...
One thing at a time here, I'm scouring the good book for solar references. While I'm reading you can view some video evidence that the Moon (along with the Sun and Stars) is a projected hologram.
Lunar Wave by CRROW777 --
https://youtu.be/scvvVKnJzzg (mirror video & mirror site due to "shut it down")
An obvious edited fake video is not proof that the moon is a hologram, sorry. Give me a real video of the moon.
Like I said the video is to pass the time while I compile biblical evidence for a projected Sun, and also to show that I have more than zero evidence like you claim.
So tell me what make it "obvious" that its fake, for example when a NASA tech is so high on coke that he accidentally misses a CGI edit, and the stage harness and wires are visible on the ISS astronaut in the live video feed then I say "hey, that's obviously fake"?
Obviously fake, I mean, I could create that effect in an hour or so using a video of the moon, easily. You have fake evidence which is worse than having zero evidence.
You offer nothing to indicate that it's fake other than a claim that you could easily reproduce the effect. The camera is panning meaning any added animation would have to synchronize with the motion and the line moves in perfect synch with camera pan; an indication that it's unedited video. You then use this claim that an edit job that would take many hours of painstaking work to synchronize seamlessly is proof it's fake?
Shit or get off the pot, what are indications are there in this video that it's a CGI edit job? Your claim of being a CGI editing master as proof the video is fake, much like the surface of a spinning ball doesn't hold any water. This video isn't the best evidence but it is evidence the Moon is a projection none the less.
Extremely obvious CGI, plus a black background would make it extremely easy to edit in any way. All flat earth videos are clearly CGI.
Btw I'm acting like you, maybe you didn't realize that. You are saying it can't be edited because the camera is moving but we have videos and livestreams of space and yet you say all of those are fake, funny how your brain works, huh?
There are many indications with the video NASA provides of manipulated and composit images and they have a huge budget with a ton of manpower and the latest CGI software and hardware. Also I don't claim that it can't be an edited video just that there's nothing to indicate that it is.
Your claim that all flat earth videos are clearly CGI doesn't make any sense, do you mean balloon footage? There are literally 20 million FE videos on YouTube from millions of different users. Sying they're all CGI is nonsense with that many sources and nothing in most of the videos to indicate any kind of deception.
You claim the video is extremely obvious CGI yet can't point to anything specific, you've been BTFO.
''There are literally 20 million FE videos on YouTube'' You sure about ''literally''? I can tell you one thing, there are literally hundreds of millions of pictures of earth from space and yet you don't seem to care about that.
''You claim the video is extremely obvious CGI yet can't point to anything specific'' It's just a wave, anyone can make it, do you think I don't have a telescope? Are you saying that if I use a telescope I will be able to see the wave? Rofl.
If you count every fame of video you might get "hundreds of millions of pictures" from NASA, when I say literally I mean it:
Looks like they deleted 6,000,000 videos since I last checked but 13,400,000 is still a healthy number.
As for the seeing the wave with a telescope, no because the scrolling line or wave is produced by the same effect as that can occur when recording video of a TV or computer monitor. This doesn't happen as much with newer hardware due to changes in frequency refresh rates and the switch to from analog to digital. Most adults will have seen this effect on TV especially on the news where there are CRT computer monitors in the background during an interview. It's caused by a mix or the difference in refresh frequencies used in each device.
This scroll effect is the crux of my argument, the video shows the Moon is exhibiting the same behavior as an old CRT computer monitor screen being recorded by analog analog video camera.
edit:
CRROW777 says he's received reports (see the first video in the post below) of the effect occurring when viewed with the eye through a telescope. He also says the effect only seems to occur during certain celestial events such as the spring equinox.
In light of this information I would theorize that the secondary device causing the frequency synchronization scroll or wave effect might not be the camera but another celestial object. The effect could be a v-sync issue entirely within the projector.
This effect needs more investigation, a measurement of the moonlights frequency(s), wavelength(s) and pulse refresh frequency(s). With photo-diodes and resistive photo-sensors connected to a frequency counter and oscilloscope would be a good start.