Topic: [GLBSE] [Stochastically.com] - Dividend Returns - updated 12 times a day. - page 3. (Read 20535 times)
July 02, 2012, 10:51:22 AM
great thread
July 02, 2012, 01:11:41 AM
I personally see nothing wrong with the pirate bonds on the list as they are some of the biggest and most liquid. Clearly the people want pirate bonds so why not report what they pay out?
I do understand about taking away some of the assets but taking away 30% of the value of GLBSE and 60% of the weekly trade volume seems counter productive. I would assume as soon as you take this off there would be a different guy making a new list with it on it.
If you wanted to break it up into different type of bonds and have more than one list that would be cool. Mining here, pirate there, physical goods and what not and so on.
Just my thoughts
I do understand about taking away some of the assets but taking away 30% of the value of GLBSE and 60% of the weekly trade volume seems counter productive. I would assume as soon as you take this off there would be a different guy making a new list with it on it.
If you wanted to break it up into different type of bonds and have more than one list that would be cool. Mining here, pirate there, physical goods and what not and so on.
Just my thoughts
That makes sense. I will just leave all of them up here. I have been working on a small site to display this information and will have different sections for bonds, companies, ect.
Cant wait. And thanks for this thread stochastic.
July 02, 2012, 12:21:39 AM
I personally see nothing wrong with the pirate bonds on the list as they are some of the biggest and most liquid. Clearly the people want pirate bonds so why not report what they pay out?
I do understand about taking away some of the assets but taking away 30% of the value of GLBSE and 60% of the weekly trade volume seems counter productive. I would assume as soon as you take this off there would be a different guy making a new list with it on it.
If you wanted to break it up into different type of bonds and have more than one list that would be cool. Mining here, pirate there, physical goods and what not and so on.
Just my thoughts
I do understand about taking away some of the assets but taking away 30% of the value of GLBSE and 60% of the weekly trade volume seems counter productive. I would assume as soon as you take this off there would be a different guy making a new list with it on it.
If you wanted to break it up into different type of bonds and have more than one list that would be cool. Mining here, pirate there, physical goods and what not and so on.
Just my thoughts
That makes sense. I will just leave all of them up here. I have been working on a small site to display this information and will have different sections for bonds, companies, ect.
July 01, 2012, 11:23:21 PM
Oops, I have been playing around with this table for a little bit so the number of tickers changed from what it should be. I was in a rush because I had to go out to see to do some biological specimen collecting and forgot to change it back.
I was experimenting with taking off certain kinds of assets like Pirate bonds, ect.
There are a lot of assets on here that I don't think should be because they are not liquid enough. What kind of filters would people like to see with this, if any? I was thinking of a minimum 7-day average, a certain market capitalization, and minium number of volume traded per week.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
I was experimenting with taking off certain kinds of assets like Pirate bonds, ect.
There are a lot of assets on here that I don't think should be because they are not liquid enough. What kind of filters would people like to see with this, if any? I was thinking of a minimum 7-day average, a certain market capitalization, and minium number of volume traded per week.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
June 30, 2012, 11:30:54 AM
I am not saying put them back on. I think you have the right idea, but the wrong way of doing it. Your info is awesome but what you are trying to do is take out the meaningless light weights. My example was a bit unreaslistic but I was trying to make a point.
If you can take out all stocks that have less than 10BTC traded that week not included it would in my opion be better than stocks with less than 100 shares.
I hope I am expressing my idea correctly.
If you can take out all stocks that have less than 10BTC traded that week not included it would in my opion be better than stocks with less than 100 shares.
I hope I am expressing my idea correctly.
Yea I see the point, but the only problem I feel is that securities that don't have a lot of trading are not effective either. If there is a share that is 0.10 BTC and sells 100 shares a week, it will more more liquid than one that sells for 1 BTC a week but only sells 10 shares. If everything else was equal I would prefer to purchasing 10 of the 0.10 BTC shares rather than 1 of the 1 BTC share.
I guess it is personal preference where is that cutoff point. This is why large exchanges have a minimum trade amount that the listed company must maintain to stay on the exchange.
June 30, 2012, 10:38:28 AM
Dividend table has been updated. I removed assets that have a volume of less than 100 shares a week.
Can you please make it a BTC amount and not a share amount. If stock ABC trades 99 shares at 50 BTC each and is not included and stock XZW who trades 100 shares at .0000001 BTC each is it will be odd.
BTW thanks for the great work:)
Well I could put them all back on, but I have never liked information overload. Especially when a lot of shares may have a high dividend but are not very liquid. I would trade a lower yield for a more liquid security as there is more guarantee to get out when the money is needed.
For example, here is a table of the securities that have at least 100 share volume a week and a weighted average of over 0.10 BTC.
Code:
Symbol Outstanding Volume Weighted_Average High Low Dividend Dividend_Yield
1 FOO.PPPPT 4181 1207 1.0777 1.15 0.98 0.07 6.5 %
2 TYGRR.BOND-P 21390 5468 1.0461 1.08 1.019 0.068 6.5 %
3 BIB.PIRATE 13907 1032 1.05338 1.09 1.025 0.0675 6.41 %
5 PPT.DIV 9000 1687 0.69071 0.9999 0.5 0.02459 3.56 %
6 OBSI.1MHS 3278 820 0.16095 0.18 0.15 0.00445 2.76 %
7 TEEK.B 1999 340 1.10134 1.9 1.022 0.03 2.72 %
9 GIGAMINING 40000 3351 0.89857 1.1 0.7901 0.0233 2.59 %
10 YABMC 54278 5661 0.15993 0.1987 0.141 0.00408 2.55 %
16 BITBOND 46138 407 0.47224 0.56 0.35 0.00936 1.98 %
17 TYGRR.BOND-B 33300 2015 0.10094 0.103 0.098 0.002 1.98 %
22 BTC-MINING 1933 161 0.90618 0.9999 0.6 0.01492 1.65 %
23 BMMO 7972 1082 0.17218 0.23 0.15 0.0027 1.57 %
26 BFLS 6395 173 1.20514 1.26001 1.02 0.01829 1.52 %
27 PUREMINING 20000 2601 0.27822 0.3397 0.215 0.004 1.44 %
38 COGNITIVE 6400 242 0.63963 0.66 0.5712 0.00472 0.74 %
June 30, 2012, 09:49:35 AM
Dividend table has been updated. I removed assets that have a volume of less than 100 shares a week.
I left them all in.
I left them all in.
June 26, 2012, 04:37:35 AM
Geez, look at Tygrr-Bond-A and generally M.ETF. Did the difficulty halve?
Tygrr-Bond-A pays dividends at a difficulty change, which is once in 2 weeks.
June 25, 2012, 10:25:00 PM
Geez, look at Tygrr-Bond-A and generally M.ETF. Did the difficulty halve?
June 25, 2012, 09:48:39 PM
Is there any chance of getting a table of the market capitalisation of glbse stocks ?
Yes, something like that is coming.
June 25, 2012, 08:30:01 PM
Is there any chance of getting a table of the market capitalisation of glbse stocks ?
June 25, 2012, 09:00:09 AM
OK this week has been updated. I have been working on a more automated way as well so hopefully I will have that done soon.
June 25, 2012, 04:55:28 AM
I was sick all weekend so I didn't get a chance to update this. I will do once GLBSE comes back up. There was some issues with the security USD that I manage so the site seems to be shut down until the problem is fixed. There was an issue over a week ago that I notified nefario about were it seemed like the API keys were getting crossed. That problem got fixed so hopefully this new issue will get resolved soon and make GLBSE more secure.
June 19, 2012, 06:30:00 AM
yeah.. this service is killer.... lots of good stuff coming from you Stochastic..
June 19, 2012, 01:03:00 AM
Thank you for providing this service.
June 13, 2012, 05:18:03 PM
very nice service..
June 09, 2012, 12:09:45 PM
Do you have archive of "Week of 2012-06-02 to 2012-06-08"? Could you make it available?
And THANKS for all hardwork!
And THANKS for all hardwork!
If you are looking for last weeks here it is. It is also located on the OP under the week table.
If you are looking for the week prior it is now linked in the History section.
June 09, 2012, 12:00:26 PM
Do you have archive of "Week of 2012-06-02 to 2012-06-08"? Could you make it available?
And THANKS for all hardwork!
And THANKS for all hardwork!
June 09, 2012, 12:26:36 AM
Week of 2012-06-02 to 2012-06-08 dividend chart has been updated.
June 03, 2012, 11:50:38 AM
Subbed....This is my new favorite thread
If you like this thread check out daily gainer/loser thread.
Jump to: