Topic: Flat Earth - page 212. (Read 1095196 times)

Nothing but insults.  This from Mr. do you know astrophysics.  What a joke. 

Great proofs by the way! 

We know how things fall but we don't know why they fall.    Show us your proof if you have any.

We will be waiting for your proofs or more insults. 

Are you a fucking moron or what? Of course it's been observed and measured. Do some real research.
I'd link some sites to show you but won't waste my time because you will just come up with some retarded rebuttal about nasa hoaxes or what have you.
Jeezus christ dude, fucking educate yourself and get off this ridiculous thread.
(or just keep posting moronic hilarious pics, IDFC)
Unless you are just obsessively trolling for past 3 years or whatever, (distinct possibility)
I feel sorry for you and your sheer ignorance.
Now go pray to your magic invisible sky fairy that I burn in imaginary hell...

....Hey btw, is hell shaped like a pancake too...a really hot one?.. like floating below the earth pancake?

Globe Earth requires globe Moon, prove the globe by explaining how the Moon is evenly lit! Explain in detail how the fact there's no shading around the edges or a hot spot in the middle proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Moon is a sphere lit by the Sun.

Use science, you can do it!

(ノ°Д°）ノ︵

Thanks for your polite response.   It's appreciated.

#1 Have you personally been to the true north and south pole?   All my research indicates there is a military blockade and no true independent exploration or experimentation can be done.   Can you practically demonstrate, from the poles (which I don't think the two sides agree upon anyways) your experiment?   Who proved it?   How was the experiment done?   Do you simply believe these results that were given to you?   I think this is the fundamental issue the two sides are having.   I'm a practical person.   I want to see it and do the experiment for myself.   Not be told.   If you choose to believe the finding you were given that fine but know all you have is a belief.   I think the flat earthers want proof and everything that they can prove for themselves is showing flat earth.   Hence the debate.

#2 Assuming I take the spring scale example at face value as I have not done this experiment, how do you know it was gravity which caused your results and not something else.   Most in this thread do not believe in gravity so that claim must be proven.   Can you prove to us gravity is the cause of your findings?   How did you rule out all other factors?

Once again I'm not attempting to be argumentative but we are 600 pages in.   We need proof, not stories about experiments none of us have ever seen, done or can verify.   It sounds like all that is happening is your preaching the science you were given.   It's understandable given that if you repeat it well enough you get A's in school and get a nice job!   

I know what the science book says.

My question to you is simply this.  Prove it is the moon causing it the tides here on earth.  Use the scientific method if you don't mind. 

We all know what the science book says.  What we are asking for is you to prove it to us. 

Show me gravity.  Prove it.  You will do something that the top scientists cannot do.

Do you have beliefs or facts?

Folks, I'm asking the simplest, most basic and least complex physical question possible. After 50 pages of discussing the Lorentz contraction, its reasoning, proofs and feasibility it becomes obvious it's an artifact of the provably false model that special relativity describes. Why engage in pilpul wandering off into complex mathematical equations that have no basis in reality when you can answer this one simple (two-part) question:

   If the Moon is a sphere illuminated by the Sun, why is it missing shading around the edges and a hot spot in the middle?

Two things I can think of are:
1. At the poles it has been proven that things are slightly heavier than at the equator. One might think that the equatorial bulge would make for more material at the equator (the diameter is larger at the equator), and more weight because of this, but it seems that the difference and distance is offset by the centrifugal force at the equator... and so much so that things at the poles weigh slightly more than the equator;
2. A very sensitive spring balance scale shows that things weigh less when taken into a tunnel under the middle of a tall mountain. This is because the gravitational force of the mountain above, offsets some of the gravitational force of the earth below.

Can you please show some empirical proof of the gravitational effects on space/time.  I would be very interested in your demonstration of this.  I would love to see a working example of this.  

If you can make a large object attract a small object as the Newtonian model suggests I would love to see this demonstrated as well.  I think the last time it took place was in the 1790's in Mr. Cavendish's shed.  Unfortunately he was the only one who saw it.

Hopefully with you apparent high education you can all show us this.  You will also be rewarded handsomely by the science community as well due to the fact they are having a bit of trouble showing a display of any of this.  

