Topic: Good ICOs should be protected from dump - page 7. (Read 23351 times)
This doesn't sound logical to me, in a free market, you can't determine to price of commodities. The price is influenced by market forces, demand and supply. So I don't see how an ICO can be protected from dump if a coin holder wish to sell his or her coin for little or nothing which is entirely his or her right.
Those are good suggestions to start with ams there are also other ways employed by some projects. Although, they would have been more effective, had it been investors are not having the mindset that come what may, no matter how good a coin is, it will still dump.
So with this mindset, they too will start selling their coins below the targeted price.
Trusting the system is of great importance.
So with this mindset, they too will start selling their coins below the targeted price.
Trusting the system is of great importance.
First of all, investors dump their Tokins for any money that they destroy the market. Projects should go to good exchange points. Projects must provide the necessary information to investors and not disappear after the distribution of coins.
Yes, it already seems to me that ICO no longer makes a profit. Of course, except the organizers.
Yes, it already seems to me that ICO no longer makes a profit. Of course, except the organizers.
After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
Sorry ... You want to say that project developers do not know what you wrote here I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
There are many factors that influence the price of tokens, and in current conditions, it is very difficult to ensure that the price of the token grows after how it will appear on the exchange, even taking into account the factors listed above 
After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
Well your points are clear but I must say with those measures you can't protect any coin from dump. A project that's built to achieve great goals with good platform and token usage hardly get dumped as the investors are fully there to protect the image of that project for their own benefits ahead, but in a case where they have observe that the project has no future plan such as token usage then even investors has no option than to sell and go for the better once.I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
Good or bad ICOs, the are both open to dump on the exchange, depending on the market conditions or ico bonuses or bounties. But the good ones will surely find their way back up when they start to meet their roadmap milestones.
There's no way a particular ICO could be protected from dumping, even if they only sold there token through only ICO, some people that doesn't have patient will still dump it below ICO price talkless of if they gave airdrop and some through bounty.
Well, in this sense, and not to allow to sell below cost. That is, the possibility of selling will be limited. I think that this is quite real, but it is important that the project itself does not overestimate its capabilities and does not sell tokens at exorbitant prices during the ICO.
There's no way a particular ICO could be protected from dumping, even if they only sold there token through only ICO, some people that doesn't have patient will still dump it below ICO price talkless of if they gave airdrop and some through bounty.
After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
Well your points are clear but I must say with those measures you can't protect any coin from dump. A project that's built to achieve great goals with good platform and token usage hardly get dumped as the investors are fully there to protect the image of that project for their own benefits ahead, but in a case where they have observe that the project has no future plan such as token usage then even investors has no option than to sell and go for the better once. I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
With all the measures we cannot protect ICOs from dump and we should not to do so. This is a free market and investors will decide what is their best interest. Of course projects should to do everything to convince their investors that they are doing everything in the best interest of the project.
Yes they need to protected from the investors for want to dump their tokens soon after it get listed but how to do that, listing the token on exchange after a while are going to stop those investors from participating on ICOs.
Good protecting from the dump is inevitable some projects once listed in exchange can be dumped for 90 percent soon they will get recovered from positive movement so ico companies can do measurements for coins nt to dump
i think we can't fight for dump after listing , especially when there bounty for it , but quality wont lie , if that ico really have good quality it will make more investor to invest for it and hold together
I don't agree that KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants. managers have to find another solution to avoid multiple accounts.
KYC also can prevent the expected dump after listing coin. Bounty participants are first batch of sellers after starting bell on exchanges. There is no proper solution due to unexpected attacks by speculants and reward owners.
In order for tokens not to lose their value after listing on the stock exchanges, they must be in demand, be it a good or bad project. If there is demand, the price will increase. There will be no demand - the price of tokens will be reduced until demand appears.
As good as those suggestions are, no one can really prevent coin or token holders from selling at a cheap price. Even measures such as having lock-up period can only prevents dumping temporarily.
A lot of ICOs looks good on paper. You'll only find out which ones are really good during and after development phase.
A lot of ICOs looks good on paper. You'll only find out which ones are really good during and after development phase.
Most of ICO companies doesn't care about their token price after their sale end, which is bad for their reputation.
I believe they care but the price in the exchange is out of their control, it's the owner of the token who are in control. Never expect that the price will rise after it's listed, sometimes it will but given the market situation, price will likely to go down and the company you said already knew it, that's why sometimes some are not rushing in listing their tokens.
They are too afraid to spend money to protect the value of their coin. I think if they let their token price down, it can damage their token permanently.
If the token value gone too low, they will have difficulty to gain the value back, even at least back to ICO price.
The way I see it, you like them to manipulate the price, I don't think they will do it, besides, what benefits they would get, If the token value gone too low, they will have difficulty to gain the value back, even at least back to ICO price.
Maybe they can protect for some time but not in the longer run.
That's right, these are just a few solutions to the problems associated with the quality of the token that projects are releasing!
Most of ICO companies doesn't care about their token price after their sale end, which is bad for their reputation.
They are too afraid to spend money to protect the value of their coin. I think if they let their token price down, it can damage their token permanently.
If the token value gone too low, they will have difficulty to gain the value back, even at least back to ICO price.
They are too afraid to spend money to protect the value of their coin. I think if they let their token price down, it can damage their token permanently.
If the token value gone too low, they will have difficulty to gain the value back, even at least back to ICO price.
I agree with all you posted excepted the number two it's like promoting KYC when it is against the rule of decentralization, and we have seen how in the past ICO doing KYC for all participants only to vanish after a few months.
Jump to: