Topic: Flat Earth - page 637. (Read 1095196 times)

The only thing gravity is the center of is a massive deception. It's density that pushes objects down or causes them to rise with the aether ultimately defining up and down. It's the round ball Earth that's absurd here, because without the hoaxed pictures from NASA there's really nothing else to indicate it's a sphere. Check out the horizon, it's as flat as a pancake!

The moon is not real. So, he's only a tic.     

The earth is not flat. Gravity is in the centr pulling us down. Why would it be flat? It sounds reslly absurd to see that. Anyways i respect people who believe that and i think they have their reasons

^^^^^^
So here we got

Flat earth'ers
Ball earth'ers
Inside out ball earth'er (just one)

You are a lunatic.

It does not look like he is arguing with me. He just used a rhetoric figure that Shoppenhuaer has devised. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right

Im not sure if its:

31 This Is Beyond Me

or

38 Become Personal, Insulting, Rude (argumentum ad personam)

He should name what sentence I've made wrong. If he would not do that, you can be sure he had used a logical fallacy. What is a logical falacy? Its an utterly wrong argument that appear right only because it abuses the flaws in a human psychology.

But what do I expect? All of the flat earth concept is just an abuse of a human psychology.

All flat earthers have ever did was calling a sky uncomprehensible because:

a) God have made it. - its a logical fallacy of calling idem per idem. They try to explain the unknown by the unknown. It doesnt mean that stating anything about God is false. But putting a God into unlogical sentence does not make sentence right, it just makes God look ridiculous.
b) Sky is only a hologram - its fallacy of basicly the same nature as above. They wrongly assume that if something is just a refference like a computer screen you can make everything up and everything is possible. No its not possible. There are some rules even for a holographic projections.

P.S you can call me a lunatic all day. You wont scare me away by insults. The concave earth have such a bad reputation because people associate it with flat earth. Thats just a deliberate psyop.

If its quote time here are some nice ones:

"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently". Friedrich Nietzsche

"Anyone who has declared someone else to be an idiot, a bad apple, is annoyed when it turns out in the end that he isn't." Friedrich Nietzsche

Like the CIA director said...



So, they are going to keep on trying with everything, even flat earth. They are trying to judge their success, based on the number of responses to this thread.

Dude, you can't even form proper sentences much less defend your inside-out ball Earth nonsense. Earth is not a ball or a pear or any other kind of fruit you fruit.

It does not involves logic as well. The only logical explanations are that the earth is convex or even more logical - concave. The only reason convex earth is semi logical is because they invent shits from an ass like dark matter and a theory of relativity. Those things does not exists but... at least a convex earth model does not contradicts itself. How flaters contradicts themself? For example they had invented a satelite of the sun to make their story logical. Kind of. But at the same time they dont believe that other satelites are real and no objects is sateliting around anything else. You've got my point? Or should I draw it?

That was just an example of this model not involving a complexity of reasoning that people above 110-120 Iq should posses. Yes it looks ok. Before you try to compare one phenomen to another. Yes taken individualy. Yes it seems ok. Flat earth is fine. Until you imply any complexity to it. Its just melt as a theory. Its impossible to exist.

Concavity of the earth you can check for yourself by doing a simple experiments. You dont have to believe any object in the sky. You can do experiments of earth. You dont have to believe that there is invisible satelite of the sun as well.

You dont have to have any degree or knowledge. all you have to know is how scientific experiment works.

Because my version of Flat Earth doesn't involve information from a third party.

Yeah including a flat earth. Why do you exclude yourself? Some part of american public believe it. Its like a bufour of safety. Child playground for non threating infantiles. Grow up people.


Hercules 23, Dionisius 452 + other rnd person from mythos + rnd number. Makes sense.............. not. Its highly unlikely. If I were them I would mke the pictures the most believeble not less ffs. They should keep those others pictures as well right if you have said its just for a brief moment. Show me the worse pictures or didnt happen. None of them? Oh what a pity. They need to photoshop.

Thanks for supporting the baby fucking faggots and cannibals who rule the population with their massive lies, murder and faggotry.

Source: http://naturalnews.com/041406_wikipedia_propaganda_disinformation.html



The only intellectual dishonesty here is from faggots like you, Google and the CIA run Wiki.

--->   https://youtu.be/HuKTENd1wTc

The earth is only flat to those who don't actually know how to Google search.

No. Just answer me why the picture is not blurred in that supposed to be venus images. The image is so still like its just some 20 degree celcius with mild breeze and fresh air. It was just an infantility on my part with that picture exchange action lol.

Wake up!!!!
Nasa is big budget bullshit!!
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

^- photograph is taken from the surface of bullshit.


^- We have found an aliens on the surface of mars. Halleluyah!


We can play copy paste all day.

Its not that its longer shorter or whatever. If there is a corelation in play in statistic, there is something that need to be further explained. And as youve stated the correlation is almost 100%.

In other words its not statisticly random so it must further explained. And planets are supposedly made randomly. Right? So they should not be correlated with anything unless this "anything" is further explained.

Sorry but that Venus looks like dried up salty lake with a yellow blending. Not at all convincing. Outside of that supposedly on venus are huuuge, enourmous temperatures. Why is not the view blurred from an extreme temperature - 462 celsius degree.

Which means? Venus is not a planet. Its some object on the sky. Its too coincidencial statisticly speaking. Ofcourse statistics can be wrong, but it gives you a hint.

Listen people they are for real here from flatearthsociety .org


No........ Its a month cycle. Why do you think we call it a mo(o)nth? Satelite of the sun? What? Where? And no.... its not those brainiacs mason conspiracy. You have eyes? Right? Right. Or are you have antieyes every 5 months that masons have implemented in every single human. Damn those Nasians they purposefuly make lunar eclipse more often too fool you. You are too smart to not notice that. Damn those fake Nasians and reptilians.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_orP5JHZWE

People.... snap out of the flat earth if you have any brain cells left.

The fact that lunar eclipses even occur debunks the flat Earth theory. So much so that flat Earth believers had to invent another celestial body to place between the Sun and the Moon for a lunar eclipse to even occur in their world.

Of course this new celestial body only ever causes the blocking of the Sun's ray during a lunar eclipse, at all other times you can't see it or its affect on any other object. 

Hah, no my artwork was intended as an insult to flat-Earthers - I can stoop to your level and use MS Paint to prove some of you wrong.  

As for the shadow of the Earth going the "wrong way" during a lunar eclipse, that can be easily explained by your position on the Earth and the speed at which the moon travels round the Earth - a lot slower than the 24 hr orbit of the Earth.

http://moonblink.info/Eclipse/why/solar Scroll down to "It Goes the Wrong Way!"

Mystery solved!