Do you know this science your speaking of or is it a belief?

Very excited to see your demonstrations.  Extra credit if you can do it without insults.

Robert, you're just gay black cowboy I was looking for! With your vast knowledge of science, math and physics perhaps you can answer these questions:

   If the Moon is a sphere illuminated by the Sun, why is it missing shading around the edges and a hot spot in the middle?

Can you feel the Moon's frosty gaze?

Great pipul suchmoon! There are so many variables involved with watching a ship go over the horizon it will take pages to explain in detail and in the end, as joe stated, both models allow for ships to be engulfed bottom up at the horizon by a narrow band mirage. Subject successfully changed to a proof that's not a proof but the globe model allows for this particular occurrence so you can successfully defend not the premise that a ship goes over the horizon but, the presupposition that we're on a globe.

For those of you that don't know because the subject is taboo and censored by Google and company. Pipul is the Jewish argument technique for winning arguments that are false, it's outlined in their religious text as the Jew is permitted to lie to all non-Jews who are goyim slaves.

If the Moon is a sphere illuminated by the Sun, why is it missing shading around the edges and a hot spot in the middle? Answer the questions or stop claiming the Moon is a heavy ball in the sky reflecting light from the Sun.

Great proofs there.  Overwhelming evidence.  All you have is insults. 

No need to project ignorance on you.  You have taken care of that quite nicely with your "I can see the curve with my binoculars"  LOL. 

The video provided and a little knowledge of anatomy shows anyone here that you are a fool and a liar.

"Science is not an opinion or a belief and it doesn't need defending"  Another doosie.  Not even sure what to say about this one.  You have actually trumped your curve seen from binoculars stupidity with this one. 

I will let you just keep going. Your doing  a fine job of making an ass out of yourself.  Keep talking.  We are loving it. 

Suchmoon quotes
"I can see the curve with my binoculars"
"Science is not an opinion or a belief and it doesn't need defending"

As I said - you're not looking for an answer. Getting off youtube and going outside would serve you well though, I hope you'll see that one day.

You're projecting your ignorance on me. Look at your buddies here claiming that God created the pancake we're supposedly living on - that's religion, or some sect thereof.

Science is not an opinion or a belief and it doesn't need defending, particularly not from moronic liars such as yourself.

And yet you believe that you live on a spinning ball, although we can not see, observe or measure any curvature at all. And that is moronic  

No curvature equals no ball, comprende amigo?

3D, just make sure that you will not die once atheist, because living in the lake of fire for all eternity really isn't profitable. Make sure to invest in profitable future.

Bonus video - scientism exposed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRfqjtHUwIo

Bonus image for knucklehead suchmoon:

You are doing a dis-service to the very people your trying to defend.   You know as well as everyone reading this you did not see the actual curve with your binoculars.  What a tit you are.  Everyone knows your full of shit now.  Mission accomplished.  

Show us your empirical proof of curvature.  Try not making up stories about your super duper binoculars this time.  Both sides of the argument round or flat are well past the ship going behind the curve.  

What will you go with? A straw man, false equivalence, sophistry?  How about straight to ridicule!  


"I can just take binoculars and watch a ship go beyond the horizon"
suchmoon the tit


You have no desire to learn or teach.   Your here simply to preach your religion.  Show me proof of this curve you believe in so much.

Go outside FFS.

Insults insults insults.  

The boat simply went out of your perspective or your binoculars perspective.  If you get stronger binoculars you can see it again.  It's right there on youtube x 10,000 times.  May be easier just to ridicule and insult though.  

Here is a boat being pulled out.  Notice how it disappears.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg3RkwbEF-w

Suchmoon.  What type of binoculars do you have that can zoom more than the p900?  How were you able to keep it steady so you could view it?  Were the binoculars on a tripod?  Can you please describe your setup?  You may be one of the only people on earth who have actually seen a ship sink beyond the horizon and not simply been fooled by perspective.  

I don't need to "get" it. I can just take binoculars and watch a ship go beyond the horizon and marvel at your stupidity. What exactly are you hoping to achieve here? Aside from some deranged clowns like notbatman you can't really convince anyone.