Did they give you any reason why it took 4 days to get your money ? I had the same issue with somewhere else as well and I feel like this late withdrawals are getting more common. I don't think any casino has given us a reason why but it has been constantly happening for the past 2-3 weeks so far, they always delay their withdrawals, not just here don't get me wrong, among many many casinos and for each amount, not just small or big ones.
They are random as well, some people get it in 30 minutes but some people get it in 2 days. Considering this is getting more common in all of casino and has no pattern at all, I kinda can't stop wondering what happened a month ago that made all casinos randomly select few withdrawals to delay. I don't the reason but I would love to hear it.
People just don't listen when I try to tell them FJ is a rigged and rogued casino. But they are so happy to just continue to troll for them. Here is a complaint just been filed by someone who says they have proof their dice game is rigged!
I used to submitted a complaint about Fortunejack dice scam, you told me I don't have enough data to prove it, now I have it. But Fortunejack team only sent me my lastest 2000 rolls, and refused to provided more. As a sample, I count and ananysis the data and found the issue.
The chart in this email shows clearly that the higher you bet, the higher the chance you lose.
To put it another way, your bet amount will influence the roll.
I'll list some data here: I played with payout 1.5-1.6, win chance 66-61.87%. The overall win chance of my lastest 2000 rolls is 65.3%, well, this is fine. But the win chance decrease while the bet amount is doubled:
Bet amount 0.001, win chance 65.5% (>65.3%)
Bet amount 0.002, win chance 66.8% (>65.3%),
---here is where the trick comes in---
Bet amount 0.004, win chance 65.0% (<65.3%),
Bet amount 0.008, win chance 63.4% (<65.3%),
Bet amount 0.032, win chance 64.3% (<65.3%),
Bet amount 0.064, win chance 55.6% (<65.3%).
See? The higher the bet, the lower the win chance!
We can see clearly the trend from 2000 rolls, the trend will be more clearer if the Fortunejack team can provide all my history.
If you insist the data is not enough, the Fortunejack should be obliged to provide enough data against my proof and conclusion.
But yet FJ refuses to provide this player with the remaining data that they asked for to further prove his case, and they also refused to even comment on his complaint (thus far)
That's because you're both idiots. That isn't "proof", is an obscure data chunk that just happens to loosely follow his uninformed hypothesis. That's not how roll outcome generation works. The only things used to calculate roll outcomes are client seed, server seed, and nonce. If they tried to influence it somehow using your balance or bet amounts, then you wouldn't be able to verify your rolls because they'd come back as false (in which case,
you could call it rigged).
It's always the people that don't understand Provably Fair that cry scam and rigged all the time.
