Author

Topic: Flat Earth - page 175. (Read 1095196 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 07, 2018, 11:54:55 AM
Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion.  

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

I admire you. My mistakes usually aren't very big, but I have this false pride that makes it hard for me to admit to them.

Cool









Thank you for showing us your FE philosophy... or is it really your FE deception ideals for controlling the world?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 07, 2018, 11:34:30 AM
Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion.  

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

I admire you. My mistakes usually aren't very big, but I have this false pride that makes it hard for me to admit to them.

Cool







full member
Activity: 288
Merit: 102
Yin Yang religion of wisdom, harmony
November 07, 2018, 11:03:46 AM

4D flat square earth is moving on strong

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47675749
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 06, 2018, 08:17:15 PM
Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

I admire you. My mistakes usually aren't very big, but I have this false pride that makes it hard for me to admit to them.

Cool
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 105
Negative trust for an opinion! Check it out.
November 06, 2018, 07:25:40 PM
Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.

But can you prove any of the claims you're making or are you just here running your mouth? 

Prove to us your claim of stars being what you stated them to be.  What type of experiments have you done to prove this claim to yourself?   



legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
November 06, 2018, 07:09:37 PM
  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

says the clown who still isn't convinced the earth isn't flat because water doesn't curve or some such ridiculous thing...
or is just trolling and likes getting attention like the other two silly twats in here...
copper member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 4460
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 06, 2018, 06:58:16 PM
Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 

Oh, I know the difference, but unlike you I'm able to admit I've been mistaken, I'm capable of learning, and I don't get butthurt when somebody calls out one of my mistakes.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 06, 2018, 06:47:00 PM
Flat earth people:




 Cheesy
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 105
Negative trust for an opinion! Check it out.
November 06, 2018, 06:46:48 PM
If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so.  

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Get back to me when you've proven you're qualified.

Ok no need to prove your claim.  Just wanted to make sure you didn't have anything.  Should of known you were not going to be able to prove much not knowing the difference between fission and fusion. 
copper member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 4460
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 06, 2018, 06:43:02 PM
If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so.  

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Get back to me when you've proven you're qualified.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
November 06, 2018, 06:42:37 PM


If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so.  

jeezus christ dude, are you trolling like your buddy batshitcrazy now? ...pick up a basic physics textbook and read about stars...
oh wait...no that won't work... they are all  written by a conspiracy of lying nasa scientists...nm....

legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
November 06, 2018, 06:35:02 PM
cue some moronic rebuttal meme .... delusional trolling nonsense in 3...2...

right on cue....
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 105
Negative trust for an opinion! Check it out.
November 06, 2018, 06:06:53 PM
how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Thermonuclear bomb uses fusion.

Thanks for the correction.  It's been many years since my last physics class.

If you could provide solid proof of stars being what you claim (I think your claiming they are thermonuclear bombs in the sky) I for one would love for you to do so. 
copper member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 4460
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 06, 2018, 05:40:22 PM
how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Thermonuclear bomb uses fusion.

Thanks for the correction.  It's been many years since my last physics class.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
November 06, 2018, 05:12:53 PM
how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.

Thermonuclear bomb uses fusion.
copper member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 4460
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 06, 2018, 04:50:52 PM
how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein.

That would be impossible, because it's not a thermonuclear bomb (nuclear fission.)  Our sun, and all stars are powered by a nuclear fusion reaction.

Proving a concept to someone requires that individual to have incite, a basic understanding of the subject, and a wiliness and the capacity to learn.  You've demonstrated you have none of the prerequisites.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
November 06, 2018, 04:45:02 PM
Why the number 137 is one of the greatest mysteries in physics


Famous physicists like Richard Feynman think 137 holds the answers to the Universe.

The fine structure constant has mystified scientists since the 1800s.

The number 1/137 might hold the clues to the Grand Unified Theory.

Relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics are unified by the number.

Does the Universe around us have a fundamental structure that can be glimpsed through special numbers?

The brilliant physicist Richard Feynman (1918-1988) famously thought so, saying there is a number that all theoretical physicists of worth should "worry about". He called it "one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man".

That magic number, called the fine structure constant, is a fundamental constant, with a value which nearly equals 1/137. Or 1/137.03599913, to be precise. It is denoted by the Greek letter alpha - α.

What's special about alpha is that it's regarded as the best example of a pure number, one that doesn't need units. It actually combines three of nature's fundamental constants - the speed of light, the electric charge carried by one electron, and the Planck's constant, as explains physicist and astrobiologist Paul Davies to Cosmos magazine. Appearing at the intersection of such key areas of physics as relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics is what gives 1/137 its allure.

Physicist Laurence Eaves, a professor at the University of Nottingham, thinks the number 137 would be the one you'd signal to the aliens to indicate that we have some measure of mastery over our planet and understand quantum mechanics. The aliens would know the number as well, especially if they developed advanced sciences.


Fine Structure Constant - Sixty Symbols

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlSLIW0gZtk



In other words, standard science fits math almost completely. And vice-versa. But FE has almost an infinity to go to fit math and make sense at the same time.


Cool
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
November 06, 2018, 01:16:39 PM
Would you believe a bitch two miles tall? You've been lied to about fossils and the creation of Earth, fossils form like concrete and dry quickly. T-Rex is a lie, they've tricked you with a piece of giant chicken bone less than 10,000 years old and a bullshit story to go along with it.

Then I would have been lied to about carbon dating, evolution, fossils, etc.

Or.. OR.... you are lying to us right now.

The Sun is a light in the sky, how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein. '

Been done a million times, literally.

Why don't you prove you are not lying?


 Cool
donator
Activity: 3228
Merit: 1226
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
November 06, 2018, 12:50:27 PM
In the ocean, you see boats cut off, and slide off, while you argue its visual/distance.

There is an experiment that refutes this and further demonstrates the Earth is, in fact, a sphere.

1) Find a flat land patch, say desert, big field, etc.
2) Set a laser 3 meters above the ground
3) Drive in any direction you like for 15-20 KM.
4) Place a segmented graph that is 3 meters tall and see if the laser still shines at the 3-meter mark.

This strongly suggests a curvature earth model. As if the Earth was 100% flat, you'd see the laser at exactly the 3-meter mark.

newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
November 06, 2018, 12:46:49 PM
Board on a ship for round the world sailing. This will be an experiment. Or try to fly to space (actually, you may just watch some pics and videos from there, but up to you).
Jump to: