Author

Topic: Flat Earth - page 775. (Read 1095196 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 18, 2016, 08:14:07 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

whats bugging me is, the earth allegedly spins at a thousand mile per hour, now if this was true, knowing how my sky tv works, allegedly pointed at a satellite that has to be ultra precise or you do not not get a signal, now if the earth is spinning at 1000mph or even stationary, how the hell do these satellites keep a perfect location in the sky, so millions of people can watch tv? to me the accuracy needed for satellite  must equate to these satellites being fixed, maybe even tethered

I suspect the signals are ground based and they bounce them off the ionosphere. There are sever other possibilities I can think of but that seems the most likely.

i agree, but again it kinda proves there are zero satellites in "geostationary" orbit as they allege haha, and if there are no satellites then we must be on a flat earth lol, im not saying we are, just the evidence suggests we are, im still open to physical indisputable physical evidence for sphere or hollow earth though, 3 brilliant concepts which show off reality that we are educated into a belief system Sad 

Umm no, just because you don't know how a satellite works it doesn't prove that they don't exist. Most geostationary satellites do in fact creep out of their orbit eventually, so they have small rocket propulsion systems to correct the orbit. I suspect that a TV satellite doesn't need to be that accurate to function anyway. The parabolic shape of the dish on your house would collect the signal even if it was off by a couple of degrees.

The fact is that differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure. This is proof that rockets need something push against and that they don't work in a vacuum environment.
legendary
Activity: 1188
Merit: 1016
January 18, 2016, 07:37:13 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

whats bugging me is, the earth allegedly spins at a thousand mile per hour, now if this was true, knowing how my sky tv works, allegedly pointed at a satellite that has to be ultra precise or you do not not get a signal, now if the earth is spinning at 1000mph or even stationary, how the hell do these satellites keep a perfect location in the sky, so millions of people can watch tv? to me the accuracy needed for satellite  must equate to these satellites being fixed, maybe even tethered

I suspect the signals are ground based and they bounce them off the ionosphere. There are sever other possibilities I can think of but that seems the most likely.

i agree, but again it kinda proves there are zero satellites in "geostationary" orbit as they allege haha, and if there are no satellites then we must be on a flat earth lol, im not saying we are, just the evidence suggests we are, im still open to physical indisputable physical evidence for sphere or hollow earth though, 3 brilliant concepts which show off reality that we are educated into a belief system Sad 

Umm no, just because you don't know how a satellite works it doesn't prove that they don't exist. Most geostationary satellites do in fact creep out of their orbit eventually, so they have small rocket propulsion systems to correct the orbit. I suspect that a TV satellite doesn't need to be that accurate to function anyway. The parabolic shape of the dish on your house would collect the signal even if it was off by a couple of degrees.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 18, 2016, 07:11:38 PM
...clip...

Maybe this could help a bit - understanding of perspective:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63bK7AnWNWw

Excellent video, funny how somebody can graduate from university and never once be taught this in all those years of school.

What's even more funny is that, in order to even understand what is being explained, because it is so different than the way the laws of science explain things about perspective, one has to become a believer in flat earth, just to understand the video.

Smiley

My point is that's it's not taught in schools with the one exception being an advanced art student. Your statement that it's taught differently is incorrect but please, feel free to prove me wrong.

The same is true with the Airy's failure experiment, while they'll beat you over the head with Michelson-Morley to make Eisenstein look good not once will they ever mention Airy's Failure even though it's skinning the same cat.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 18, 2016, 05:50:33 PM
...clip...

Maybe this could help a bit - understanding of perspective:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63bK7AnWNWw

Excellent video, funny how somebody can graduate from university and never once be taught this in all those years of school.

What's even more funny is that, in order to even understand what is being explained, because it is so different than the way the laws of science explain things about perspective, one has to become a believer in flat earth, just to understand the video.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 978
Merit: 506
January 18, 2016, 05:06:35 PM
...clip...

Maybe this could help a bit - understanding of perspective:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63bK7AnWNWw

Excellent video, funny how somebody can graduate from university and never once be taught this in all those years of school.

Agreed.

Also this one is "a must watch".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBxiJfs_mxc

Thanks to the uploader for his hard work.

Movement is now really gaining momentum.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 16, 2016, 11:38:59 PM
...clip...

Maybe this could help a bit - understanding of perspective:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63bK7AnWNWw

Excellent video, funny how somebody can graduate from university and never once be taught this in all those years of school.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 255
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
January 16, 2016, 09:55:42 PM
earths structure likes a baloon. its growing slowly and grounds far away between them slowly.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 16, 2016, 05:07:10 PM
Obviously it is flat, how else would we be able to walk? I called it.

No, no. I live in a valley. It's concave. I roll up one side and down the other. This is because up and down are reversed.

Smiley
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
January 16, 2016, 02:55:34 PM
Obviously it is flat, how else would we be able to walk? I called it.
hero member
Activity: 978
Merit: 506
January 16, 2016, 01:30:27 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

Why don't you tell me how a sun 3,000 miles in altitude illuminates the bottom of the cloud layer after sunset, but doesn't illuminate the top of the cloud layer?  Light isn't a boomerang.

Pictures or it didn't happen.

Oh, the incredible irony of asking for pictures.  Perfect -- ignore all photos that don't match your thinking, unquestioningly accept all photos that do, and make immediate, unreasonable demands for personal photos about scenarios that are so common and that literally thousands of people experience every single day (when a better alternative is to pull your head out of your ass).

Let's simplify it since this is apparently so difficult for you -- just after sunset, your 3,000 mile-high sun illuminates the bottom of the clouds, but not the fucking ground.  Show me your MS Paint skills for that scenario.

Maybe this could help a bit - understanding of perspective:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63bK7AnWNWw
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
January 16, 2016, 12:18:59 PM


But you don't trust pictures, remember? 
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 16, 2016, 12:37:21 AM
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
January 16, 2016, 12:11:56 AM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

Why don't you tell me how a sun 3,000 miles in altitude illuminates the bottom of the cloud layer after sunset, but doesn't illuminate the top of the cloud layer?  Light isn't a boomerang.

Pictures or it didn't happen.

Oh, the incredible irony of asking for pictures.  Perfect -- ignore all photos that don't match your thinking, unquestioningly accept all photos that do, and make immediate, unreasonable demands for personal photos about scenarios that are so common and that literally thousands of people experience every single day (when a better alternative is to pull your head out of your ass).

Let's simplify it since this is apparently so difficult for you -- just after sunset, your 3,000 mile-high sun illuminates the bottom of the clouds, but not the fucking ground.  Show me your MS Paint skills for that scenario.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 15, 2016, 11:05:24 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

Why don't you tell me how a sun 3,000 miles in altitude illuminates the bottom of the cloud layer after sunset, but doesn't illuminate the top of the cloud layer?  Light isn't a boomerang.

Pictures or it didn't happen.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
January 15, 2016, 03:07:22 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

Why don't you tell me how a sun 3,000 miles in altitude illuminates the bottom of the cloud layer after sunset, but doesn't illuminate the top of the cloud layer?  Light isn't a boomerang.
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 251
January 15, 2016, 12:20:03 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

whats bugging me is, the earth allegedly spins at a thousand mile per hour, now if this was true, knowing how my sky tv works, allegedly pointed at a satellite that has to be ultra precise or you do not not get a signal, now if the earth is spinning at 1000mph or even stationary, how the hell do these satellites keep a perfect location in the sky, so millions of people can watch tv? to me the accuracy needed for satellite  must equate to these satellites being fixed, maybe even tethered

I suspect the signals are ground based and they bounce them off the ionosphere. There are sever other possibilities I can think of but that seems the most likely.

i agree, but again it kinda proves there are zero satellites in "geostationary" orbit as they allege haha, and if there are no satellites then we must be on a flat earth lol, im not saying we are, just the evidence suggests we are, im still open to physical indisputable physical evidence for sphere or hollow earth though, 3 brilliant concepts which show off reality that we are educated into a belief system Sad 
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 15, 2016, 09:37:26 AM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

whats bugging me is, the earth allegedly spins at a thousand mile per hour, now if this was true, knowing how my sky tv works, allegedly pointed at a satellite that has to be ultra precise or you do not not get a signal, now if the earth is spinning at 1000mph or even stationary, how the hell do these satellites keep a perfect location in the sky, so millions of people can watch tv? to me the accuracy needed for satellite  must equate to these satellites being fixed, maybe even tethered

I suspect the signals are ground based and they bounce them off the ionosphere. There are several other possibilities I can think of but that seems the most likely.
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 251
January 15, 2016, 07:48:59 AM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

whats bugging me is, the earth allegedly spins at a thousand mile per hour, now if this was true, knowing how my sky tv works, allegedly pointed at a satellite that has to be ultra precise or you do not not get a signal, now if the earth is spinning at 1000mph or even stationary, how the hell do these satellites keep a perfect location in the sky, so millions of people can watch tv? to me the accuracy needed for satellite  must equate to these satellites being fixed, maybe even tethered
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 14, 2016, 11:43:38 PM
Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
January 14, 2016, 11:08:43 PM




I'm starting think you guys on more than just the sauce.

...
Here's a question for you:  How would you explain the fact that, just after the sun sets, the bottom of the cloud layer becomes illuminated by the sunlight?  Specifically, how would you reconcile the fact that the sun's altitude must be below the cloud layer so as to illuminate the bottom of it with your model that claims the sun is some ~3,000 miles above a flat earth at all times, rotating in a circular orbit?
...

I crafted an image depicting just that and posted it a while back:



Comedy.

Okay, cute picture.  Now, explain to me how, when you fly in an airplane just after sunset, the top of the clouds are not illuminated (when the bottom of the cloud layer is).  I've done this multiple times.  Try it.

P.s. Thank you for highlighting the curvature with your line.  It clearly shows the assymetry of each end (compared to the middle).
Jump to: