For now, you may rarely see any good ICO because of the bear market.
In 2017, there were many ICO's doing buyback to protect the value of their token so their token won't dump while crypto in a bull market.
I guess the market condition can affecting the ICO performance in the future too.
Topic: Good ICOs should be protected from dump - page 5. (Read 23377 times)
The roadmap of project is very essential. If not followed duly, it can affect the trust that investors have in such project.
Sometimes,if there are changes in the roadmap, it is better the community is informed in order to foster more support for the project and its team.
Sometimes,if there are changes in the roadmap, it is better the community is informed in order to foster more support for the project and its team.
Often people invest and they hope to make money quickly but not because they believe in the project, so it’s hard to argue them not to sell tokens
I've seen so many ICO projects after completing their ICOs start to talk about the whole moon talk, lambo talk but in terms of product they show us no substance. Any project's team that only wants to release news during an uptrend is clearly a pump & dump token. And sadly most of the ICO investors want to get involved with those projects because it is in those moments their dream of making quick bucks come true. But most of times their dreams get shattered. I think it is not always easy to determine which project is good. If investors do not take care of the project and do not maintain liquidity, it will be difficult to save the token from the dump. Much depends on token liquidity .
In fact, it's easy to distinguish 1k bad projects from some good ones - we have a set of assessment criteria. It's more difficult to guess which of good projects will grow and which will disappear.
If there are really good ICOs coming in the launching, it is good if it will be develop more ,so that it will come with a good success , so help it by not dumping the tokens immediately so that the price value of tokens will rise up high and will have a good effect and exchanges in the market in the future.
Often people invest and they hope to make money quickly but not because they believe in the project, so it’s hard to argue them not to sell tokens
I have come to the understanding that, no matter what is done, there are coins and in fact almost every coin will first dump at their initial listing.
Nonetheless, some certain coins will still rise, but it depend on so many factors. If those factors are not fulfilled, such as an active developmental process or a product that is already in use, which will bring value to the coin, the coin might continue to dump.
Nonetheless, some certain coins will still rise, but it depend on so many factors. If those factors are not fulfilled, such as an active developmental process or a product that is already in use, which will bring value to the coin, the coin might continue to dump.
If there are really good ICOs coming in the launching, it is good if it will be develop more ,so that it will come with a good success , so help it by not dumping the tokens immediately so that the price value of tokens will rise up high and will have a good effect and exchanges in the market in the future.
Now it is difficult to judge what kind of ICO will be able to enter the market. Is that very large, which has already raised funds in private.
It is very important that the project be interesting and promising, because in other cases, many will refuse to provide their documents!
I think it is not always easy to determine which project is good. If investors do not take care of the project and do not maintain liquidity, it will be difficult to save the token from the dump. Much depends on token liquidity .
That depends on the how much demand that will generate volume on exchange site. you need a lot of order buy to prevent the dump that created from the sell order. volume is the only correct answer to prevent this dump. that's why most of the good platforms applied major exchange for its first listing. 
I think it is not always easy to determine which project is good. If investors do not take care of the project and do not maintain liquidity, it will be difficult to save the token from the dump. Much depends on token liquidity .
I think that they need to figure out how they will support their development at the initial stage and this is the main question
We only have one problem. How does the ICO project show that it is authentic and reliable? I believe that ICO projects that can solve this problem can get the best attention and development.
Good question. These days it's difficult to know which ICO is genuine. Any ICO that wants to excel should first show good transparency to investors. While listing, maintain the initial ICO price and stay there.
If you want to protect your investors, make the least effort to launch something with product or application, then allow the market and investors to judge and give the fair and balanced price! Many ICOs offer a huge amount of tokens and suddenly find themselves aimless, deliver nothing, do not know what to do. 
But perhaps, there are some ICOs, that the project did not leave the paper without any investment, for example, some DEXs.
But perhaps, there are some ICOs, that the project did not leave the paper without any investment, for example, some DEXs. After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
Its the personal responsibility of the investors, airdrop participat and bounty hunters that can keep the token in good shape. Also the team's management is the vital role to keep an eye on it.
This is something that usually happens after ICO and that a dump occurs. And I don't think this is only caused by a bounty hunter but an investor who throws a coin. Because if of course investors have coins that are larger in number than the bounty hunter. However, some ICO projects prevent dumps. By the way, the total coins obtained by bounty hunters are sent every month for several months.
Really agree with your opinion, almost of ICO project always dump after listing their coin at exchange market, they could protect their token from dump and never have way how to make their coin raised up with buy back with their money.
all the reasons you mentioned are very cornering the bounty hunter, even though you also need to know that causes dump prices not only to bounty hunters, it can also be investors who make their prices dump
investors who get the biggest bonus at the beginning are usually the ones who first get their tokens and they can make the dump, even if the new coin / token is in an exchange with a good reputation, the dump cannot be avoided
investors who get the biggest bonus at the beginning are usually the ones who first get their tokens and they can make the dump, even if the new coin / token is in an exchange with a good reputation, the dump cannot be avoided
Gone are the days of good ICOs ,they don't exist anymore unless its a security tokens like STO ,we need a new way to handle ICO or else its goodbye for ICO
After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
I like the idea of continuing to protect good projects from dump, to provide sufficient support for them. But in fact you need to understand - it is very difficult to determine in advance which ICO projects will be successful. But mandatory KYC can be a problem for the market, putting at risk the protection of users' personal data.
Jump to: