No need to introduce any additional benefits for individual ICOs. Who will determine which of the ICO projects are promising and which are not? In any case, this will create arbitrariness and corruption. We have already passed this more than once. Only the market, the demand for cryptocurrency can determine which types of cryptocurrency exist and which do not exist.
As for the KYC verification for bounty hunters, it is better to immediately advertise that you are putting confidential data into the hands of fraudsters and all kinds of criminals for use. The KYC check on bounty hunters is generally illegal because we are not investors. Its use for other purposes is illegal.
Topic: Good ICOs should be protected from dump - page 9. (Read 23377 times)
If you have a good ability to review ico and rate it as good ico, I am sure many people will rate it good too. If you sure specific ico so good, you should love when the dump happen, you can buy it as much as you want. Good project will bounce back, it's just about time.
no wonder there were some ICOs even though the koi had entered the market, they held the koi for campaign participants with distributed prizes for fear of being dumped, I waited 12 months for distribution
Still, those projects that had such a long distribution today are falling in price as well as others. This will not save the situation, because everything depends only on the fact that people stop believing in cryptocurrency.
The above information is useful for ICO projects but I think that still does not prevent dump! dump seems to be part of the market, it depends on those investors who own token but no one can manage their tokens by themselves, it's like whale manipulation so you can't stop it!
no wonder there were some ICOs even though the koi had entered the market, they held the koi for campaign participants with distributed prizes for fear of being dumped, I waited 12 months for distribution
Still, those projects that had such a long distribution today are falling in price as well as others. This will not save the situation, because everything depends only on the fact that people stop believing in cryptocurrency.
I have seen many investors give up their investment in real projects because of concerns about ICO market fraud, which has led to the failure of a large number of real ICO projects.
I think we can't control the ICOS from the dump because when the icos hit the first market this is out of our control because it's depend for demand and supply.. If it just a bad icos with useless product, the project will dead less than 1 year.
I am very willing to protect and participate in a good ICO, but I can't even judge the 100% authenticity of the ICO project now, which makes me confused because it makes me unable to fully trust ICO.
After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
I agree with your idea on protecting any good project, it will be able to makes the crypto market better. but what hard would be the people, we can't really control them, cause usually who makes the market drop is because some people dropping the price of the coins because the sell them out of panic or just try to sell them ASAP without thinking about profit or anything.I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
Investors like us are losing, as ICOs today call almost exclusively from organizations. Small investors are no longer in the majority because they have left the market they think is dead
It is extremely difficult to protect the IC from dump. After all, people sell coins for a reason, because in the current market there are no other options. If now there was a period of growth, then most of the investors would have been waiting for the price to rise and not collapse it.
This is a good idea, but no one can stop the issuance of ICO projects. ICO's issuance and investment are free. In the future, ICO will only be able to restore the price of Ethereum if it is regulated. Too many ICO projects are now fraudulent.
There's no reason why crypto coins gonna dumo if bitcoin will gonna dump. For sure they following bitcoin if the price gonna pump or dump.
After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
I agree with your idea on protecting any good project, it will be able to makes the crypto market better. but what hard would be the people, we can't really control them, cause usually who makes the market drop is because some people dropping the price of the coins because the sell them out of panic or just try to sell them ASAP without thinking about profit or anything. I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:
1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.
2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced
3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.
4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.
5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.
6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.
Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.
These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 657
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
How good an ICOs project is doesn't justify it been protected from dump because it the move and strategy planned/applied by the strategy team of the project will determine if the project will be protected from the current dump in price which the crypto sphere encountered. However, most ICOs owner used the buyback and hold to make more profit strategy.
I don't think it will be possible, as the dump is made not only by bounty hunters, but also by investors. Everyone wants to make a profit and drain quickly, because of this and the problem.
Firstly, there's no way a good ICOs can be protected from the current dump in the crypto market because all the coins and tokens were all affected. However, I dont see any reason why project investors will be among those that dump the price of the project they invested because investment in crypto currency means trusting/believing in the future promising of the project. But, the early miners of the new project are the one to be held responsible for the dump in price of the project and we have read about the man(early BTC miner) that bought a big pizza with huge amount of BTC then so same thing still happen with new project either. 
I don't think it will be possible, as the dump is made not only by bounty hunters, but also by investors. Everyone wants to make a profit and drain quickly, because of this and the problem.
WHen people think ICO as an short term investor then how caan we stop them from selling their coins and tokens when it listed on exchanges,if someone hold too long they are taking huge risk because once the price dumped means they may not recover forever so making the profits at the right time is indeed.
You can't just protect an ICO from the dumping folks.
Why is it that when there are dumps, the one that gets blamed are the bounty hunters? how big usually is the allocation that they get from the total circulating supply of that token? it is around 1%-10%. You should question the devs but you can't figure it out unless you follow their balance addresses.
If the devs is really serious about his project, it won't be a problem for them to accomodate some coins owned by bounty hunters. I think 1% -5% of the total supply is not too much. It would be great if there was a project like that, like previously Populous Platform project that their tokens rising 10x from ICO price shortly after the ICO ends, who easily accommodates all the bounty tokens owned by hunter bounties. Why is it that when there are dumps, the one that gets blamed are the bounty hunters? how big usually is the allocation that they get from the total circulating supply of that token? it is around 1%-10%. You should question the devs but you can't figure it out unless you follow their balance addresses.
et's look at the truth. Who destroys this market. Investors or Hunters?
How many hunters we get 1.000.000 tokens for 300-500 people. And investors? If the project is large. They bring to the stock exchange 500 000 tokens at the lowest price. What destroys the token at the start of trading on the exchange.
How many hunters we get 1.000.000 tokens for 300-500 people. And investors? If the project is large. They bring to the stock exchange 500 000 tokens at the lowest price. What destroys the token at the start of trading on the exchange.
no wonder there were some ICOs even though the koi had entered the market, they held the koi for campaign participants with distributed prizes for fear of being dumped, I waited 12 months for distribution
Jump to: