Topic: Flat Earth - page 176. (Read 1095196 times)

Would you believe a bitch two miles tall? You've been lied to about fossils and the creation of Earth, fossils form like concrete and dry quickly. T-Rex is a lie, they've tricked you with a piece of giant chicken bone less than 10,000 years old and a bullshit story to go along with it.




The Sun is a light in the sky, how about you prove it's a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb Einstein. 'you gonna tell me how heavy balls in the shed proves there's a heavy spherical bomb exploding up there? Maybe tell me how the flying underwater photoshop puppet masters at NASA use their Venusian radar to measure the Sun. Perhaps you'll show me Hollywood made moves of the hydrogen bomb exploding, followed The Moon Landing, The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut.

Asshat.

So in your flattard world, dogs are thousand of kilometers tall?

Your second sentence makes the same amount of sense.

The only way I feel heat from a hologram is if she is good looking and doing something naughty.

 

''The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.'' Prove it dipshit, you keep making ridiculous claims with 0 evidence. Show me the projector.

^^^ If the Earth was a ball dogs would have chewed it to shreds by now.



That's like asking how far is 100 mph?

When you observe an object or area with the naked eye it has a measurable size, this is measured by viewing the angle formed between the sides of the object or area and the vanishing point at the horizon. It doesn't matter where the visible object is located in your field of view or how far away it is, the angle will always be the same and will correlate with a physical distance. In the case of an angle of 1' it correlates with a distance of 1 nautical mile.

In 1° there are 60' so if the angular size measured is 10° then the object is 600 miles wide and will most likely be a coastline or mountain range.




The Sun and Moon are holographic projections and not physical objects.

The sun is a bomb 93,000,000 miles away.  Know that for a thousand years.

Nautical miles exist, like any other form of measurement.

Angles can be measured, but they can't compute distance anymore than a hammer can.

You need to know to work the sextant.

If you are done with your REEEEEEEE!!!!!  tell us why your derp magic should be considered over billions of repeated observations?

 

The heat production of a 32 mile-object would be fairly immense and concentrated, so during an eclipse, the moon should be heated up and glowing, from being much closer to the object, and from the fact, the object is producing enough heat for that much warmth over a large area.

You are making a fool out of yourself right now.   

If you have any cousins in school, ask them why you are wrong.

Tell me - how far away is 10 degrees?

 

The Sun can be observed to change size while rising/setting at high altitudes when atmosphereic conditions allow for it.; the atmospheric magnification that normally occurs as a function of distance is reduced. Under average conditions at sea level with the Sun directly overhead, atmospheric distortions are minimized and the agreed upon measured angular size is 32 arcminutes. With this in mind  and considering the definition of one nautical mile is one arcminute the diameter of the Sun can be stated empirically as 32 miles.

Fact: The Sun's angular size is 32'.
Fact: One arcminute is one nautical mile.

The reason the shills are freaking out so hard is because of how the nautical mile is defined, it's based on the angle of one arcminute centered on the horizon and the physical distance that angle covers. With the globe hallucination, the horizon is the curve of a dome of water or land that's three miles out. In reality the horizon is generally the result of optical convergence and because of this, the actual size of an object can be measured by measuring it's angular size. The object having its angular size measured can be in your face or miles away and the measured angle will be the same (atmospheric effects not withstanding).

The shill will continue to REEEEEEEEEEEEE NASA's Venusian radar proves the Sun is 93,000,000 miles away, it's a bomb a million miles wide, REEEEEEEEEEEEE! !!!!!!!! Nautical miles are impossible REEEEEEEEEEEEE! !!!  The size of angles can't be measured REEEEEEEEEEEEE! !!!!!!! The sextant doesn't work REEEEEEEEEEEEE! !!!!! GLOBE GLOBE GLOBE! !!!!!!

Please consider suicide.

This is a troll thread for flat earth.  Take a look at notaman's OP.  It was lie - he was just baiting responses.

When facts started coming in fast that he was a flattard, he enjoyed it.

Blind azimuth, these are globehead starter packs posted in a wrong thread. This is Flat Earth.

Poor guy, you don't even have a globehead thread so you need to bring all this garbage here.

I will repeat again: monkeyman science links are obsolete in Flat Earth Truth thread.

Globo-azimuth's toys 

....check

....check

...check

....or just trolling or both


yeah, roger that, you dumb ass...
try these for starters..there's phuking hundreds of em...then go pray to your imaginary invisible sky fairy

http://itc.gsw.edu/faculty/bcarter/physgeol/egypt/FlatEarth.pdf
https://astronomytopicoftheday.wordpress.com/2016/03/12/the-earth-is-flat-and-other-nonsense/
http://embracetheball.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-distance-to-sun.html
http://embracetheball.blogspot.com/p/flat-earth-tests.html
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/41-our-solar-system/the-earth/orbit/87-how-do-you-measure-the-distance-between-earth-and-the-sun-intermediate
https://www.space.com/17081-how-far-is-earth-from-the-sun.html
https://earthsky.org/earth/you-can-measure-the-sun
http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast161/Unit4/venussun.html
https://www.universetoday.com/117843/how-did-we-find-the-distance-to-the-sun/
http://www.josleys.com/show_gallery.php?galid=384

cue some moronic rebuttal meme about nasa conspiracies, faked images, the lies we've been told, or some such paranoid delusional trolling nonsense in 3...2...

I think it's interesting that notbatman has actually stated he believes the Sun is 32 arcminutes in size, as this is a constant value that contradicts his Flat Earth model.

Why only a couple of days ago he posted a gif of the Sun changing size as it moved as his proof that the Sun is close.

 

Links of nasa and monkeyman science do not prove spinning ball earth, also they can't debunk flat earth.





Of course not. Everyone with eyes to see(except for an atheist horde of bct) can observe that small sun is close and circling above Flat Earth.










 

haha, wait, wut?


ROFLMFAO!  You must not know that "arcminute" is an angular measurement, or you're completely oblivious of how angles work, or as others have said you're a liar... because I find it really hard to believe anybody is that stupid.

^Agreed... and I think he just enjoys the attention tbh.
Probably doesn't get much irl...

you actually think he has any?

 

We all know he doesn't believe what he posts - he certainly doesn't tell his real life friends he is a loon.

Only in the anonymity that this forum provides will he lie, because there are no consequences for him.

why are you not in a straitjacket?


I googled and got this.... same as every other normal person who googles "What is diameter of the sun"

Here, let me google that for ya.....

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=what+is+diameter+of+the+sun%3F

Of course it is.  But any junior high student will know an angle does not equal a distance.   You need to know the angle and two out of the three sides, or two angles and one side to calculate the third distance.

If I ask you how far away 45 degrees is, how can you answer that?

We can calculate the distance to the sun by observing it from two different angles and knowing the distance between them.

 

Your first fact is correct, you would not be able to see the Sun 93 million miles away if it were 32 miles in diameter.

You second "fact" is not only wrong but irrelevant as the fact, the Sun is visible with an angular size of 32' proves it's not 93 million miles away.

The angular measurement of 32' is confirmed by Google. Also what evidence do you have that discredits the sextant, a distance measuring device? At this point you're just making fallacious claims. The sextant's ability to give a precision measurement to the Sun is irrelevant if the measurement is only off by a few hundred miles; you're conflating "can't measure" with "can't measure with precision".

Why are you not swinging from a rope?