Yes it's indeed a strange payout structure: if showed in percentage it is
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
The payout structure is actually fine and good enough. It may seems like a weird number however the first structure as used by Fortunejack will give more to players assuming that if you are not finished as the second or the first rank. This payout structure was actually based on number of players imo incase if you forgotten
To be more clear what I find strange is the too little difference between 3rd and 4th position and not the lower/higher reward to the first two positions.
About the bolded part: maybe it's my poor english but I couldn't get what you mean with it. Anyway that payout structure was referred to those 41 entrants registered at the moment the screenshot was taken. I know that the more entrants the more place paid (generally according to a payout structure but couldn't find it on FJ).
Agree.
They should really just copy pokerstars or full tilt for all tournament structures. These sites have been around for 15 years and the info is available, just use it.
