^^^ Coulomb's Law isn't up for debate, it's proven empirically. Gravity on the other hand is an unproven theory whose sole existence is to support the fraudulent claim of heliocentrism and the globe. Gravity is unprovable because it is a deception and part of a conspiracy, calling it a law is a bad joke. Sure things fall/sink in predictable manner, that's not the fucking point here however.
There is no such thing as an ''unproven theory'' but nice try. We are still waiting for those pictures of the dome mate.
Gravity theory is not proven to be true regarding things about gravity. Gravity exists whether or not there is any theory about it. Gravity theory does indeed exist, so it is proven to be a theory.
There is no such thing as an unproven theory... except for all the theories that do not exist as theories.
Its like trying to teach a brainwashed person common sense. but very hard.... Now they claim theory are facts and facts are theories.
You are right in this. But gravity doesn't have anything to do with gravity theory.
Gravity is a word that people give to something that happens. Gravity may work by density or electrostatics or some law of attraction or something else. Whatever makes gravity work is part of gravity theory. But even without the theory, gravity still works. The theory is only some thinking in the minds of some people who are trying to figure out the ins and outs of gravity operation.
Science theory can be about anything from any angle or direction. But two of the basic directions are:
1. Theory that something exists or doesn't exist;
2. Theory about how it works when it exists, or would work if it existed.
In the case of gravity, it exists. The theory is simply about how and why.
The idea that density or electrostatics has anything to do with making the effects of the thing that we call gravity, might be theory in the minds of some people. But others have shown that density and electrostatics are things that are completely different than gravity, although they work along with gravity at times.
