Pages:
Author

Topic: First BFL ASIC! - page 32. (Read 58277 times)

full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
April 01, 2013, 03:53:29 AM
#48
If you look very closely in the picture, you can see the address where it's mining at. That's the stats for the miner.

Therefore it's mining in KC. If still in doubt take another look at this video (only 2 min. long): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C4bgho5JSI
I do not dispute that. But it is mining. Smiley

Now I'm getting a bit worried about my batch 3 Avalon...
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 01, 2013, 03:49:26 AM
#47
If you look very closely in the picture, you can see the address where it's mining at. That's the stats for the miner.

Therefore it's mining in KC. If still in doubt take another look at this video (only 2 min. long): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C4bgho5JSI
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
April 01, 2013, 03:39:59 AM
#46
If you look very closely in the picture, you can see the address where it's mining at. That's the stats for the miner.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 01, 2013, 03:38:08 AM
#45
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 01, 2013, 03:33:44 AM
#44
And to think there's members here who are jacking off all over themselves after reading the OP, perhaps ready to order more.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 01, 2013, 03:29:02 AM
#43
counter point, maybe the video is of Luke's lab to begin with and he had the hardware for a while?

not cheering BFL, just adding constructive argument.

http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.butterflylabs.com%2Fattachment.php%3Fattachmentid%3D755%26amp%3Bd%3D1364793240

Quote
Basic Image Information
Artist:   Josh
Date:   March 31, 2013   11:53:12PM (timezone not specified)
(34 minutes, 29 seconds ago, assuming image timezone of US Pacific)
File:   680 × 895 JPEG
114,188 bytes (0.11 megabytes)     Image compression: 94%
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
April 01, 2013, 03:28:38 AM
#42
Good catch. Interesting...
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
April 01, 2013, 03:26:14 AM
#41
counter point, maybe the video is of Luke's lab to begin with and he had the hardware for a while?

not cheering BFL, just adding constructive argument.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 01, 2013, 03:25:56 AM
#40
And the plot thickens..
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 01, 2013, 03:23:57 AM
#39
I have to hand it to the swarm of locust over at BFL, for not only did they deliver a miner to Luke half way around the world in two days on Easter weekend, but they shipped him the whole fuckin' lab.



hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
COINDER
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
April 01, 2013, 03:02:36 AM
#37
Another pic, april 1 coincidence?

legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1003
April 01, 2013, 02:58:17 AM
#36
It's 24 gigahash per second it looks. like...
So basically Josh took responsibility for a design that is equivalent to 1 Avalon module system?

I feel a bit skeptical....I think it has to be a put on...or  a joke of some kind.

I find it pretty hard to believe that the Single SC is drawing almost the same electrical power as one Avalon Hashing module and producing roughly the same hashing rate. At 65nm they did that while the Avalon team did this at 110nm.

If this isn't a joke, then man, the ineptitude is all that much more "Epic".

Imagine what the Avalon team will do when they get down to a 65nm process node....
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
firstbits.com/1kznfw
April 01, 2013, 02:57:54 AM
#35
Advertised specs ruins it anyway so what's there to bitch about?

No it doesn't. Little SCs are advertised as 30 GHps and the picture shows an average hash of 24.86, which is 82.7%. And the bet didn't reference all specs, it said 75% of advertised hashrate.
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
April 01, 2013, 02:57:36 AM
#34
179W / 24 Ghash = 7.5W / Ghash

Avalon is 620 / 65 = 9.5W / Ghash

I would not call this "out perform[ing] any competing products by a very wide margin in terms of power", which was Josh's claim even with the power drain. Unless I've missed something...

That said, still excellent news for those with orders.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
April 01, 2013, 02:52:48 AM
#33
Advertised specs ruins it anyway so what's there to bitch about?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
firstbits.com/1kznfw
April 01, 2013, 02:50:19 AM
#32
As I mentioned previously. Sending 2 units to a software developer that is making software for your product is NOT "shipping".

And as I mentioned previously, the bet isn't about shipping but about a bitcointalk forum post being made, which this one does fit the description except for the niggle about the intended timezone.
hero member
Activity: 1118
Merit: 541
April 01, 2013, 02:43:16 AM
#31
Unfortunately for this bet, Luke posted 36 minutes after April 1.

Does the bet specify a timezone?

I think this is going to be hotly debated. The parameters of the bet a the bottom specifically refer to Eastern Time, but the words of the bet do not, so it seems that there is some wiggle room on either side.

As I mentioned previously. Sending 2 units to a software developer that is making software for your product is NOT "shipping".
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1003
April 01, 2013, 02:43:09 AM
#30
All right, BFL.. I probably won't have to ask you to do this.. but. Can you please fuck up one more time until I get my Avalon II?

jk. GG.
Isn't that a given?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
April 01, 2013, 02:42:43 AM
#29
Pages:
Jump to: