Pages:
Author

Topic: Germans are looking to firewood for energy as natural gas prices soar - page 10. (Read 4254 times)

legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Sad to realize that only small part of people understand real problem natural resources.
Also sad many politicians don't understand it either. The focus has been on CO2 and the climate for a long time, up to the point of storing CO2 underground. But none of that solves the supply problems, and I believe a shortage of resources is going to be a much bigger problem than rising temperatures.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1215
What will be offered to burn next to get warm ?
Bills and eviction notices Cheesy

A minute of black humor. Somewhere in the Internet I've seen a funny picture - "how to fight with poverty and hunger - let hungry people eat poor people" two problems solved simultaneously. That is an answer what should be burned next. It might turn that all of a sudden amount of gas supply is enough for everybody.

Sad to realize that only small part of people understand real problem natural resources. A lot of people know that their monthly bill amount to be paid soon will look like telephone number, but people prefer to smile, joke and only complain about that. I expect new offers from banks to appear - loans to pay utility bill.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
What will be offered to burn next to get warm ?
Bills and eviction notices Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1215
Germans and Europe is dependable from Russian gas, wheat war, oil price growth - sometimes I am amazed how countries blindly became fully dependable from their neighbor and never had Plan B in case something happens. Politicians must have foreseen such cases and be ready to act or give a reasonable alternative. I dont count consumption reduction is a way out of this situation. How many times we need to cut gas consumption, that will make everyone happy and had enough of it? Firewood is not infinite. What will be offered to burn next to get warm ?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Isn't possible that the U.S. wants the E.U. to be more dependent on them than the Russians?
Probably. You don't need tin-foil hats for that: most countries would rather have business for themselves than for another country.

their full 100% storage is only enough for a week or two of gas consumption in normal situation, not even during cold season when consumption increases.
That's incorrect:
Secondly they are counting the gas that was supposed to be received from US and elsewhere as part of that storage whereas they haven't sent that gas yet!
I haven't seen this before. Do you have a reference link?

Quote
In other words the economic situation is so much worse that we thought. We should expect a much bigger inflation due to this money printing policy in near future on top of everything else.
Agreed. We're pretty much fucked at the moment.
copper member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 915
White Russian
Any alternative with supplies will cost a lot more due to logistical problems. Therefore, a more likely scenario is the purchase of Russian gas in other countries, and according to documents, it will not come from Russia.

I don't think so - because of the same logistical problems. In order to resell Russian gas to the European Union in a democratic package, the intermediary must have some kind of surplus, and no one has such surplus now. Hungary recently agreed with Gazprom on additional gas supplies in the amount of several million cubic meters per day, which will come through the Turkish Stream - and this is perhaps all that the European Union can count on. If Hungary wants to share.


Wasn't Germany the intermediary before? I believe that there might be a conspiracy here. Tin-foil hats on, but the United States might have something to do with this. Because when Germany, the intermediary, has been importing more and more Natural Gas from Russia, they also started being less dependent on U.S. Gas. Isn't possible that the U.S. wants the E.U. to be more dependent on them than the Russians?
Yep. Germany was an intermediary and resold gas to neighbors through a virtual or physical reverse, but now this is in the past - Germany itself does not have enough gas in the conditions of the Nord Stream shutdown.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
- As of August 31, the filling of gas storages exceeded 85%
Once again your hatred of Russia blinded you about other propaganda. First of all their full 100% storage is only enough for a week or two of gas consumption in normal situation, not even during cold season when consumption increases.
Secondly they are counting the gas that was supposed to be received from US and elsewhere as part of that storage whereas they haven't sent that gas yet!

- The German government announced the allocation of 65 billion euros to help businesses and the public.
In other words the economic situation is so much worse that we thought. We should expect a much bigger inflation due to this money printing policy in near future on top of everything else.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
Any alternative with supplies will cost a lot more due to logistical problems. Therefore, a more likely scenario is the purchase of Russian gas in other countries, and according to documents, it will not come from Russia.

I don't think so - because of the same logistical problems. In order to resell Russian gas to the European Union in a democratic package, the intermediary must have some kind of surplus, and no one has such surplus now. Hungary recently agreed with Gazprom on additional gas supplies in the amount of several million cubic meters per day, which will come through the Turkish Stream - and this is perhaps all that the European Union can count on. If Hungary wants to share.


Wasn't Germany the intermediary before? I believe that there might be a conspiracy here. Tin-foil hats on, but the United States might have something to do with this. Because when Germany, the intermediary, has been importing more and more Natural Gas from Russia, they also started being less dependent on U.S. Gas. Isn't possible that the U.S. wants the E.U. to be more dependent on them than the Russians?
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
While the propaganda media of the terrorist country and their henchmen are spreading a horror story from an alternative pseudo-reality about how the whole of Europe will freeze without Russian gas, in Germany, in reality the situation is as follows:
- As of August 31, the filling of gas storages exceeded 85% and the rate of gas accumulation exceeded the filling rate for the last 5 years. This is provided that gas consumption will be reduced by 15%, which means that with this nuance, storage facilities have 100% of the required reserve, taking into account the deduction of 15% for reducing gas consumption. BUT! The purchase of gas has not ended yet Smiley
- The German government announced the allocation of 65 billion euros to help businesses and the public.

Well, how did the Kremlin terrorists achieve results with terrorism? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
The interesting is that people are not realizing "why" firewood is used right now as alternative and why it is a good thing. The real deal is that Germans realized long time ago Russians can't be trusted and Putin is the evil person in the world today, history always had those evil people, maybe Putin is not as bad as Hitler, but certainly the worst for the world today.

Unfortunately, Germany and the EU did not do anything after the Russian attack on Crimea, because if that had been the case, then today such stories would be completely pointless. Eight years have passed since then, and everything continued as if nothing had happened, and if we had reacted then as we do now, we might have prevented this bloody war that has been going on for months.

So instead of gas, oil, petrol whatever that you can get from Russia, they would use firewood, but not forever neither. Even though as you mentioned it is not as bad as people imagine, it is still not a forever thing, Europe is trying to build self-energy sustainable ways and when that happens, firewood will slowly fade out again.

Firewood will be used only by those who have the conditions for it, and you cannot use firewood if you live in an apartment building that does not have a chimney - unless you push the stove pipe through the window. If we look at the infographic, less than 50% of German households use gas for heating, the rest have some other alternatives. As I already stated in my previous post, wood can be used for heating, and even without a major impact on the environment if it is used and produced in a sustainable way.


full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 167


Or they could just buy lots of red hot chilli peppers, store them to last up to spring. It warms the body without having to burn anything.  Just add 3 chilli peppers to a noddle soup and its good. Add peppers to every food thats to be eaten. Food is importanter than gas in the long run.

I don't know if you're serious about the chili part. That just trick your body into thinking you're hot. That's why Thais love them, they sweat and then it evaporates and cool them down. But yes, food is definitely important in helping keep the body warm. Maybe they can adjust the heating to be lower than they're used to and just put on an extra layer or two of clothing.
do we always eat chili and consume it, of course this is not friendly to the body. I prefer to use SPICE/REMPAH drinks, like what Asian people do to brew drinks by adding ginger, turmeric, kapulogo and others [whose benefits are the same] we find so many in the asia area, so that not only warmth is obtained but immunity and stamina are maintained in times of extreme weather.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1188
The alternative is anything that can help you warm up during the winter, or to cook something to eat if you have no other source of heat. There is a type of tree that grows very fast and I know it has spread a lot in Europe in the last 10-15 years - and it takes about 3-4 years to grow a tree for cultivation. The ash produced by burning wood is a good fertilizer, and it can also be used as a protection against snails if it is sprinkled around the plant. Today, it is also possible to buy smoke filters that significantly reduce pollution - so everything is not as black as many think.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulownia
The interesting is that people are not realizing "why" firewood is used right now as alternative and why it is a good thing. The real deal is that Germans realized long time ago Russians can't be trusted and Putin is the evil person in the world today, history always had those evil people, maybe Putin is not as bad as Hitler, but certainly the worst for the world today.

So instead of gas, oil, petrol whatever that you can get from Russia, they would use firewood, but not forever neither. Even though as you mentioned it is not as bad as people imagine, it is still not a forever thing, Europe is trying to build self-energy sustainable ways and when that happens, firewood will slowly fade out again.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
maybe they can just, you know, burn their trash in incinerators for electricity
They do that already, it produces about 1% of the total electricity.

Quote
In the end it'll also boil down to proper design. I've seen illustrations of houses that uses water heated by the sun to warm to home, maybe they do that there. I mean, the sun still shines during winter, except if there's a blizzard.
Much easier: windows facing the sun. It helps, but it's not enough.

Wow, and even the incinerators are not enough. And yes properly designed windows, design the house for maximum sun absorption and heat retention. Unfortunately I don't think those living in flats have much options. I have family in Italy and they complain about the cold and are not running the heater continuously to save on gas (this was even before prices skyrocket). I can imagine it'll be much frigid in Germany. Hope they sort that all out before winter.


Or they could just buy lots of red hot chilli peppers, store them to last up to spring. It warms the body without having to burn anything.  Just add 3 chilli peppers to a noddle soup and its good. Add peppers to every food thats to be eaten. Food is importanter than gas in the long run.

I don't know if you're serious about the chili part. That just trick your body into thinking you're hot. That's why Thais love them, they sweat and then it evaporates and cool them down. But yes, food is definitely important in helping keep the body warm. Maybe they can adjust the heating to be lower than they're used to and just put on an extra layer or two of clothing.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
Firewood is not an alternative. How long does it takes for a tree to grow on a hight of 3-4 store house ? 50 years? It takes several days to burn all those logs. And as you say - dust is created after burning logs, and the amount of trees decreases each day, to clean air. That is a a path to nowhere.

The alternative is anything that can help you warm up during the winter, or to cook something to eat if you have no other source of heat. There is a type of tree that grows very fast and I know it has spread a lot in Europe in the last 10-15 years - and it takes about 3-4 years to grow a tree for cultivation. The ash produced by burning wood is a good fertilizer, and it can also be used as a protection against snails if it is sprinkled around the plant. Today, it is also possible to buy smoke filters that significantly reduce pollution - so everything is not as black as many think.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulownia

Cultivation for firewood
It is planted at a distance of about 2×3 m. After 3-4 years, we get a tree with a diameter of about 20 cm and 0.25 m2. A household that annually consumes about 15 m2 of wood can plant a plantation with 200-250 trees on an area of 1000-1500 m2. After 3 years, he can start logging and cover all heating costs for the next 30 years. This is because after cutting, a new tree sprouts again from the existing root.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1215
Firewood as a solution to high gas price? Ridiculous. Worse decision ever. What next, go to caves and prey hunting? How long do they plan to replace gas with firewood? Few years and there will be no trees on the earth.
As long as Russia still covers gas supplies to Germany, then there is an alternative way for people to prepare firewood for sufficient supply for the winter, the demand for wood is increasing because the government has subsidized it, but will it reduce natural greening if the demand for firewood increases?

Quote
I have a fireplace also, but its purpose is to heat biggest room only. I know that is individual, but one fireplace usually dont heat whole house, but having multiple fireplaces at home is an expensive investment during construction period, it limits useful space at home. And keeping fire creates minor inconveniences. It is not pull the handle and go to sleep.
If the fireplace uses gas for only limited use while the gas is still filled, it will eventually switch to a pallet wood fireplace, but it is unhygienic for indoor use, creating dust that is bad for breathing.

Firewood is not an alternative. How long does it takes for a tree to grow on a hight of 3-4 store house ? 50 years? It takes several days to burn all those logs. And as you say - dust is created after burning logs, and the amount of trees decreases each day, to clean air. That is a a path to nowhere.
full member
Activity: 653
Merit: 183
If only Germans start to take the nuclear energy pill sooner.
They did that, see this image on Wikipedia (hotlinking the image from Wiki doesn't work).
Then, after the Fukushima nuclear disaster, they decided to get rid of them quicker. And coal too, because of the climate. Natural gas consumption on the other hand went up, because of the lower emissions and higher flexibility (needed to deal with the increasing share of wind and solar). And that's in a nutshell how we ended up where we are.

But even if they'd do use nuclear power for heating, using electricity for resistor heating is quite wasteful. You'd need a lot more power plants.
Yes, electricity is ill-suit to power the boiler, low efficiency to be used for heating in the winter. If we have more nuclear power, we can reduce the amount of reliance on natural gas. In turn, allow the oil-power boiler to take place. Yes, it was a thing. There is a downsize from oil-power boiler vs gas-power boiler but still a considerable replacement especially the biodiesel mix.
On the world scale, if more nuclear power plants are being built, it'll reduce the number of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and LNG to generate electricity. More available for those resources, supply and demand kick in, and cheaper prices as well.

Japan's Fukushima disaster was the worst. Not just Germany but a lot of countries around that time halted their plan to build new nuclear power plants. To be fair, Japan stood on the Pacific Ring of Fire, they should've known better when built the Fukushima nuclear power plant on their coast.


Nuclear energy is one of the greenest forms of energy available. I don't know why the Green Party always oppose nuclear power plants. Obviously disposal of nuclear waste is a serious concern. But now technology has advanced and safe disposal methods are available. And this is the reason why energy prices in France has remained stable so far this year, while those in other European countries have gone up by anywhere from 500% to 1,000%. Germans are the most stupid ones. Rather than building new nuclear powerplants, they closed down the existing ones.

The Green Party is just a front for renewable energy and oil cartels to hide behind it and spread their agenda. All because of money and profit. Pure greed, I tell you. Thing is changing. In COP26 or 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference where they sang a different tune, moved nuclear energy to the 'green list', and stop discouraging countries from seeking it.
copper member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 915
White Russian
Any alternative with supplies will cost a lot more due to logistical problems. Therefore, a more likely scenario is the purchase of Russian gas in other countries, and according to documents, it will not come from Russia.
I don't think so - because of the same logistical problems. In order to resell Russian gas to the European Union in a democratic package, the intermediary must have some kind of surplus, and no one has such surplus now. Hungary recently agreed with Gazprom on additional gas supplies in the amount of several million cubic meters per day, which will come through the Turkish Stream - and this is perhaps all that the European Union can count on. If Hungary wants to share.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 4602
Buy on Amazon with Crypto
Firewood?
Sustainable?
How about: *polluting*, *extremely unhealthy* the reason firewood is not used that much anymore is because of the problems it comes with. Wooden gas burner is not a solution, think about the environment as well, how many wild trees would be cut down just because people will try and sell it illegally once the prices sore. It's not an alternative, is not an option, we all need to learn about environment friendly options and at the end make things better not just for us but for our future generations as well.

The suggestion to burn firewood is a retrograde step. We moved from firewood to natural gas many decades ago. It is retarded to even think about going back. Firewood is neither environmentally friendly, nor healthy. It produces much more soot and ash, when compared to natural gas. I am not saying that natural gas is the safest option that is available. But at least with natural gas, the pollution levels are much lower when compared to firewood and coal. People come up with all sort of crazy suggestions when there is a shortage of natural gas. This talk will just die down when gas becomes more abundant again.

This is really crazy solution, it shouldn't be done. Using coal in addition to creating ash and dust that pollutes the air also has a lot of impact on the environment. We all know that deforestation will cause environmental hazards, and natural disasters such as droughts, floods, earthquakes are all caused by deforestation. It is difficult to find an alternative to Russian gas in the short term, but the German and EU governments should reconsider the use of firewood instead. It is a step backward for humanity.

Do you know how much forest is burned in fires every year?
https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-wildfires
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-wildfires
Any alternative with supplies will cost a lot more due to logistical problems. Therefore, a more likely scenario is the purchase of Russian gas in other countries, and according to documents, it will not come from Russia.
copper member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 915
White Russian
Is there truly a Russian propaganda?
Of course there is, just like there's Western propaganda. One of the first things EU did, was ban Russian state-owned media.
It's safe to assume propaganda and censorship are always happening, the very tricky part is knowing what's real or not.
The reality is that Nord Stream 1 is closed for an indefinite period (due to identified malfunctions on the only working Siemens turbine, which are not clear how to fix due to the imposed sanctions), gas from Russia to Europe now flows only through Ukraine and through the Turkish Stream.

It is also realistic that the EU's total gas demand at the end of 2021 was about 550 billion cubic meters per year, with its own production of about 210 billion cubic meters per year (340 billion cubic meters per year the EU imported in total, including about 150 billion cubic meters per year from Russia ). The total capacity of underground gas storage facilities in the European Union is 70 billion cubic meters per year. Everyone has the right to draw their own conclusions.

Plus it would be very easy to say to go through winter with limited, or no heating and energy if you are not there to experience it. There are real people, FAMILIES, who would suffer, or even also die. I know it was wrong of Putin to order the attack on Ukraine, I'm not saying ignore it. But it's very hard for those ordinary people to go through the coming winter.
People will not freeze, but the entire energy-intensive European industry is fucked up.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1108
Free Free Palestine
Firewood?
Sustainable?
How about: *polluting*, *extremely unhealthy* the reason firewood is not used that much anymore is because of the problems it comes with. Wooden gas burner is not a solution, think about the environment as well, how many wild trees would be cut down just because people will try and sell it illegally once the prices sore. It's not an alternative, is not an option, we all need to learn about environment friendly options and at the end make things better not just for us but for our future generations as well.

The suggestion to burn firewood is a retrograde step. We moved from firewood to natural gas many decades ago. It is retarded to even think about going back. Firewood is neither environmentally friendly, nor healthy. It produces much more soot and ash, when compared to natural gas. I am not saying that natural gas is the safest option that is available. But at least with natural gas, the pollution levels are much lower when compared to firewood and coal. People come up with all sort of crazy suggestions when there is a shortage of natural gas. This talk will just die down when gas becomes more abundant again.

This is really crazy solution, it shouldn't be done. Using coal in addition to creating ash and dust that pollutes the air also has a lot of impact on the environment. We all know that deforestation will cause environmental hazards, and natural disasters such as droughts, floods, earthquakes are all caused by deforestation. It is difficult to find an alternative to Russian gas in the short term, but the German and EU governments should reconsider the use of firewood instead. It is a step backward for humanity.
Pages:
Jump to: