Topic: Flat Earth - page 265. (Read 1095196 times)

Quote from: TooQik on May 05, 2018, 09:11:25 AM

^^^ That's right folks, no need for stupid replicated and peer reviewed established empirical experiments that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is motionless; just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.

If that was a peer reviewed established empirical experiment, scientists would say the earth is flat yet they don't. Imagine how idiotic the belief is considering that a lot of scientists do believe in god yet virtually all of them do not believe the earth is flat. People already showed you a few pages ago that your experiment does not prove the earth is motionless.

'' just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.'' Better to think that the dome is rotating around us or something no?

I'm still scratching my head on why the stars....sorry, I mean projected holograms....circle in the opposite direction for us people in the Southern Hemisphere (or is that Hemiflat???). What kind of magic is that?!?! Wink

The dome is a concave mirror, there's a point where inversion occurs depending on your position.

Then why can't I see reflections in the dome when I look up?

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ That's right folks, no need for stupid replicated and peer reviewed established empirical experiments that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is motionless; just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.

If that was a peer reviewed established empirical experiment, scientists would say the earth is flat yet they don't. Imagine how idiotic the belief is considering that a lot of scientists do believe in god yet virtually all of them do not believe the earth is flat. People already showed you a few pages ago that your experiment does not prove the earth is motionless.

'' just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.'' Better to think that the dome is rotating around us or something no?

I'm still scratching my head on why the stars....sorry, I mean projected holograms....circle in the opposite direction for us people in the Southern Hemisphere (or is that Hemiflat???). What kind of magic is that?!?! Wink

The dome is a concave mirror, there's a point where inversion occurs depending on your position.

celtic99

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 41

All of life can just be a simulation anyways and we are just in a computer matrix. It's possible and we would never even know it. So earth isn't flat or round, it doesn't exist.

MiSKLaCH

sr. member

Activity: 417

Merit: 253

I hate everyone, equally.

How's possible this shit is still going? Huh

TooQik

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 258

^^^ That's right folks, no need for stupid replicated and peer reviewed established empirical experiments that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is motionless; just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.

If that was a peer reviewed established empirical experiment, scientists would say the earth is flat yet they don't. Imagine how idiotic the belief is considering that a lot of scientists do believe in god yet virtually all of them do not believe the earth is flat. People already showed you a few pages ago that your experiment does not prove the earth is motionless.

'' just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.'' Better to think that the dome is rotating around us or something no?

I'm still scratching my head on why the stars....sorry, I mean projected holograms....circle in the opposite direction for us people in the Southern Hemisphere (or is that Hemiflat???). What kind of magic is that?!?! Wink

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ That's right folks, no need for stupid replicated and peer reviewed established empirical experiments that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is motionless; just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.

If that was a peer reviewed established empirical experiment, scientists would say the earth is flat yet they don't. Imagine how idiotic the belief is considering that a lot of scientists do believe in god yet virtually all of them do not believe the earth is flat. People already showed you a few pages ago that your experiment does not prove the earth is motionless.

'' just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.'' Better to think that the dome is rotating around us or something no?

1. The Michelson & Morley Experiment, Airy's Failure Experiment, The Sagnac Experiment and Dufour & Prunier's replication of the Sagnac Experiment are all peer reviewed and established empirical experiments.

2. (((Scientists))) have an agenda and no amount of proof can change that, they have to support the Jews and their lies no matter what.

3. The dome is motionless and fixed to the Earth below. The Sun, Moon and stars are holographic projections off of its mirrored surface, this is how they're in motion.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 07:39:53 PM

^^^ That's right folks, no need for stupid replicated and peer reviewed established empirical experiments that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is motionless; just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.

If that was a peer reviewed established empirical experiment, scientists would say the earth is flat yet they don't. Imagine how idiotic the belief is considering that a lot of scientists do believe in god yet virtually all of them do not believe the earth is flat. People already showed you a few pages ago that your experiment does not prove the earth is motionless.

'' just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.'' Better to think that the dome is rotating around us or something no?

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ That's right folks, no need for stupid replicated and peer reviewed established empirical experiments that prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth is motionless; just look at the stars circling above and pretend you're on a merry-go-round.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 07:23:23 AM

Quote from: TooQik on May 02, 2018, 05:57:44 AM

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 05:13:00 AM

^^^ Clown.

The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.

I know you won't read it notnatman, but for the sake of others who might be slipping into a like mindset, here's some interesting reading: https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/11/does-the-aether-exist-hint-no/

This article states that the Sagnac experiment proves the aether "A shift in the interference pattern is exactly what the aether model predicts." A direct quote that contradicts the title of the article proves it's misleading and intellectually dishonest.

It then tries to whitewash the result by claiming it didn't disprove relativity because it (relativity) doesn't apply to rotating systems. Dufour and Prunier totally blow this argument out of the water by proving the results are in fact not consistent with relativity:

"Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories" -- https://books.google.ca/books?id=XVLmihZnsvUC

You've just been BTFO asshole.

It's no wonder you believe in a flat Earth, your reading comprehension is abysmal at best or blinded by your one-eyed subjectiveness at worst.

Here's a key point taken straight from the article that you conveniently ignore constantly when the Sagnac experiment is discussed:

"...the Sagnac experiment is inconclusive, since it agrees with both the aether and relativity models."

You've been BTFO, deal with it.

edit:

Lets see if I can clarify the intellectual dishonesty in your linked article a bit.

1. They reference the Sagnac Experiment.
2. They reference two theories:
(a) Static Aether.
(b) Special Relativity.
3. They note the experiment is consistent with both theory 'a' and theory 'b'.
4. They claim because the experiment is consistent with theory 'b' theory 'a' has been disproven.

Can you see what an absolute fuck head the guy who wrote that MSM style article is? Not to mention that Dufour and Prunier proved empirically that special relativity is in fact not consistent with the results, a fact the author omits entirely so can make his intellectually dishonest claims.

edit_2:

The comments in the linked article are gold.

There is no need for stupid experiments that you can't perform. Just take a camera and make a timelapse of the stars, easy evidence there, look through a telescope at other planets or the moon. It is so easy to prove the earth is not flat and yet you don't want to believe it.

Adricic

newbie

Activity: 102

Merit: 0

the earth is uneven. because there is its rotation day and night

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

The longest straight line you can travel without hitting hand.

Poor idiotic notbatman probably can't figure out how a straight line can curve. Cheesy

https://gizmodo.com/this-is-the-longest-straight-path-you-could-travel-on-w-1825725532

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 07:23:23 AM

Quote from: TooQik on May 02, 2018, 05:57:44 AM

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 05:13:00 AM

^^^ Clown.

The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.

I know you won't read it notnatman, but for the sake of others who might be slipping into a like mindset, here's some interesting reading: https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/11/does-the-aether-exist-hint-no/

This article states that the Sagnac experiment proves the aether "A shift in the interference pattern is exactly what the aether model predicts." A direct quote that contradicts the title of the article proves it's misleading and intellectually dishonest.

It then tries to whitewash the result by claiming it didn't disprove relativity because it (relativity) doesn't apply to rotating systems. Dufour and Prunier totally blow this argument out of the water by proving the results are in fact not consistent with relativity:

"Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories" -- https://books.google.ca/books?id=XVLmihZnsvUC

You've just been BTFO asshole.

It's no wonder you believe in a flat Earth, your reading comprehension is abysmal at best or blinded by your one-eyed subjectiveness at worst.

Here's a key point taken straight from the article that you conveniently ignore constantly when the Sagnac experiment is discussed:

"...the Sagnac experiment is inconclusive, since it agrees with both the aether and relativity models."

You've been BTFO, deal with it.

edit:

Lets see if I can clarify the intellectual dishonesty in your linked article a bit.

1. They reference the Sagnac Experiment.
2. They reference two theories:
(a) Static Aether.
(b) Special Relativity.
3. They note the experiment is consistent with both theory 'a' and theory 'b'.
4. They claim because the experiment is consistent with theory 'b' theory 'a' has been disproven.

Can you see what an absolute fuck head the guy who wrote that MSM style article is? Not to mention that Dufour and Prunier proved empirically that special relativity is in fact not consistent with the results, a fact the author omits entirely so can make his intellectually dishonest claims.

edit_2:

The comments in the linked article are gold.

TooQik

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 258

Quote from: Vod on May 02, 2018, 10:53:17 AM

It's no wonder you believe in a flat Earth, your reading comprehension is abysmal at best or blinded by your one-eyed subjectiveness at worst.

Here's a key point taken straight from the article that you conveniently ignore constantly when the Sagnac experiment is discussed:

"...the Sagnac experiment is inconclusive, since it agrees with both the aether and relativity models."

You are arguing facts with a lying troll. :/

We proved the earth was a globe hundreds of years ago. There is no debate anymore.

These type of threads just serve to feed attention to a very lonely man.

Oh I'm well aware of everything you just said but sometimes I feel the urge to debate with an idiot.

Besides that, it's quite possible someone reading this thread could get sucked into his lies, so I feel it's also important to try and add some balance.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970