Post a link to your peer-reviewed scientific paper and let's discuss it. Youtube videos don't count.
Ok so the bendy water is off? Don't want to talk about that anymore?
Everyone here just note how these operatives work. Once whooped they will simply move to the next thing. Over and over. This shows no desire to learn. suchmoon is here to defend his science/religion. He is unreachable. The beauty is he thinks he has a higher intelligence than all of us because he can repeat what he has been told. Just a FYI we can all simply repeat what they told us. Some of us are looking for proof of the claim. Nothing more and nothing less.
You made the claim of gravity I did not. I'm asking you to prove your claim. I believed in gravity for 25+years. Now I want facts to back that belief. Show me gravity at work. There should be 500 years of data that you can go from. Prove to me it is gravity that causes me to fall off the ladder. Show me a larger object attracting a smaller object with no other force than gravity at play.
Remember I'm a moron for not buying into gravity. WHY? If I can be relegated to the status of a moron for not believing, I would think I should have a clear cut example of gravity causing objects to fall in the next few minutes. Remember you need to prove it was gravity that actually caused it.
Jump from a building, see what happens. ''There should be 500 years of data that you can go from.'' Yes, all the math and physics are there to back it up, you sure you went to school?
''Show me a larger object attracting a smaller object with no other force than gravity at play. '' You believe outer space doesn't exist, so it would be hard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_velocity
Science is not about belief. You are choosing to believe the story which was given. The story you believe in goes against how I see water behaving. It goes against my reality. Hence I want to see proof of the claims in the science book. Once I'm greeted with hate and vigor and not proof then this becomes a game of simply exposing you, which nobatman has done very well. None of you are interested in science.
The physics of water and it's properties does not back up your story. The physics of water says it finds it's level, It must be in a container or it flows, it does not take the form of the exterior of a shape. If you want to make a claim that goes against this then you must prove it. Science demands it.
Math proves nothing. It's a language. Vod is having a bit of trouble with this as well. You must first know the underlying axioms they have used. Yes the formulas work out but they are not based in reality (Tesla). It's a trick to fool people like you into disbelieving your reality.
Straight from Richard Feynman's mouth regarding the math your attempting to use. It just shows you have no idea what the hell your claiming regarding math. Let me guess Feynman is a dick hole as well. What school did you go to where they told you math proves things?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obCjODeoLVw
You have put your direct reality on hold to believe your authority. This is brainwashing.
What happens when a bunch of those fall to the ground? They find level. Your comparing a raindrop (surface tension) to the ocean. This is a false equivalence. Show me a body of water do that and then you'll have something. The way science supporters do science is very fascinating.
Finding it's level =/= being flat. Water in the ocean is not flat, unless you can prove it.
Science made the claim we are on a sphere 500 years ago. It's up to you to prove the bending/curving water. The person making the claim is the one who needs to provide the proof.
The only claims I'm making is
Bodies of water find level (testable, provable repeatable)
Bodies of water must be contained or they will flow (testable, provable repeatable)
Bodies of water do not take the exterior form of a shape (testable, provable repeatable)
Once you get away from the 3 claims I have made above I simply have no idea. Hence the questions. This is why I'm asking for proof.