25). Currently China is ranked 80th.

legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1472
Judging from the geographical and weather conditions, it seems that the South American zone is very supportive for national teams from Europe, many national teams seems not comfortable when Qatar as the host of FIFA World Cup 2022 because have hot weather and changed several league schedule for World Cup matches held on at the end year.

Still not official confirmed yet with FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States will held on middle years after several European League competition ended or FIFA keep try begin like the same previous FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar, but most effective with FIFA World Cup start after all league ended around June until July not on December like in Qatar.

As far as I know, the 2026 World Cup will be held on the same date as previous World Cups, excluding Qatar, which would be from June to July.
The dates speculated are from June 8 to July 3, 2026.
Fifa should soon announce the official dates for clubs and confederations to prepare.

The Qatar Cup was the only one played on this different date because of the climate. In the traditional months of June and July it would be practically impossible to hold the matches due to the extreme heat, but this should not happen again.
But you are right, it's not confirmet yet.

I am very curious to see India in the next World Cup, I think it is a unique opportunity that they have, now that there are new quotas so that some countries can go and have the opportunity to be in a World Cup for the first time, that It fills an entire country with hope, which means that if it is probable that I can go to this World Cup, the truth is that I would like my country to finally go to a World Cup, I think that the feeling of listening to the country's anthem in a World Cup is a unique feeling, it makes many cry, I do want these teams that have never been to qualify.

My support for the decision to have 48 teams instead of 32 is precisely because countries that have never participated in a World Cup can participate for the first time.
I think that we can have 3 or 4 new teams in the next World Cup, but it would be great if there were 5 or even more new teams. This could help strengthen soccer in many countries.

I don't know Indian soccer that well, but it would be very interesting to see a country with 1.4 billion people cheering for their team.
Jump to: