The most honest FortuneJack bitcoin casino , and the payouts for video konkurs was paid
Obvious shill is Obvious.obvious scammer casino which wont pay promised prizes without heavy pressure
Topic: FJ Agrees to make payment after extraordinary display of scumminess(Cliffs inOP) (Read 7258 times)
July 21, 2016, 05:36:36 AM
obvious scammer casino which wont pay promised prizes without heavy pressure
July 20, 2016, 09:18:41 PM
The most honest FortuneJack bitcoin casino , and the payouts for video konkurs was paid
Obvious shill is Obvious. 
July 20, 2016, 05:44:21 PM
The most honest FortuneJack bitcoin casino , and the payouts for video konkurs was paid
Well done on creating an account just to post this.
July 20, 2016, 05:07:32 PM
The most honest FortuneJack bitcoin casino , and the payouts for video konkurs was paid
May 30, 2016, 09:18:55 AM
Seems like they chose to say they would pay all contenstants and then just pay those who they think would know and/or complain.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
player claims they were not paidAnd I'm still not received anything from the contest !
You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 20th I request list of paid winners (never receive reply)You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
Each video contestant was payed, we cannot distribute transactions due to our privacy policy.
The player you are referring to, S1ng, confirmed receive of the funds.
Quote
https://blockchain.info/tx/b03fe39a5ebe4a8194970eb39a58d5e39516bd8cbd49d188ecac913bdc9cc000
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
Last time you said you paid everyone (on May 19th) you were lying. I think you still have only paid the players who know about this thread.
You said you would announce the winners, and I don't see any good reason not to - unless you only paid some of them...
I should also point out to everyone that FortuneJack does not seem to regret the way they have handled this situation in general. It was all denies and lies, then one day "WE PAYED EVERYONE SO TAKE OFF OUR RED TRUST!" (which was also a lie)
Not even an attempt at convincing players that they plan on behaving any differently in the future.
Quote
Last time you said you paid everyone (on May 19th) you were lying. I think you still have only paid the players who know about this thread.
You said you would announce the winners, and I don't see any good reason not to - unless you only paid some of them...
You said you would announce the winners, and I don't see any good reason not to - unless you only paid some of them...
Once again, we payed out all contestants, the reason S1ng wrote again was that player had 2 accounts at Fortunejack. The video was uploaded by 2 contestants.
Quote
I should also point out to everyone that FortuneJack does not seem to regret the way they have handled this situation in general. It was all denies and lies, then one day "WE PAYED EVERYONE SO TAKE OFF OUR RED TRUST!" (which was also a lie)
The acquisition was raised because of us not paying out Video Contest prizes. We had our arguments about it, in the end, we still payed out and therefore, acquisition must be closed. You are the only community member demanding us to regret we did not pay out in time, while contestants themselves seem to be satisfied with the outcome of your reference.
Quote
You said you would announce the winners, and I don't see any good reason not to - unless you only paid some of them...
There were no winners for the contest, the promotion was void! We would never post 'we payed out all contestants' without crediting their accounts. Raising doubts like this is not necessary and does not sound professional.
May 30, 2016, 05:24:59 AM
Seems like they chose to say they would pay all contenstants and then just pay those who they think would know and/or complain.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
player claims they were not paidAnd I'm still not received anything from the contest !
You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 20th I request list of paid winners (never receive reply)You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
Each video contestant was payed, we cannot distribute transactions due to our privacy policy.
The player you are referring to, S1ng, confirmed receive of the funds.
Quote
https://blockchain.info/tx/b03fe39a5ebe4a8194970eb39a58d5e39516bd8cbd49d188ecac913bdc9cc000
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
Last time you said you paid everyone (on May 19th) you were lying. I think you still have only paid the players who know about this thread.
You said you would announce the winners, and I don't see any good reason not to - unless you only paid some of them...
I should also point out to everyone that FortuneJack does not seem to regret the way they have handled this situation in general. It was all denies and lies, then one day "WE PAYED EVERYONE SO TAKE OFF OUR RED TRUST!" (which was also a lie)
Not even an attempt at convincing players that they plan on behaving any differently in the future.
May 30, 2016, 04:41:11 AM
Seems like they chose to say they would pay all contenstants and then just pay those who they think would know and/or complain.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
player claims they were not paidAnd I'm still not received anything from the contest !
You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 20th I request list of paid winners (never receive reply)You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
Each video contestant was payed, we cannot distribute transactions due to our privacy policy.
The player you are referring to, S1ng, confirmed receive of the funds.
Quote
https://blockchain.info/tx/b03fe39a5ebe4a8194970eb39a58d5e39516bd8cbd49d188ecac913bdc9cc000
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
May 28, 2016, 10:58:31 PM
Seems like they chose to say they would pay all contenstants and then just pay those who they think would know and/or complain.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
MAY 19th they claim everyone has been paid
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
player claims they were not paidAnd I'm still not received anything from the contest !
You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 20th I request list of paid winners (never receive reply)You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
MAY 23rd Player who spoke up about not being paid received payment
This may seem petty, but It's one of many pieces of evidence that suggests FortuneJack has ultimately not decided to change their ways. If they think they will get away with it, and it's easier than telling the truth, they will lie.
May 23, 2016, 09:50:12 AM
https://blockchain.info/tx/b03fe39a5ebe4a8194970eb39a58d5e39516bd8cbd49d188ecac913bdc9cc000
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
I have received it too ,the prize for the contest !
Thanks FortuneJack !
Thanks TwitchySeal !
May 22, 2016, 04:04:11 AM
Im Confirming here that I received .3 BTC Two days ago,
All happened because TwitchySeal made this came into light.Otherwise they would have gone away with videos paying participants small amount of BTC.It is great to see a community member to work towards the right way .You earned my respect TwitchySeal.
May 21, 2016, 06:52:44 AM
Im Confirming here that I received .3 BTC Two days ago,
May 20, 2016, 01:34:04 PM
Provide a list of the contestants who were paid in total 3 BTC.
People are claiming you did not pay.
All your posts regarding signature campaign enrolment are deleted, so we can't bring up any proofs. The whole marketing team states otherwise.
No they aren't. lol Sig campaign thread isn't self moderated. I've never wore any signature advertising any site EVER.
The whole marketing team= Tako? Same person who is likely to blame for this entire mess?
People are claiming you did not pay.
Quote
All your posts regarding signature campaign enrolment are deleted, so we can't bring up any proofs. The whole marketing team states otherwise.
No they aren't. lol Sig campaign thread isn't self moderated. I've never wore any signature advertising any site EVER.
The whole marketing team= Tako? Same person who is likely to blame for this entire mess?
May 20, 2016, 05:17:19 AM
May 19, 2016, 08:44:10 PM
And I'm still not received anything from the contest !
You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
In the end, as you can see, we still payed out the prizes, so the accusation must be closed for now.
No ! This case must be continue ... !
You're publishing my video it means that you're accept my video and will pay afterward but ...
In the end, as you can see, we still payed out the prizes, so the accusation must be closed for now.
No ! This case must be continue ... !
May 19, 2016, 10:04:57 AM
Otherwise, why would be pay out 4-10 3 BTC each, and 11 - 30 places 3 BTC each as well? Could we not be more creative and differentiate 26 places?
As an example, attaching a screenshot from our Poker Tournament Interface, where you can see similar chart to ours (video contests'), for Prize fund distribution, where the amount of 303.6 mBTC is split between 10 - 12 places.
As an example, attaching a screenshot from our Poker Tournament Interface, where you can see similar chart to ours (video contests'), for Prize fund distribution, where the amount of 303.6 mBTC is split between 10 - 12 places.
Umm... I'm pretty sure that the picture you're showing actually means that 10, 11, and 12th place get 303.6 mBTC EACH just like your video contest was supposed to be .
If it were split between those places, it'd most likely be written 10 - 101.2, 11 - 101.2, 12 - 101.2 or 10-12: 101.2.
If it actually is splt, it's very deceptive to your players especially since it's following a relatively similar increase/decrease in pay spots.
Either case, you're just pouring more fuel to the fire at your own hand.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14400688
Here's the reply posted by accusation author TwitchySeal to our thread, where he brought to community's attention the terms of Video Contest, from where we can read:
[/size]
Quote
"7 participants who finish at IV place, will receive the prize pool of 3BTC equally distributed among them"
What I'm saying is the picture that you posted (as an example to back your case) is the same type of structure seen here (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14400688).
It seems that the payout from that poker tournament would be paying out 303.6mBTC EACH. Are you saying that those payouts referenced only pay out 101.2 each?
May 19, 2016, 09:31:30 AM
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
So you ignored it for weeks, then you told countless lies about it, then you tried to blame someone else and made up lies about me, now you expect to be trusted...hmm
I hope that other players will read this thread and realize that the more we stand up for ourselves the less we will get screwed. At the very least sites like FortuneJack will think twice before trying a scumbag move in the future.
No, we counted promotion void as there was no winner announced, nobody accumulated enough views. To our point of view, the whole accusation was about whether it was correct to void the promotion and not pay out the prizes for the rest of the contestants, or not. Concerned to those, whom T&C did not determine the minimal view requirement.
In the end, as you can see, we still payed out the prizes, so the accusation must be closed for now.
May 19, 2016, 09:17:44 AM
Here's the reply posted by accusation author TwitchySeal to our thread, where he brought to community's attention the terms of Video Contest, from where we can read:
[/size]
[/size]
Quote
"7 participants who finish at IV place, will receive the prize pool of 3BTC equally distributed among them"
You can just read what I said in OP of this thread. The only reason were still discussing 3btc each vs 3btc split is because you decided to lie over and over:
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
So you ignored it for weeks, then you told countless lies about it, then you tried to blame someone else and made up lies about me, now you expect to be trusted...hmm
I hope that other players will read this thread and realize that the more we stand up for ourselves the less we will get screwed. At the very least sites like FortuneJack will think twice before trying a scumbag move in the future.
May 19, 2016, 09:12:22 AM
Otherwise, why would be pay out 4-10 3 BTC each, and 11 - 30 places 3 BTC each as well? Could we not be more creative and differentiate 26 places?
As an example, attaching a screenshot from our Poker Tournament Interface, where you can see similar chart to ours (video contests'), for Prize fund distribution, where the amount of 303.6 mBTC is split between 10 - 12 places.
As an example, attaching a screenshot from our Poker Tournament Interface, where you can see similar chart to ours (video contests'), for Prize fund distribution, where the amount of 303.6 mBTC is split between 10 - 12 places.
Umm... I'm pretty sure that the picture you're showing actually means that 10, 11, and 12th place get 303.6 mBTC EACH just like your video contest was supposed to be .
If it were split between those places, it'd most likely be written 10 - 101.2, 11 - 101.2, 12 - 101.2 or 10-12: 101.2.
If it actually is splt, it's very deceptive to your players especially since it's following a relatively similar increase/decrease in pay spots.
Either case, you're just pouring more fuel to the fire at your own hand.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14400688
Here's the reply posted by accusation author TwitchySeal to our thread, where he brought to community's attention the terms of Video Contest, from where we can read:
[/size]
Quote
"7 participants who finish at IV place, will receive the prize pool of 3BTC equally distributed among them"
May 19, 2016, 08:54:26 AM
We payed out all of the contestants the split prize of 3 BTC as it was noted in T&C, therefore, the accusation must be closed.
May 19, 2016, 08:00:17 AM
Otherwise, why would be pay out 4-10 3 BTC each, and 11 - 30 places 3 BTC each as well? Could we not be more creative and differentiate 26 places?
As an example, attaching a screenshot from our Poker Tournament Interface, where you can see similar chart to ours (video contests'), for Prize fund distribution, where the amount of 303.6 mBTC is split between 10 - 12 places.
As an example, attaching a screenshot from our Poker Tournament Interface, where you can see similar chart to ours (video contests'), for Prize fund distribution, where the amount of 303.6 mBTC is split between 10 - 12 places.
Umm... I'm pretty sure that the picture you're showing actually means that 10, 11, and 12th place get 303.6 mBTC EACH just like your video contest was supposed to be .
If it were split between those places, it'd most likely be written 10 - 101.2, 11 - 101.2, 12 - 101.2 or 10-12: 101.2.
If it actually is splt, it's very deceptive to your players especially since it's following a relatively similar increase/decrease in pay spots.
Either case, you're just pouring more fuel to the fire at your own hand.
Jump to: