Topic: Flat Earth - page 151. (Read 1095196 times)
I am surprised this subject on flat earth remains debatable till now since 2015 when this topic first came out. Oh well, there can certainly be no right if there's no left, no positive when there's no negative. Opposites do attract.. that's the human law of attraction.
Why do they keep drawing some lines and claim the water is ''flat'' Have they actually measured to see it's not actually flat?
maybe joe knows...he seems to be a very smart dude when it comes to these bulging watery type matters....
Why do they keep drawing some lines and claim the water is ''flat'' Have they actually measured to see it's not actually flat?
Well now, I just can't decide if batty or exemply should get the next Nobel Prize in flatearthretardology.
I was leaning toward my buddy exemply, but nowmy fellow epic troller batty seems to be
taking the lead. His posts are insightful and truly educational and I do believegullible idjits people will be truly impressed
with his ingenious theoretical hypothesis represented in stunning meme style that just blows away
any argument put forth by the current science community. Hats off to the newTroll Einstein of 2018.... Battyboy.
My hearty congratulations and keep up the awesome3 year prank job....
I was leaning toward my buddy exemply, but now
taking the lead. His posts are insightful and truly educational and I do believe
with his ingenious theoretical hypothesis represented in stunning meme style that just blows away
any argument put forth by the current science community. Hats off to the new
My hearty congratulations and keep up the awesome
...
Nothing to debunk here. Flat water - flat earth, it is so simple. That's why you're still on the list.
Research atmospheric refraction-atmospheric lensing: http://flatearth.altervista.org/gallery/MIRAGGI/
Bonus research link: https://downloadmp3x.com/watch/x5a5kIdvnfE/
I checked your link about mirages/atmospheric refraction. Unfortunately in my video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ObTd7DLMw you can clearly see the bottom of the ship as well as the top, all your images are ''doubled'' in a way because of the mirage/other effects. However you can clearly see none of those are in my video. Sucks for you..
Consider self-immolation, because a viewer watching a ship sail across the horizon debunks ships going up, over and behind curved water. Perspective, convergence and atmosphereic effects explain precisely what a viewer watching the ship sail away is observing.
While you decide what kind of accelerant to use, ponder the fact the bottom part of the scuttled ship in that video you've posted over and over and over again is a reflection of the area just above it due to a narrow band mirage.
I know you think throwing around this soup of words ''Perspective, convergence and atmosphereic effects explain precisely what a viewer watching the ship sail away is observing.'' Is debunking it but it's not, please explain how exactly and where in the video any of these effects are going on.
Nothing to debunk here. Flat water - flat earth, it is so simple. That's why you're still on the list.
Research atmospheric refraction-atmospheric lensing: http://flatearth.altervista.org/gallery/MIRAGGI/
Bonus research link: https://downloadmp3x.com/watch/x5a5kIdvnfE/
I checked your link about mirages/atmospheric refraction. Unfortunately in my video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ObTd7DLMw you can clearly see the bottom of the ship as well as the top, all your images are ''doubled'' in a way because of the mirage/other effects. However you can clearly see none of those are in my video. Sucks for you..
Consider self-immolation, because a viewer watching a ship sail across the horizon debunks ships going up, over and behind curved water. Perspective, convergence and atmosphereic effects explain precisely what a viewer watching the ship sail away is observing.
While you decide what kind of accelerant to use, ponder the fact the bottom part of the scuttled ship in that video you've posted over and over and over again is a reflection of the area just above it due to a narrow band mirage.
I know you think throwing around this soup of words ''Perspective, convergence and atmosphereic effects explain precisely what a viewer watching the ship sail away is observing.'' Is debunking it but it's not, please explain how exactly and where in the video any of these effects are going on.
A ship sails straight across the horizon when viewed from the side. Go curl up inside a gas oven, you've got nothing but dishonest rebuttals.
3. You're conflating one measurement with another, one phenomenon with another.
You're conflating your head with a hole in the ground. You're accusing me of using the same types of false reasonings that you make yourself, blissfully unaware of the point I was making, while throwing out thousands of years of science in the process, to bulldoze your way into ignorance with the passion of a homicidal maniac.
You forgot to mention that two of your great grandfathers were in the crowd of your picture (must be a family heirloom), who were married to two sisters, and all four of them had the same parents, which explains a lot about you.
https://i.imgur.com/pVrZrgL.jpg
How about you address my point about "apperent size" vs. "angular size" instead dipshit. The sextant is a scientific tool that's been in use for "thousands of years" dipshit. Go join your butt buddy Astargath in the oven, dipshit.
3. You're conflating one measurement with another, one phenomenon with another.
You're conflating your head with a hole in the ground. You're accusing me of using the same types of false reasonings that you make yourself, blissfully unaware of the point I was making, while throwing out thousands of years of science in the process, to bulldoze your way into ignorance with the passion of a homicidal maniac.
You forgot to mention that two of your great grandfathers were in the crowd of your picture (must be a family heirloom), who were married to two sisters, and all four of them had the same parents, which explains a lot about you.
Using a sextant I can measure angles on plane proving the Earth is flat, and with a gyroscope I can show the Earth is not in motion.
If I use a sextant to measure your height and it reads 45 degrees, you must be 2,700 miles tall.
Non-mechanical gyroscopes can be used to prove the earth is rotating.
But who are you kidding, I know you don't have either instrument, nor do you know what either one actually does.
But then again I know this is all a joke to you, so, joke's on me for responding to you.
1. You're conflating "apparent size" (measured from the viewer and changes value with distance to the viewer) with, "angular size" (measured from the horizon vanishing point and has a constant value).
2. You're conflating the so-called "Coriolis Effect" (an effect so small it requires a super-sensitive LASER or MEMs gyroscope to detect) caused by the rotation of the stars (aether drift) with the theorized rotation of a globe. If the Earth was in motion about an axis then a desktop gyroscope would experience torque; you can't rotate a gyroscope 360° in 24 hours and not have it react to maintain its position.
3. You're conflating one measurement with another, one phenomenon with another. I'm sorry but you're a fucking brainwashed retard or a shill. I've explained this several times now so I'm going to assume you're a shill, go rope yourself in either case.
Using a sextant I can measure angles on plane proving the Earth is flat, and with a gyroscope I can show the Earth is not in motion.
Using my brain and one of the millions of cells in it I can prove the earth is an oblate spheroid by looking at a picture. In fact even the most chromosomally challenged individuals can also identify a near round object from pictures.
Religous dogma makes you stupider than a retard LOL sounds about right!
Images from NASA prove nothing but your gullibility.
^^^Hey exemply my friend! So how's the funny farm treating you?
I see they give you internet access.
Maybe you could submit your ingenious bitcointalk off topic flat earth research for peer review along with all your fabulously intelligent posts and memes.
I think all your amazing bonus youtube links will be the final proof in the pudding that all of science has got it wrong for the past 1000 years.
Yes dude, I do believe the next Nobel Prize in Flatearthretardology has your name on it.
Well done and keep up the great work.....
(oh.. and tell your shrink I said Hi...)
I see they give you internet access.
Maybe you could submit your ingenious bitcointalk off topic flat earth research for peer review along with all your fabulously intelligent posts and memes.
I think all your amazing bonus youtube links will be the final proof in the pudding that all of science has got it wrong for the past 1000 years.
Yes dude, I do believe the next Nobel Prize in Flatearthretardology has your name on it.
Well done and keep up the great work.....
(oh.. and tell your shrink I said Hi...)
Using a sextant I can measure angles on plane proving the Earth is flat and with a gyroscope I can show the Earth is not in motion.
Using my brain and one of the millions of cells in it I can prove the earth is an oblate spheroid by looking at a picture. In fact even the most chromosomally challenged individuals can also identify a near round object from pictures.
Religous dogma makes you stupider than a retard LOL sounds about right!
Looking at an imaginary cartoon picture with deluded atheistic mind does not provide any ball earth proof whatsoever.
But flat enclosed stationary earth covered with a dome which is true creation proves The Bible is faithfull and true.
Earth is more than obvious display of a Creator.
LMAO!! This is ridiculous. 
I still lean toward Earth not being flat, but ...
LOL! Are you whinging about me asking you a question?
No, I’m not actually, glad you got a laugh tho.
You are such a child.
Wrong again...no surprise there.
At least the FE people bring up all kinds of points for FE.
Yeah and they are about as valid as your sky fairy science.
Ok, your turn bud. Gotta get back to work, so you can get your last word in, as per the usual.....
Two equal shills argue who is more wrong.
A la cart same team divide and conquer operators.
One flip-flopping between his blue marble ball and the oblate spheroid, the other fantasizing of some space Frisbee engulfed by endless amounts of gas burning at 3k NM distance, at a particular spot only .
Here enjoy 4 PLANE view.
That's tellin' them! Check out Tesla and 3 6 9 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NHaUrm4QN0. Besides, the music is classical.
The cube within the cube
Can you stop posting random shit? You don't even know it's called PLANE not Plain. For god's sake dude, go to a mental hospital.
There's a saying to never interrupt an enemy when he's making a mistake however, I'll make an exception in this case:
Dude's on your team man, posting shitty memes with spelling mistakes and ridiculous theories renforces the stereo type flat earth is stupid and crazy. This along with multiple full-size images per post helps slide informative posts with straight garbage. Users like this along with organizations like the Flat Earth Society are your greatest allies and all you can do is shit on him, you should feel bad and KYS
Nothing to debunk here. Flat water - flat earth, it is so simple. That's why you're still on the list.
Research atmospheric refraction-atmospheric lensing: http://flatearth.altervista.org/gallery/MIRAGGI/
Bonus research link: https://downloadmp3x.com/watch/x5a5kIdvnfE/
I checked your link about mirages/atmospheric refraction. Unfortunately in my video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ObTd7DLMw you can clearly see the bottom of the ship as well as the top, all your images are ''doubled'' in a way because of the mirage/other effects. However you can clearly see none of those are in my video. Sucks for you..
Consider self-immolation, because a viewer watching a ship sail across the horizon debunks ships going up, over and behind curved water. Perspective, convergence and atmosphereic effects explain precisely what a viewer watching the ship sail away is observing.
While you decide what kind of accelerant to use, ponder the fact the bottom part of the scuttled ship in that video you've posted over and over and over again is a reflection of the area just above it due to a narrow band mirage.
I know you think throwing around this soup of words ''Perspective, convergence and atmosphereic effects explain precisely what a viewer watching the ship sail away is observing.'' Is debunking it but it's not, please explain how exactly and where in the video any of these effects are going on.
Two equal shills argue who is more wrong.
A la cart same team divide and conquer operators.
One flip-flopping between his blue marble ball and the oblate spheroid, the other fantasizing of some space Frisbee engulfed by endless amounts of gas burning at 3k NM distance, at a particular spot only .
Here enjoy 4 PLANE view.
That's tellin' them! Check out Tesla and 3 6 9 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NHaUrm4QN0. Besides, the music is classical.
~whinging about sky fairy terminology~
Start a sky fairy thread ....I’m sure all your most pressing questions will be addressed...problem solved.
Any other issues I can help you with there, bud?
LOL! Are you whinging about me asking you a question? You are such a child. You don't even seem to have an answer for something that you talk about. At least the FE people bring up all kinds of points for FE.
~whinging about sky fairy terminology~
Start a sky fairy thread ....I’m sure all your most pressing questions will be addressed...problem solved.
Any other issues I can help you with there, bud?
Two equal shills argue who is more wrong.
A la cart same team divide and conquer operators.
One flip-flopping between his blue marble ball and the oblate spheroid, the other fantasizing of some space Frisbee engulfed by endless amounts of gas burning at 3k NM distance, at a particular spot only .
Here enjoy 4 PLANE view.
Using a sextant I can measure angles on plane proving the Earth is flat and with a gyroscope I can show the Earth is not in motion.
Using my brain and one of the millions of cells in it I can prove the earth is an oblate spheroid by looking at a picture. In fact even the most chromosomally challenged individuals can also identify a near round object from pictures.
Religous dogma makes you stupider than a retard LOL sounds about right!
This is what Kyrie Irving was preaching on the entire NBA. But it won't really matter if it's flat or round, right?
Jump to: