Topic: Flat Earth - page 211. (Read 1095196 times)

Here is the easy way to see how it works until you are mentally challenged. Take a flashlight, point it towards anything and move away, there will be no hotspot eventually. Are you ok?

I'll give you an out, you'll have to sacrifice a massive piece of the globe model but you can still try and say that the Earth is a geoid.

You can argue that the Sun creates a static charge on the lunar surface and an ultraviolet emitting plasma causes the calcium phosphate containing rocks to phosphoresce. Just like the mercury filled florescent light tube Tesla himself first invented all by his lonesome, the Moon is evenly lit.

You see the petrified wood the astronauts brought back from the Moon was rich in phosphorus the same substance that coats the inside of a phorescent light. One of the Moon rocks was gifted to the queen of Holland and currently resides in a museum.

Here's the full meme:


   

Shading around the edges like when the moon is not full? Or are you this retarded?

What the world is we will not know for a long time to come.
It is easy to discredit Olaf Jansen after all he was thrown into the nuthouse.
Authenticity of something must always put to question but check Rear Admiral Richard Evelyn Byrd's diary right at the end.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46602263

Geological anomalies, the only anomaly here is that Earth is not a geoid.

Antarctic treaty does not allow you to take fuel or supply south of 60° (unless you have permission) Now tell me how you cook or heat assuming you go by sail and dont need to eat.



12226 Meters and not any deeper, its not possible.
Kola Super Deep Bore Hole, interesting geological anomalies were found, Temperatures reached 180 °C (356° F)
Deepest Hole ever drilled by men



btw
Olaf Jansen the first men to circumnavigate north to south from April 3, 1829 to 1831 having spent 2 and a half years  "within", with the cradle, of the human race thinks:

Holy shit that's dense even by your own standards. You can take a cruise to Antarctica, do it and report back with pictures of the military blockade. Surely someone must have done that already. No youtube?


Careful, he might end up in Australia. That would shatter the firmament of his delusion.

It's amazing they believe so hard but can't prove a damn thing (or even say anything intelligent).  Have you had any real challengers over the last 3 years?  Seems like all we have are the scrubs that don't even know the basics.

You have probably converted thousands with the lack of science knowledge your opposition has.  They may not all say it due to the cowardly negative trusts they hand out to silence the debate but your info is spot on. 

Keep up the good work.  It's obvious to anyone who can read your the one providing proof of your position while they ridicule and hate without any substance at all. 

sirazimuth my good man of science,
   
   will you step up to the plate and explain to us how the Moon's evenly lit surface proves that it's a solid sphere illuminated by the Sun?

dude, you dug your delusional hole so deep, you might as well keep digging....

All sides claim this information is true.  Both government (antarctic treaty) and people who have been turned around.  There is no dispute in the matter.  I would liken this to me believing that Australia is real.  Never been there and it is a belief for me personally that it exists however I don't have a legion of people claiming it's not there.  If eventually a group of people claim it's not there and they can show me evidence that goes in line with my direct reality that it was not there then I would suspend that belief until I flew there to see.  I have the capability to suspend pre-conceived beliefs if information is presented to me that goes directly against what I'm experiencing.  I do not get the wild fight or flight some of you boys are getting when your world view is challenged and go on the attack.  

In my reality everything about my environment tells me it's flat.  I would have to disbelieve my own reality to believe in the sphere.  There is where the issue stems.  You also have no idea we are on a sphere.  Earlier today you were claiming the earth is a sphere because you have seen the curve with your binoculars.  You have been debunked. You still refuse to even acknowledge your error.  This shows the type of individual you are and also shows your motives.   You are a deciple.  You do not even know why you believe what you do.  You are whats referred to as a useful idiot for the elite.

Are you ever going to show us your real science and proof of the curve that doesn't involve you bullshit binocular story?  You keep talking about this science but I just see you getting thrashed on this subject then seemingly forgetting it and moving to your next bullshit point (of which never contains any proof whatsoever - just you running your mouth) .  Either way the more you spout your complete and obvious bullshit the more you help spread the word.  I don't even think you realize the arguments your making go against what your own team is saying.  I bet if they had your binoculars they would see it your way.  

Can't wait to see your next batch of bullshit (that will most likely cause the rest of the science community to do a face palm).  I can guarantee the next thing out of your mouth will contain no proof or real science.

Famous Suchmoon quotes
"I can see the curve with my binoculars"
"Science is not an opinion or a belief and it doesn't need defending"

Good lord...If there was a Nobel Prize for trolling, you'd win hands down.

BADecker, surely you of all people can answer this riddle:

   If the Moon is a sphere illuminated by the Sun, why is it missing shading around the edges and a hot spot in the middle?




This is leaps and bounds closer to the truth than a globe spinning a thousand miles an hour with a pressurized atmosphere in a hard vacuum rocketing through space at over 0.2% the speed of light in a vacuum. Do you have any concept of how much energy a 6.669 sextillion ton sphere traveling at 388.5 miles per second relative to the so-called cosmic microwave background would have? If a spec of dust got in the way the resulting explosion would destroy half the known universe!

So you're blindly trusting this but not actual science? Is there a youtube video of the blockade?

Too right. I love being triggered by delusional twats on this thread my friend. Its entertaining, how about you?

10-4.  I respect your response. 

Admiral Richard E. Byrd tells you how big Greenland is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czW0iRJuH1A&t=1m41s


No
Mercator's is, Gleason's is but Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)  or MGRS (NATO's system) is not. You can not stack if it is distorted.


You can see the distortion on Mercators map

Sorry, I'm not into this deeply enough to be able to show the proof. The best I can do is direct you to what others say. Google "weight difference between equator and poles."

As for the gravitational pull of the mass of a mountain, you might Google "gravitational force of a mountain."

Nice one Exemplaar.  You got this one triggered.