Topic: Flat Earth - page 200. (Read 1095196 times)

So your definition of the ocean/lake is it's a container?  Are we still on a giant curved sphere (I know you like going back and forth)?  Your water is clinging to the outside of a sphere.  Where is the container?

I noticed you have avoided all the other question and the one you attempted to answer was well.  I'll leave it at that. 

Do you BELIEVE in gravity or is gravity a FACT?  If you say you BELIEVE in gravity then I have no issues with that.  Just like I have no issues if people BELIEVE in Jesus, God, Buddha, or Zeus.  It's when they tell me it's a FACT I have an issue.

What real FACTS do you as a man have regarding the shape of the earth?  All your doing is repeating your education which most of us have had.  You must have ample proof of this topic that you have gone out and done for yourself.  I would like to see it.  Calling people every name in the book while having nothing but 2nd hand and 3rd hand knowledge, of which goes against our direct reality, with no real evidence you have gained yourself shows much about who and what you are.

Show me bodies of water displaying convexity.  Show me bodies of water conforming to the exterior of a shape.  For you to put your direct reality on hold you must have witnessed this for yourself.  You for sure must have seen this with your own experiments to consider yourself such an expert to be able to judge other peoples intelligence. 

Finally IF I scammed you who is the smart one?  Your walking around  here acting smart all the while being easily scammed.  It's very confusing.  I would think someone of your immense intelligence would not fall for such an obvious scam. 

Yes, the container is called an "ocean". Or could be a "lake". Walk up to one (preferably not in a hurricane) and see if it flows on you. I think it doesn't.

But yeah, you idiots don't believe gravity either. That's another NASA/Tyson conspiracy, right scammer?

LOL  Nice avoid.  Amazing the water levels right out when you want it to.  Nice insults.  

I guess we need to go back to step one with suchmoon.

Is the water curved at any point on the way from NA to Europe?  Does this water display convexity at any point?  Have you with your own eyes + magic binoculars seen the boat go behind water or did it go out of your perspective?  How did you prove that it was earths curvature and not perspective?  What experiments and measuring devices did you use?

I wonder if I sent my son to regular school if the science teach would provide real evidence or just throw screen shots up from seemingly a deep dive website.  Seems you need to learn about the scientific method.  Prove the tripe your saying son.

My proof is that all bodies of water finds it's level and must be in a container or else it will flow.  Bodies of water do not take the shape of the exterior of a surface.  That is everyday reality.  Measurable, observable, repeatable.

Show us your evidence of bodies of water (ocean) able holding shape to the outside of a container (earth) without flowing.  Can you prove anything at all?  Or you just run your mouth, son?

Because you lied. There is nothing about sailing over curves in Tyson's quote. As I said, the only place where that phrase appears is a flat-earther site:




You should let your kid go to an actual school and perhaps go with him too, you dumbass scammer.

"A globe is a globe, it doesn't have "domes" in its oceans and ships don't sail "up" on them."

If you sail from North America to Europe on a spherical object how can you not be sailing up the water at some point?  The water surface is never level on your model.  Your either sailing up or down (the entire time).   Please explain.

If the Earth is a globe then there's a fucking convex dome of water, I didn't invent the fucking globe math, I didn't make this shit up.


"... "If you send a ship straight to the horizon eventually it begins to disappear until it’s no longer visible beyond you horizon," he said. ..."
Source: https://www.newsweek.com/neil-degrasse-tyson-flat-earth-startalk-explains-842432

"... a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University. ...",
"...  He was awarded the NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal ...",
"... hosted the television show NOVA ScienceNow on PBS. ..."
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGrasse_Tyson


Why do you keep making false accusations about me lying?

No. That's just something you made up. A globe is a globe, it doesn't have "domes" in its oceans and ships don't sail "up" on them.


Googling "boats sail over the curve" shows only one result from a flat-earther site, so you're lying again.

There's only one straw man here and you're propping it up, nowhere do I state the point at which the ship vanishes, only that there's a convex dome of water that the globe can't exist without. Remember you're the one screaming you can't bring a ship back into view with binoculars and that perspective isn't dictating what's being seen. Well on a globe there's a convex dome of water 3 miles out that a ship sails up, over and behind and, the horizon line is the peek of this convex dome; THE DOMERIZON. You're the one arguing for the globe and this fucking convex dome of water.

If the dome of water isn't there, neither is the globe. Convergence and perspective on a plane; if your height is 6' then it takes 3 miles of ocean to visually rise up to eye level, beyond that objects moving away become obscured from the bottom up. With the naked eye and a 6' vantage point objects will pass the vanishing point due to convergence before any other effects such as narrow band mirages begin to obscure them. Objects past the vanishing point for the human eye can be brought back into view with binoculars, perspective will still cover some of the bottom and the magnified image will reveal the narrow band mirage covering the horizon line. At the limit of binoculars either the vanishing point is reach or the object is obscured by the narrow band mirage and a telescope must be used. If atmospheric conditions are good the telescope may bring the object back into view where it will start to become magnified by the atmosphere in an effect called looming, this effect like perspective and the narrow band mirage also obscure the bottom of objects by enlarging them beyond the horizon line.

---

---

Using the Earth curvature formula of 8" per mile squared it dictates that, when viewing a ship 7 miles away between you and the ship there's a 8' tall convex dome of water. If you claim the Earth is a globe then you can not escape THE DOMERIZON! The globe is huge in scale compared to our size so, even the slight bend over 7 miles translates into a massive 8' tall convex dome of water that ships sail up, over and behind. This is why sources like Universities, NASA, PBS, etc, all say "boats sail over the curve" because they have to, the globe math forces them to claim this absurdity and they do.

---

---

I've condensed the posts into a single amended post you festering sack. You're the one that needs to go...empty his bowels in a more appropriate location; your accusations are as full of shit as you are.

"Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness." -- Exodus 23:1, KJV

---

Just report him for posting five times in a row.  Liar needs to go. 

There is no "dome" and there is no "up" and the ship doesn't disappear 3 miles out.

I just can't let go laughing at your fight with your own straw man.

I Rest my case.

Factual data.
The "cut" line is wherever anyone might be.
or


Religion has 7 dimension, Science 10 or more.
4th dimension incredible complex created earth it is.
Time, your eyes can never be at the same place at the same time as someone else. Fact, you will always see it different than everyone else.

If I did not know this through 3 party, I still think that the earth is a surface because I am moving straight on the face so it can not shaped differently.

Yes! Earth is really flat if we lay the map on the table. But literally, earth is a sphere and we are not living in the prehistoric era for us to not be able to know that Earth is not flat.

It was at the time it occurred.
But after perusing a 600+ page btctalk thread on the farcical finer points of the ridiculous notion of a flat earth,
nothing surprises me anymore.

cue another joe screed kissing batty's arse in 3...2...

Guys what time does the Bus leave?




After taking into account all know facts i can only conclude that we deal with a Cross-cap, a projective plane.



No magic ball or overdone pizza will ever deal with 100% flatness and 40k km circumference at equator and 30k km at 33° south (Sydney Santiago) or 9k km of the Russian choo choo.
Both models have been proven wrong many times over.
Productive input is non existent in this thread.



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46866761

-

I think even flat-earthers were shocked by that. Like "who? some guy from the NASA-controlled TV show? does he have any youtube videos?".

Is that really a surprise?

Well, Donald Trump was elected president, so there's that...

Why is this topic so popular. I honestly don't understand if this a parody of some kind that I don't get or is a real concern. How can someone with enough dexterity to comment here can still believe the earth is flat. My mind is blown. Honestly.

You're trying too hard to avoid your fuckup with the cathedrals. The charities will be just fine without your $50, it's obvious that you need it more.

I have a feeling that those lists of "proofs" where certain objects can be seen from hundreds of miles away were posted somewhere as a joke and idiot flat-earthers picked them up as gospel.


Your attempt to help your scammer buddy Joe is admirable. I posted a reply that you didn't like, deal with it. It's not "perspective" hiding the ships and binoculars don't "bring them back". Sorry to break this to you but the Earth is not a pancake.