Topic: girl math vs boy math - page 2. (Read 646 times)

if everyone invests, I mean here where the money will flow?
because I think the person who sold at the beginning will give the money to those who are still holding back.
Or if everyone invests there will be no loss for each person because they don't sell?

In essence married women will be much more able to control their finances because at this point they are no longer concerned with themselves but rather with how their family's needs can be met well even though their husband's income level is small. The needs of unmarried people are quite different from those of married people because they talk about responsibilities. But for those who are not married, money is definitely sought only for their own needs without sacrificing the needs of other people.

I see women who are much more wasteful before they get married and even though there are also women who are married they are still quite wasteful. There is a fairly basic difference in how someone who is married is much more able to control their money to meet the needs of living together with their family because maybe they were taught by circumstances to live more frugally..

I like how they argue by the knowledge they have, cause if the girl only knew about $100 for sure she would literally pick it, as the boy chooses Bitcoin cause he's either aware of Bitcoin's value or he's doing crypto. But it is still a win-win situation for the girl cause she knows that $100 is a huge amount, but if $100 is an option for a Bitcoin, isn't she would be curious why is it getting compared to $100? Like how her boyfriend keeps saying Bitcoin? By reading your reply I think I have answered my question, might not be true to all of girls or boys but I think we can observe those claims.

What I was trying to say is that it isn’t every female that thinks so, you will be impressed at how some of them think. And it’s the same thing I’ll tell you about what you say about one’s woman leaving them when they are broke. Again, it isn’t always the case I’ve seen families where the woman is playing a great role financially. So maybe we need to be more cautious when we talk on things like this because it makes the hardworking women feel bad and unappreciated. So instead of generalizing it, you can say that some women, or most women will leave.

there is a philosophy that men know the future is not guaranteed so would work/invest for the future. where as some philosophies suggest women always see that future partners/opportunities will pop up. so do not fear taking what they can get in the moment

..
as for how modern social media cause changes in peoples economic philosophies.. i have seen a recent trend of people who think homeless are secretly ALL richguys doing RAK(random acts of kindness) skits/reels, so these people would put junk change(pennies) into a homeless guys tip-cup and then expect to be given $xxx back. and if not would just raid the homeless guys whole tip-cup, or argue that the homeless guy didnt perform like a dancing monkey to reward the person who only put a few pennies in

Of course there are differences between female mathematics and male mathematics. Specifically in basic psychology, men take more risks, while women seek certainty (on average). If we can give an example, men and women definitely have different approaches to money.

A man when he had a problem almost went bankrupt. he will reduce expenses, he will create a budget and he will try to earn more. Meanwhile for women, they cannot live without money and it is very unlikely they will run out of money because for them money is everything. If a married man empties his bank account, then the woman will leave and will soon be divorced. So the conclusion is that men's mathematics is better than women's mathematics because men have a strong mentality in all things to earn money.

This reminds me of the videos I've seen before.
- Interviewer: $100 or 1 bitcoin
- Young girls: $100

I haven't seen clips showing how boys/men responded but I'm pretty sure there are some who would choose the $100 as well. Maybe the ratio is 1 boy for every 10 girls hehe.

There are claims that most girls act and think that way because they do not have the natural inclination to provide for anyone other than themselves. Boys are usually shaped as the provider so there's the big difference in mindset.

Very true for majority of the cases but there are cases where the boy math is terrible and he’s thinking to spend his money wrongly (especially with women, have fun, go clubbing, etc). And there are cases when the girl is doing investment calculations too. But no doubt that guys likely think to invest more because there’s that mentality of the tag of men from society.

The example you put is realistic.

That's how women really are, most of them spend their money on beauty products, luxury goods, fancy clothes, etc. And this is normal for women.
For men, most of them don't buy too much in terms of things, not too expensive for the body, a good watch and a simple outfit are okay.

oh my god i mention girl and suddenly it must be an attack....... um..nope
i did not brand/label 'girl math' as 'girl math'... females did.

just treat it as a brand of a economic philosophy that just happens to mention the G word. and you will notice the topic is about economic philosophies
stop crying because i said the word girl and instead treat it as a brand name of a economic philosophy instead of getting triggered by the word girl and thinking it must be a gender attack because it mentions a gender

remember this is a ECONOMICS category
discuss the economic philosophy. dont get triggered because someone mentions a gender

when you start devolving communication into "lets avoid a topic and instead turn it into a gender argument" you are not going to win any debate, you are just avoiding the discussion

this topic in economic category is about the economic philosophy being shared, not the brand name.
dont blame me for the G word in the brand. i didnt invent it.


would make even more sense if people understood the context and content are of 2 different economic philosophies instead of only talking about how a brand name mentions G and then avoid the economic topic to cry how the brand (i had no involvement in inventing) should be rebranded to B(oomers)
knowing all that would do is just still ignore the economic discussion just to scream and cry how its then age-ist.

how about not get triggered by the label as the excuse to avoid talking about the economics

its the same silly mindset as
i wanted to highlight a bitcoin bug in 2016 that would allow junk data be added to block without majority node requirement to validate each byte of data. leading to a scenario where junk can be added in large lumps.... (fast forward to 2022 where ordinal junk shown what my warning was about)

rewind to 2016-2022 just mentioning the flaw over the years, people ignored the flaw discussion and just cried how i mentioned the devs names involved in allowing the bug and instead of seeing the real issue that effects bitcoiners.. they instead just wanted to kiss ass and woke play their admiration of devs as gods that should be defended.. ignoring the bug that needed to be sorted
oh well. when idiots rather want to ass kiss a group rather then discuss the content.. its on them

Would make more sense if you did boomers vs millennials to be honest.

The Americans doesn't like this, where's trans women, trans men, pan sexual, non binary, third gender etc etc.

I think both genders are same, although women are tend to spend the money to men. My assumption most of users that joining in this forum are males and they have better understanding about money management, so the lesson is don't choose women that only loves you when you have money, try to test them to not give money and brought her to live like a poor.

I very often encounter this calculation in everyday life, in general, women want to get something bigger than men. Men are more consistent in their goals, while women are not. It's not that women don't understand how to save and invest, but because of their greater desire, they prefer to spend some of their money to buy something new. This comparison is very realistic and has become the nature of women as explained by Op.

I normally don't care about social media. And social media isn't society. And if one is to spend some precious moments on social media, it shouldn't be on garbage contents like this one.

How could anybody not think that it is not an attack on gender when you are creating labels based on gender? Is it not an attack on gender when you are classifying an otherwise neutral mathematics into girl math and boy math and that the former is associated with squandering, impulsive buying, being shallow, high time preference, and so on while the latter is all about being wise, mature, and so forth?

If that crypto is just a bag of altcoins and he didn't sell during the bull market, it doesn't matter that he had a huge unrealized gain, because the bear market will wipe out all those gains for good and the coins will never recover. And many crypto investors, especially beginners, do in fact hoard hyped altcoins instead of BTC, because they expect quick profits and BTC seems too slow for them.

well the tricks of social media and culture can play different in different era's
there have been era's of the "dead-beat dads" and the "single parent moms"

but yet again we are not so much talking about gender stereotyping.. but economic philosophy


(no genders mentioned in both examples)
invest, accumulate then spend a portion
vs
discount spend. then spend the rest

previous era of
"bread winner"
one earns the household income
vs
"house spouse"
other manages and budgets household income

Apparently, it’s often the case when you have to put these gender together in a means that deals with money management and utilization under normal circumstances. Especially, for the age grade used in making these experiments.

The innate nature of a male child is one that comes with challenges of which most is, having to be the provider, the one that is at the giving end but, the mechanics is different with the female child. They face a different kind of challenge and that be, getting married, yeah, getting married.
As such, the need to be the provider isn’t much of a concern but, it’s often left in the hands of the males.

Of course there are females that have been known to step up and do step up when the situations aren’t right but, there is always a course for this shift. For males, it’s just how life is for the gender.

The use of money for married women and men is of course very different based on their living needs and the needs of their own families, even though the goal is to make themselves and their families happy. However, this will look even more different for an unmarried woman and man who sets goals only for themselves because they don't have family needs that they need to think about. Apart from that, the way women and men care for their face and health is often not the same, so any differences are always born at first.

When someone is older or elderly, of course additional differences in the use of money will also reappear naturally in everyday life because every person who is old or who is still the highest leader in a family will definitely use money very wisely. So that all the money is not spent in vain and can continue to be used to earn more money by investing capital in business, investment and others. This was done only in order to enable his children and grandchildren to experience a more decent life through whatever means, including through more formal education in life after he was no longer around.

Wow I enjoyed this statistic. It is very interesting, although it is funny. Girls usually always think about luxurious things, especially dresses, heels, purses, and some makeup, while a man or a boy can endure and save as much as he can in order to achieve his goal in the near future. That is why you can't compare the methods of thinking of a man and a woman. Although it is not true for all girls that you can compare the method of their thinking with that of men, almost 85% have the same thinking about using expensive things. That is why you always see boys or men who are always thinking of getting more than they have just to live a better life.

Furthermore, men are the breadwinners of the family, and being a breadwinner is not a small task to face, so even if they didn’t inform you of ways to get the money or plan a strategy to make money, you will go and identify it yourself in order to succeed and give a good and best life for you and your family at large. That is why, most of the time, the thinking and calculation of boys and girls are different.

This is your opinion though but I consider it a stereotype and inaccurate generalization that society makes us to believe from the time immemorial. It's time to discard this belief and face the reality because nowadays, we have many women who can manage money excellently and likewise we have men who are extravagant. Actually, women tend to spend more on luxury and irrelevant things but it doesn't mean they're not financially responsible or conscious. There are factors that contribute to this imbalance spending habit between us and we can not conclude generally that one gender is better or worse with money management than another.