Author

Topic: FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest - page 1259. (Read 565954 times)

hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 576
WTF are you babbling about?  I said right from the very beginning that it would be interesting to see a battle between the snipers and large youtube personalities for this.  So far youtubers dont give a rats ass about this (probably because they dont want to encourage their users to bet huge amounts) but it's clear that snipers are here to take a swing but thats boring because it's a one sided affair atm.  The one exception is that android app that I discovered earlier.  The rest of them are all snipers (self referrers).

Yes I edit things.  Because you whine bitch and moan about making to many posts LMFAO.  Whatz the matter,  you cant reply again to your own post?  Lol

Anyway,  to get back to what I was talking about,  this contest is crap.  All it does is prove the below statement as true:

https://www.gamblingsites.com/online-casino/blacklist/

Read this bullet point:

Too Good or Too Big an Offer
If the casino offers huge matches or huge bonuses (or both) that are just unheard of – we’re talking $5,000 here and $10,000 there – that’s a sign saying you should avoid them. Look at all the legit casinos and you’ll see that most offers are $500, $1000 or maybe $2000. There’s something fishy about a casino that’s offering 5 or 10x that.

Note: If you look through the casinos on our blacklist, you’ll notice that that’s one of the things they have in common. Like Loco Panda with their 400%, $4,000 deposit bonus.
Not taking any sides but
I dont see the point of blabbering about snipers, even if they are there you dont have a way to proove it.

Its largely dependent upon your trust, no point talking shit about you cant control.
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
WTF are you babbling about?  I said right from the very beginning that it would be a interesting to see a battle between the snipers and large youtube personalities for this.  So far youtubers dont give a rats ass about this (probably because they dont want to encourage their users to bet huge amounts) but it's clear that snipers are here to take a swing.

I pointed out that whatever happens, you would draw the same conclusion based on opposing facts. You're the insane idiot that babbles.

Edit: More lolz as the post I reply to changes before I could possibly reply.

Edit 2: This fuckwit as added yet another paragraph without acknowledging it. I guess he thinks he can get away with posting lies I won't see.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 6
WTF are you babbling about?  I said right from the very beginning that it would be interesting to see a battle between the snipers and large youtube personalities for this.  So far youtubers dont give a rats ass about this (probably because they dont want to encourage their users to bet huge amounts) but it's clear that snipers are here to take a swing but thats boring because it's a one sided affair atm.  The one exception is that android app that I discovered earlier.  The rest of them are all snipers (self referrers).

Yes I edit things.  Because you whine bitch and moan about making to many posts LMFAO.  Whatz the matter,  you cant reply again to your own post?  Lol

Anyway,  to get back to what I was talking about,  this contest is crap.  All it does is prove the below statement as true:

https://www.gamblingsites.com/online-casino/blacklist/

Read this bullet point:

Too Good or Too Big an Offer
If the casino offers huge matches or huge bonuses (or both) that are just unheard of – we’re talking $5,000 here and $10,000 there – that’s a sign saying you should avoid them. Look at all the legit casinos and you’ll see that most offers are $500, $1000 or maybe $2000. There’s something fishy about a casino that’s offering 5 or 10x that.

Note: If you look through the casinos on our blacklist, you’ll notice that that’s one of the things they have in common. Like Loco Panda with their 400%, $4,000 deposit bonus.
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
Naah,  snipers (including sniping software) includes pushing the price up on purpose early to discourage others from jumping in until the very end.  Then right at the end,  they all make a mad dash at it.  This is common for electronic or highly sought after items.  For items that dont really have much popularity,  you wouldnt see snipers pushing the price up at all and they just show up at the very end.  Sniping consists of more than just the end but thats where they are most visible yes.

You really are a complete muppet. If nobody was wagering large you would say snipers are waiting to come in at the end, but as they are you've changed your tune to say they are going early to try and discourage others. You're just making a complete prat of yourself as always.

Edit. LOL. I love how you keep adding more shit to the end of your posts by editing them.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 6
Naah,  snipers (including sniping software) includes pushing the price up on purpose early to discourage normal users from jumping in causing the price to rise organically (slowly) and then all the sniper has to deal with are other snipers at the very end.  Then right at the end,  they all make a mad dash at it.  This is common for electronic or highly sought after items.  For items that dont really have much popularity,  you wouldnt see snipers pushing the price up at all and they just show up at the very end.  Sniping consists of more than just the end but thats where they are most visible yes.

Besides,  you couldnt pay me enough to snipe anything lol.  I'd wager that the current #1 is probably 20+BTC in the hole lol.  But that cant proven without the statistic to back it up.  It should also show the user's "personal stats page" to show that betting isnt or is worth the reward.  Without that statistic,  I default to assuming that this clown just lost 20+ BTC and is to embarrassed to cry about it lol.  All problematic gamblers hide their losses and pretend they never happened.
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
So far it's the snipers that are winning.

Look up what sniping is. They come in at the end. That makes this statement as stupid and dumb as anything you have said so far and that is a very high bar.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 6
Looks to me like a sniper is already on the horizon.  This contest is progressing the same way a bid use to progress on Ebay with all the snipers lol.  I am curious to find out if the snipers will win or the big ass youtubers (which I havent seen yet,  so far they all appear to be snipers except for 1 which is an android app).  Trevon James could win this easily if he started promoting it again.  Maybe wetsuit stopped paying him once he found out that the dude was being investigated by the FBI lol.  Or maybe banned his account or something.  Who knows.

So far it's the fat stack snipers that are winning (but I'd bet the house that the winners are actually huge losers).  Take a looksie at the #1 position right now and tell me thats not a single guy using himself as a referral.  lol.  Both the #1 wagerer and #1 referer have the exact same amount.  This indicates that only 1 person owns both accounts Smiley  Even I had a setup like that when I first tested the site a few months ago to see if referral income actually showed up when it should.  I am my own referral lol.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1454
Right,  ok so we should just write off PewDiePie's followers list as a fluke and no one actually watches it.  Good solid marketing plan.  LMFAO.  And if you only have 100s of followers in 10yrs,  you're doing worse than anyone I've ever heard of.  Even I have 811 and I've only been doing it for less than a year and havent even been uploading anything.  The streaming is just something new recently.

I'm just drawing a parallel.   Pewdiepie wont have every follower watching his videos, the quality and depth he reaches his audience cant be presumed to be 100% every time the man makes a pronouncement.  People are more complicated then that, he dont have a puppet army clearly.

I dont know what percentage are still checking into his channel every week, I will venture a guess its way below 50%  If we say once a month maybe its like a third of his followers but I'm being super optimistic there imo     I kinda agree with you, you are new within the last year and got alot of people to follow so your % reach to a responsive audience is probably way better then the stone dead silence I have for many hundreds of followers who dont ever actually watch.     Over time those followers decay if not literally in an unfollow but they go silent, just dont watch any more maybe not even a live youtube account.  Sometimes people fake followers from the very beginning, the whole concept is very 'spongy'

Can David slay Goliath the giant here and beat the top youtube accounts, I believe so if they got that trending reach at that moment in time.  How people conjour up that magic, I dont know but I believe its feasible and probably a genuine skill to market yourself, the channel.   Also helps to know the audience for a video type, etc.  

  Me I just post crap on my channel that I like and want to keep a memory of so whatever, its just personal and occasionally someone else likes the video also and maybe a few thousand views happen or 100k if it trends, random
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 6
Which is exactly why mathematical truths != reality truths Cheesy  Just because something is going to happen, doesnt mean I need to be concerned with it happening in my lifetime,  therefore to me,  it's irrelevant that it's true to begin with and is therefore false for my purposes Smiley  

I dont believe gravity creates time,  but gravity (which is created by mass) can bend time Smiley
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
Well according to Thequack,  bots always lose even if the house edge is 0.000000000001 or anything above 0 but he wont back it up by setting it that low to be proven wrong  lmao.  He doesnt understand that just because something is a mathematical truth doesnt make it a reality truth.  Some things would take so long that they would take longer than time itself (end of the universe as i believe creation of universe also created time).

I'm not sure about the creation of time thing. Time is a dimension added by gravity.
Mass produces gravitational forces (well it's more the property of a mass).
And mass is made by the conversion of energy to matter.

If something is mathematically true then it's true. You can get a superposition of truth and false but not the math becoming false.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 576
The house edge hasn't always been 5% has it?!
TheQuin said that when Freebitco.in launched, house of edge was 0%.

Affiliates get 5% of what the house takes.  Lol. :-/
The site will so much be in overall loss if they reduce the house edge to 0 or 1% with all the current bonuses like lottery tickets and reward points they are giving out. It is only possible with this kind of high house edge.
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
The house edge hasn't always been 5% has it?!
TheQuin said that when Freebitco.in launched, house of edge was 0%.

Affiliates get 5% of what the house takes.  Lol. :-/

I honestly can't remember if the 0.25% for referral wagering was always there or added later but I do remember this:

** House edge of the HI-LO game has been reduced to 0% **

Sadly, I had to add a house edge for the Multiply your BTC game as bots were bleeding it dry. It's currently at 5% but I will lower it if it exceeds break-even.

legendary
Activity: 4018
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
The house edge hasn't always been 5% has it?!
TheQuin said that when Freebitco.in launched, house of edge was 0%.

Affiliates get 5% of what the house takes.  Lol. :-/
legendary
Activity: 3262
Merit: 1376
Slava Ukraini!
The house edge hasn't always been 5% has it?!
TheQuin said that when Freebitco.in launched, house of edge was 0%.
legendary
Activity: 4018
Merit: 1250
Owner at AltQuick.com
The house edge hasn't always been 5% has it?!
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 609

I'm an affiliate person,  I let someone else do the scamming and I simply profit right along with them.  Simple.
Good for you! Using up others to make profit with just affiliate (hands down)
Well we do have our own ways and making sort of things dont minding on others situation as long we do benefit. Isnt surprising though.

This is why freebitco has such a HUGE bot problem lmfao.
They are well aware about that matter and just let them solve regarding to that and besides not only freebitco do have such problem when it regards to bots.
Read this bullet point:
Bullet point?
Even just on our common sense and experience. Any promotions either good or average ones,we do know on whats the main purpose of those.

---snip---

I do understand on what you are trying to prove here and try to convince people that most gambling sites are shady.For we have no argumentations nor derailing this main thread of Freebitco then so be it. Just believe on what you believe and people do have their own decisions in life since its their money then shady or not they do have the free will to play on any gambling sites they do like.
Just remember that always avoid on engaging to sites arent popular or do have issues.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 6

I'm an affiliate person,  I let someone else do the scamming and I simply profit right along with them.  Simple.
Good for you! Using up others to make profit with just affiliate (hands down)
Well we do have our own ways and making sort of things dont minding on others situation as long we do benefit. Isnt surprising though.

This is why freebitco has such a HUGE bot problem lmfao.
They are well aware about that matter and just let them solve regarding to that and besides not only freebitco do have such problem when it regards to bots.
Read this bullet point:
Bullet point?
Even just on our common sense and experience. Any promotions either good or average ones,we do know on whats the main purpose of those.

Cool,  if you think freebitco is actually legit,  then you'll love all the sites listed on https://www.gamblingsites.com/online-casino/blacklist/ as they are mirrors of freebitco (or more correctly freebitco is a mirror of them).

Lets go through the list shall we:

Common Shenanigans Scam Casinos Pull

Unfair Games:  IMO 5% house edge is WAY above and beyond what it should be using.  But other than that, the game is fair so I'll give it a little for that (Neutral)

Non-Payment:  We have received reports of them not paying people (the latest showed up a few days ago) but no evidence supports this, so I'll give them a bit here but the reports are still disturbing. (Neutral)

Slow Pay:  This is the only part of the site where I think freebitco excels and thats because it's forced to excel with it since it's bitcoin based.  Therefore I dont consider this much when looking at freebitco,  bitcoin basically forces it to pass. (PASS)

Predatory Terms:  Have you every attempted to use the "Bonus balance matching" scam? it counts against them in this category.  This is where freebitco would match whatever you put into a "locked balance".  So if you put in 1 BTC,  it would give you an extra 1BTC.  Then you could roll like you had 2BTC.  However,  you couldnt withdraw ANY of it until you wagered 26BTC worth.  This is an example of "Predatory terms:".  It also has a crap ton of other predatory tactics such as leaving out fine details of certain items or making them difficult to find on the site on purpose so that they are not plainly visible.  (FAIL)

Changing Terms:  This goes without saying.  Freebitco changes its terms more than running water.  (FAIL)

Marketing Spam:  This site has like 3 or 4 threads on this 1 forum alone and Wetsuit spams them whenever they become stale.  Forum spamming is common among all scam sites.  Legit sites dont even bother using forum sites.  They have no need for them at all.  So just the fact that we're all here checks this box.  (FAIL)

Licensing and Regulation:  This site is not licensed ANYWHERE.  Thus,  we can check this box as it cant fulfill it in any jurisdiction. (FAIL)

Too Good or Too Big an Offer:  This goes without saying,  just look at the latest crap promotion it's running.  This is an easy (FAIL)

SCORE:
Neutral:  2
Pass: 1
Fail: 5

IDK about you,  but those are scam numbers if you ask me.  Failing 5 out of 8 is NOT good.  Even if I gave it high marks in the 2 neutral's,  it would STILL fail to pass the sniff test.
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 609

I'm an affiliate person,  I let someone else do the scamming and I simply profit right along with them.  Simple.
Good for you! Using up others to make profit with just affiliate (hands down)
Well we do have our own ways and making sort of things dont minding on others situation as long we do benefit. Isnt surprising though.

This is why freebitco has such a HUGE bot problem lmfao.
They are well aware about that matter and just let them solve regarding to that and besides not only freebitco do have such problem when it regards to bots.
Read this bullet point:
Bullet point?
Even just on our common sense and experience. Any promotions either good or average ones,we do know on whats the main purpose of those.
jr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 6
Right,  ok so we should just write off PewDiePie's followers list as a fluke and no one actually watches it.  Good solid marketing plan.  LMFAO.  And if you only have 100s of followers in 10yrs,  you're doing worse than anyone I've ever heard of.  Even I have 811 and I've only been doing it for less than a year and havent even been uploading anything.  The streaming is just something new recently.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4102
Merit: 1454
When I looked at it 2 minutes ago, there were 2 current viewers, 9 likes and 2 dislikes. Not that much of attention, considering it was published almost a month ago, so it doesn't really work for him.


Quality cannot be ascertained immediately in one number.  As a youtuber of ten years with hundreds of followers I'll admit that sadly about 2 of them view a video if that when I upload.   People follow and it really doesnt mean a ton long term, its quite a disposable platform not exactly where people reside like Facebook for example where you have a strong connection.   For whatever reason people dont always watch the channels they follow that often.

So yea its possible someone could beat a much higher follower youtube channel however unlikely it might seem.   I think youtube views are very trend based, its hard to say exactly how to capture that.  Sometimes its just the title you set or the picture frame used that gets peoples attention.     Its about as easy as walking a barrel down a river, hard to stay on top imho
Jump to: