Topic: Flat Earth - page 162. (Read 1095196 times)

The five scientific experiments I offer as proof,

1. Aiy's Failure Experiment,
2. The Michelson & Morley Experiment,
3. The Trouton–Noble experiment,
4. The Sagnac Experiment,
5. Prunier & Dufour's replication of The Sagnac Experiment,

they've all been carefully documented and repeated by others. The results of the experiments are agreed upon by everybody. Why should my argument be dismissed when nobody is arguing the results? Any results from me attempting to replicate all those experiments myself would have less credibility than the existing documented results.

Am I "just trusting random internet websites"? No, these are established scientific experiments.

Finally you accuse me of being dishonest, fuck off you worthless sack of shit.


No I'm not wrong about aether, those five established scientific experiments I offer as proof are not wrong. Those experiments have been carefully documented, replicated by others and the results have been confirmed.


If you've been doxed, then perhaps you should be more careful about who you make false accusation about when you're screwing over their ability to trade and make money on this forum.

You are a liar.     WHO is hiding?

My name and address are known.  I live with my beliefs every day.

Let's see YOU identify yourself and have your family, friends and coworkers know you are a liar.

Anonymous people can be as dishonest as they want.

 

Personally, I don't think anybody should get a negative trust rating for something he believes in. I mean, if you think it is right, and you are right or wrong, that is no reason for a trust rating in a forum. Giving such a trust rating is childish.

Where you are wrong with anything that includes the aether is, nobody has enough knowledge as to how the aether acts, and why it acts that way, to conclusively use aether "science" as proof for anything... at least not the way you are using it.

Yeah but you didn't answer though. Have you performed the experiments yourself or are you just trusting random internet websites? Why is it that everytime an article/website is against your belief it is a hoax but if it supports your belief it has to be 100% true? Stop being a dishonest person.

^^^ No it's not meaningless, Vod is claiming I'm a liar and given me a negative trust rating as a member of the default trust list for stating a provable fact. Fucking sack of shit hides behind the cop-out to authority.

Do it then, show us a video of you re creating the experiment, why would you trust them? Why would you think anyone ever did that experiment? Why don't you use the same criteria for your beliefs? Dishonest liar, as always.

''I'm quoting a wikipedia article (with sources) that I believe is factual (quoted text)'' What you believe is meaningless if you haven't done the experiments yourself.

@Astargath, you're screaming in pain as you strike out at me "LIAR!".

Airy failed to detect the motion of the Earth, re-branding the experiment as a failure to prove the existence of the aether is a Jewish tactic and a lie; Airy set out to prove the motion of the Earth. Saying the experiment as an aberration in the heliocentric theory is Jewish word salad for "our bullshit theory is proven wrong so we'll give it fancy label and carry on".

AF is a simple experiment that almost anybody who's technically inclined can perform to prove there's a aether and, that the Earth is motionless. The results of AF are confirmed by the Michelson & Morley Experiment (also dishonestly re-branded as a failure to detect the aether) and, all arguments against both experiments involving Special Relativity are debunked by the Prunier & Dufour replication of the Sagnac Experiment. The P&D Sagnac replication takes SR into account and proves the theory is not consistent with experimental results.

---

---

I've got even more proof of a motionless Earth:

   "The Trouton–Noble experiment was an attempt to detect motion of the Earth through the luminiferous aether, and was conducted in 1901–1903 by Frederick Thomas Trouton (who also developed the Trouton's ratio) and H. R. Noble. It was based on a suggestion by George FitzGerald that a charged parallel-plate capacitor moving through the aether should orient itself perpendicular to the motion. Like the earlier Michelson–Morley experiment, Trouton and Noble obtained a null result: no motion relative to the aether could be detected.[1][2] This null result was reproduced, with increasing sensitivity, by Rudolf Tomaschek (1925, 1926), Chase (1926, 1927) and Hayden in 1994. ..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouton–Noble_experiment

How am I liar, how does this make a liar? I'm quoting a wikipedia article (with sources) that I believe is factual (quoted text), how am I fucking lying?

---

---

6-Hour Gyroscope Test Debunks Spinning Earth - Flat Earth -- https://youtu.be/IGPSjgv9t3E

Shills claiming ring LASER and MEMs gyroscopes can measure a rotation are full of shit BTW, they're measuring the weak Coriolis effect caused by aether drift (measured by the M&M Experiment). If Earth was spinning at it would effect the gyroscope in the video.

---

---

The Earth is motionless and this is an observable, repeatable, testable, documented, empirical fact:

    Aiy's Failure Experiment. -- Empirical proof the Earth is motionless.

   The Michelson & Morley Experiment. -- Empirical proof the Earth is motionless.

   The Trouton–Noble experiment.  -- Empirical proof the Earth is motionless.

   The Sagnac Experiment. -- Empirical proof of the aether.

   Prunier & Dufour's replication of The Sagnac Experiment. -- Empirical proof the theory of Special Relativity is not consistent with experiment.

Why do you believe that Airy actually did the experiment? Are you not listening to the masses to believe that the experiment was ever done, or the results gathered were what they were? Do you own a sextant? Have you ever used it yourself to measure whatever it is you did? Did you build your own sextant? Maybe the person who constructed your sextant if you have one has prisms in it that refract the light to make you believe what you are seeing is real when it really isnt. Have you ever got a sunburn? How do you know its from UV radiation from the sun, and that the gravity elves didn't actually use a ray gun on you to punish you for basking in their holy sun? How do you know that the world didn't begin when you were born, and that everyone else was artificially planted on this "earth" (cough cough simulation) with their own memories and personalities to make you believe that the earth was more than a century old and round?

I buy that Nasa is the "mass" in power or whatever (they aren't, they are just a bunch of space nerds), but what about all of the high school physics teachers. No slight to them, but I can hardly define them as the ruling elite with a sole mission to brainwash us for... whatever reason? The same can be said about english teachers, have you ever considered how evil it is that we have language!?! Someone taught you language, and you just unknowingly agreed to be taught! What if the word "physics" is actually a magic word that allows the elves to take a fraction of your soul (made of aether and corn syrup) every time you say it?

Your arguments are rambling thought experiments more than anything else. If anyone wants to discuss the implications of physics using planes instead of spheres thats one thing. If you want to say that 90% of the laws of physics aren't real, you should first come up with working alternate theories that don't rely on the physics you are discarding to prove. Stop trying to prove things with optics. You claimed the sun was the span of the Atlantic ocean away from the earth, and the rays are divergent. Optics as we know them don't work under those assumptions.

Save a Bitcoin, and one day if it ever hits an absurd amount of money, please book a commercial space flight that'll be available in 10-20 years.

You are a dishonest liar, again.

''Airy was trying to repeat an observation made by a German astronomer a few years before.

Airy’s Failure is an 1871 experiment that George Airy undertook which attempted to measure the drag on light that would change the stellar aberration of light from a suitable star that was almost overhead (hence almost zero refraction), by using a telescope filled with water rather than air. (See his original paper here: http://rspl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/20/130-138/35.full.pdf+html) The Aether theory indicated that the different refractive medium should produce a different effect compared to a telescope filled with air. The experiment was repeated a number of times on different nights, at times six months apart. The result of the experiment was that there was no evidence to support the existence of the Aether. The common name for this, ‘Airy’s Failure,’ concerns the failure of the experiment to demonstrate the existence of the Aether. However, if you believe in the Aether (against all evidence), then you would conclude the Earth was stationary, even though the regular stellar aberration observations indicate that it is not stationary.

The notion of a stationary Earth is not proved or denied by this experiment. It helped to remove the Luminiferous Aether theory''

Why do you keep lying?

Do you know what brainwashing is?

It is believing in something that is told to you over and over and over.

You are saying that everyone who has worked with satellites, for example, is told everyday that what they work on is nonsense?

Grow up troll - I find it impossible for you to be brainwashed against things you can prove to yourself.

That makes you a liar.  Not us.

The obvious reality is that everybody is brainwashed not knowinly liars, the liars are actually few in number perhaps 1% of the population. You're dishonestly framing my arguments and should curl up in the oven with Vod for being a fag.

I think most people will agree he was in the beginning.

But everyone is calling him on his lies, we have proved his magic doesn't exist.

Now all he can do is tell people to kill themselves.  Boring.

It's sad how far he has fallen  

You can't be the only one telling the truth if everybody else is a liar. That's not how reality works. But please don't let little things like reality get in your way, you've been massively entertaining, to say the least.

"The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you"

Actually - that would be you.

You are calling 7 billion people liars, and then you get upset when someone calls you one.

No you're a hippocrit who goes around accusing people of being liars while being the liar and copping out to authority. Go curl up inside a gas oven you worthless sack of shit!

Then another person will take my place.  And then another.

I'm not the only person that detests liars...

You should kill yourself.

You'd have to be a bastard to believe you were correct and 99% of the world was wrong, wouldn't you?

We continue to provide you with what you asked for - simple experiments you can do yourself to prove the world is a sphere.

You ignore them, then claim magic that exists no where else in the universe makes your fantasies true. 

Remember how upset you got when I first called you a liar?  You're regularly calling 7 billion people liars.

Get over yourself, troll.

How is the experiment "trash"? The nature of electrostatic forces makes the Cavendish experiment inconclusive and a completely useless setup. You just calling AF trash because it failed to support the bullshit globe model is just an immature response from a butthurt loser who can't prove the official narrative.

SaltySpoon wanted an experiment he could perform himself and AF was the simplest one I could think of. Proof of the aether is available in the form of the Sagnac Experiment, however the setup is more complex. The Dufour & Prunier replication also debunks special relativity.


Yes Vod, the masses are full of truth and I'm the bastard...


The shortwave radio signals bounce between the ionosphere and the ground (a waveguide) and can reach any point on Earth.This works on both the globe model and in reality. If you're having trouble tuning into your assinged shortwave number station from within the US, it's probably because of atmosphereic conditions or, changes made by HAARP to block your espionage related actives.