FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders. - page 5.

flynn

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 540

Quote from: ngzhang on November 04, 2012, 09:52:53 AM

Quote from: flynn on November 04, 2012, 09:45:55 AM

With cgminer 2.4.2 (which I know is not showing HW errors) and --icarus-timing=90

Quote

GPU 0: 70.0C 1893RPM | 327.7/342.3Mh/s | A:24 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.22/m I: 4
ICA 0: | 344.2/451.4Mh/s | A:43 R:0 HW:0 U: 7.56/m

I have no idea if this is good or bad

U 7.56/m means 550MH/s

Then this is good

ALtho, it's probably an illusion from some statistical variance

Quote

GPU 0: 70.0C 1894RPM | 326.8/331.8Mh/s | A:141 R:1 HW:0 U: 4.22/m I: 4
ICA 0: | 282.6/424.1Mh/s | A:200 R:2 HW:0 U: 5.99/m

That's 430 MH/s

ngzhang

hero member

Activity: 592

Merit: 501

We will stand and fight.

Quote from: flynn on November 04, 2012, 09:45:55 AM

With cgminer 2.4.2 (which I know is not showing HW errors) and --icarus-timing=90

Quote

GPU 0: 70.0C 1893RPM | 327.7/342.3Mh/s | A:24 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.22/m I: 4
ICA 0: | 344.2/451.4Mh/s | A:43 R:0 HW:0 U: 7.56/m

I have no idea if this is good or bad

U 7.56/m means 550MH/s

flynn

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 540

With cgminer 2.4.2 (which I know is not showing HW errors) and --icarus-timing=90

Quote

GPU 0: 70.0C 1893RPM | 327.7/342.3Mh/s | A:24 R:0 HW:0 U: 4.22/m I: 4
ICA 0: | 344.2/451.4Mh/s | A:43 R:0 HW:0 U: 7.56/m

I have no idea if this is good or bad

flynn

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 540

Wow ! very good news ! Thank you Ngzhang !

I'll try that asap

ps: it's named "42" of course

ngzhang

hero member

Activity: 592

Merit: 501

We will stand and fight.

https://github.com/ngzhang/Lancelot

all hardware documents released.

also released a 460~ 520 MH/s bitsteam for Lancelot.

for test purpose only. please carefully test it with the bit file before flash the MCS file into the EEPROM.

Temporarily no technical support for the new bitsteam, Busy with Avalon.

punin

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: makomk on November 01, 2012, 07:50:13 AM

Spartan-6 chips are actually quite a bit worse at Bitcoin mining than comparably-sized Virtex ones, it's just that the price difference more than makes up for it.

Word. I'm running -3I chips and max out at 300Mhps per chip.

makomk

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 564

Quote from: hardcore-fs on October 31, 2012, 09:03:21 PM

I'm moving my 'demo' single XUPV5 with SINGLE core FROM 160MH/s to 200MH/s later today.
so based on that, two XUPV5 should give me 400MH/s, therefore Two spartan 6 with dual core should be hitting 800MH/s!!!

Nope, single core each. Spartan-6 chips are actually quite a bit worse at Bitcoin mining than comparably-sized Virtex ones, it's just that the price difference more than makes up for it.

hardcore-fs

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

400MH/S from DUAL spartan6 with two cores each. That is FUCKING tragic.

I'm moving my 'demo' single XUPV5 with SINGLE core FROM 160MH/s to 200MH/s later today.
so based on that, two XUPV5 should give me 400MH/s, therefore Two spartan 6 with dual core should be hitting 800MH/s!!!

Plus the shit XUPV5 is only hitting 43 deg. C with an ambient of 25 Deg. C.

HC.

Icoin

hero member

Activity: 585

Merit: 501

LancelotQC runs with around 32°C on the original bistream. i would like to run the x6500 overclocker bitstream, does someone know if that bitstream is adjustable for lancelot??
http://www.fpgamining.com/documentation/firmware
http://www.fpgamining.com/content/03-documentation/03-firmware/x6500-overclocker-0402.bit

Energizer

sr. member

Activity: 273

Merit: 250

If you are interested in buying Icarus boards to mine today, then upgrade it to ASIC whenever avalon ASIC is available, check my Icarus sale thread here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sold-discounted-icarus-fpga-upgradable-to-avalon-asic-115154

Dexter770221

legendary

Activity: 1029

Merit: 1000

No one exept ngzhang, but it seems that he is no longer visit this topic. Shame, really shame. And its always about money...

irritant

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol

can anyone confirm?

luffy

hero member

Activity: 607

Merit: 500

is the new bitstream project just stale or cancel?

flynn

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 540

bump ...

Dexter770221

legendary

Activity: 1029

Merit: 1000

Digilent Nexys2 500k board:
http://www.kamami.pl/index.php?ukey=product&productID=59725

loshia

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Dexter770221 on October 08, 2012, 04:48:46 PM

Don't bother loshia. Spartan3 500k will not perform faster than 2MH/s....

it is spartan 6 and it is performing...The git file source has been edited probably and what i see is commented

Dexter770221

legendary

Activity: 1029

Merit: 1000

Don't bother loshia. Spartan3 500k will not perform faster than 2MH/s....

loshia

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1000

Quote from: flynn on October 08, 2012, 04:41:49 PM

Quote from: makomk on October 08, 2012, 04:39:10 PM

Hmmmm... I haven't blown up any FPGAs lately. This is bitstream-compatible with Icarus, right?

AFAIK yes;

Yes it is. The difference between cm1 and icarus should be

https://github.com/ngzhang/Icarus/blob/master/FPGA_project/Src/fpgaminer_top.ucf
# UCF for a Nexys2 500K board
NET "osc_clk" LOC = "J1";

# serial port receive & transmit
NET "RxD" LOC = "D1";
NET "TxD" LOC = "B1";

# TTL level serial port: ja3 = rxd, ja2 = txd
NET "extminer_txd<0>" LOC = "D22";
NET "extminer_rxd<0>" LOC = "B22";

there is a chance your bitstream to work on one core only....

makomk, what do you think about that? Will your bitstream work?

flynn

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 540

Quote from: makomk on October 08, 2012, 04:39:10 PM

Hmmmm... I haven't blown up any FPGAs lately. This is bitstream-compatible with Icarus, right?

AFAIK yes;

makomk

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 564

Hmmmm... I haven't blown up any FPGAs lately. This is bitstream-compatible with Icarus, right?

Topic: FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders. - page 5. (Read 101887 times)