Topic: girl math vs boy math - page 3. (Read 711 times)

On the age of 20 then it would really be that impossible that someone cant really be able to think up well on whats viable things that needs to be done and what are the things that should really be avoided.
Spending up something on wants isnt bad but thinking up more or having that kind of importance when it comes to investment then it is much more worth.
Thinking or mindset would really be that entirely be depending on a certain individuall in regardless of their gender, it is really just that not shocking that girls or women does really like on buying things on which
they would really be that being too impulsive if we do compare it to males on which we are really that adventurous when it comes to investment.This is why that someone who had been thinking about
investment would really be always have the advantage specially if dealing up with Bitcoin or crypto then prices or value could shoot up even more higher or more than on what you do expect on.

I know some smart girls who do business, so I wouldn't generalize. As a matter of fact, my richest neighbor is a woman and there's some really rich people living here, but she's on another level.
The example is good if we don't focus on genders, but rather on a situation an investor will find himself in when compared to a spender. Women are usually spenders, but it doesn't mean men can't be.
My father used to be a saver and he never made big money.

I sometimes feel like this all saving and investing is overrated. I've been in bitcoin for many years and I feel like we're being constantly abused by bad actors. It's scammers, market manipulators, politicians...
I admit that sometimes I feel like giving up and spending all my investments and showing off for a few years before I get too old to enjoy it.

I do feel like there is a stigma and feeling of the "n-word" in this topic. When women talk about girl math, they are making a joke together, they are women and they can joke about it, just like the n-word where people could make that joke or say that word if they belong to that group, but if you are as white as a hospital wall, then I am sorry but it is racist to use that word, it would be considered racist, you may agree or disagree on this arrangement but that is how it is, same with this girl math thing.

Women can go around and talk about girl math and joke about it, because they are women, and they are doing it ironically and they are joking, but when we men do it, it's not nice, it's like we are mocking them, and could be considered sexist, we need to be careful about it.

We can conclude that money will be in the right condition when someone can use it and perhaps the mindset of women and men has a different structure, whether they are young or old. Men usually handle finances differently from women and there are times when the two are often out of sync when combined together, for example how each partner handles money in everyday life with different needs.

The point is that I agree that age and gender will see money differently in the process. Even though money is essentially the same and the only difference is how someone uses it to buy, invest, do business or other ways. Sources of income can be seen from how aggressively a person can produce and opportunities may also differ.

its not about favouring either

just 5 years ago the narrative was the opposite economic philosophy
guys "YOLO LAMBO" and girls "frugal/coupon"

its got do so with for/against the post creator favouring/disliking either. its about economic philosophy

Do you favoring men over women?

I can feel happy with the example of this case, but not everyone is like that, and we all understand that it depends on investment perception. It is not fair that "female" are the ones who study hard and have knowledge about life, their investment abilities are also very different, and it is no exception that "male" also have their own ways of living far away from evil and are unable to invest successfully. I can only describe investing in terms of age. Most of them at that age still have to learn a lot, and admittedly lacking experience, only a few can access the investment space as well can earn profit. The majority are still dependent on material attractions, or are not capable of investing, or they have an unhealthy lifestyle of spending money.

       -   When I read the title made by @franky1, I said to myself that I am weak in math or numbers. But I'm good at counting money . According to the illustration given by OP, I kind of feel like I can relate to this story.

In reality, this really happens; only the patient and steadfast succeed in cryptocurrency. Especially if you know for yourself that you are sure of the crypto assets you are holding that will give you big profits in the future during the upcoming bull run.

many era's of different economic philosophies of genders have manifested.
generally since the civilised world of photography and television.. women wanted to be shiny things, guys wanted to own shiny things

Naturally your postulation is the psychological posture of the female and the male gender, it is believed that as a man your build or wired to provide and create solution and improve on your wealth, but women are built to enhance their beauty, to look good for men and for themselves, so theoretically each of them would want to spend their money on what deems them fit. However this theory is a bit twisted as most young men are usually engulf in youthful exuberance, so at that age they too would want to wear the latest shoes, wristwatches or  drive the best cars, it's just a handful of them that will think about investment.

harmful? (adjective: causing or likely to cause physical damage/injury)
no one is physically hitting anyone..

i did not invent "girl math" infact it was females that popularised it themselves.
and even they are not physically bruising each other over it

if you are in the mindset that topics should not be talked about if a gender is mentioned and then you avoid the content and context of the topics ECONOMIC philosophy, to just act offended by the very mention of a gender.. its time you wake up

you getting triggered by topics for simply mentioning gender is where you are part of a group inciting more gender division and causing arguments by trying to turn every conversation into a gender debate

its like the silly non binary "pronoun" trend that is meant to cause confrontation
here ill spell it out

when two people are talking directly to each other, both sides do not use he/she pronouns in conversation.. grammatically its not even part of the conversation.. in reality and grammatically direct 1-on-1 conversation uses "I" and "YOU"
(try it. have direct conversations with anyone, and count how many times you use the term he/she when talking to them about them.. you will find it very very difficult to even try to insert intentionally " he/she" into a direct conversation when describing them directly to them.)
the pronoun argument is a anti-social trend pretending to solve a problem that was not even part of the conversation

so when one person interrupts the conversation to grammar-nazi check the other person, controlling the other persons narrative by saying they should identify them as not he/she.. that person interrupting is just sheep speaking(mindless copying) a trend they heard on social media. to cause argument in a conversation where by the conversation never spoke the words he/she in the first place, but instead did say i/you..
so grammatically never needed correcting, and instead was just a silly interruption to cause confrontation where no confrontation was needed

when someone interrupts a conversation to then scream about some gender related emotions they have.. or how topic physically injures them because the other person is talking about a topic and not some trend they want to interrupt with.. it gets stupid

by having people get triggered by very mentions of gender where by conversations are being commanded to not talk about topics as a whole unless they met some social media trending grammatical policy.. just makes people avoid the topic completely.. dividing people from even communicating with each other

if you have a issue with people talking about women (good or bad) then thats on you
if you have a issue with people talking about men (good or bad) then thats on you

just the mention of a gender is not a reason to avoid a topic

We must first acknowledge that financial decisions are personal. Instead of gender stereotypes, they reflect personal beliefs. Your female character chooses quick enjoyment, a common human desire, while the male invests in crypto long-term. Not gender, but financial literacy and foresight

Bitcoin support is more than just hoarding it like a dragon. Recognition of its financial transformation potential. Your guy appreciates the value of investing and sees past the attraction of fancy products. A financial revolution, Bitcoin is more than a money. Freeing people from established financial structures, it allows them to manage their finances. The actual lesson is that, not high heels or timepieces

Well - The only subject that scared me in class is MATHS.

I lost my in space after reading the question and i really don't no why I'm replying this.

HAHAHA

Honestly, promoting gender stereotypes for no reason isn't something I endorse. Tons of women don't care and no longer wear high heels, and wouldn't want to spend so much money on something as meaningless as a clothes item. Of course, many males also don't care neither about watches nor about cryptos and hoarding cryptos. Girls aren't stupid and focused on shoes, boys aren't investment geniuses.
Making more generic examples and saying that it's just 'person A' and 'person B' would argue for the same point of accumulating cryptos, without stereotypical harmful gender roles.

My wife does this shit.
She even tacks on the words "Girl Math" when she does it.
At least she recognizes she has a problem 😂.
Sad part is she has her MBA. She's aware.
Should see the buying power girl math has during a mining boom..
"How many pairs of shoes can you mine this week?"

It seems to be a cultural difference. In my country, women tend to save more than men, as you find that most young men buy a new car approximately every 6 months, and before reaching the age of 30, they will have paid more than 200,000 dollars in cars, while women buy a simple car, by the age of 30 they buy an expensive car and so on. Most of the women in my country spend on travel and beauty products, but there is rarely extravagant spending on clothes, while men spend more on cars, houses and watches than on investments.

19yo female: "finds a rich sponsor, someone she would call Daddy"
19yo male: "works on 3 jobs to get money for university, rolex, first investment"
...
...
...
25yo female: "I have my cheap old out of fashion Jimmy Choo. Daddy please-please-please get me a pair of new one, and since you off to shop, grab me iPhone 15 Pro Max Ultra Carbon Bourbon 1TB"
25 yo male: "still holding, works on a regular job in the office".

both genders suffer from "fake it till you make it" economic philosophy in recent generations

other economic trends like "dont work for the man, take a side hustle".
where minimum wage of $15 = $120 average day but social media promote "make $100 a day" meaning get paid less than minimum wage

there are too many bad economic lessons at play. yet instead of concentrating on the economics, some wanna turn it into a "gender" debate

And do you know what? most people think women are better in financial management to men.

Maybe, but I'm not really sure.

With the current society where everyone try to impress other people e.g. wear branded cloth, eat in luxury hotel, have a lambo etc, even though all the assets they own are borrowed with loan. So we can't really know the real rich person and the fake one.

its about the economics not insulting genders

very recently in the past the roles were reversed
guys would be YOLO'ing lambos and girls would be studying STEM to get good careers to invest in future

its not about insulting a particular gender. its about how ECONOMICS of social media education show different philosophies, perpetrated by their own genders sharing their gender philosophy between themselves using social media to cause economics to change per generation

This is like a slight jab against prioritization of genders, but this is highly true. My ex-partner was always on the lookout for 'deals' on shoes, bags, and clothes thinking that she is doing a great job 'saving' when buying those sale on the mall, while I was there thinking of ways to make money while not actively trading or engaging in something that takes off time for myself in doing other things. Good thing I invested in bitcoin, stuck through it, and made bank and never told her. Most of them think of impressing others, unfortunately, and it becomes their downfall financial wise.