Topic: FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest - page 1256. (Read 565954 times)

If you manage to double your balance again, withdraw your original deposit.
If you want to play for longer periods of time then you should probably reduce the size of your bet somewhat or reducing your multiplier.

Let's hope you get better luck next time!

I'm sorry for your loss, but it happens, every long time dice player knows that. Although it's very rare but you can get 27 reds in row playing with 2x multiplier. But actually I suspect you were playing with multiplier other than 2x, weren't you?



That's sad for me, but I understand your decision to not do it. No company would be excited about getting a storm of complaints from their customers in the future.

very bad day for me
I managed to get my balance almost doubled after a month+ then I lost it 3-4 days ago
then today I made another deposit close to ~30 mbtc, I was hoping it could last a month or so
but what happened was... 27 lose streak in a row
It feels like I'm donating to the prize pool contest

The referral who manage to get a big whale player to sign up under his referral link would be very happy in this new referral contest, as the referral will be able to earn an amazing amount of $5000 USD without the need to take any risk playing the HI-LO game in order to win the first prize for the referral contest.

It's not really difficult but we would need to put more archive data servers in place to do it. At the moment we only store total values for each account. It is something we're looking into the feasibility of adding.

I think it is hard for them to inplement this kind of thing, may be they can make it that simple like current wagered or may be lifetime wagered. To ask them get weekly or monthly data on wagering for everyone must be really hard. And btw they already have put lottery tickets weekly so there is no need for that. If you want that so bad, maya be you can ask wetsuit is to send the details towards your email

One roll of 25 BTC with 95% chance to win means you're going to lose 1/20 of the time right?

You're going to lose 1.25 ish against the edge.  Bitcoin is worth $6000.  You win $10,000 (1.512 Bitcoins back)

EV+ atm?

You could self-affiliate to make it even more positive at this point.  It is still very early in the month.

The contest is wagered... not gross profits. (I believe)

The less you play against a big house edge, the better.  

#1 is now >67 BTC.

Using the same token,  who do you think will return to try again  The one who thinks they actually have a shot at winning,  or the guy who just lost everything in 1 shot and is now crying that he didnt beat the house edge even though he thought he would with that 1 shot try.  I dont want the smart users who know how to beat the house edge by rolling it all on the 1st try.  They are few and far between.  I want the complete idiots out there,  which there are far more of who dont understand that putting it all up front on 1 roll is the only possible way of coming out on top.... maybe.

They are BOTH idiots,  but one is a different type of retard than the other I think lmao.  I just think the retards that last longer are more likely to come back to try again.  Besides,  my bot is pretty damn convincing.  I've had people using it for months and still havent lost.  Some of them are welllllllllllllllllllllllll in the black,  a couple have done some really stupid things and I wouldnt want to be them lol.  If it's used responsibly,  you'd be pretty darn surprised how well it does against a 5% house edge  You should watch my youtube live stream sometime.  Thats 100% live and real  It takes FOREVER for it to win anything,  but it does lol.  It makes a pretty convincing case to give it a try lol.

Gay.

I want people banging the max bet.  

Fuck your shitbot.    Only retards uses bots vs house edge (mostly teasing... I know lots of "smart" folks who use bots).  Gotta use the third eye and your epeen.

I'm hoping for the best worst situation I suppose. 

I do hope they win their big bet... so they can play two more times!

You're not allowed to post referral links on this forum, it's against the rules - DELETE THIS POST!

That's interesting, from a referrers perspective it would be better if they were able to roll over the same money many times rather than losing it in one big bet.

Absolutely.

A player only has $10,000 to lose per say... we want as much of that lose as possible.

In my opinion... most losses happen fast (in one big best mostly).


Depends on what your max bet is.

I'd rather advertise company ABC 5% house edge with 20% commission on the edge rather than company CBA with 1% house edge @ 60% commission on the edge because I'm looking for someone that loses a single 20BTC roll.

On a single 20 BTC roll with company ABC vs CBA:
ABC would pay .2 BTC
CBA would pay .12 BTC

Riiiiiight and thats why you are running a desperation promotion for referrals.  I already covered why you are doing this and the fact that im one of the top referrers just goes to prove how bad things truly are for the site because i shouldnt even be in the top 10p or 1000 in the referrals dept.  Yet there it is.  The house edge according to your own words is "in line with all other online casinos" yet we all know thats a blatant lie.  Now you are trying to back peddle on that when others bring it up.  Even the site you just posted yourself proves the simple fact that freebitco runs a retardedly high house edge with very few features more than the other sites to show for it.

It must be killing you inside to see one of your biggest critics climbing the ladder in your own contest.  Might be time to put down the ego bag and listen for a little while.  The cash flowing in isnt justifying the far to small of features flowing out.  The site lacks all of the important statistics that other sites do as well (which is one of the reasons its not listed on statistics sites such as the one u listed).

It also checks far to many of the scam flag boxes from the  blacklist site and the biggest example of that is the current contest.

We've been doing this for nearly 5 years now and it has been very successful. There has never been any sign of anything drying up. Again there is no point in going and competing in an already saturated market. Have a look at the fiat casinos and their house edges and you'll see how successful our approach is.

Also, take a look at https://dicesites.com/ and compare turnover on those sites in the last 7 days to our 891.758 BTC. It looks like Bustadice had an exceptional week but we're happy with where we stand.

If you listened to yourself, you'd have heard a voice asking, how far can you get with playing the Ostrich? The fund for the bonuses and free lotto tickets comes from the very 5% house edge and now a huge chunk of your so called " plenty players," are at the site not for the game, but for the bonuses. You don't have to hold a degree in Math to know, it won't be long before the loot dries off! If there's any move worth taking by this site to make it genuinely competitive, it's to do away with the obnoxious house edge for something within the industry standard.

There are already plenty of sites competing in the low house edge market. We offer something different and that's been very successful for us. There are plenty of players out there that prefer all the bonuses and free lotto tickets. If we took all that away and lowered the house edge we would be just another dice site competing in a very competitive space.

Well one cannot really complain about a particular house edge because its a free fair world and they are not hiding something from you, if you want to play then you are free to do so, if you want to go somewhere else then also you are free to do it.

This is like catching a double edged knife. You get cut, no matter what you do.  If they offer a lower house edge, then something else must be sacrificed. We might have to give up some cross-funded features, like the Lottery system or the FREE faucet etc.

So let's just accept the fact that there are no perfect solution for this and just enjoy the features that are on offer, because of this high house edge.  In future they might come up with a better way to fund this and the house edge might be lowered.

Do people who are into referring others pay much attention to the percentage of the share they are getting from the net profit of the website?
So if I start a dice site with giving out 80% of the 1% house edge profit to the referrers do you really believe that people will actually advertise my site on their own (given that I built up some trust on my site for an year or so)?