Author

Topic: Flat Earth - page 125. (Read 1095196 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
December 31, 2018, 03:57:09 AM
Happy New Year's everybody!*

*Except for notbatman and joerogers (and the other clowns that make guest appearances), because they know that as the sun and outer space don't exist, the idea of a "new year" is nonsensical bullshit.

OK, back to retirement.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 31, 2018, 03:47:58 AM
I'm trying to figure why you so stubbornly support the "official narrative" on basically every controversial subject Vod. Are you by chance, of Pakistani decent?

I support it because it's fact.  Been a fact for over two thousand years.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 30, 2018, 10:17:52 PM
I'm trying to figure why you so stubbornly support the "official narrative" on basically every controversial subject Vod. Are you by chance, of Pakistani decent?
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 30, 2018, 09:52:02 PM
Not according to comment sections on websites almost everywhere, there's a raging fire burning.

No one is discussing it seriously.  We've known the world is a sphere for 2,000 years.

We aren't arguing about a universal fact batty - you are simply entertaining us.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 30, 2018, 09:49:17 PM
The question of whether the Earth is in motion could be settled at an observatory with large telescope.

It was settled a couple thousand years ago.  Smiley

Not according to comment sections on websites almost everywhere, there's a raging fire burning.

Some of my research shows it wasn't until after world war 2 that the belief became wide spread in spite of the RCC and the Jesuits pushing globalism for 500 years. I'm sure wide spread use of the sextant made sure that faggots like Pythagoras didn't have the general public fooled into believing his mathematical slight of hand for thousands of years. The globe, as seen on TV! I bet your teachers, your priests, the brick layer and that nice Jewish lady down the street sold you too!
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 30, 2018, 07:40:37 PM
The question of whether the Earth is in motion could be settled at an observatory with large telescope.

It was settled a couple thousand years ago.  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 30, 2018, 06:57:49 PM
The question of whether the Earth is in motion could be settled at an observatory with large telescope. With the telescope base set to rotate at 15 degrees per hour, a desktop sized precision mechanical gyroscope need only be placed on the rotating platform with its axis set horizontally.

The gyroscope is then observed maintaining its position in space and the speed of the rotating platform derived from this observation. Setting the gyroscope axis vertical to test the Earth's rotation isn't even necessary at this point as everybody in the room already knows the outcome.

Game over, summary execution.

Do you have anything that's not hypothetical? Oh yeah, it could be done like this or that, do it yourself bitch.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 30, 2018, 05:26:27 PM
The question of whether the Earth is in motion could be settled at an observatory with large telescope. With the telescope base set to rotate at 15 degrees per hour, a desktop sized precision mechanical gyroscope need only be placed on the rotating platform with its axis set horizontally.

The gyroscope is then observed maintaining its position in space and the speed of the rotating platform derived from this observation. Setting the gyroscope axis vertical to test the Earth's rotation isn't even necessary at this point as everybody in the room already knows the outcome.

Game over, summary execution.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
December 30, 2018, 04:32:57 PM
Can I claim balloons rise because of the force of float, the sky with its negative mass crates a floatational field that pulls them up?

I'm tired of this absurd bullshit, it's a fucking conspiracy by organized crime.

You can claim anything that you want. But I can claim that balloons float upward because they are lighter than air.

So what? Whatever the reason, it isn't something to want to kill other people over. If you are so frustrated because you can't make other people believe the way you do, especially when you can't prove to them who the organized crime criminals really are, go have an ice cream.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 30, 2018, 04:17:09 PM
Can I claim balloons rise because of the force of float, the sky with its negative mass crates a floatational field that pulls them up?

I'm tired of this absurd bullshit, it's a fucking conspiracy by organized crime.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
December 30, 2018, 03:53:38 PM
A logical fallacy proves gravity does it? You idiots need to die, this conspiracy is fucking bullshit.

Gravity is simply the word used by most people to talk about something that happens. Whether or not there is an attraction or repulsion or something else, gravity is what it is called. If you don't like the word gravity, use something else. But don't get so upset when people laugh at you or revile you for trying to cram a different word down their throats. Your upset is only hurting yourself... or are you some crazy kind of a masochist?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 30, 2018, 03:46:55 PM
A logical fallacy proves gravity does it? You idiots need to die, this conspiracy is fucking bullshit.

If you get hit in the head with a baseball does that prove the ball was thrown by somebody? It seems like a reasonable explanation until you learn the ball was shot out of a pitching machine.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 30, 2018, 02:14:56 PM
^^^ Claiming that pressurized gas can exist in a hard vacuum without a barrier directly violates the laws of physics. Claiming the pressurized gas surrouning a rotating object moves with that object also violates the laws of physics. Claiming water conforms to the exterior of a rotating sphere violates the laws of physics as well.

Cut yourself and bleed to death you fucking liar!

Prove it, how do you know? Did you read about it? You never do your own experiments thats why you are so gullible and believe any idiot on youtube, it happens with flat earthers.

You worship free masons and their pseudo science brainwash scam.


Gravity is easily disproven.

Everything points to a geocentric flat earth.

Space is a lie.

Curve doesnt exist.

Stop arguing and do research before you talk crap there have been scientists since 500 years who proved flat earth coz the globe theory was only invented 500 years ago.

Even a recent guy called Albert a physicist proved there is no motion.

''Gravity is easily disproven.'' This will be fun, let's see it. Jump from a bridge!
member
Activity: 250
Merit: 10
December 30, 2018, 11:00:17 AM
^^^ Claiming that pressurized gas can exist in a hard vacuum without a barrier directly violates the laws of physics. Claiming the pressurized gas surrouning a rotating object moves with that object also violates the laws of physics. Claiming water conforms to the exterior of a rotating sphere violates the laws of physics as well.

Cut yourself and bleed to death you fucking liar!

Prove it, how do you know? Did you read about it? You never do your own experiments thats why you are so gullible and believe any idiot on youtube, it happens with flat earthers.

You worship free masons and their pseudo science brainwash scam.


Gravity is easily disproven.

Everything points to a geocentric flat earth.

Space is a lie.

Curve doesnt exist.

Stop arguing and do research before you talk crap there have been scientists since 500 years who proved flat earth coz the globe theory was only invented 500 years ago.

Even a recent guy called Albert a physicist proved there is no motion.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
December 30, 2018, 08:38:47 AM

Yo batty ...don't forget your favorite trademark trolling device...


But we should respect notbatman by capitalizing his name, shouldn't we? I mean, just because he doesn't capitalize it, doesn't mean we should disrespect him by doing the same, right? I mean, just because he doesn't respect himself, doesn't mean we shouldn't respect him, right?

Or does he know something we don't? Does he know that not capitalizing his name shows that he is a [wo]man? Does he know that if he capitalized the first letter of his name - Notbatman - that he would be suggesting that he is the member of the family of all those who do the same? Or does he know that writing his name in all caps - NOTBATMAN - shows that he is a slave? And he doesn't want to be a member of a family, or a slave.

Nah. Anybody who thinks the earth is flat probably doesn't know this stuff.

Cool
member
Activity: 222
Merit: 58
They call me Rad Rody.
December 30, 2018, 02:01:30 AM
notbatman
Flat Earth VIP
Legendary "in his own mind"

Activity: 1792
Merit: -360
Posts: 6297




Trust: -3,141,592/+1

TRADE WITH EXTREME CAUTION!!!

Using a sextant and a gyroscope I can prove the earth is flat. I mean I think that I can but I've never tried it, just regurgitating stuff that was said in YouTube videos. Also, gravity and pretty much all science is wrong, all space travel is faked, the poles do not exist, nor does Antarctica, nor do satellites, the sun, the moon, the stars, nor does any inkling of common sense. Oh also, Hitler was a pretty cool guy. Don't know how that's related, but go hang yourself with a celibate rope.


---


Also, congratulations to Colin O'Brady, the first man to cross the entirety of Antarctica alone.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/12/27/this-man-just-crossed-antarctica-alone-record-time/

Or as notbatman might call him, "the world's newest celebrity round earth shill."
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
December 29, 2018, 09:26:18 PM
^^^ Now you're supporting the conspiracy to replace fine artistic depictions with the "modern art" of meaningless and confusing shapes and colour combinations.

https://i.imgur.com/BU5pmb2.jpg

"modern art" and "modern science" are fruits of malice.

You're the dufus who suggested that an ancient Sumerian lion was wearing a modern wristwatch▼▼▼.

Here's a dude with a pet lion wearing a wrist watch:




Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 29, 2018, 08:54:18 PM
^^^ Now you're supporting the conspiracy to replace fine artistic depictions with the "modern art" of meaningless and confusing shapes and colour combinations.



"modern art" and "modern science" are fruits of malice.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
December 29, 2018, 08:33:44 PM
^^^ It's pink, grey and light blue.

Here's a dude with a pet lion wearing a wrist watch:

https://i.imgur.com/trW4yo4.jpg


You really need to realize that that's not a dude or a lion or a wristwatch. It's a statue or a carving. No wonder you think the earth is flat.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
December 29, 2018, 07:43:11 PM
^^^ It's pink, grey and light blue.

Here's a dude with a pet lion wearing a wrist watch:



Jump to: